Aspire Calixia
K-RERA · the public record
JAL VAYU TOWERS
· AIR FORCE NAVAL HOUSING BOARD
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a unit? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your unit, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
See the report before you buy
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best units.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗From another project
See the report before you buy.
A published sample shows the level of detail, source illustrations and buyer reasoning. Its findings belong to that project.
Read a sample report ↗388registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 16 Jul 2026
Free project details
Registration read 16 Jul 2026Registered units and project size
B
144
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 16 Jul 2026
The whole registration
13.1registered acres
29.6registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for JAL VAYU TOWERS
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1268/378/PR/171214/001637
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Land area53,119 sq m (13.1 acres)
Homes registered388
Tower/wing entries12
Unit mix144 × B
In context
Density29.6 homes per acre
Density in context10th percentile of 4913 projects in this register (median 82)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 388 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 18,083 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 53,119 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 1.98 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 12 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 200 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 15-07-2015 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| B | 144 | 100% | 18,083 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLOCK1A (3.5BHK DUPLEX) | 12 | 24 | 10 | - |
| TOWER 1B (3.5 BHK DUPLEX) | 12 | 24 | 17 | - |
| BLOCK 1C (3.5 BHK DUPLEX) | 12 | 24 | 9 | - |
| BLOCK 1D (3.5 BHK DUPLEX) | 12 | 24 | 19 | - |
| BLOCK1E (3.5 BHK DUPLEX) | 12 | 24 | 9 | - |
| BLOCK 1F (3.5BHK DUPLEX) | 12 | 24 | 19 | - |
| BLOCK 2A (3.5BHK SIMPLEX) | 12 | 48 | 15 | - |
| BLOCK 2B (3.5BHK SIMPLEX) | 12 | 48 | 35 | - |
Showing first 8 of 12 tower/wing rows.
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 393 official flat/unit rows vs 388 registered units disclosed above; ask why the row count differs. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 BHK | 192 | 145.9-147.8 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 92 (100 with 0) |
| 3.5BHK | 96 | 147.8 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 57 (39 with 0) |
| 3BHK | 60 | 110.5 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 25 (35 with 0) |
| 2BHK | 40 | 74.2 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 15 (25 with 0) |
| OTHER | 5 | 0.0-800.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 11 (3 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLOCK 4 (3 BHK) | 60 | 110.5 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 25 (35 with 0) |
| BLOCK 2A (3.5BHK SIMPLEX) | 48 | 145.9 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 15 (33 with 0) |
| BLOCK 2B (3.5BHK SIMPLEX) | 48 | 145.9 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 35 (13 with 0) |
| BLOCK 2C (3.5BHK SIMPLEX) | 48 | 145.9 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 16 (32 with 0) |
| BLOCK 5 (2 BHK) | 40 | 74.2 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 15 (25 with 0) |
| BLOCK 1C (3.5 BHK DUPLEX) | 24 | 147.8 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 9 (15 with 0) |
| BLOCK 1D (3.5 BHK DUPLEX) | 24 | 147.8 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 19 (5 with 0) |
| BLOCK 1F (3.5BHK DUPLEX) | 24 | 147.8 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 19 (5 with 0) |
| BLOCK1A (3.5BHK DUPLEX) | 24 | 147.8 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 10 (14 with 0) |
| BLOCK1E (3.5 BHK DUPLEX) | 24 | 147.8 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 9 (15 with 0) |
| TOWER 1B (3.5 BHK DUPLEX) | 24 | 147.8 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 17 (7 with 0) |
| BLOCK 3 (CLUB HOUSE) | 5 | 0.0-800.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 11 (3 with 0) |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | BLOCK1A (3.5BHK DUPLEX) | 2 | 3.5BHK | 147.8 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 1 |
| 102 | BLOCK1A (3.5BHK DUPLEX) | 2 | 3.5BHK | 147.8 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 |
| 103 | BLOCK1A (3.5BHK DUPLEX) | 2 | 3.5BHK | 147.8 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 1 |
| 104 | BLOCK1A (3.5BHK DUPLEX) | 2 | 3.5BHK | 147.8 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 |
| 201 | BLOCK1A (3.5BHK DUPLEX) | 4 | 3.5BHK | 147.8 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 1 |
| 202 | BLOCK1A (3.5BHK DUPLEX) | 4 | 3.5BHK | 147.8 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 17 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Aug 2019, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 31 Aug 2020 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 20 Jun 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1268/378/PR/220620/001637) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Fire NOCBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Pollution control (KSPCB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Environmental clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Airport Authority height clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
K-RERA complaint orders (3 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lt CDR Arjun Subramanyam vs DIRECTOR GENERAL, AIR FORCE NAVAL HOUSING BOARD | Refund of amount paid Rs.27,00,000/-(Twenty Seven lakh only) with interest at 12% from date of my withdrawal from project i.e., 16-04-2018. | AUTHORITY | 06/12/2022 |
| DR. G SURESH BABU vs AIR FORCE NAVAL HOUSING BOARD | Refunds from AFNHB as prayed in the complaint. | AUTHORITY | 05/08/2022 |
| G BALASARSWATHI vs AIR FORCE NAVAL HOUSING BOARD | Refunds from AFNHB of Depolsit of Rs 22,31,600 plus interest 2 % more than SBI MCLR from 30-7-2018 to till to date of realisation plus compensation of Rs 25.0 lakhs plus legal expenses. | AUTHORITY | 05/08/2022 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (6 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190405/0002577 05-04-2019 | Refund of money as delivery date expired and other violations from the promoter's side | JAL VAYU TOWERS | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190416/0002587 16-04-2019 | Withdrawal and refund | JAL VAYU TOWERS | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190702/0003427 02-07-2019 | Project delays and non compliance of offer | JAL VAYU TOWERS | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/191219/0005023 19-12-2019 | withdraw from scheme and get refund | JAL VAYU TOWERS | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/201127/0007033 27-11-2020 | Request to order for Refund of deposited money with interest and compensation and legal expenses on withdrawal from the project on 30-7-2018.. | JAL VAYU TOWERS | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/201127/0007034 27-11-2020 | Request to order for Refunds of deposited money with interest and compensation and legal on withdrawl from the project on 30-07-2018. | JAL VAYU TOWERS | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Mr Ramesh | - | 2009 | Hitech City, Madhapur |
| Contractor | Mr Jangum Gopi | - | 2009 | VENKOTI BUILDING, AYYAPPA SOCIETY |
| Structural engineer | Mr GVB Nandeeswara Rao | - | - | - |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹44.1 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: ICICI Bank SIDDARTHANAGAR, MYSORE. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 6 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 6 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 6 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 8 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 11 km |
| Electronic City | 17 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 23 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.