Vinayaka
K-RERA · the public record
Century Indus Phase 2
Bengaluru South · Vinayaka Builders and Developers
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
31 Dec 2018declared completionK-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
196registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 26 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
The whole registration
5.9registered acres
33.4registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Century Indus Phase 2
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/170905/000135
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion31 December 2018
Land area23,747 sq m (5.9 acres)
Homes registered196
Tower/wing entries2
In context
Density33.4 homes per acre
Density in context10th percentile of 791 Bengaluru South projects (median 77.3)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 196 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 23,747 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 1.9934 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 2 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 224 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 1 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 30-10-2015 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 13 | 98 | 112 | - |
| B | 13 | 98 | 112 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 196 official flat/unit rows, matching the 196 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 138 | 63.2-134.5 sqm | 28.6-57.2 sqm | 156 |
| 2BHK | 58 | 66.0-96.5 sqm | 29.4-42.7 sqm | 68 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 98 | 66.0-134.5 sqm | 29.4-57.1 sqm | 112 |
| B | 98 | 63.2-129.2 sqm | 28.6-57.2 sqm | 112 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | A | 0 | 3BHK | 95.3 sqm | 41.9 sqm | 2 |
| 002 | A | 0 | 3BHK | 93.1 sqm | 41.5 sqm | 2 |
| 003 | A | 0 | 2BHK | 68.2 sqm | 30.9 sqm | 2 |
| 004 | A | 0 | 2BHK | 66.0 sqm | 29.4 sqm | 2 |
| 005 | A | 0 | 2BHK | 74.1 sqm | 35.0 sqm | 2 |
| 006 | A | 0 | 3BHK | 88.1 sqm | 39.3 sqm | 2 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 14 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2018, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 31 Dec 2019 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 15 Mar 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/220315/000135) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Fire NOCBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Pollution control (KSPCB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Environmental clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Airport Authority height clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
1 K-RERA order on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (16 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| APARNA K ADIGA vs M/S VINAYAKA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS | Delay compensation and such other reliefs as this Tribunal deems fit | AUTHORITY | 30/10/2023 |
| Babruvahan Saptasagar vs M/S VINAYAKA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS | (1) Payment of Compensation for delay in possession and obtaining OC (amounting to Rs. 16,34,334/-); (2) Payment of Compensation for non-adherence to promised project specifications | AUTHORITY | 30/10/2023 |
| Raghavendra Mruthyunjaya vs M/S VINAYAKA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS | (1) Payment of Compensation for delay in possession and obtaining OC (amounting to Rs. 23,80,815/-); (2) Payment of Compensation for non-adherence to promised project specifications | AUTHORITY | 30/10/2023 |
| Arun Hagaragi vs M/S VINAYAKA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS | (1) Payment of Compensation for delay in possession and obtaining OC (amounting to Rs. 6,64,436/-); (2) Payment of Compensation for non-adherence to promised project specifications | AUTHORITY | 30/10/2023 |
| Hosalli Ramachandra vs M/S VINAYAKA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS | (1) Payment of Compensation for delay in possession and obtaining OC (amounting to Rs. 16,84,337/-); (2) Payment of Compensation for nonadherence to promised project specifications | AUTHORITY | 30/10/2023 |
| Sudhindra Rao vs M/S VINAYAKA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS | (1) Payment of Compensation for delay in possession and obtaining OC (amounting to Rs. 17,95,833/-); (2) Payment of Compensation for nonadherence to promised project specifications | AUTHORITY | 30/10/2023 |
| Subharanjan Sahoo vs M/S VINAYAKA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS | (1) Payment of Compensation for delay in possession and obtaining OC (amounting to Rs. 7,86,297/-); (2) Payment of Compensation for non-adherence to promised project specifications | AUTHORITY | 30/10/2023 |
| SHUCHI GUPTA & MANGESH KUMAR PORWAL vs M/S VINAYAKA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS | Request to Honorable Authority to Direct the builder to pay Interest on delay period from 1-10-2017 to 28-3-2019 Rs. 733177 ( net of credit note of Rs. 31,327) | AUTHORITY | 22/08/2024 |
| Chetana Parameshwara & Parameshwara Vaijinathappa vs M/S VINAYAKA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS | (1) Payment of Compensation for delay in possession and obtaining OC (amounting to Rs. 8,58,710/-); (2) Payment of Compensation for nonadherence to promised project specifications | AUTHORITY | 14/12/2023 |
| Mala Prasad vs Vinayaka Builders & Developers | (1) Payment of Compensation for delay in possession and obtaining OC (amounting to Rs. 16,66,440/-); (2) Payment of Compensation for nonadherence to promised project specifications | AUTHORITY | 10/04/2024 |
| Rajashekhar Rajole vs Vinayaka Builders & Developers | (1) Payment of Compensation for delay in possession and obtaining OC (amounting to Rs. 9,76,890/-); (2) Payment of Compensation for nonadherence to promised project specifications | AUTHORITY | 10/04/2024 |
| Sudhamani M J vs Vinayaka Builders & Developers | (1) Payment of Compensation for delay in possession and obtaining OC (amounting to Rs. 8,77,774/-); (2) Payment of Compensation for nonadherence to promised project specifications | AUTHORITY | 10/04/2024 |
| Varun P V vs Vinayaka Builders & Developers | (1) Payment of Compensation for delay in possession and obtaining OC (amounting to Rs. 8,28,463/-); (2) Payment of Compensation for nonadherence to promised project specifications | AUTHORITY | 10/04/2024 |
| Venkatesha vs Vinayaka Builders & Developers | (1) Payment of Compensation for delay in possession and obtaining OC (amounting to Rs. 7,72,726/-); (2) Payment of Compensation for nonadherence to promised project specifications | AUTHORITY | 10/04/2024 |
| Omprakash M Ballary vs Vinayaka Builders & Developers | (1) Payment of Compensation for delay in possession and obtaining OC(amounting to Rs. 13,39,947/-); (2) Payment of Compensation for non-adherence to promised project specifications | AUTHORITY | 10/04/2024 |
| Yogeshwaran Dhandapani vs M/S VINAYAKA BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS | (1) Direction to execute Sale Deed in favour of Complainants, (2) Compensation for delay u/s 18 of RERA and (3) compensation u/s 14 of RERA for non-adherence of project specification | AUTHORITY | 02/11/2023 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (15 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/200813/0006281 13-08-2020 | Delay Compensation | Century Indus Phase 2 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/200827/0006436 27-08-2020 | Compensation for Delay and Execution of Conveyance Deed by the Promoter | Century Indus Phase 2 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/200828/0006452 28-08-2020 | Compensation for delay in possession and non-adherence of promoter to promised project specifications | Century Indus Phase 2 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/200907/0006530 07-09-2020 | Compensation for delay in possession and non-adherence of promoter to promised project specifications | Century Indus Phase 2 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/200907/0006531 07-09-2020 | Compensation for delay in possession and non-adherence of promoter to promised project specifications | Century Indus Phase 2 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/200909/0006545 09-09-2020 | Compensation for delay in possession and non-adherence of promoter to promised project specifications | Century Indus Phase 2 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/200909/0006544 09-09-2020 | Compensation for delay in possession and non-adherence of promoter to promised project specifications | Century Indus Phase 2 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/200909/0006549 09-09-2020 | Compensation for delay in possession and nonadherence of promoter to promised project specifications | Century Indus Phase 2 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹51.4 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC Richmond Road (IFSC HDFC0000523, a/c …7432). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 18 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 13 km |
| Electronic City | 18 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 19 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 19 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 27 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 38 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.