K-RERA · the public record
SRI VANI ORCHIDS
Bengaluru South · SRI VANISHELTERS
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
0.6registered acres
83.2registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for SRI VANI ORCHIDS
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/181010/002060
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
In context
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 52 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 3,787 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 2,530 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.25 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 2 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 52 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 23-01-2018 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apartments | 52 | 100% | 3,787 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower A | 3 | 28 | 28 | - |
| Tower B | 3 | 24 | 24 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 52 official flat/unit rows, matching the 52 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 40 | 656.0-759.0 sqft | 445.0-509.0 sqft | 40 |
| 3BHK | 12 | 916.0-1,033.0 sqft | 631.0-692.0 sqft | 12 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower A | 28 | 723.0-1,033.0 sqft | 477.0-692.0 sqft | 28 |
| Tower B | 24 | 656.0-755.0 sqft | 445.0-506.0 sqft | 24 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1-001 | Tower A | 0 | 3BHK | 916.0 sqft | 631.0 sqft | 1 |
| T1-002 | Tower A | 0 | 3BHK | 1,024.0 sqft | 647.0 sqft | 1 |
| T1-003 | Tower A | 0 | 2BHK | 731.0 sqft | 509.0 sqft | 1 |
| T1-004 | Tower A | 0 | 3BHK | 1,033.0 sqft | 692.0 sqft | 1 |
| T1-005 | Tower A | 0 | 2BHK | 759.0 sqft | 493.0 sqft | 1 |
| T1-006 | Tower A | 0 | 2BHK | 723.0 sqft | 477.0 sqft | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 17 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 01 Dec 2019, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 01 Jun 2021 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 22 Dec 2020 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/201222/002060) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
K-RERA complaint orders (29 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chaitra R vs SRI VANISHELTERS | a) Refund advance amount of Rs. 2,00,000 and EMI paid Rs. 5,32,680 with interest @12% b) direct builder to repay the remaining loan amount to the SBI c) Rs. 5,00,000 compensation for mental agony | AUTHORITY | 26/11/2025 |
| R Shivaraj vs SRI VANISHELTERS | The complainant seeks immediate refund of all the amounts paid to the builder & promoters with interest along with compensation & litigation costs and any other reliefs deemed fit by the authority. | AUTHORITY | 26/11/2025 |
| Ragamsetti Surekha vs SRI VANISHELTERS | Sir, We have paid money 85% of the sale amount in 2019 it self. 1. RERA Expired on 1- Sep 2021 Still project possession not done 2.Builder Threating to cancel Deal 3. Sale Deed pending 4. Need Possess | AUTHORITY | 25/04/2024 |
| Chandana Narayan vs SRI VANISHELTERS | Refund with Compensation for Rs 22,50,000 paid to Promoters and Closure of Home Loan taken for the flat purchase A307 | AUTHORITY | 25/04/2024 |
| P HIMABINDU vs SRI VANISHELTERS | Requesting to Authority for Refund the paid sale consideration with interest and penalty from respondents as per RERA Act | AUTHORITY | 25/04/2024 |
| Chandramohan T vs SRI VANISHELTERS | Refund of invested amount and compensation | AUTHORITY | 25/04/2024 |
| P Kavitha vs SRI VANISHELTERS | REFUND WITH COMPENSATION @18% AS MENTIONED IN SALE AGREEMENT (FOR RS 60 LAKHS PAID IN MAY 2016 AND AFTER. DUE TO DELAY IN COMPLETION OF ALLOTTED FLATS AND PROJECT. | AUTHORITY | 25/04/2024 |
| Sri Vani Orchids Welfare Association vs SRI VANISHELTERS | To handover the project completion to owners and association; cancel all the POA-GPA issued to developer; defunct the subsequent ATS holders. | AUTHORITY | 25/04/2024 |
| VINOTH KUMAR vs SRI VANISHELTERS | Requesting Hon Authority members to issue an order to proceed construction further by Owner / Association Team and conform 2nd Reg done on my Flat no 105 is not Valid or Req Refund | AUTHORITY | 25/04/2024 |
| VINOTH KUMAR vs SRI VANISHELTERS | Requesting Hon Authority members to issue an order to proceed construction further by other Owner / partner / Association Team to take the construction further step or Req Refund with interest | AUTHORITY | 25/04/2024 |
| Rajesh Kumar vs SRI VANISHELTERS | The Complainant prays for immediate possession of Flat No. B-23 with occupancy certificate, along with interest for the delay in possession. | AUTHORITY | 24/06/2026 |
| Sudhir vs SRI VANISHELTERS | a) Refund of the advance sale consideration of INR 5,50,000 and emi amount 3,50,000 with interest @15%PA, b) Refund of the loan disbursed from the LIC along with interest @15% and damages of 5,00,000 | AUTHORITY | 22/12/2025 |
| MUKESH N vs SRI VANISHELTERS | The Complainant seeks for Refund and Compensation. | AUTHORITY | 22/12/2025 |
| MUKESH N vs SRI VANISHELTERS | The Complainant seeks for Refund and Compensation. | AUTHORITY | 22/12/2025 |
| Sulochana vs SRI VANISHELTERS | Refund with Compensation of Rs 25,80,000/- (for Rs 16,00,000/- paid in Feb 2019, delay in Flat Completion & Legal fee) or Correct Flat Allocation with Compensation | AUTHORITY | 22/06/2026 |
| Chaitra R vs SRI VANISHELTERS | a) Refund advance amount of Rs. 2,00,000 and EMI paid Rs. 5,32,680 with interest @12% b) direct builder to repay the remaining loan amount to the SBI c) Rs. 5,00,000 as compensation | AUTHORITY | 20/11/2025 |
| S Smitha vs SRI VANI ORCHIDS | a) Refund advance amount of Rs. 3,50,000 and EMI paid Rs. 6,32,609/- with interest @12% b) direct builder to repay the remaining loan amount to the LIC c) Rs. 5,00,000 compensation | AUTHORITY | 18/06/2024 |
| Dhanraj M vs SRI VANI ORCHIDS | Return of amount and compensation also clearing the NPA (Non-Performing Asset) from Bank | AUTHORITY | 18/06/2024 |
| Harsha G vs SRI VANI ORCHIDS | Refund of advance amount Rs 2,00,000 paid to the builder and EMI paid Rs 1,91,653 with interest @ 12%.Requesting to refund Rs 27,25,000 to the housing loan having account no:160000716205. | AUTHORITY | 18/06/2024 |
| Rajesh Kanduri vs Sri VaniShelters | The complainant seeks immediate refund of total amounts paid with interest | AUTHORITY | 17/10/2025 |
| Nilesh Kumar Sinha vs SRI VANISHELTERS | completion of project, Possession and interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 12/12/2025 |
| Amit Kiran Dasgupta vs SRI VANISHELTERS | cancellation of flat and closure of bank loan and refund of earnest money of complainant | AUTHORITY | 04/09/2025 |
| Viswanadh Chowdari vs SRI VANISHELTERS | Refund with applicable compensation of Rs 27,00,00 for Flat A304 | AUTHORITY | 03/06/2026 |
| Sudhir vs SRI VANISHELTERS | a) Refund of the advance sale consideration of INR 5,50,000 and emi amount 3,50,000 with interest @15%PA, b) Refund of the loan disbursed from the LIC along with interest @15% and damages of 5,00,000 | AUTHORITY | 03/06/2026 |
| Durga Madhab Swain vs SRI VANISHELTERS | Refund of amount and compensation and need to resolve from NPA (Non-Performing Asset) from Bank | AUTHORITY | 03/06/2026 |
| Suresh Kumar Varada vs SRI VANISHELTERS | LOAN REPAYMENT FROM BUILDER | AUTHORITY | 03/06/2026 |
| Abhishek Johri vs SRI VANISHELTERS | Black list and refund of deposit and bank issue to be sorted | AUTHORITY | 03/06/2026 |
| INDLA RAMADEVI vs SRI VANISHELTERS | a) Refund advance amount of Rs. 8,00,000 and EMI paid with interest @12% b) direct builder to repay the remaining loan amount to the Canara Bank . | AUTHORITY | 03/06/2026 |
| ABHISHEK JOHRI vs SRI VANISHELTERS | Black list and refund of deposit and bank issue to be sorted | AUTHORITY | 03/06/2026 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (1 complaint listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/220530/0009549 30-05-2022 | Still Under Construction, Compensation, Builder Threating, Sale deed | SRI VANI ORCHIDS | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹15.4 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. J P Nagar (IFSC KVBL0001344, a/c …2962). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 9 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 9 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 14 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 15 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 22 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 23 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 41 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.