RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview

Prestige Park Grove

PRESTIGE PROJECTS · Bengaluru East · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/100823/006141

Report coverage

Full registry, builder-record & site-plan report

What this report covers

  • Official K-RERA registry facts — units, cost, land area, towers, approvals
  • Complaint / litigation & compliance history
  • Builder delivery record across their K-RERA portfolio
  • Construction trajectory & sales pace from quarterly filings
  • Site & infrastructure intelligence from the filed sanctioned plan

To confirm directly with the builder

  • No dimensioned unit layouts could be confidently extracted from the filed plans.
  • Utilities were found on the site plan, but could not be mapped confidently to building blocks or units.
Not yet
Completion certificate
None declared
Legal status
Utilities found
Utility proximity check
88
Other RERA projects by builder

Decision summary

Overall risk
Medium
Legal riskLow
Delivery riskMedium
Livability riskMedium

Legal = litigation/declared disputes. Delivery = OC status, the project's own registration validity, and builder delay history vs the local benchmark. Livability = whether filed-plan utilities are absent, mapped near a block, or visible but not mappable from the current extraction. Each is a summary of a fact shown elsewhere in this report, not an independent score — verify against the relevant section before relying on it.

No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.RERA filing
Parking disclosure is relatively generous: 5781 disclosed spaces for 3715 registered units (1.56/unit). Confirm whether your quoted unit includes one.RERA filing
Utilities are visible on the filed site plan, but block proximity is not mapped. Treat livability risk as unresolved until the builder maps your block/unit against the sanctioned plan.Vision-read from plan
24 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable.RERA filing
1 key buyer paperwork item is not usable in the catalog (Encumbrance certificate). See "Buyer paperwork readiness" below.RERA filing
9 critical shared facility/common-area rows are below 80% completion (Electricity (0%), Fire escapes (0%), Power Backup (0%)…). See "Shared facilities & handover readiness" below.RERA filing
Quarterly filing check: In the latest QPR, escrow withdrawal exceeds buyer collections for that quarter. This can be normal if prior balance existed, but it needs a clean explanation.RERA filing
No completion certificate yet — project hasn't been declared complete.RERA filing
Builder track record: 55 of 88 other projects by this developer are past their declared deadline without an OC.RERA filing

What I'd do as a buyer

The shortest version of this report — specific moves for your situation. Not financial advice; each traces to a fact below.

If you're comparing specific units: ask the builder to overlay your block and flat on the sanctioned site plan — utilities are visible, but this report could not map proximity to units.
If you need a ready-to-move home: treat possession timing as uncertain — this project has no completion certificate on file yet.
If the builder can't map your flat number to a spot on the sanctioned plan: pause — you can't verify what you're actually buying until they do.

Who this suits & what to verify

Conditional guidance based on the facts above — not a buy/don't-buy recommendation, and not financial advice. Weigh each point against what matters to you.

No completion certificate yet — best suited to buyers comfortable carrying possession-timeline uncertainty. If you need an OC-in-hand, ready-to-move home, treat this as watch-and-verify, not a sure thing.
The filed site plan shows utility infrastructure, but the report could not confidently map it to a building block. Ask the builder to mark your exact block/unit against the sanctioned site plan before treating livability risk as low.
We couldn't extract dimensioned unit data from the filed plans for this project — before booking, get the builder's dimensioned floor plan for your specific unit and confirm carpet area in writing.

Questions to ask the builder

  • Can you map my specific flat number to its block, wing, and floor on the sanctioned plan?
  • Please have my lawyer verify the conversion order, deed/JDA, khatha, EC, and owner-share rows for the survey numbers listed in the K-RERA land-title table (JDA Land, Own Land).
  • The K-RERA registration discloses 5781 parking spaces for 3715 registered units — is my specific parking bay allotted, covered/open, and marked on the sanctioned parking plan?
  • Please match my quoted flat number against the K-RERA official unit register and confirm its carpet area, UDS, floor, tower/wing, and parking-lot count in the agreement draft.
  • The sanctioned site plan shows STP/transformer infrastructure — can you mark my block and flat on that plan so I can see the actual distance and exposure?
  • What's the realistic timeline to completion certificate, given the current construction stage?
  • Can you share the current usable version of these buyer paperwork items before I pay a token: Encumbrance certificate?
  • Before handover, what is the date-wise completion plan for these lagging shared works: Electricity, Fire escapes, Power Backup, Water and Sanitation?
  • Why did the latest QPR show escrow withdrawals above buyer collections for that quarter, and which certified construction milestones supported the withdrawal?
  • Can you share recent dated construction photos for my specific block/wing, since no project-photo uploads are visible in the K-RERA catalog?
  • 55 of your other projects in this city are past deadline without an OC — what's different about this one?
3,715
Registered units
₹2269.1 Cr
Est. construction cost
Units profiled
52
RERA documents on file

Official Registry Facts

Official project scale

RERA filing

Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.

DisclosureOfficial valueWhy it matters
Registered units3,715Total inventory registered with K-RERA.
Official carpet area425,085 sqmRegulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums.
Official built-up area884,879 sqmUseful scale context when comparing density and project cost.
Registered land area289,573 sqmThe land area attached to this K-RERA registration.
Sanctioned FAR/FSI2.249Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design.
Registered towers/wings20Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page.
Parking disclosed5,391 covered, 390 open (1.56 spaces/unit)Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits.
Approved plan numberBDA/TPM/DLP/05/2022-23/332/2023-24Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder.
Plan approval date11-05-2023
Project start date01-10-2023

Official inventory & towers

RERA filing

K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.

Registered inventory mix

TypeUnitsShareOfficial carpet area
1 Bed37310%14,850 sqm
3 Bed1,86550%198,051 sqm
3.5 Bed852%12,071 sqm
Villas882%23,823 sqm
2 Bed43212%28,714 sqm
4 Bed87223%147,574 sqm

Registered tower / wing summary

Tower/wingFloorsUnitsParkingHeight
Tower - 123949473.65 m
Tower - 22610610682.8 m
Tower - 32911811891.95 m
Tower - 432131131101.1 m
Tower - 535143143110.25 m
Tower - 638155155119.4 m
Tower - 735142142110.25 m
Tower - 832131131101.1 m

Showing first 8 of 20 tower/wing rows.

Official unit register

RERA filing

K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 3,715 official flat/unit rows, matching the 3,715 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.

By unit type

Unit typeRowsCarpet areaUDSParking lots
4 BED610146.8-162.1 sqm72.9-82.0 sqm610
3 BED 3T466119.7-125.2 sqm58.3-64.3 sqm466
1 BED36338.3-68.6 sqm19.6-35.3 sqm363
3 BED 3T (S)328107.6-109.6 sqm53.0-54.9 sqm328
3 BED 2 T28686.2-149.8 sqm42.0-82.6 sqm286
4 BED L262207.4-211.6 sqm109.3-114.6 sqm262
2 BED23662.5-103.2 sqm31.7-54.9 sqm236
3BED 2T22747.4-88.0 sqm24.1-43.4 sqm227
2BED19662.5-89.2 sqm33.1-45.2 sqm196
3BED 3T192119.8-176.9 sqm58.3-92.8 sqm192
3 BED 2T18685.7-106.5 sqm42.5-53.4 sqm186
3 BED 3 T S128109.0-111.8 sqm54.1-55.1 sqm128

Showing first 12 of 16 unit type groups.

By tower / wing

Tower/wingRowsCarpet areaUDSParking lots
Tower - 1934938.3-39.4 sqm19.6-20.0 sqm349
Tower - 1228445.5-88.0 sqm23.2-43.4 sqm284
Tower - 1326045.5-88.0 sqm23.2-43.4 sqm260
Tower - 1724565.5-107.6 sqm33.5-54.9 sqm245
Tower - 1423868.6-125.2 sqm35.3-64.3 sqm238
Tower - 923868.6-127.8 sqm35.3-65.5 sqm238
Tower - 1622769.9-119.8 sqm36.9-58.3 sqm227
Tower - 1121068.6-111.8 sqm34.2-55.1 sqm210
Tower - 1520969.9-119.8 sqm36.9-58.3 sqm209
Tower - 1019268.6-111.8 sqm34.2-55.1 sqm192
Tower - 1815565.5-107.6 sqm33.5-54.9 sqm155
Tower - 6155106.5-146.8 sqm53.4-75.2 sqm155

Showing first 12 of 20 tower/wing groups.

Show sample official unit rows
UnitTowerFloorTypeCarpetUDSParking
010001Tower - 103 BED 2T102.5 sqm49.7 sqm1
010004Tower - 103 BED 2T102.5 sqm49.7 sqm1
010101Tower - 113 BED 2T102.5 sqm49.7 sqm1
010102Tower - 113 BED 2T102.5 sqm49.7 sqm1
010103Tower - 113 BED 2T102.5 sqm49.7 sqm1
010104Tower - 113 BED 2T102.5 sqm49.7 sqm1

What the numbers tell you

Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.

Unit formatAverage official carpet area is ~1,232 sqft — large-format homes (3BHK-and-up territory), not compact stock. This is a large, multi-tower township — 3715 homes across 20 towers. Carpet is the RERA-defined usable area, so compare it against the 'super built-up' a broker quotes (typically 25–35% larger).
ParkingThe project declares 5,781 parking spaces for 3,715 homes (~1.6 per home) — comfortable headroom over the 1-per-home many projects offer.
Your land share (UDS)Undivided land share averages ~62 sqm per home; across all 3,715 homes that is ~80% of the plot — a healthy sign: buyers collectively hold close to all the land. Low UDS relative to land can mean the builder keeps land value the flat owners think they're buying.
Joint-development titleThis is (at least partly) a joint-development (JDA) project — the landowner and developer split the built units per an agreed ratio. Standard in Bengaluru, but it adds one check: confirm in writing that your specific unit falls in the developer's sale share, and ask to see the JDA's area-sharing clause so there's no dispute over who can sell you the flat.

Site & infrastructure

Vision-read from plan

Read directly off the project's site/layout plan filed with K-RERA — where utility infrastructure (sewage treatment, transformers, generators) sits on the plot, and which buildings are closest to it. This is the kind of thing a builder's sales team won't volunteer, but it's public on the filed plan.

⚠ Utility infrastructure is visible on the filed plan, but this extraction did not capture enough building/block context to score proximity. Ask the builder to map your block and flat against this sanctioned plan.

Orientation: North arrow points straight up (toward the top of the page), located in the upper-right area of the crop within the Location Map section (read from the sheet's own north marker). This tells us roughly how the site sits, not which way any individual unit's balcony faces — we don't have a reliable per-unit facing read, so this report makes no vastu/facing claims.

The sanctioned site plan, as filed

Open full-size image → · On mobile, pan the image sideways to read the labels.

The sanctioned site/layout plan as filed with K-RERA, showing the buildings, amenities and utility infrastructure with the developer's own labels
The developer's own site plan as filed with K-RERA (tap to open full-size) — shown for reference, with its printed labels (STP, transformer/DG yards, building and block numbers) intact. Any highlighted trade-offs below are marked only where the plan's own text confirms them.
FeaturePosition on site
TRANSFORMERleft-center area of the crop, within plot 30/1, along the western boundary, labeled vertically
STPper site plan

Which Unit to Buy Here

From the sanctioned site plan, we map every block against the amenities worth being near and the utilities worth avoiding, using each item's position on the plan:

✓ Club House✓ Parks & Open Space✗ Space For Services✗ Stp

Of the 28 blocks on the sanctioned plan, 9 sit next to the key amenities and 8 back onto utilities. Where you buy within the project matters:

FavourBuilding-10 Tower 10, Building-2 Tower 2B, Building-3 Tower 3A, Building-3 Tower 3B, Building-4 Tower 4A, Building-2 Tower 2A, Building-8 Tower 8, Building-4 Tower 4B and Building-9 Tower 9A
the pick of the layout — closest to the parks & open space and club house. Target higher floors here.
MixedBuilding-7 Tower 7, Building-5 Tower 5A, Building-1 Tower 1B, Building-1 Tower 1A, Building-11 Tower 11, Building-5 Tower 5B, Building-9 Tower 9B, Building-12 Tower 12, Building-6 Tower 6A, Building-13 Tower 13 and Building-17 Tower 17
a mix — near an amenity but also within range of a utility; favour higher floors on the amenity side.
Be cautiousBuilding-14 Tower 14, Building-6 Tower 6B, Building-15 Tower 15, Building-18 Tower 18, Building-19 Tower 19, Building-16 Tower 16, Building-20 Tower 20 and Building-21 Tower 21
nearest the stp and space for services — expect odour, pump/generator noise and EMF at the lower floors; prefer higher floors and the elevation facing away, or another block.

A closer read on a few:

Building-10 Tower 10 is the pick of this layout — it overlooks the parks & open space and is clear of the project's utilities. A unit here, on a higher floor, is where the premium sits.
Building-2 Tower 2B is the pick of this layout — it overlooks the parks & open space and is clear of the project's utilities. A unit here, on a higher floor, is where the premium sits.
Building-20 Tower 20 sits close to the stp — expect odour and pump/processing noise at the lower floors. Prefer higher floors and the elevation facing away from it, or another block.
Building-21 Tower 21 sits close to the stp — expect odour and pump/processing noise at the lower floors. Prefer higher floors and the elevation facing away from it, or another block.

Positions are read from the sanctioned plan, not surveyed; distances are relative within the plan, not metres. Treat this as where to look first and what to check on a site visit — not a final verdict.

Two flats in the same project can differ 15–20% in liveability and resale for the same price. Here's how to pick the right one — tower, side, floor, facing, position and size — read off the sanctioned plan and the filed inventory. Directional, not surveyed: verify on a site visit.

1 · Which tower, and which side of it

Two flats in the same project can be a good buy and a bad buy depending on the face. From the plan geometry:

Building-10 Tower 10 — Buy the east-facing flats — they overlook the parks & open space. Skip the southeast-side flats — they look onto the space for services.
Building-2 Tower 2B — Buy the east-facing flats — they overlook the parks & open space. Skip the southeast-side flats — they look onto the space for services.
Building-3 Tower 3A — Buy the southeast-facing flats — they overlook the club house.
Building-3 Tower 3B — Buy the southeast-facing flats — they overlook the club house.
Building-4 Tower 4A — Buy the east-facing flats — they overlook the club house. Skip the southeast-side flats — they look onto the space for services.

2 · Which floor

Target the upper-middle floors: high enough to clear street dust, boundary-wall sightlines, mosquitoes and ground-floor privacy/security worries, but below the very top floor (terrace heat and leak risk). Avoid the ground and first floor (dust, noise, privacy, waterlogging in a bad monsoon) unless you specifically want a private-garden unit and accept the trade-offs. In any tower sitting next to the STP, DG set or transformer, buy higher — odour, generator noise and EMF concentrate at the lower floors. Ask which floors are refuge/service floors and skip the flats directly above or below them.

3 · Which facing

Target North, Northeast and East-facing homes — even, glare-free light all day and no direct heat load — the safe pick. Steer clear of South, West and Southwest-facing living rooms and bedrooms — west/south-west take the full 2–7pm summer sun (heat you pay to fight with the AC all year). A west kitchen or utility is fine; a west master isn't. Confirm the exact facing with a compass on site — brochure 'park-facing' isn't a compass reading.

4 · Which flat on the floor

Prefer a corner unit — two or three external walls mean cross-ventilation, light on more than one side, more windows and a resale premium. Avoid the flat that shares a wall with the lift shaft or staircase (vibration, footfall, less privacy) and the one beside the garbage chute or electrical/meter room. Check the units-per-floor-per-lift ratio — more than ~4 flats sharing one lift core means waits and crowding.

5 · Which size, for value

The 2BHK and 3BHK stock is the liquid part of this project — easiest to rent and to exit, so the safest for capital. The 1BHK / studio and 4BHK+ units are a thinner resale market (fewer buyers, longer to sell) — only if you'll actually use the space, not as the investment pick. Registered carpet averages 429–2,914 sq ft per home across the filed mix; check the loading (carpet ÷ super-built-up) — under ~65% means you're paying for wall/common area, not home.

If it were my money

I'd target a corner unit on an upper-middle floor of Building-10 Tower 10 and Building-2 Tower 2B, on the east-facing side that overlooks the parks & open space and in a 2BHK and 3BHK configuration. I'd pass on the Building-14 Tower 14, Building-6 Tower 6B and Building-15 Tower 15 towers near the utilities, west/south-west-facing living rooms and bedrooms and anything on the ground/first floor or the top floor.

Plan-derived guidance, not a survey or a vastu consultation — confirm facing, tower distances and floor specifics on site.

Density, Parking & Open Space

Density & Parking

The filing gives carpet area (what you legally own) but not the builder's super-built-up, so the loading/efficiency % isn't in the RERA record — ask the builder for it and check carpet is ≥65% of super-built-up before you sign.

Coverage & Open Space

Vision-read from plan

How much of the plot the buildings actually cover, and how close the project ran to its permitted FAR/FSI — context that affects how crowded the site feels day to day, separate from any single unit's own size.

The buildings cover 45% of the site against 55% permitted — a fairly built-out site, so check how much usable open ground actually remains between blocks; it is built to 2.249 of the 2.25 FAR allowed (~100%), near the permitted ceiling — little scope to add more density later.

Plot area2,86,800.75 sqmt (71A - 22.50G)
Net site area (after road/encroachment deductions)2,77,474.48 sqmt
Park & open space area28,965.55 sqmt
FAR/FSI allowed2.25
FAR/FSI achieved2.249
Ground coverage allowed55%
Ground coverage achieved45%

Read off the site plan's own "Development Plan Area Statement" panel, cross-checked across repeated independent reads — only fields where those reads agreed are shown here.

Land & Title

Land title & ownership

RERA filing

K-RERA land-survey/title rows summarize parcel extent, conversion, deed/JDA, khatha, and owner-share disclosures. 73 survey/parcel rows; land types: JDA Land, Own Land; 73/73 conversion/alienation marked YES; 73/73 deed marked YES; 59/73 JDA marked YES. Use this as a checklist for your lawyer, not as a substitute for title due diligence.

Survey / parcelLand typeExtentTitle milestonesOwner-share rows
87JDA Land1 Acre 20 GuntasConv YES · Deed YES · JDA YES · E KhathaGopalan E. (33)
76JDA Land39 GuntasConv YES · Deed YES · JDA YES · E KhathaGopalan E. (33)
75JDA Land24.5 GuntasConv YES · Deed YES · JDA YES · E KhathaGopalan E. (33)
73/2JDA Land26 GuntasConv YES · Deed YES · JDA YES · E KhathaGopalan E. (33)
73/1JDA Land25 GuntasConv YES · Deed YES · JDA YES · E KhathaGopalan E. (33)
71/2JDA Land20 GuntasConv YES · Deed YES · JDA YES · E KhathaGopalan E. (33)

Showing first 6 of 73 parcel rows.

Title & buyer-document read-through

RERA filing

For the most buyer-critical non-plan PDFs, the report now downloads the actual filing and extracts conservative text cues. These cues are not legal opinions; they tell your lawyer what the RERA upload appears to contain and which documents need closer review.

DocumentPagesExtracted cues
Commencement / building licence
PARK GROVE - DP WORK ORDER.pdf
15Issuing authority identified: Bangalore Development Authority (BDA); Document type: Official Order (ಕಾರ್ಯಾದೇಶ / Work Order or Directive); Visible date: 11/05/2023; Reference number visible: BDA/DLP-05/2022-23/332/2023-24, C.No. 166509
Allotment letter draft
Allotment Letter RERA The Residences.pdf
8date(s) visible: 31/12/2027; mentions lender/charge/mortgage-type language
Sale deed proforma
PPG -Scanned_compressed (1).pdf
100Project name visible: residential development branding page; Developer brand ('Prestige') identified; Location identifier present: Whitefield area mentioned; No date visible on this page
Form B declaration
Form B.pdf
3e-Stamp certificate dated 12-Jul-2023; Government of Karnataka Non-Judicial stamp paper; Stamp duty amount: Rs. 20 (Twenty only); Document type: Article 4 Affidavit / Affidavit cum Declaration

Legal, Approvals & Project Team

Litigation & compliance

RERA filing

No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.

24 of 45 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 21 slots have usable uploaded filings.

No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.

Named utility/regulatory approvals

Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Not found in catalog
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)✓ On file (Water Permission Letter)
Fire NOC✓ On file (Fire Force Department)
Pollution control (KSPCB)✓ On file (KSPCB)
Environmental clearance✓ On file (SEIAA)
Airport Authority height clearance✓ On file (Airport Authority of India)

"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.

Statutory approval status

RERA filing

Clean approvals profile: every applicable statutory NOC is on file — including Fire NOC and pollution-control clearance (KSPCB), the clearances buyers most often find still pending. Nothing is outstanding among the statutory NOCs — which compliance documents are filed versus still under process is a separate matter, covered in Litigation & compliance above. Note environmental clearance is not among the approvals K-RERA marks applicable to this project — if the named-approvals check shows it as "not found in catalog", that is why; ask the builder directly whether it applies here. Since these are developer-filed portal statuses, have your lawyer confirm them against the linked NOC copies.

5 further authority slots are marked not applicable by the regulator.

Authority / NOCStatusDateFile
Water supply and sewage boardApproved06-02-2023WATER_NOC.pdf
KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres)Approved01-03-2023KSPCB_CFE_NOC.pdf
KPTCL- BESCOMApproved05-04-2023BESCOM_NOC.pdf
Fire and SafetyApproved17-03-2023FIRE_NOC.pdf
Airport Authority of IndiaApproved04-08-2022AIRPORT_NOC.pdf

Project team & certifications

RERA filing

K-RERA names 4 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.

RoleNameRegistration / licenceSinceLocality
Chartered accountantM Padmanabha Bhat0253051986Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560093
EngineerBuro HappoldBCC/BL-3.6/SE- 264/2017-181976Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560001
ArchitectRSP Design ConsultantsCA/2012/567902002Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560001
ContractorLarsen & Toubro Limited-1913Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560001

Facilities & Paperwork Readiness

Shared facilities & handover readiness

RERA filing

21 applicable shared facility/common-area rows; average reported completion across rows that state it is 28%. Since no OC is on file yet, low shared-work progress is a direct handover question.

⚠ K-RERA's page records no Association of Allottees formed yet. Common-area handover runs through the association, so for a project this far along ask the builder when it will be formed and what happens to maintenance charges until then.

Critical shared works to verify before handover

  • Electricity: 0% complete
  • Fire escapes: 0% complete
  • Power Backup: 0% complete
  • Water and Sanitation: 0% complete
  • Water conservation and renewable energy: 0% complete
  • Lifts: 5% complete

Common areas

WorkLatest completionFiled area
Lifts5%13,730 sqm
Common entrance and exit for the building/common portico/foyer/verandah15%7,815 sqm
Corridor/Lobbies15%71,945 sqm
Terrace15%25,845 sqm
Staircases40%909 sqm
Basement70%216,683 sqm
Outer Wall70%1 sqm
Fire escapes0%19,300 sqm
Open parking areas0%5,362 sqm
Water conservation and renewable energy0%1 sqm

Amenities

WorkLatest completionFiled area
Community Hall10%1,354 sqm
Swimming Pool15%1,050 sqm
Club House25%11,955 sqm
CCTV Surveillance0%10 sqm
Electricity0%5,498 sqm
Gym0%1,460 sqm
Indoor Sports facility0%2,388 sqm
Outdoor Sports facility0%3,476 sqm
Parks0%139,791 sqm
Power Backup0%2,480 sqm

Showing 10 of 11 applicable rows, prioritizing low or unstated completion.

Buyer paperwork readiness

RERA filing

Key legal and booking documents surfaced from the K-RERA catalog. This is not legal advice and does not replace a lawyer's title due diligence, but it shows which drafts/filings are actually visible before you pay a token or sign.

Document typeStatusCatalog file
Agreement for sale draftFiled N.A.NA.pdf
Allotment letter draftOn fileAllotment Letter RERA The Residences.pdf
Sale deed proformaOn filePPG -Scanned_compressed (1).pdf
Form B declarationOn fileForm B.pdf
Commencement certificateOn filePARK GROVE - DP WORK ORDER.pdf
Encumbrance certificateNot found in catalog
Land conversion / CLUFiled N.A.NA.pdf
JDA / development agreementFiled N.A.NA.pdf

Treat placeholders and missing rows as questions, not accusations: ask the builder for the current document and have your lawyer review the actual signed version before committing.

Builder track record

RERA filing

Prestige has 88 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Prestige Projects”) (average reported construction progress 62%). 55 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder.

Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder's other K-RERA registrations and check whether they've actually been delivered.

Financials & Construction Progress

Financial disclosures

RERA filing

Latest quarterly filing (2025-Q4): ₹170.13 Cr collected from buyers, ₹177.20 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account. This quarter the escrow withdrawal (₹177.20 Cr) exceeded buyer collections (₹170.13 Cr) — worth asking the builder to reconcile against certified construction milestones, which is what RERA requires escrow draws to track.

Construction progress47% → 54% (+7 pts)
Units sold/booked as registered3068/3715 (83%)
Buyer collections in available QPRs₹456.07 Cr
Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs₹456.90 Cr (1.00x collections)

QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.

Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹61.1 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.

RERA 70% project account is on file: KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK lavelle Road Bengaluru IFSC Code : KKBK000042 Pin Code : 560001. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.

How to use this report

Before signing anything: check the litigation & compliance section above — any declared dispute on the project should factor into your decision.

Want to verify something yourself? Every document this report draws from is listed in the catalog just below, with a direct link to K-RERA's own copy.

How confident is each fact? Every section is tagged by source:

RERA filing Highest confidence — read straight off the K-RERA registry (registration, OC status, litigation, builder history, the document list). Verifiable against the filings.
Vision-read from plan Approximate — read by AI vision off the developer's scanned plan PDFs (room dimensions, unit areas, where infrastructure sits). Good signal, but it's OCR of a noisy scan, not a survey — confirm anything decision-critical against the linked plan.
Inferred Lowest confidence — a heuristic layered on the above (e.g. approximate compass facing, corner-unit guess). Directional only; never a substitute for a site visit or a vastu consultation.

Document catalog

RERA filing

Every document row on file with K-RERA for this project. Plan-like filings are processed for report intelligence when usable; buyer-critical support PDFs are selectively downloaded for read-through; placeholder uploads are shown as not usable; other compliance documents link directly to K-RERA's own copy.

DocumentFilenameStatus
Registration CertificateIncorporation Certificate PPPL.pdfView on K-RERA →
PAN CardPAN PPPL.pdfView on K-RERA →
Address ProofGST Certificate.pdfView on K-RERA →
Board Resolution for Authorized Signatory/Certificate of AuthorizationBR PPL_RERA Authorisation Letter.pdfView on K-RERA →
PAN CardPan SA.pdfView on K-RERA →
PAN CardPAN - IR.PDFView on K-RERA →
Organization StructureOrg Chart.pdfView on K-RERA →
AffidavitNo Litigation Affidavit.pdfView on K-RERA →
Certificate from Chartered AccountForm 1 CA Certificate Park Grove.pdfView on K-RERA →
Commencement CertificatePARK GROVE - DP WORK ORDER.pdfDownloaded for read-through →
Electricity Permission LetterNA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Water Permission LetterPANCHYAT - WATER NOC.pdfView on K-RERA →
Approved Layout PlanPARK GROVE - DP.pdfProcessed for plan intelligence
Approved Building/Plotting PlanPARK GROVE DP.pdfProcessed for plan intelligence
Existing Layout PlanPARK GROVE - DP.pdfProcessed for plan intelligence
Existing Section Plan and SpecificationPARK GROVE - DP.pdfProcessed for plan intelligence
Sectional Drawing of the apartmentsPARK GROVE - DP.pdfProcessed for plan intelligence
Project SpecificationsPPG Apartment Specs - updated (1).pdfView on K-RERA →
Approved Section Of Building/Infrastructure Plan of PlottingPARK GROVE DP.pdfProcessed for plan intelligence
Area Development Plan Of Project AreaPARK GROVE DP.pdfProcessed for plan intelligence
Certificate from Registered Engineer indicating the structural safety of the buildingNA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Advocate Search ReportNA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Urban Land CeilingNA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Collaboration Agreement/Development Agreement/Joint Development Agreement/Other AgreementNA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Change of Land UseNA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
District MagistrateNA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Conversion Certificate under section 95 of the KLR Act 1964NA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Any other document (Rights/Title/Interest/Name)NA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Proforma of Agreement for SaleNA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Proforma of Allotment LetterAllotment Letter RERA The Residences.pdfDownloaded for read-through →
Proforma For Sale DeedPPG -Scanned_compressed (1).pdfDownloaded for read-through →
Declaration (Form B)Form B.pdfDownloaded for read-through →
Section 3(1) Notarized AffidavitNA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
JD AFFIDAVIT CUM DECLARATIONAffidavit cum Declaration.pdfView on K-RERA →
ESCOM/ElectricityNA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
KWSSB/WaterPANCHYAT - WATER NOC.pdfView on K-RERA →
Approval/NOC under section 109 of KLR Act 1961NA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Approval/NOC under section 14 of the KTCP ActNA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Fire Force DepartmentPARK GROVE - FIRE NOC.pdfView on K-RERA →
Airport Authority of IndiaAIRPORT NOC.pdfView on K-RERA →
KSPCBKSPCB CFE - 02032023.pdfView on K-RERA →
SEIAAEC_Prestige Park Grove.pdfView on K-RERA →
BSNLNA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Lift AuthoritiesNA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
BMRCLNA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
NOC in case of building proposals abutting to neighbouring propertiesNA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Bangalore Urban Arts CommissionNA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Inspector Of Factories Controller Of Explosives RailwaysNA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Coastal Regulation Zone AuthorityNA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Utilisation certificateNA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Transfer of development rights certificateNA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Relinquishment DeedNA.pdfPlaceholder / not usable

Request the report on Prestige Park Grove

We analyse Prestige Park Grove in full and send you the RERA Property Intelligence Report — we analyse in 1 working day.

Something went wrong — email hello@quietlist.in instead.