Open the Gardencity Enclave listing on SquareYards and its registration table names “DLF Gardencity Enclave (Phase 3)”. Follow the same registration to Haryana RERA’s project-detail page and the name is “Independent Floors at DLF Gardencity Enclave Phase 2”. For a buyer in Sector 93, the registration should settle which project is being discussed before the phase label shapes the comparison.
This is a useful, answerable question alongside the wider discussion of building approvals covered by Hindustan Times in its report on Gurugram’s stilt-plus-four development. That report supplies the news context. The finding here is narrower: the differently labelled pages can be connected to a specific registered project and a separately described group of residential plots.
The land description earns its place beside the name
DLF’s own Phase 2 page uses the same phase name as Haryana RERA and displays the matching registration. The authority names DLF Limited as promoter. Its separate record for Independent Floors at DLF Gardencity Enclave also names DLF Limited and places that project in Sector 93.
The shared promoter and address explain why a development-name search alone is insufficient. The more revealing distinction appears in DLF’s Phase 2 application form. It describes an earlier independent-floor registration covering 97 residential plots, followed by a further 136 residential plots earmarked for independent floors under a separate registration.
These are separately described plot groups within the development. Matching the registration resolves whether the buyer is discussing the earlier independent-floor project or Phase 2. It also identifies which project’s quarterly reports belong in the comparison. Establishing where an offered home sits within that group requires its plot number and the corresponding plot schedule or plan.
The cited project records and application establish phase identities and plot-group sizes, but do not establish an offered floor’s approval position, current availability, construction percentage or confirmed possession date.
More plots explain the larger reported total
The latest comparable Haryana RERA quarterly progress reports are for April–June 2026. Both DLF projects submitted theirs on 14 July 2026. The earlier independent-floor project reports 388 units; Phase 2 reports 544 units.
The table brings those filings together with the plot scopes in DLF’s application, the registration identities on Haryana RERA’s project-detail pages and the expiry months in its project entries.
| Registered project | Promoter | Registration number | Residential plots described by DLF | April–June 2026 QPR units | Registration expiry |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Floors at DLF Gardencity Enclave | DLF Limited | GGM/603/335/2022/78 | 97 | 388 | August 2027 |
| Independent Floors at DLF Gardencity Enclave Phase 2 | DLF Limited | GGM/657/389/2023/01 | 136 | 544 | October 2028 |
Phase 2 reports 156 more units alongside 39 more residential plots in the application’s description. The relationship is more informative than the unit totals alone: each phase’s reported units amount to 4.0 per documented plot. Those comparisons use the named projects’ April–June 2026 Haryana RERA QPRs and DLF’s application form.
That is a project-level comparison. It helps a buyer understand the scale described in the paperwork without treating a larger unit total as a reason to prefer a home. The offered floor’s layout, access and shared spaces remain the practical subjects for a viewing and document review.
The archive keeps the phases separate
The distinction also holds through the reporting history. Haryana RERA’s QPR archive contains 15 filings for the earlier independent-floor project and 13 for Phase 2. Across their 13 shared quarterly periods, the former consistently reports 388 units and the latter 544.
This establishes continuity in the reported project totals. It supports reading the phases as separate reporting histories, rather than combining everything carrying the Gardencity Enclave name. It does not turn a project total into a plot-level identifier.
For a household comparing Independent Floors at DLF Gardencity Enclave with Phase 2, that separation also preserves the different registration-expiry months shown above. A proposed possession date should be stated separately in the offer, with its own supporting document.
A local scale reference, carefully chosen
The chart selects the paired DLF independent-floor projects central to the naming question and Orchard Avenue - 3 as a separately labelled Sector 93 scale reference. Every bar uses units reported for the same quarterly period.
Reported project sizes in Sector 93
units reported in the filing
Source: Haryana RERA, April–June 2026 QPRs for the named projects; DLF filings submitted 14 July 2026 and Orchard Avenue - 3 submitted 15 July 2026
Orchard Avenue - 3, recorded under Signature Builders, reports 257 units in its April–June 2026 Haryana RERA QPR, submitted on 15 July 2026. Its role here is a scale reference, not an equivalent housing option inferred from the locality. The useful explanation for the difference between the DLF bars comes from their separately documented plot groups.
For the buyer, the next conversation can therefore be precise: identify the offered plot and floor, match the registration, and request the corresponding schedule and sanctioned building plan. Then compare the actual home and its stated possession date. The documented naming difference has a clear resolution; the purchase discussion can move from a changing phase label to a specific property.