Bhuleshwar to Mulund West: compare the month before the completion year

Put Prestige Ocean Towers North and South beside each other on a homebuying shortlist. Write only “2030” against them and they appear to offer the same timing. Their individual MahaRERA project-detail records say something more useful: North carries a proposed completion date of 30 June 2030; South carries 31 December 2030. For a household planning a move in Bhuleshwar, that difference belongs near the top of the comparison.

Now look at Bellanza in Mulund West. Its selected phases have proposed completion dates in different years, but their separation is also six calendar months. A year filter makes these choices look less alike than they are. Buyers should give comparable timetable differences comparable attention, wherever December falls between them.

Quietlist Research’s comparison of the individual MahaRERA registration and project-detail records also finds a separate reason to read beyond the label: at Bhagwati Elysia in Panvel, phase numbering follows neither registration order nor a sequence of proposed completion dates.

These are comparisons of filed timetables within selected developments, not measures of construction progress, actual possession, availability or delivery reliability.

December changes the label, not the decision

Prestige Ocean Towers North and South name Prestige Projects Private Limited as promoter in their respective MahaRERA project-detail records. Their proposed completion dates are separated by 184 days.

Bellanza’s Phase 1, covering Wings A, B and C, and Phase 2, covering Wings D, E and F, name PRESTIGE MULUND REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED. Their individual MahaRERA project-detail records carry proposed completion dates of 31 December 2026 and 30 June 2027, separated by 181 days.

The practical similarity matters more than which pair has the larger day count. A family comparing Bellanza in Mulund West should consider the effect of that timing difference on its moving plans. A family comparing Ocean Towers should give its similar gap the same attention, even though both entries pass a “2030” filter.

A rental arrangement, a work move or a preferred school term belongs on the household’s side of this comparison. The filed date belongs on the project’s side. Keeping those separate allows the buyer to decide how well the stated timetable fits, without letting a search category decide for them.

Registration dates add another layer

The MahaRERA registration records show Ocean Towers North registered on 18 December 2023 and South on 11 June 2024. Registration therefore occurred 176 days apart, while the proposed completion dates are 184 days apart.

Measured from registration to proposed completion, the intervals are 2386 days for North and 2394 days for South. Their difference is 8 days. This is a useful distinction: the later proposed finish accompanies a later registration, while the lengths of the filed intervals are close.

Bellanza presents a different relationship. Its Phase 1 registration is dated 12 May 2022 and Phase 2 registration is dated 6 August 2022, according to their individual MahaRERA registration records. Those dates are 86 days apart. The registration-to-proposed-completion intervals are 1694 and 1789 days respectively, a difference of 95 days.

For buyers, these calculations answer a narrower question than “Which finishes sooner?” They describe how the stated timetable relates to the registration date. That can make a conversation with the sales team more precise: ask about the schedule attached to the offered phase, rather than assuming every phase was registered with an identical development period.

The household still plans from the proposed finish date. The registration history helps explain the paperwork behind that date.

Elysia’s numbering answers a different question

Bhagwati Elysia III and IV in Panvel both name BHAGWATI SIGNATURE LLP as promoter and carry a proposed completion date of 31 December 2029 in their individual MahaRERA project-detail records.

Their registration sequence runs against their numbering. MahaRERA’s registration record dates Elysia IV to 10 May 2024 and Elysia III to 16 May 2024. IV was registered 6 days earlier.

That gives the phase comparison a distinct purpose. A buyer cannot use “III” to establish an earlier registration or an earlier proposed finish. The names identify the projects; the dated records establish the sequence.

With the filed completion date matching, the useful next questions concern the offered apartment and its surroundings: carpet area, layout, position, included facilities and quoted price. Each can provide a reason to prefer a particular home. The phase numeral, by itself, supplies no timetable advantage here.

The records behind the comparison

The selection pairs registrations within each named development. The table keeps their promoters and dates together; the chart compares only the separation between proposed completion dates within each pair.

Source: the individual MahaRERA registration and project-detail records identified in the registration-number column. Date intervals in this article are calculated in SQL from these dates.

Keep the month in the decision

Build the shortlist around the offered property, its exact registered project, its filed promoter and its full proposed completion date. Then place the household’s preferred moving date alongside it. This makes timing a visible part of the purchase discussion rather than a detail recovered after choosing a phase.

At Ocean Towers, preserve North’s June date and South’s December date. Give that difference the same practical attention as Bellanza’s move across the year boundary. At Elysia, do not prefer III on numbering alone: choose on the apartment’s documented merits.