K.r.k Aayush
K-RERA · the public record
UDBHAV CHINMAYA
· UDBHAV DEVELOPERS
Is this the right project?
Which unit should you choose?
Read the free RERA facts below. For help choosing a unit or comparing a price, select a report.
See the report before you buy
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best units.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗From another project
See the report before you buy.
A published sample shows the level of detail, source illustrations and buyer reasoning. Its findings belong to that project.
Read a sample report ↗15%construction reportedQ4 2025 filing
33units not bookedof 40 · Q4 2025 filing
0registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 16 Jul 2026
Free project details
Registration read 16 Jul 2026Construction progress and dates
Promoter-reported construction
5%
Q3 2025
15%
Q4 2025
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q4 2025
declared completion
Not recorded
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 16 Jul 2026
Registered units and project size
3 BHK
5
3 BHK
5
3 BHK
5
4 BHK
5
3 BHK
5
3 BHK
5
3 BHK
5
3 BHK
5
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 16 Jul 2026
The whole registration
0.6registered acres
0.0registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for UDBHAV CHINMAYA
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1257/334/PR/311225/008371
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Land area2,478 sq m (0.6 acres)
Tower/wing entries1
Unit mix35 × 3 BHK, 5 × 4 BHK
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Official carpet area | 4,686 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Official built-up area | 7,904 sqm | Useful scale context when comparing density and project cost. |
| Registered land area | 2,478 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.66 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 64 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Covered-parking field | 64 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Approved plan number | Plan | Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder. |
| Plan approval date | 15-10-2025 | |
| Project start date | 01-12-2025 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 BHK | 5 | 12% | 604 sqm |
| 3 BHK | 5 | 12% | 561 sqm |
| 3 BHK | 5 | 12% | 541 sqm |
| 4 BHK | 5 | 12% | 708 sqm |
| 3 BHK | 5 | 12% | 579 sqm |
| 3 BHK | 5 | 12% | 592 sqm |
| 3 BHK | 5 | 12% | 555 sqm |
| 3 BHK | 5 | 12% | 546 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UDBHAV CHINMAYA | 5 | 40 | 64 | 17.9 m |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingThe promoter answered No to the land-litigation question. This is a filed declaration, not a court search.
All 5 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →
Statutory approval status
RERA filing3 of 3 applicable approvals are marked Approved in the filing. Check the linked documents for their scope and validity.
7 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water supply and sewage board | Approved | 17-11-2025 | Water Noc Self Attached.pdf |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | Approved | 17-11-2025 | Mescom Noc Self Attached.pdf |
| Labour and Education Department | Approved | 05-11-2025 | Labour Certificate.pdf |
Builder track record
RERA filingUdbhav Developers has 4 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records. 0 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2025-Q4): ₹2.30 Cr collected from buyers, ₹1.29 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.
| Construction progress | 5% → 15% (+10 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 7/40 (18%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹2.30 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹1.29 Cr (0.56x collections) |
- Construction progress moved from 5% to 15% across the filed QPR window.
- The builder has drawn 0.56x of buyer collections from escrow (about 56% of the ₹2 Cr collected) — money is largely staying in the regulated escrow account rather than being pulled out ahead of spend, which is the safer direction. A ratio near or above 1.0 would be the one to scrutinise.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
The estimated cost above is the developer's declared construction cost only (K-RERA's own label: "Estimated Cost of Construction as certified by Engineer") — it excludes land cost, so it isn't comparable to the buyer-collection figures below or to a sale price.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Branch : IFSC Code : Pin Code : IFSC Code : Pin Code :. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 2 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 2 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 6 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 12 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 14 km |
| Electronic City | 21 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 21 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.