Amann Highland Park
MahaRERA · the public record
MAULI PRIDE
KURAR VILLAGE · MAULI SAI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a unit? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your unit, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
61units filed as unsoldInventory · 18 October 2026
08 Jul 2027declared completionMahaRERA registration · read 18 Jul 2026
496registered unitsMahaRERA registration · read 18 Jul 2026
See the report before you buy
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best units.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗From another project
See the report before you buy.
A published sample shows the level of detail, source illustrations and buyer reasoning. Its findings belong to that project.
Read a sample report ↗Free project details
Registration read 18 Jul 2026RERA details for MAULI PRIDE
MahaRERA · P51800001199
Delivery and registration
When is the project declared for completion?
MAULI PRIDE is registered with MahaRERA as P51800001199 and the promoter has declared completion for 08 Jul 2027.
08 Jul 2027
declared completion
9months to go
against the declared date
The completion date and status as they stand on the MahaRERA registration record.
Source · MahaRERA project registration · read 18 Jul 2026
| MahaRERA registration | P51800001199 |
| Registered on | 27 Jul 2017 |
| Promoter-declared completion | 08 Jul 2027 |
| Current status | Certificate Signed |
| Against today | 9 months to the declared date |
Promoter record
What else is this promoter on record for?
MAULI SAI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD is the promoter of record on 4 projects registered with MahaRERA.
4projects
registered with MahaRERA
Counted across Quietlist's full MahaRERA register store, matched on the promoter name as it appears on each filing.
Source · MahaRERA register, all projects · read 18 Jul 2026
Sales
How many are filed as sold or booked?
In MAULI PRIDE, 76 of 137 units filed with MahaRERA are recorded as sold or booked, about 55%, and 61 are filed as unsold.
55%sold or booked
76 of 137 units
₹44.85 Cr
committed by buyers
Counts and agreement value as the promoter filed them at the last compliance date; this is the filed inventory, not current availability. Of that agreement value, ₹42.33 Cr (about 94%) is recorded as collected and ₹2.51 Cr as receivable. The registration lists 496 units; this inventory lists 137. These are separate filed records. Their counts do not match; neither count establishes today's availability.
Source · MahaRERA sold/unsold inventory filing · read 18 Jul 2026
Filed agreement values: across 76 sold or booked entries with usable filed values and areas, the effective carpet rate is ₹14,032/sqft, with eight in ten falling between ₹11,213 and ₹20,413 — computed from the agreement values and carpet areas the promoter filed, not broker quotes.
The inventory filing also declares: 358 reserved and 1 not for sale.
What the filings record, unit by unit
Read from MahaRERA on 18 October 2026
This unit list contains 496 entries; the separate sales summary contains 137. The lists can differ in status coverage and filing date. Use the source date shown with each.
MahaRERA publishes, unit by unit, what this promoter filed: which units are sold and which are not, the RERA carpet area of each, and for sold or booked entries the filed agreement value — the consideration filed for that specific unit. On this project 76 units carry one, and 61 of the 496 are recorded unsold.
Here is one unit filed as unsold, beside the amounts filed for comparable units:
| Unit | Carpet | Filed comparison | Based on |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHOP NO.05 | 401 sqft | Rs 14,896 a sq ft typical, over Rs 10,427 to Rs 22,907 | 41 filed · nearby areas in the project (within 8%) |
A filed consideration is the amount the promoter reported for one unit. It is not a valuation, and MahaRERA does not publish the date of any of these agreements — read a range as a spread, not as a trend. An unsold row means no sale had been filed for it when we looked, which is a filing state, not a promise that the unit is available to you today. One of the two observations is an archived copy whose time is the moment the file was written, not a portal fetch time.
In MAULI PRIDE, 57 of the 61 unsold units have filed sales to compare with. The Sales Report gives each of them its own row — the filed agreements behind its comparison listed in full, the government reckoner value the promoter filed against it, and mortgage status where the filing supplies it. Missing mortgage information is not confirmation that a unit is free of a mortgage. Built from the filing itself, sent by email.
Buildings & Wings
The buildings and wings registered under this project, with each tower's sanctioned height and declared completion date. Here the tallest tower rises to G+25 and 496 units are registered across the project.
| Building | Wings | Floors | Units | Declared completion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRIDE BUILDING NO 3 | 1 | G+23 | 236 | - |
| PRIDE BUILDING NO 2ABC | 1 | G+25 | 107 | - |
| PRIDE BUILDING NO 1A | 1 | G+23 | 153 | - |
Unit mix on the filing: 480 residential and 16 non-residential.
Legal and disputes
What disputes are disclosed?
1 complaint is on the MahaRERA record for MAULI PRIDE, with orders passed in 1 of them.
1complaint
1with an order
Counts as disclosed in the project record.
Source · MahaRERA project disclosures · read 18 Jul 2026
| Complaint no. | Filed | Parties | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CC006000000197429 | 28/06/2021 | YOGESH JOSHI vs MAULI SAI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | order passed |
Legal & Litigation
The promoter has declared 6 court cases on this project to MahaRERA. Filed statuses: 1 “CLOSED” (filed description; status field empty); 1 “PENDING NEXT DATE GIVEN” (filed description; status field empty); 4 “Ongoing”. These are the promoter's filed statements, not a current court check. A disposed application or motion does not establish that the whole case is closed. Litigation can cloud the land title or stall the build — have a lawyer pull the cause list for each and confirm whether it touches the title to your unit. This is declared by the promoter; there may be further cases not on the RERA record.
| Court | Case no. | Year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| City Civil Court Dindoshi | 2109 | 2015 | Status not supplied Filed description: CLOSED |
| City Civil Court Dindoshi | 1211 | 2016 | Status not supplied Filed description: PENDING NEXT DATE GIVEN |
| Rera Appellate Tribunal | AT006000000154544 | 2023 | Ongoing Filed description: a) Being partly aggrieved by an Order dated 2nd June, 2023 passed ex-parte by Hon’ble Shri Mahesh Pathak, Hon’ble Member MahaRERA in the Compliant No. CC006000000197429 inter alia, directing the Appellant herein to execute the registered agreement for sale with the complainants as per allotment letter dated 7th December, 2016, within a period of 30 days from the date of this order, the appellant begs to prefer the present appeal. Hereto annexed and marked as "Exhibit A" is a copy of the said Impugned Order dated 2nd June, 2023. b) The Appellant states that the Appellant is the promoter/developer of registered project known as ‘Mauli Pride’ bearing MahaRERA registration no. p51800001199, (hereinafter referred to as “the said project”) located in Village Kurar, Borivali. c) The Appellant states that in the month of November, 2010, the Respondents showed interest in buying a flat in the said registered project. Pursuant to the same, on 15th November, 2010, the Respondents booked Flat No. 401 admeasuring 34.28 sq. mtrs (carpet) area in wing 2B of building ‘Mauli Pride’ (hereinafter referred to as “the said Flat”) for sell consideration of Rs. 42,63,000/- (Rupees Forty-two Lakhs Sixty-Three thousand only). The appellants crave leave to refer and rely upon the said booking form dated 15th November, 2010, as and when required. d) The Appellant states that as per the payments schedule decided between the parties, the Respondents were supposed to pay 30% of the flat cost to the Appellant, but the Respondents only paid a sum of Rs. 10 lakhs as booking amount as on 31st January, 2011. e) The appellant states that the respondent miserably failed to pay the sale consideration as per the payment schedule. The respondents did not pay any amount after 31st January, 2011 and showed no interest to register the agreement for sale. Therefore, on 7th December, 2016, the appellant had no option but to issue a demand notice to calling upon the respondents to pay Rs. 11,56,604/- (Rupees Eleven Lakhs Fifty-Six Thousand Six Hundred and Four only) as 4th slab of the said project was already complete. Hereto annexed and marked as the Exhibit - B is the copy of the Demand Notice dated 7th December, 2016. The demand notice was duly served and received by the Respondents. f) The appellant states that in the said demand notice, the respondents were further called upon to pay the said outstanding amount within 7 days from the receipt thereof, failing which the appellant will be forced to cancel the booking of the respondents. The appellant offered to refund the entire payment of the respondents with 8% simple interest. g) The appellant states that after receipt of the said notice, the respondents neither replied to the said notice nor paid the demanded amount to the Appellant. Thus, the Respondents consented to the cancellation of the booking of the said flat. h) The appellant states that the appellant was surprised to receive the legal notice dated 26th March, 2021, calling upon the Appellant to execute an agreement for sale towards the said flat and reminder notice dated 3rd May, 2021 after lapse of nearly 4 years and after having no steps pursuant demand notice dated 7th December, 2016. Hereto annexed and marked as Exhibit -C and D are the copies of the legal notice dated 26th March, 2021 and reminder notice dated 3rd May, 2021, respectively. i) The Appellant states that in reply to the said notices, the appellant vide a reply dated 18th May, 2021 denied all the contentions of the respondents and stated that the booking of the said flat has already been cancelled as the Respondents failed to take any measures after notice dated 7th December, 2016 and that the respondents have not taken any steps to take the refund from the appellant. j) The Appellant states that the respondents filed the complaint no. CC006000000197429 before the MahaRERA on 28th June, 2021, seeking directions from the Ld. Authorityto execute the agreement for sale under section 13 of RERA Act, 2016, without disclosing material facts and thus playing fraud upon the Ld. Authority. Hereto annexed and marked as the Exhibit - E is the copy of the said complaint. k) The appellant states that the appellant was unable to appear before the Ld. Authority as the person incharge/manager of handling and managing the MahaRERA portal and other formalities did not keep the management informed of the proceedings filed by the respondents against the appellant. The said employee subsequently left the appellant organization and did not handover the MahaRERA portal details to his successor. Therefore, on several occasions when the hearing was held the appellant was unable to attend the same due to the inadvertence on the part of the employee/manager of the appellant. l) The appellants states that due to the said inadvertence, on 2nd June, 2023, the Ld. Authoritypassed an impugned ex-parte order against the appellant. Hereto annexed and marked as the Exhibit – F is the copy of the impugned order dated 2nd June, 2023. Under the said order, the Ld. Authority rejected most of the claims and contentions of the respondents but partly allowed the complaint by ordering the appellant to register the agreement of sale with the respondents as per demand notice cum allotment letter dated 7th December, 2016 within a period of 30 (Thirty) days from the date of the impugned order. m) The appellant states that the appellant was informed of this order via an email dated 5th June, 2023 sent by the Hon’ble Tribunal. Hereto annexed and marked as the Exhibit – G is the print out of the Email dated 5th June, 2023. n) Being aggrieved by the impugned order passed by the Ld. Authority, the appellant begs to filed the present appeal on the following amongst other grounds which are without prejudice to each other: - 7. Reliefs sought: In view of the aforesaid facts, the appellant prays as under: - 8. That the papers and proceedings of complaint No. CC006000000197429 be called and after going into the legality and validity of the impugned order dated 2nd June, 2023, (Ex-_), the same be quashed and set aside. 9. Interim order, if prayed for: Pending final decision on the appeal, the Appellant seeks the following interim order:- That pending the hearing and final disposal of the Appeal, the operation and implementation of Order dated 2nd June, 2023 passed in complaint No. CC006000000197429, be stayed. |
| Rera Appellate Tribunal | AT006000000174640 | 2023 | Ongoing Filed description: Reliefs Sought: a. This Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal be pleased to order the Respondents that as the Respondents has failed to provide and perform within the reasonable time, then the Respondents shall pay compensation along with the interest for such delay till the handing over of possession along with OC. u/s. 18(1) of the Real Estate (Regulation and development) Act, 2016 and the Rule 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) rules, 2017 and Maharashtra regulations, 2017 till date. The interest calculated at being SBI highest Marginal lending rate plus 2%. rate b. This Hon'ble appellate Tribunal be pleased to order the Respondent to pay compensation for hardship faced by the appellants of Rs. 10,00,000 (Rupees Ten Lakhs Only)due to change in project plan and hence change in the position of the Appellants flat. c. This Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal be pleased to order the Respondent to pay Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) for legal expenses. d. This Hon'ble Appellate Tribunal shall pass the order with costs. |
| Bo,Bay High Court | 2765 | 2024 | Ongoing Filed description: (a) That the pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to declare that the without giving notice to all plaintiffs by the concerned B.M.C. / S.R.A./ State of Maharashtra/Builder and Developer and defendant No. 1,2 and 3,4, for demolition of structure as well as Road Widening / Road Cutting is illegal, null and void, bad in law as well as improper and the same is not allowed in any law as well as Plaintiff No.1 is Aadivasi and belonging to S.T./O.B.C. Community. Therefore there is Special protection by the Government. Therefore it is declared that at any condition without giving any alternate accommodation not to demolish or shifting any room premises from the suit premises without due process of law i.e. property bearing Survey No.391-A, Hissa No. A/1 pt. C. T. S. No. 391-A pt. of Village- Kurar Taluka-Borivali, Mumbai Suburban District of Municipal Ward P/North Saibaba Temple Road, Near Sai Swayam Hospital, Next to Navdurga Mitra Mandal, Kurar Village, Malad (East), Mumbai 400 097 (b) That the pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct that defendant No. 1,2 and 3,4, for the demolition of Plaintiff suit premises the concerned S.R.A. officer have no Right to demolition the all plaintiff suit premises as suit premises situated in private property and it is Adivasi land and all Plaintiffs rooms/property situated in Survey No.391-A, Hissa No. A/1 pt. C. T. S. No. 391-A pt. of Village- Kurar Taluka-Borivali, Mumbai Suburban District of Municipal Ward P/North Saibaba Temple Road, Near Sai Swayam Hospital, Next to Navdurga Mitra Mandal, Kurar Village, Malad (East), Mumbai 400 097 (c) That the pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit that the defendant No. 1,2 and 3,4, their officers, agents, servants, representatives and/or any other person or persons claiming through or under them be restrained by permanent order and injunction of this Hon'ble Court from taking forcible possession of suit premises or any part or any action without due process of law all Plaintiffs rooms/property situated in Survey No.391-A, Hissa No. A/1 pt. C. T. S. No. 391-A pt. of Village- Kurar Taluka-Borivali, Mumbai Suburban District of Municipal Ward P/North Saibaba Temple Road, Near Sai Swayam Hospital, Next to Navdurga Mitra Mandal, Kurar Village, Malad (East), Mumbai 400 097 (d) That the pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to appoint any fit and proper persons to act as a commissioner with direction to visit the suit premises and to submit his report about the actual and factual possession and position of the suit premises i.e. property bearing Survey No.391-A, Hissa No. A/1 pt. C. T. S. No. 391-A pt. of Village- Kurar Taluka-Borivali, Mumbai Suburban District of Municipal Ward P/North Saibaba Temple Road, Near Sai Swayam Hospital, Next to Navdurga Mitra Mandal, Kurar Village, Malad (East), Mumbai 400 097 (e) Pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit Interim and ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clauses a,b,c, (d) above be granted. (f) Cost of the suit be provided for (g) Such other and further reliefs as the nature and circumstances of the case may require be granted. |
| Bombay City Civil Court | 3456 | 2023 | Ongoing Filed description: (a) That the pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to declare that the without giving notice to all plaintiffs by the concerned B.M.C. / S.R.A./ State of Maharashtra/Builder and Developer and defendant No. 1,2 and 3,4, for demolition of structure as well as Road Widening / Road Cutting is illegal, null and void, bad in law as well as improper and the same is not allowed in any law as well as Plaintiff No.1 is Aadivasi and belonging to S.T./O.B.C. Community. Therefore there is Special protection by the Government. Therefore it is declared that at any condition without giving any alternate accommodation not to demolish or shifting any room premises from the suit premises without due process of law i.e. property bearing Survey No.391-A, Hissa No. A/1 pt. C. T. S. No. 391-A pt. of Village- Kurar Taluka-Borivali, Mumbai Suburban District of Municipal Ward P/North Saibaba Temple Road, Near Sai Swayam Hospital, Next to Navdurga Mitra Mandal, Kurar Village, Malad (East), Mumbai 400 097 (b) That the pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct that defendant No. 1,2 and 3,4, for the demolition of Plaintiff suit premises the concerned S.R.A. officer have no Right to demolition the all plaintiff suit premises as suit premises situated in private property and it is Adivasi land and all Plaintiffs rooms/property situated in Survey No.391-A, Hissa No. A/1 pt. C. T. S. No. 391-A pt. of Village- Kurar Taluka-Borivali, Mumbai Suburban District of Municipal Ward P/North Saibaba Temple Road, Near Sai Swayam Hospital, Next to Navdurga Mitra Mandal, Kurar Village, Malad (East), Mumbai 400 097 (c) That the pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit that the defendant No. 1,2 and 3,4, their officers, agents, servants, representatives and/or any other person or persons claiming through or under them be restrained by permanent order and injunction of this Hon'ble Court from taking forcible possession of suit premises or any part or any action without due process of law all Plaintiffs rooms/property situated in Survey No.391-A, Hissa No. A/1 pt. C. T. S. No. 391-A pt. of Village- Kurar Taluka-Borivali, Mumbai Suburban District of Municipal Ward P/North Saibaba Temple Road, Near Sai Swayam Hospital, Next to Navdurga Mitra Mandal, Kurar Village, Malad (East), Mumbai 400 097 (d) That the pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to appoint any fit and proper persons to act as a commissioner with direction to visit the suit premises and to submit his report about the actual and factual possession and position of the suit premises i.e. property bearing Survey No.391-A, Hissa No. A/1 pt. C. T. S. No. 391-A pt. of Village- Kurar Taluka-Borivali, Mumbai Suburban District of Municipal Ward P/North Saibaba Temple Road, Near Sai Swayam Hospital, Next to Navdurga Mitra Mandal, Kurar Village, Malad (East), Mumbai 400 097 (e) Pending the hearing and final disposal of the suit Interim and ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clauses a,b,c, (d) above be granted. (f) Cost of the suit be provided for (g) Such other and further reliefs as the nature and circumstances of the case may require be granted. |
Deadline Extensions
The MahaRERA completion deadline for this project has been formally extended 2 times, as recorded on the register.
| From | Extended to | Stated reason |
|---|---|---|
| as registered | 08 Jan 2024 | THE PROJECT HAS BEEN AMENDED FOR 3 BUILDINGS AS PER DCPR-2034 ON DATED 05.03.2021 BY WAY OF ADDING 1 MORE BUILDING AND EXTENSION IN EXISTING BUILDING NO. 3. AS PER OLD COMPLETION D |
| 08 Jan 2024 | 08 Jul 2027 | In alignment with the updated provisions and functionalities of the new RERA website and regulations, we have devised a strategje plan to leverage the option of deregistration and |
Location, Land & Connectivity
Located at KURAR VILLAGE, DAFTARY ROAD, Borivali, Mumbai Suburban, 400097. Per the filed land record, the plot is bounded to the north by 80 AND 90, to the south by 441, to the east by 278 and to the west by 391 AND 390. These are the boundaries as recorded in the filed land record.
Location & connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 6 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Andheri MIDC / SEEPZ | 6 km |
| Powai / Hiranandani business park | 9 km |
| Chhatrapati Shivaji Int'l Airport | 11 km |
| Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC) | 14 km |
| Lower Parel / Worli business district | 21 km |
| Nariman Point / Fort | 29 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.