RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview

SAI NANDANA MARVELLA

SAI NANDANA PROPERTIES · Bengaluru South · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/091122/005432

Report coverage

Full report — registry facts + unit-level plan intelligence

What this report covers

  • Official K-RERA registry facts — units, cost, land area, towers, approvals
  • Complaint / litigation & compliance history
  • Builder delivery record across their K-RERA portfolio
  • Construction trajectory & sales pace from quarterly filings
  • Site & infrastructure intelligence from the filed sanctioned plan
  • Unit-level plan intelligence — dimensioned layouts, facing, per-block detail

To confirm directly with the builder

  • Utilities were found on the site plan, but could not be mapped confidently to building blocks or units.
Not yet
Completion certificate
None declared
Legal status
Utilities found
Utility proximity check
2
Other RERA projects by builder

Decision summary

Overall risk
High
Legal riskLow
Delivery riskHigh
Livability riskMedium

Legal = litigation/declared disputes. Delivery = OC status, the project's own registration validity, and builder delay history vs the local benchmark. Livability = whether filed-plan utilities are absent, mapped near a block, or visible but not mappable from the current extraction. Each is a summary of a fact shown elsewhere in this report, not an independent score — verify against the relevant section before relying on it.

No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.RERA filing
Utilities are visible on the filed site plan, but block proximity is not mapped. Treat livability risk as unresolved until the builder maps your block/unit against the sanctioned plan.Vision-read from plan
4 of 28 compliance document slots are filed as under process / not yet usable.RERA filing
2 key buyer paperwork items are not usable in the catalog (Sale deed proforma, Encumbrance certificate). See "Buyer paperwork readiness" below.RERA filing
Registration validity has lapsed (~10 months past the last permitted end date). The declared completion on the registration was 30 Sep 2025. Until an extension is approved, the project is past its permitted timeline without a completion certificate — RERA restricts a promoter from advertising or selling in a project whose registration has expired. Confirm the extension status with K-RERA before paying anything.RERA filing
No completion certificate yet — project hasn't been declared complete.RERA filing
Builder track record: 2 of 2 other projects by this developer are past their declared deadline without an OC.RERA filing

What I'd do as a buyer

The shortest version of this report — specific moves for your situation. Not financial advice; each traces to a fact below.

If you're comparing specific units: ask the builder to overlay your block and flat on the sanctioned site plan — utilities are visible, but this report could not map proximity to units.
If you need a ready-to-move home: treat possession timing as uncertain — this project has no completion certificate on file yet.
If the builder can't map your flat number to a spot on the sanctioned plan: pause — you can't verify what you're actually buying until they do.

Who this suits & what to verify

Conditional guidance based on the facts above — not a buy/don't-buy recommendation, and not financial advice. Weigh each point against what matters to you.

No completion certificate yet — best suited to buyers comfortable carrying possession-timeline uncertainty. If you need an OC-in-hand, ready-to-move home, treat this as watch-and-verify, not a sure thing.
The filed site plan shows utility infrastructure, but the report could not confidently map it to a building block. Ask the builder to mark your exact block/unit against the sanctioned site plan before treating livability risk as low.
This developer's reported delay rate (100% of their other projects) runs above the local norm (~72%) — weigh that if on-time possession is essential to you.
Whatever unit a broker shows you, have the builder map that flat number to its exact block, wing, and floor on the sanctioned plan before booking — the report identifies units by position, not by flat number.

Questions to ask the builder

  • Can you map my specific flat number to its block, wing, and floor on the sanctioned plan?
  • Please have my lawyer verify the conversion order, deed/JDA, khatha, EC, and owner-share rows for the survey numbers listed in the K-RERA land-title table (Own Land).
  • The K-RERA registration discloses 106 parking spaces for 95 registered units — is my specific parking bay allotted, covered/open, and marked on the sanctioned parking plan?
  • Please match my quoted flat number against the K-RERA official unit register and confirm its carpet area, UDS, floor, tower/wing, and parking-lot count in the agreement draft.
  • The sanctioned site plan shows STP/transformer infrastructure — can you mark my block and flat on that plan so I can see the actual distance and exposure?
  • Your K-RERA registration validity has lapsed with no completion certificate on file — has an extension been applied for, and what is its current status with the regulator?
  • What's the realistic timeline to completion certificate, given the current construction stage?
  • Why are these compliance slots still filed as under process / not yet usable: District Magistrate, Conversion Certificate under section 95 of the KLR Act 1964, Proforma For Sale Deed?
  • Can you share the current usable version of these buyer paperwork items before I pay a token: Sale deed proforma, Encumbrance certificate?
  • Why are no quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) available despite construction being incomplete?
  • Can you share recent dated construction photos for my specific block/wing, since no project-photo uploads are visible in the K-RERA catalog?
  • 2 of your other projects in this city are past deadline without an OC — what's different about this one?
95
Registered units
₹37.6 Cr
Est. construction cost
1
Units profiled
35
RERA documents on file

Official Registry Facts

Official project scale

RERA filing

Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.

DisclosureOfficial valueWhy it matters
Registered units95Total inventory registered with K-RERA.
Official carpet area10,110 sqmRegulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums.
Official built-up area13,721 sqmUseful scale context when comparing density and project cost.
Registered land area4,501 sqmThe land area attached to this K-RERA registration.
Sanctioned FAR/FSI2.25Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design.
Registered towers/wings1Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page.
Parking disclosed106 covered, 0 open (1.12 spaces/unit)Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits.
Approved plan numberBBMP/Addl.Dir/JDSOUTH/0008/ 22-23Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder.
Plan approval date05-09-2022
Project start date01-11-2022

Official inventory & towers

RERA filing

K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.

Registered inventory mix

TypeUnitsShareOfficial carpet area
2 BHK4042%2,949 sqm
3 BHK5558%4,891 sqm

Registered tower / wing summary

Tower/wingFloorsUnitsParkingHeight
SAI NANDANA MARVELLA49510614.95 m

Official unit register

RERA filing

K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 95 official flat/unit rows, matching the 95 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.

By unit type

Unit typeRowsCarpet areaUDSParking lots
3 BHK5580.7-100.6 sqm49.6-52.6 sqm55
2 BHK4061.8-79.8 sqm39.0-45.7 sqm40

By tower / wing

Tower/wingRowsCarpet areaUDSParking lots
SAI NANDANA MARVELLA9561.8-100.6 sqm39.0-52.6 sqm95
Show sample official unit rows
UnitTowerFloorTypeCarpetUDSParking
1SAI NANDANA MARVELLA03 BHK90.3 sqm52.3 sqm1
2SAI NANDANA MARVELLA03 BHK82.4 sqm49.6 sqm1
3SAI NANDANA MARVELLA02 BHK79.8 sqm43.3 sqm1
4SAI NANDANA MARVELLA03 BHK89.2 sqm49.8 sqm1
5SAI NANDANA MARVELLA02 BHK78.3 sqm45.7 sqm1
6SAI NANDANA MARVELLA02 BHK73.8 sqm41.6 sqm1

What the numbers tell you

Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.

Unit formatAverage official carpet area is ~888 sqft — mid-format homes (2–3BHK territory), not compact stock. This is a boutique, low-density project — 95 homes across 1 tower. Carpet is the RERA-defined usable area, so compare it against the 'super built-up' a broker quotes (typically 25–35% larger).
ParkingThe project declares 106 parking spaces for 95 homes (~1.1 per home) — about one space per home — adequate but tight if you have two cars.
Your land share (UDS)Undivided land share averages ~47 sqm per home; across all 95 homes that is ~100% of the plot — a healthy sign: buyers collectively hold close to all the land. Low UDS relative to land can mean the builder keeps land value the flat owners think they're buying.

Site & infrastructure

Vision-read from plan

Read directly off the project's site/layout plan filed with K-RERA — where utility infrastructure (sewage treatment, transformers, generators) sits on the plot, and which buildings are closest to it. This is the kind of thing a builder's sales team won't volunteer, but it's public on the filed plan.

⚠ Utility infrastructure is visible on the filed plan, but this extraction did not capture enough building/block context to score proximity. Ask the builder to map your block and flat against this sanctioned plan.

Orientation: north points toward the top of the sheet, slightly left of vertical (upper-left direction), as indicated by the arrow labeled 'TO BANNERGATTA ROAD' (read from the sheet's own north marker). This tells us roughly how the site sits, not which way any individual unit's balcony faces — we don't have a reliable per-unit facing read, so this report makes no vastu/facing claims.

FeaturePosition on site
TRANSFORMERbottom-center of the crop, near the entry/exit point of the building, adjacent to the road setback

Which Unit to Buy Here

From the sanctioned site plan, we map every block against the amenities worth being near and the utilities worth avoiding, using each item's position on the plan:

✓ Basement Floor (Car Parking)
MixedProposed Residential Apartment is set away from both the key amenities and the utilities. This is a low-confidence read of the filed drawing — treat it as a flag to check the utility's position on the sanctioned plan, not a settled fact.

Positions are read from the sanctioned plan, not surveyed; distances are relative within the plan, not metres. Treat this as where to look first and what to check on a site visit — not a final verdict.

Two flats in the same project can differ 15–20% in liveability and resale for the same price. Here's how to pick the right one — tower, side, floor, facing, position and size — read off the sanctioned plan and the filed inventory. Directional, not surveyed: verify on a site visit.

2 · Which floor

Target the upper-middle floors: high enough to clear street dust, boundary-wall sightlines, mosquitoes and ground-floor privacy/security worries, but below the very top floor (terrace heat and leak risk). Avoid the ground and first floor (dust, noise, privacy, waterlogging in a bad monsoon) unless you specifically want a private-garden unit and accept the trade-offs. Ask which floors are refuge/service floors and skip the flats directly above or below them.

3 · Which facing

Target North, Northeast and East-facing homes — even, glare-free light all day and no direct heat load — the safe pick. Steer clear of South, West and Southwest-facing living rooms and bedrooms — west/south-west take the full 2–7pm summer sun (heat you pay to fight with the AC all year). A west kitchen or utility is fine; a west master isn't. Confirm the exact facing with a compass on site — brochure 'park-facing' isn't a compass reading.

4 · Which flat on the floor

Prefer a corner unit — two or three external walls mean cross-ventilation, light on more than one side, more windows and a resale premium. Avoid the flat that shares a wall with the lift shaft or staircase (vibration, footfall, less privacy) and the one beside the garbage chute or electrical/meter room. Check the units-per-floor-per-lift ratio — more than ~4 flats sharing one lift core means waits and crowding.

5 · Which size, for value

The 2BHK and 3BHK stock is the liquid part of this project — easiest to rent and to exit, so the safest for capital. Registered carpet averages 794–957 sq ft per home across the filed mix; check the loading (carpet ÷ super-built-up) — under ~65% means you're paying for wall/common area, not home.

If it were my money

I'd target a corner unit on an upper-middle floor, with a north/east-facing living side and in a 2BHK and 3BHK configuration. I'd pass on west/south-west-facing living rooms and bedrooms and anything on the ground/first floor or the top floor.

Plan-derived guidance, not a survey or a vastu consultation — confirm facing, tower distances and floor specifics on site.

Unit-level specifications

Vision-read from plan

Room dimensions read directly off the developer's sanctioned building plan filed with K-RERA (vision-extracted, in the units shown on the plan — often metres or millimetres — not an independent survey). Total area below is the sum of labeled enclosed-room dimensions, excluding obvious exterior/open labels such as balconies, terraces, and landscape courts. It is an approximation, not the builder's official carpet/built-up area. Unit labels describe position (block/wing/floor) as drawn on the sheet, not a flat number — the plan doesn't print one. ⚠ cards flag units near utility infrastructure per the site plan (see "Site & infrastructure" above); we don't have a reliable per-unit balcony-facing read, so this report makes no vastu/facing claims for individual units.

Range across profiled units: 667–667 sqft (avg 667 sqft)

top-right unit

667 sqft (approx., enclosed-room sum)

Likely a corner unit (two external-facing walls) — usually better cross-ventilation and natural light than a mid-block unit.

KITCHEN1.62x1.70 m
UTILITY1.24x1.10 m
BATHROOM3.44x1.96 m
BEDROOM1.3x3.65 m
M.BEDROOM4.37x3.39 m
KITCHEN (second)2.1x3.35 m
UTILITY (second)2.1x1.13 m
DINING2.5x3.35 m
GARDEN4.1x3.13 m
BEDROOM (second)4.1x3.35 m

From sanctioned plan, page 2

Density, Parking & Open Space

Density & Parking

The filing gives carpet area (what you legally own) but not the builder's super-built-up, so the loading/efficiency % isn't in the RERA record — ask the builder for it and check carpet is ≥65% of super-built-up before you sign.

Coverage & Open Space

Vision-read from plan

How much of the plot the buildings actually cover, and how close the project ran to its permitted FAR/FSI — context that affects how crowded the site feels day to day, separate from any single unit's own size.

The buildings cover 44% of the site against 50% permitted — a fairly built-out site, so check how much usable open ground actually remains between blocks; it is built to 2.25 of the 2.25 FAR allowed (~100%), near the permitted ceiling — little scope to add more density later; the project fronts a 9.14 m road — on the narrower side; visit at peak hour to gauge congestion before committing.

Plot area4501.96 sqmt
Net site area (after road/encroachment deductions)4501.96 sqmt
FAR/FSI allowed2.25
FAR/FSI achieved2.25
Ground coverage allowed50.00%
Ground coverage achieved44.43%
Approach road width9.14 m

Read off the site plan's own "Development Plan Area Statement" panel, cross-checked across repeated independent reads — only fields where those reads agreed are shown here.

Land & Title

Land title & ownership

RERA filing

K-RERA land-survey/title rows summarize parcel extent, conversion, deed/JDA, khatha, and owner-share disclosures. 1 survey/parcel row; land type: Own Land; 1/1 conversion/alienation marked YES; 1/1 deed marked YES; 0/1 JDA marked YES; mortgage declaration: NO. Use this as a checklist for your lawyer, not as a substitute for title due diligence.

Survey / parcelLand typeExtentTitle milestonesOwner-share rows
65-1Own Land2 Acres 13 GuntasConv YES · Deed YES · JDA NO · A KhathaSai P. (100)

Title & buyer-document read-through

RERA filing

For the most buyer-critical non-plan PDFs, the report now downloads the actual filing and extracts conservative text cues. These cues are not legal opinions; they tell your lawyer what the RERA upload appears to contain and which documents need closer review.

DocumentPagesExtracted cues
Commencement / building licence
BBMP Building License 65_1.pdf
5date(s) visible: 65/1/434, 01-04-2013; mentions lender/charge/mortgage-type language; contains commencement/building-licence language
Title / buyer paperwork
Title Deeds.pdf
69Document dated 02-06-2020, executed at Bengaluru; Titled 'Absolute Sale Deed' — sale deed language confirmed; Karnataka State Registration and Stamps Department stamp paper visible; Document reference: BKT 535/30-81, Paper Document No. 535, Year 2020-21
Agreement for sale draft
Proforma AOS.pdf
34date(s) visible: 25/03/2011, 24/59-60, 31/07/1982; contains agreement-for-sale/RERA draft language
Allotment letter draft
Allotment letter.pdf
1Date field present but left blank — document not yet dated; Allotment letter format — pre-sale residential flat allotment document; Property schedule language visible: Converted Survey Sy.No.65/1; Land conversion language: property described as 'Converted Survey'
Form B declaration
Form B Affidavit.pdf
2e-Stamp certificate dated 23-Sep-2022; Certificate No. visible: IN-KA40138588098109U; Document type: Article 4 Affidavit — Affidavit Cum Declaration; First Party identified as a properties/promoter entity

Legal, Approvals & Project Team

Litigation & compliance

RERA filing

No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.

⚠ 4 of 28 compliance document slots are filed as under process / not yet usable: District Magistrate, Conversion Certificate under section 95 of the KLR Act 1964, Proforma For Sale Deed, JD AFFIDAVIT CUM DECLARATION.

3 additional compliance slots are filed as Not Applicable.

No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.

⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 30 Sep 2025 — which has passed with no OC on file.

Named utility/regulatory approvals

Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)✓ On file (Electricity Permission Letter)
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)✓ On file (Water Permission Letter)
Fire NOCNot found in catalog
Pollution control (KSPCB)Not found in catalog
Environmental clearanceNot found in catalog
Airport Authority height clearanceNot found in catalog

"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.

Project team & certifications

RERA filing

K-RERA names 4 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.

RoleNameRegistration / licenceSinceLocality
Chartered accountantC Venkatesulu0196591986Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560011
EngineerSRINIVAS RAO BOLIMUNTABCCL/BL-3.6 SE-0043/21-222010Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560020
ArchitectV Siva KumarBCCL/BL-3.6/E-0336/21-222008Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560070
ContractorSAI NANDANA PROPERTIES-2017Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560011

Facilities & Paperwork Readiness

Shared facilities & handover readiness

RERA filing

12 applicable shared facility/common-area rows; the filed rows don't state a meaningful completion % (every row reads zero), so treat shared-work progress as a question to raise rather than a measured status.

Common areas

WorkLatest completionFiled area
BasementNot stated0 sqm
Common entrance and exit for the building/common portico/foyer/verandahNot stated0 sqm
Corridor/LobbiesNot stated0 sqm
LiftsNot stated0 sqm
Outer WallNot stated0 sqm
StaircasesNot stated0 sqm
TerraceNot stated0 sqm

Amenities

WorkLatest completionFiled area
CCTV SurveillanceNot stated0 sqm
ElectricityNot stated0 sqm
Power BackupNot stated0 sqm
Swimming PoolNot stated0 sqm
Water and SanitationNot stated0 sqm

Buyer paperwork readiness

RERA filing

Key legal and booking documents surfaced from the K-RERA catalog. This is not legal advice and does not replace a lawyer's title due diligence, but it shows which drafts/filings are actually visible before you pay a token or sign.

Document typeStatusCatalog file
Agreement for sale draftOn fileProforma AOS.pdf
Allotment letter draftOn fileAllotment letter.pdf
Sale deed proformaPlaceholder / not usableNot Available.pdf
Form B declarationOn fileForm B Affidavit.pdf
Commencement certificateOn fileBBMP Building License 65_1.pdf
Encumbrance certificateNot found in catalog
Land conversion / CLUOn fileKSPCB NOC with Fee paid receipt.pdf
JDA / development agreementFiled N.A.Not Applicable.pdf

Treat placeholders and missing rows as questions, not accusations: ask the builder for the current document and have your lawyer review the actual signed version before committing.

Builder track record

RERA filing

Sai Nandana has 2 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records. 2 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a higher delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.

Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder's other K-RERA registrations and check whether they've actually been delivered.

Financials & Construction Progress

Financial disclosures

RERA filing

⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.

Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹39.6 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.

RERA 70% project account is on file: STATE BANK OF INDIA Mysuru Bank Circle, Avenue Road Bengaluru-560002. IFSC Code : SBIN0040007 Pin Code : 560002. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.

How to use this report

If a builder or broker has shown you a specific unit: the sanctioned plan filed with K-RERA usually doesn't print flat numbers directly — it identifies units by block, wing, and floor. Find the card in the unit-level section matching your unit's location and bedroom count, then compare its room sizes and total area against other units of the same configuration in this project. If yours is noticeably smaller for the same number of bedrooms, that's worth asking the builder about directly.

Before signing anything: check the litigation & compliance section above — any declared dispute on the project should factor into your decision.

Want to verify something yourself? Every document this report draws from is listed in the catalog just below, with a direct link to K-RERA's own copy.

How confident is each fact? Every section is tagged by source:

RERA filing Highest confidence — read straight off the K-RERA registry (registration, OC status, litigation, builder history, the document list). Verifiable against the filings.
Vision-read from plan Approximate — read by AI vision off the developer's scanned plan PDFs (room dimensions, unit areas, where infrastructure sits). Good signal, but it's OCR of a noisy scan, not a survey — confirm anything decision-critical against the linked plan.
Inferred Lowest confidence — a heuristic layered on the above (e.g. approximate compass facing, corner-unit guess). Directional only; never a substitute for a site visit or a vastu consultation.

Document catalog

RERA filing

Every document row on file with K-RERA for this project. Plan-like filings are processed for report intelligence when usable; buyer-critical support PDFs are selectively downloaded for read-through; placeholder uploads are shown as not usable; other compliance documents link directly to K-RERA's own copy.

DocumentFilenameStatus
Registration CertificateCOI.pdfView on K-RERA →
PAN CardFIRM PAN.pdfView on K-RERA →
Address ProofGST Certificate.pdfView on K-RERA →
Board Resolution for Authorized Signatory/Certificate of AuthorizationBoard Resolution.pdfView on K-RERA →
PAN CardNeerajakshulu T PAN.pngView on K-RERA →
AffidavitAffidavit for Non Litigation.pdfView on K-RERA →
Certificate from Chartered AccountForm-1 CA Certificate.pdfView on K-RERA →
Commencement CertificateBBMP Building License 65_1.pdfDownloaded for read-through →
Electricity Permission LetterBESCOM Fee paid Receipt.pdfView on K-RERA →
Water Permission LetterBWSSB Fee Paid Receipt.pdfView on K-RERA →
Approved Layout PlanBBMP Sanction drawing.pdfProcessed for plan intelligence
Approved Building/Plotting PlanBBMP Sanction drawing.pdfProcessed for plan intelligence
Existing Layout PlanBBMP Sanction drawing.pdfProcessed for plan intelligence
Existing Section Plan and SpecificationSPECIFICATIONS.pdfProcessed for plan intelligence
Sectional Drawing of the apartmentsBBMP Sanction drawing.pdfProcessed for plan intelligence
Project SpecificationsSPECIFICATIONS.pdfView on K-RERA →
Approved Section Of Building/Infrastructure Plan of PlottingBBMP Sanction drawing.pdfProcessed for plan intelligence
Area Development Plan Of Project AreaBBMP Sanction drawing.pdfProcessed for plan intelligence
Certificate from Registered Engineer indicating the structural safety of the buildingSTABILITY CERTIFICATE.pdfView on K-RERA →
Advocate Search Reportlegal opinion SN Marvella.PDFView on K-RERA →
Urban Land CeilingNot Applicable.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Collaboration Agreement/Development Agreement/Joint Development Agreement/Other AgreementNot Applicable.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Change of Land UseNot Applicable.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
District MagistrateNot Available.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Conversion Certificate under section 95 of the KLR Act 1964Not Available.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Any other document (Rights/Title/Interest/Name)Title Deeds.pdfDownloaded for read-through →
Proforma of Agreement for SaleProforma AOS.pdfDownloaded for read-through →
Proforma of Allotment LetterAllotment letter.pdfDownloaded for read-through →
Proforma For Sale DeedNot Available.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
Declaration (Form B)Form B Affidavit.pdfDownloaded for read-through →
Section 3(1) Notarized AffidavitSec 3(1) Affidavit.pdfView on K-RERA →
JD AFFIDAVIT CUM DECLARATIONNot Available.pdfPlaceholder / not usable
ESCOM/ElectricityBESCOM Fee paid Receipt.pdfView on K-RERA →
KWSSB/WaterBWSSB Fee Paid Receipt.pdfView on K-RERA →
Approval/NOC under section 109 of KLR Act 1961KSPCB NOC with Fee paid receipt.pdfView on K-RERA →

Request the report on SAI NANDANA MARVELLA

We analyse SAI NANDANA MARVELLA in full and send you the RERA Property Intelligence Report — we analyse in 1 working day.

Something went wrong — email hello@quietlist.in instead.