K-RERA · the public record
Pinnacle
· Lotus Landmakrs (I)
Know the project.
Then choose your home.
The registration, progress and filed details in one place. Go further with an independent reading of the project’s evidence.
The record · free to read
Registration read 16 Jul 2026Progress & dates
The timeline on file.
Available record
No construction trend to plot.
The records used for this page do not supply a series of construction percentages. This does not establish whether possession has been given.
declared completion
Not recorded
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 16 Jul 2026
Inventory & scale
What this registration contains.
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 16 Jul 2026
The whole registration
0.9registered acres
164.2registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual home.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This illustrates the report format. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the sample report ↗
The source record
The details behind the headline.
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1249/447/PR/180111/000488
This project, on the record
The comparable facts of this project, from its own RERA registration record. Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
Official Registry Facts
Official project scale
RERA filingRegistration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 156 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 3,844 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.65 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 156 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 01-09-2013 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pinnacle | 12 | 156 | 156 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 156 official flat/unit rows, matching the 156 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 151 | 615.0-1,084.0 sqft | 200.0-398.0 sqft | 151 |
| 3BHK | 5 | 995.0-1,293.0 sqft | 417.0-491.0 sqft | 5 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pinnacle | 156 | 615.0-1,293.0 sqft | 200.0-491.0 sqft | 156 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AG1 | Pinnacle | 0 | 2BHK | 1,084.0 sqft | 336.0 sqft | 1 |
| AG2 | Pinnacle | 0 | 2BHK | 949.0 sqft | 307.0 sqft | 1 |
| AG3 | Pinnacle | 0 | 2BHK | 720.0 sqft | 230.0 sqft | 1 |
| AG4 | Pinnacle | 0 | 2BHK | 644.0 sqft | 206.0 sqft | 1 |
| AG5 | Pinnacle | 0 | 2BHK | 644.0 sqft | 206.0 sqft | 1 |
| AG6 | Pinnacle | 0 | 2BHK | 692.0 sqft | 221.0 sqft | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingNo litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
All 18 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2019 — which has passed with no OC on file.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
K-RERA complaint orders (16 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amitava Mukhopadhyay vs Landstar Homes | Direct the Respondents to refund all payments made by the Complainant, including EMIs, and repay the outstanding home loan associated with Account No.637109559, obtaining an NOC from HDFC. | AUTHORITY | 28/07/2025 |
| ANSHU KUMAR SINHA vs Pinncle | Entire refund along with interest and direction to the bank to close the loan amount | AUTHORITY | 21/01/2026 |
| Praveen Kumar Sinha vs Landstar Homes | Refund of Rs 13 lakhs and Rs 42,11,600 of bank loan of IDBI with all penalty interest charges and compensation of 1 crore | AUTHORITY | 17/12/2025 |
| Manju Manikya vs Landstar Homes | Cancel the booking of Unit in Question and refund earnest amount of Rs. 24,15,000 to complainant and loan amount of Rs. 35,22,000 directly to SBI along with future interest and penalties, if any. | AUTHORITY | 17/12/2025 |
| Mallikarjuna Reddy N vs Landstar Homes | We urge the builder to deliver the flats without any further delay and to provide delay period interest for such period | AUTHORITY | 15/06/2026 |
| Harshit Mohan vs Landstar Homes | Developer be directed to refund the earnest money paid by complainant and close the loan account | AUTHORITY | 05/04/2025 |
| HARSHIT MOHAN vs Landstar Homes | Developer be directed to refund the complainant and close the loan account | AUTHORITY | 05/04/2025 |
| Harshit Mohan vs Landstar Homes | Developer be directed to refund the complainant and close the loan account | AUTHORITY | 05/04/2025 |
| Praveen Kumar Sinha vs Landstar Homes | Refund of Rs 13 lakhs and Rs 42,57,332 of bank loan of SBI with all penalty interest charges and compensation of 1 crore | AUTHORITY | 05/04/2025 |
| Ramesh Babu Maguluri vs Landstar Homes | Developer be directed to refund the complainant and close the loan account | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2025 |
| Kuldeep Singh vs Landstar Homes | Order the respondents to refund entire amount along with interest paid by the complainant and directions to Respondents to repay the entire outstanding of Loan | AUTHORITY | 02/04/2025 |
| Mallikarjuna Reddy N vs Landstar Homes | We urge the builder to deliver the flats without any further delay and to provide delay period interest for such period | AUTHORITY | 02/02/2026 |
| UPENDRA PRASAD vs Landstar Homes | Developer be directed to refund the complainant and close the loan account | AUTHORITY | 01/04/2025 |
| UPENDRA PRASAD vs Landstar Homes | Developer be directed to refund the complainant and close the loan account | AUTHORITY | 01/04/2025 |
| KIRAN PADAMANNOOR vs Landstar Homes | Developer be directed to refund the complainant and close the loan account | AUTHORITY | 01/04/2025 |
| KIRAN PADAMANNOOR vs Landstar Homes | Developer be directed to refund the complainant and close the loan account | AUTHORITY | 01/04/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (2 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190211/0002094 11-02-2019 | Lotus RVP City Project is not developed and no refund provided | Lotus RVP City (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/210406/0007865 06-04-2021 | Amenities & NOCs not obtained | Zenith (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Archana Patil | - | 2009 | Pushparang Building, Hindwadi Belgaum |
| Contractor | Jaddu Mandal | - | 2010 | Belgaum, Belgaum |
| Structural engineer | vijay khilare | - | - | - |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹18.6 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: STATE BANK OF INDIA SME Belgaum. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest major job hub is ~13 km away — a real but liveable commute to the nearest job hub — factor peak-hour traffic.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 7 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 13 km |
| Electronic City | 13 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 14 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 20 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 34 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.