RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
HOSKOTE NEO HOMES · Hosakote · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1250/304/PR/171031/001084
The Drawings Report · ₹4,999
We read all 5 approved drawings and 44 filed papers on this project’s RERA file — the sheets the builder filed to get it approved.
One real find, from a Noida project’s approved drawings: the buyer pays for 10,000 sq ft — the floor inside the flat is 6,982 sq ft.
Get it for this project →Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked. Sent as a PDF in one working day.
Free before you decide: the 14 things to get in writing before you book
Every item comes from a real RERA filing. Send it to the family group before anyone pays a token.
Send the checklist to the family group Read it here →Emprasa Startup City - Residential occupies 34,195 sq m (8.4 acres) and has 900 registered 1 BHK homes across 3 towers, with an estimated project cost of ₹140.9 crore. Its density of 106.5 homes per acre is the 82nd percentile among 110 Hosakote projects (median 79.6). Its declared completion date of 31 December 2019 has passed; no occupancy certificate is on record.
Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
What you can verify free on this page
The official K-RERA filing record, in plain English
Registration and delivery
Emprasa Startup City - Residential is registered with K-RERA as PRM/KA/RERA/1250/304/PR/171031/001084, and the promoter has declared completion for 31 Dec 2019.
31 Dec 2019
declared completion
Figures are the promoter's own filings as they stood when Quietlist last read the register. A declared completion date is a filing, not a handover commitment.
Source · K-RERA project register · read 10 Sep 2026
Project scale
Emprasa Startup City - Residential spans 34,195 sq m (8.45 acres), comprises 3 towers, registers 900 units, and is declared to cost ₹140.91 cr.
₹140.91 cr
declared project cost
8.45acres
34,195 sq m
900units
on the registration
1.638FAR
sanctioned
Scale and cost as the promoter registered them. The declared cost is the promoter's own estimate on the filing, not a valuation and not a price to a buyer.
Source · K-RERA project registration · read 10 Sep 2026
🔒 What I’d do as a buyer here · Drawings Report
The report opens with what this project really is — read from its approved drawings — then the specific calls: the cheapest good way to buy here, the flat to say no to, what you can stop worrying about, and what to get in writing before you sign anything.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 900 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 38 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 34,195 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 1.638 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 3 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 457 total (99 open) — 0.51 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 08-02-2017 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 BHK | 900 | 100% | 38 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block 1 | 9 | 504 | 252 | - |
| Block 2 | 9 | 216 | 108 | - |
| Block 3 | 9 | 180 | 97 | - |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 900 official flat/unit rows, matching the 900 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1BHK | 900 | 38.2 sqm | 3.4-47.1 sqm | 0 (900 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block 1 | 504 | 38.2 sqm | 21.8-22.1 sqm | 0 (504 with 0) |
| Block 2 | 216 | 38.2 sqm | 3.4-33.7 sqm | 0 (216 with 0) |
| Block 3 | 180 | 38.2 sqm | 46.1-47.1 sqm | 0 (180 with 0) |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A101 | Block 1 | 1 | 1BHK | 38.2 sqm | 21.9 sqm | 0 |
| A102 | Block 1 | 1 | 1BHK | 38.2 sqm | 22.1 sqm | 0 |
| A103 | Block 1 | 1 | 1BHK | 38.2 sqm | 22.1 sqm | 0 |
| A104 | Block 1 | 1 | 1BHK | 38.2 sqm | 22.0 sqm | 0 |
| A106 | Block 1 | 1 | 1BHK | 38.2 sqm | 21.9 sqm | 0 |
| A107 | Block 1 | 1 | 1BHK | 38.2 sqm | 22.1 sqm | 0 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Which flat to ask for · Drawings Report
The flat-level read: which towers and floors to prefer and which to avoid, what the drawings put above, below and beside each flat, and the things on this site nobody at the sales desk will tell you about.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
12 of 44 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 32 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2019 — which has passed with no OC on file.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
1 K-RERA order on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (32 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMRITHA GOWRI vs HOSKOTE NEO HOMES LIMITED | Refund of amount and compensation | AUTHORITY | 31/05/2023 |
| MR AMARJEET KUMAR & ANOTHER vs M/S.HOSKOTE NEO HOMES | 1) Termination of agreements and booking cancellation. 2) Full refund of Principal amount with accrued Interest. 3) Compensation for Paid Pre-EMI & EMI and other charges. | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2024 |
| WALTER PRADIP FERNANDES vs M/S.HOSKOTE NEO HOMES | (i) Complete refund of Rs. 23,72,813.50 along with interest calculated at MCLR + 2%. (ii) Reimbursement of Legal Expenses of Rs. 25,000/-. | AUTHORITY | 29/05/2025 |
| AJAY KUMAR KASLIIWAL vs M/S.HOSKOTE NEO HOMES | Complete refund of Rs.2,22,276/- (Paid at the time of booking) and Loan Amount of Rs. 1930,000/- totalling to an amount of Rs. 21,52,276/- along with interest calculated at MCLR + 2% from the date of | AUTHORITY | 29/05/2025 |
| KINSHUK GOEL vs M/S.KINSHUK GOEL | Complete refund of Rs. 21,52,037/- along with interest calculated at MCLR + 2% from the date of each payment. (ii) Reimbursement of Legal Expenses of Rs. 55,000/-. | AUTHORITY | 29/05/2025 |
| ASHISH SINGHAL vs M/S.HOSKOTE NEO HOMES | Complete refund of Rs. 21,52,762/- along with interest calculated at MCLR + 2% from the date of each payment. (ii) Reimbursement of Legal Expenses of Rs. 55,000/-. | AUTHORITY | 29/05/2025 |
| KUNAL WALIA vs M/S.HOSKOTE NEO HOMES | Complete refund of Rs. 24,90,159/- along with interest calculated at MCLR + 2% from the date of each payment. (ii) Reimbursement of Legal Expenses of Rs. 55,000/-. | AUTHORITY | 29/05/2025 |
| Pooja Khater vs M/S.HOSKOTE NEO HOMES | 1) Refund of entire amount of Rs. 17,67,800/- paid to Respondent along with interest as per RERA rules 2) Direct the Respondent to pay Rs50,000/- as legal expenses towards this Complaint | AUTHORITY | 29/05/2025 |
| Sundaresh MS vs HOSKOTE NEO HOMES | Full Refund of the amount paid to the builder with interest | AUTHORITY | 28/05/2025 |
| MR.GAJENDRA KUMAR AND ANOTHER vs M/S.HOSKOTE NEO HOMES LIMITED | Complainant prays for the refund of an amount of Rs.54,06,276/- (Rupees Fifty-Four Lakh Six thousand Two Hundred Seventy Six Only) paid towards the units and Rs.10,29,675 /- paid towards the pre EMI | AUTHORITY | 26/12/2023 |
| MR.VIVEK KUMAR AND ANOTHER vs M/S.HOSKOTE NEO HOMES LIMITED | Complainant prays for the refund of an amount of Rs 29,28,645/- paid along with interest @10% simple interest from the date of agreement plus an Amount of Rs. 3,60,000/- (Assured Rentals @15000/- P.m. | AUTHORITY | 26/12/2023 |
| Amit Kanodia vs EMPRASA STARTUP CITY RESIDENTIAL | Interest from 1st Jan 2019 untill possession of flat as per specified rate in RERA | AUTHORITY | 26/05/2025 |
| Joseph Sijo vs Emprasa Startup City-Residential | As they breached the trust of the customer, I don’t want to continue with the project. I want to get full reimbursement of the money which I paid along with interest. | AUTHORITY | 22/06/2023 |
| ANIMESH TIWARI AND ANUBHA TIWARI vs HOSKOTE NEO HOMES LTD | Payment of full interest till physically possession done means till date of final decisison of RERA | AUTHORITY | 22/01/2025 |
| Babu Perumsalsamy Kannuraj vs Emprasa Startup City - Residential | As they breached the trust of the customer, I don’t want to continue with the project. I want to get full reimbursement of the money which I paid along with interest. | AUTHORITY | 21/12/2022 |
| Hasanand Dayal Motiramani vs M/S.HOSKOTE NEO HOMES | Intervention from RERA is expected for the justice of investment made by senior citizens in the project. An immediate action is requested in this particular complaint. | AUTHORITY | 16/04/2025 |
| SRIPANA GHOSE & ANOTHER vs M/S HOSKOTE NEO HOMES LIMITED | To refund the amount of Rs.18,29,532.00 along with interest of 24% p.a from February, 2017 and cancel the Agreement to Sell and a Construction Agreement dated 09.02.2017 | AUTHORITY | 15/12/2023 |
| SIRSIMTH MEER ASHRAF ALI vs VARINDER KAUR | Refund of Rs 4,43,080/- | AUTHORITY | 14/03/2023 |
| Dhruba Bhowmik vs EMPRASA STARTUP CITY | Complete refund of Rs. 30,90,019/- (Booking Amount:- 2,50,000/- + Loan Disbursement: - 19,46,922/- + Pre-Emi:- 8,93,097/-) along with interest calculated at MCLR + 2%. | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| Prasoon Kumar vs Emprasa Startup City Residential | Cancellation of Allocation and Sale and Construction Agreement; Refund of money's paid (own contribution & PEMI) & interest; Closure of loan account and refund of disbursed loan amount; compensation | AUTHORITY | 10/07/2024 |
| KAUSHAL PARIKH vs EMPRASA STARTUP CITY RESIDENTIAL | To get back my PRE EMI amount along with the interest | AUTHORITY | 09/12/2024 |
| RAJANIMURTHY vs HOSKOTE NEO HOMES | Handing over of the apartment, to be paid all preEMI amount by builder and 2 years rental amount | AUTHORITY | 09/02/2026 |
| ZAKIA PARVEEN ZAIDI vs HOSKOTE NEO HOMES LIMITED | Refund of booking amount along with interest | AUTHORITY | 08/12/2022 |
| BINDHYACHAL SINGH vs Emprasa Startup City | 1. STOPPAGE OF FURTHER DEDUCTION OF PEMI AND REFUND OF DEDUCTED PEMI WHAT SO EVER AND COMPENSATION OF DELAY DELIEVRY OF FLATTILL DATE WITH INTEREST | AUTHORITY | 07/04/2025 |
| Deepak Motiramani vs HOSKOTE NEO HOMES LTD | Refund with delay period interest as per memo of calculation prescribed by Karnataka RERA | AUTHORITY | 06/07/2026 |
| MOHMMED IRFAN MHAMMED IQBAL vs M/S.HOSKOTE NEO HOMES | Refund of Principal paid along with interest and other cost as decided by RERA | AUTHORITY | 06/02/2025 |
| Deepak Motiramani vs HOSKOTE NEW HOMES LIMITED | Refund of Pre-EMI amount ,NBFC loan disbursed, promised 2 year rental and compensation | AUTHORITY | 04/07/2023 |
| NIZAR MOHAMMED KELOTHUM KANDY vs HOSKOTE NEO HOMES LIMITED | REFUND PAYMENT OF RS 18,70,000 | AUTHORITY | 04/07/2023 |
| VIKRAMADITYA GOYAL vs HOSKOTE NEO HOMES LIMITED | Full Refund of Pre-Emi, Loan EMI and Insurance Amount paid thru NBFC and Property Registration | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2023 |
| THIYAGARAJAN S vs M/S.HOSKOTE NEO HOMES | I am expecting a quick resolution for this never ending problem since 2019. Kindly request RERA should arrange a refund from the non performing promotor. | AUTHORITY | 02/08/2025 |
| VINAY SINGH vs EMPRASA STARTUP CITY-RESIDENTIAL | I WANT MY MY MONEY BACK AND CANCAL MY BOOKING | AUTHORITY | 02/02/2023 |
| HERLEEN VENUGOPAL vs HOSKOTE NEO HOMES LIMITED | 1) Refund of entire amount paid to respondent along with interest as per RERA rules 2) Legal expenses amounting to Rs 50000 | AUTHORITY | 01/07/2026 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
K-RERA names 2 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Ravi Kumar.G | - | 2012 | Marathahalli, Bengaluru |
| Contractor | M/s. Bhandari Construction and Developers Pvt Ltd. | - | 2009 | Kodihalli, Bengaluru |
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹15.7 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
K-RERA has 9 project-photo uploads.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
The nearest major job hub is ~18 km away — a real but liveable commute to the nearest job hub — factor peak-hour traffic.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 14 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 18 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 22 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 24 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 27 km |
| Electronic City | 34 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
The approved drawings
Everything above is on this page already, free, from the government record. The drawings are different: the 5 approved sheets are the same drawings the builder filed to get Emprasa Startup City - Residential approved — what sits under each tower, which floor holds machines, what the sales sheet leaves out. Nobody reads them for you. We do.
What that turns up — from other projects’ filings:
ATS Knightsbridge · Sector 124, Noida
You pay for 10,000 sq ft. The floor inside your home is 6,982 sq ft. The rest is walls, shared circulation and services. Get both numbers written into your agreement before you pay any booking amount.
Oberoi Elysian · Goregaon East, Mumbai
“The building is complete.” The tower has reached full height — true. The same filed certificate, same page: sanitary fittings 6% done. Ask for a possession date in writing.
Godrej Aristocrat · Sector 49, Gurugram
Paying extra for the top floor? The terrace drawing shows what sits on the slab above those flats: the overhead water tanks, the lift machine rooms and the roof machinery. Ask which flat sits under which.
Prestige Camden Gardens · Thanisandra, Bengaluru
The approved parking table asks for 12 visitor spaces. It shows 0. Two-wheeler spaces: also 0. Ask in writing where visitors will park.
Want this project read from its filed drawings?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. For Emprasa Startup City - Residential, one reading of it goes further. Which flat should I ask for? — what the approved drawings and filed papers say about the flats, the parking, the approvals, and what to get in writing before you sign. That is the Drawings Report. See a real one first:
Drawings Report sample: Prestige Camden Gardens → · browse all sample reports →
Payment is confirmed automatically. The Drawings Report is 1 working day. We email the link, so you can close the tab.
Drawings Report · ₹4,999
Every drawing on file, read — which flat to ask for · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Paying from outside India? Pay $59 (Drawings Report) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes, and send the 14-point booking checklist with the first email.
Built by Hoskote Neo.
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Emprasa Startup City - Residential?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 10 Sep 2026