Godrej Palm Retreat’s separately registered phases share a promoter and a registration date, but carry different declared completion dates in their UP-RERA project-summary filings. That distinction gives Sector 150 buyers a practical way to read the latest Sports City announcement: follow the specific parcel and phase covered by each approval.

Noida Authority has issued four conditional occupancy certificates alongside approval of the revised Sports City layout, according to ETRealty’s reporting. Quietlist Research’s reading of the UP-RERA project-summary filings identifies eight residential registrations in Sector 150 under the promoters named in that report. A promoter’s name alone therefore cannot settle which registered phase a certificate covers.

The announcement names specific parcels

The revised layout concerns Sports City Plot 02 in Sector 150. Hindustan Times describes a sequence of submission, public feedback and board approval. The Times of India separately reports approval of building plans for the parcel. Together, these developments bring the story from the overall layout to particular housing plots.

ETRealty pairs each reported certificate recipient with a subplot:

Reported recipient Sports City subplot
Brick Rise Developers Pvt. Ltd.SC-02/H&I
Ace Infracity Developers Pvt. Ltd.SC-02/F
Land Kart Builders Pvt. Ltd.SC-02/A-1
Samridhi Infra Square Pvt. Ltd.SC-02/D

Source: ETRealty’s report on Noida Authority’s revised master plan and conditional occupancy certificates, linked above.

These references give buyers a concrete starting point. The reported decisions attach to identified parcels and retain the description “conditional”. The relevant document for an apartment purchase should connect that parcel to the registered phase and the building containing the home.

The register explains why phases matter

The residential project-summary filings below share the reported recipients’ filed promoter names and the Sector 150 locality. They are a complete selection on that basis, kept separate from confirmed certificate coverage. Each registration number identifies the precise UP-RERA artifact supporting its row.

Registered project Filed promoter Filed category Registration number
Godrej Nest Phase-1Brick Rise Developers Pvt. Ltd.ResidentialUPRERAPRJ13521
Godrej Nest Phase-2Brick Rise Developers Pvt. Ltd.ResidentialUPRERAPRJ14252
Godrej Nurture Phase-1Brick Rise Developers Pvt. Ltd.ResidentialUPRERAPRJ17861
Godrej Palm Retreat 1Ace Infracity Developers Private LimitedResidentialUPRERAPRJ745601
Godrej Palm Retreat 2Ace Infracity Developers Private LimitedResidentialUPRERAPRJ124632
Ace ParkwayAce Infracity Developers Private LimitedResidentialUPRERAPRJ4514
Eureka Park-Phase 1Land Kart Builders Private LimitedResidentialUPRERAPRJ5448
Samridhi Luxuriya AvenueSamridhi Infra Square Private LimitedResidentialUPRERAPRJ1746

The strongest distinction sits within the Palm Retreat filings. Both phases were registered on the same day under Ace Infracity Developers Private Limited. Their respective UP-RERA project-summary records carry declared completion dates of 3 June 2025 and 30 December 2025. Even the combination of project family, promoter and registration day leaves separate phase identities to resolve.

Brick Rise’s filings make a different distinction. Godrej Nest Phase-1, Godrej Nest Phase-2 and Godrej Nurture Phase-1 each have a different registration date and a different declared completion date in their UP-RERA project-summary records. The reported H&I subplot reference must therefore be read alongside the particular project name and phase, rather than applied across every entry bearing that promoter.

Ace Infracity’s residential selection also includes Ace Parkway. Its separate UP-RERA project-summary record establishes why identifying Palm Retreat’s plot does not resolve every registration under the same promoter. Land Kart’s Eureka Park-Phase 1 and Samridhi Infra Square’s Samridhi Luxuriya Avenue complete the residential selection.

The reviewed reporting does not provide a complete certificate-to-registration mapping or a facility-opening timetable; registration histories establish identity and filed dates, rather than current construction progress, available homes or possession readiness.

Sports remain the plan’s defining commitment

The larger attraction is clear. Square Yards reports that the revised layout covers 300 acres, allocating 70% to sports facilities, 29.5% to residential use and 0.5% to commercial use.

NDTV reports that the Sports Authority of India vetted the proposed sports-facility drawings. A PTI report carried by Rediff Moneynews describes planned tennis, swimming and indoor-sports facilities, alongside a golf course and cricket academy.

Access arrangements deserve a place in the purchase decision. A household choosing the location for swimming or regular practice should establish how residents would use the planned facilities, who would operate them and what charges would apply. Those answers determine how much of the proposed setting becomes part of everyday life.

Keep the benefit attached to the home

The geography should remain equally precise when browsing wider choices such as Experion Saatori, Experion Elements Phase-1 or Godrej Riverine. Their respective UP-RERA project-summary filings identify different registered projects; the Sports City announcement supplies no basis for transferring its parcel-specific approvals to them.

For a home within the reported Sports City parcels, the next step is more focused: put the conditional certificate beside the registered phase details and identify the covered building. Then establish the proposed possession date and the arrangements for using the sports facilities.

Sector 150 now has an approval story with named recipients and identifiable subplots. Its value to a buyer lies in that precision. The apartment, its registered phase and its parcel should tell the same story before the neighbourhood’s sporting promise becomes part of the purchase price.