K-RERA · the public record
MANYAM SKYPARK
Bengaluru North · Manyam Estates
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 26 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
The whole registration
2.0registered acres
63.5registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for MANYAM SKYPARK
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/180917/002011
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
In context
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 127 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 8,093 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.5 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 2 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 127 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 22 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 144 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 01-07-2017 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 1 | 10 | 78 | 78 | - |
| Tower 2 | 10 | 49 | 49 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 127 official flat/unit rows, matching the 127 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 BHK | 42 | 88.4-145.0 sqm | 320.5-530.0 sqm | 42 |
| 2 BHK | 21 | 87.5-121.1 sqm | 319.3-436.1 sqm | 21 |
| Studio 1 | 8 | 42.0 sqm | 151.8 sqm | 8 |
| Studio 2 | 8 | 53.2 sqm | 194.3 sqm | 8 |
| Studio 3 | 8 | 24.9 sqm | 88.6 sqm | 8 |
| Studio 4 | 8 | 25.6 sqm | 93.9 sqm | 8 |
| Studio 5 | 8 | 29.9 sqm | 107.4 sqm | 8 |
| Studio 6 | 8 | 44.8 sqm | 162.7 sqm | 8 |
| Studio 7 | 8 | 41.5 sqm | 148.4 sqm | 8 |
| OTHER | 5 | 171.2-199.3 sqm | 621.2-715.8 sqm | 5 |
| Not stated | 2 | 121.1-142.9 sqm | 436.1-520.3 sqm | 2 |
| 4 BHK | 1 | 224.1 sqm | 803.6 sqm | 1 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 1 | 78 | 24.9-142.9 sqm | 88.6-520.3 sqm | 78 |
| Tower 2 | 49 | 87.5-224.1 sqm | 319.3-803.6 sqm | 49 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Tower 1 | 0 | 3 BHK | 121.3 sqm | 445.2 sqm | 1 |
| 002 | Tower 1 | 0 | 2 BHK | 98.1 sqm | 355.0 sqm | 1 |
| 101 | Tower 1 | 1 | 3 BHK | 121.3 sqm | 445.2 sqm | 1 |
| 102 | Tower 1 | 1 | 2 BHK | 98.1 sqm | 355.0 sqm | 1 |
| 201 | Tower 1 | 2 | 3 BHK | 142.9 sqm | 520.3 sqm | 1 |
| 202 | Tower 1 | 2 | 2 BHK | 121.1 sqm | 436.1 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 21 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 01 Aug 2020, extended (Covid Extension) to 01 May 2021 — both dates have passed with no OC on file.
Approval documents
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA complaint orders (8 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subramanya Krishnamurthy vs MANYAM ESTATES PVT LTD | Get the status, get the refund with interest. | AUTHORITY | 28/11/2022 |
| Shohan Reaalty vs Manyam Estates Private Limited | The Complainants request the Authority to exercise its power under Sections 7 and 8 of the RERA Act to make alternative arrangements for the completion of the "Manyam Sky Park" project. | AUTHORITY | 28/07/2026 |
| Gowtham Govindaraju vs Manyam Estates Private Limited | Seeking RERA in order to get the construction completed and handing over the flat to me | AUTHORITY | 23/07/2026 |
| Boliestty Venkata Poornananda Babu vs Manyam Estates Private Limited | making the new builder to honor sale deed which is done and handover our flats | AUTHORITY | 23/07/2026 |
| MAHADEV B B vs Manyam Estates Private Limited | We are senior citizens ,invested our retired benefits amount to purchase of schedule property. we are requesting to give the Justice either refund of my amount invested or possession for the flat. | AUTHORITY | 23/07/2026 |
| Naddana Bapiraju vs Manyam Estates Private Limited | new developer roshan reaalty is not allowing me to occupy the flat which was booked by me earlier | AUTHORITY | 23/07/2026 |
| Naddana Bapiraju vs Manyam Estates Private Limited | Handover of possession with all amenities and interest on delay period. | AUTHORITY | 23/07/2026 |
| Surya Prakash Kanuru vs Manyam Estates Private Limited | Right of ownership and access to premises | AUTHORITY | 16/06/2026 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (3 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/220122/0008853 22-01-2022 | Builder absconding and not responding to telephone calls and mails | MANYAM SKYPARK | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/220730/0009828 30-07-2022 | Construction is delayed | MANYAM SKYPARK | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/221128/0010408 28-11-2022 | Cheating by Builder and double registration to new bldr by Finance company and new builder is not honoring the sale deed and not allowing into site. So, seeking justice | MANYAM SKYPARK | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹19.7 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Bank of Baroda AKKAYYAPALEM (IFSC BARB0AKKAYY, a/c …0033). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 10 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 3 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 10 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 12 km |
| Electronic City | 16 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 19 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 30 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.