At The Formist Mandala in Hebbal Kempapura, reported construction rose from 29.0% to 34.0% between its Q4 2025 and Q1 2026 K-RERA progress filings. The reported sold count moved from 109 to 108. For someone buying a home, that combination deserves attention: work on the building and the sales record tell different parts of the story. A sensible purchase starts by reading them separately.
The proposed Hebbal short tunnel supplies the news backdrop. The Greater Bengaluru Authority received more than 1,500 objections to the proposed felling of 1,128 trees, according to The News Minute. The consultation puts the neighbourhood’s roads and landscape in focus. Inside its registered developments, however, buyers already have concrete construction histories to examine.
The strongest reason to look closely at Hebbal is the ability to distinguish buildings by their actual filings. Brigade Laguna reports fully completed construction in its named quarterly report. Mandala’s successive reports show work advancing. Each calls for a different conversation at the site office.
Start with the building you would buy
Brigade Laguna, registered to Brigade Enterprises as Residential/Group Housing, reports 100.0% construction in its Q3 2025 K-RERA quarterly progress report, submitted on 14 January 2026. That filing records 212 units sold up to registration against 212 units reported. Its K-RERA registration carries an end date of 31 December 2025.
The Formist Mandala reports 34.0% construction in its Q1 2026 K-RERA QPR, submitted on 15 July 2026. Its registration identifies Formist Realty as the promoter and Residential/Group Housing as the category. The registration end date is 31 March 2030.
Those records give the comparison substance. At Laguna, a visit can concentrate on the finished apartment, common areas and handover documentation. At Mandala, the useful discussion concerns the work completed, the next construction milestone and how payments fit the household’s finances.
The figures below come from each project’s K-RERA registration and the specified quarterly progress filing.
| Project and filed promoter | Registration number | QPR; submission date | Reported construction | Sold up to registration / filing units | Registration end date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brigade Laguna — Brigade Enterprises | PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/170322/004775 | Q3 2025; 14 January 2026 | 100.0% | 212 / 212 | 31 December 2025 |
| The Formist Mandala — Formist Realty | PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/260825/008037 | Q1 2026; 15 July 2026 | 34.0% | 108 / 245 | 31 March 2030 |
These dated filings describe reported construction and units sold up to registration, rather than current availability, possession readiness or present demand; the registration end date is separate from an apartment’s confirmed possession date.
The work advanced; the sold count barely moved
Mandala’s construction history is the richer finding. Its K-RERA QPRs report 21.0% construction in Q3 2025, 29.0% in Q4 2025 and 34.0% in Q1 2026. The respective submission dates are 19 February 2026, 30 May 2026 and 15 July 2026.
The Formist Mandala’s reported construction progress
percent
Source: The Formist Mandala’s K-RERA QPR filings, Q3 2025 through Q1 2026
Across those same filings, units reported as sold up to registration were 102, 109 and 108, against a constant filing total of 245. Construction therefore advanced while the reported sold count barely changed across the latest reporting periods. The latest sold share was 44.08%, calculated from Mandala’s Q1 2026 filing.
This matters because a buyer can otherwise let a sales conversation stand in for an assessment of the building. Here, the construction history supplies its own evidence of progress. The sales entries should be read on their stated basis, without assigning a reason to the movement between reports.
Bring both histories to the site discussion. Ask the builder to identify the work behind the construction percentage and explain what the sales entry covers. Then compare the apartment’s price, carpet area and payment terms with the household’s needs. A percentage becomes useful when it leads to a specific question about the home being considered.
A familiar project name can mean commercial space
The Hebbal project pages also lead to Shriram Hebbal 1. Its K-RERA registration identifies the promoter as Shriram Upscale Space and the project category as Commercial. Its registration end date is 19 January 2027.
The project’s Q3 2025, Q4 2025 and Q1 2026 K-RERA QPRs consistently report 100.0% construction. That history belongs in a discussion of commercial premises. Residential comparisons should retain the filed category alongside the construction figure.
Readers browsing the Shriram Properties builder page should carry the exact project name and filed promoter into their shortlist. The project-level record establishes what kind of property they are examining. This small step keeps a neighbourhood search focused on the space the household actually intends to buy.
Put the proposed road on your own route
BDA officials told The Hindu that preliminary works on the short tunnel had commenced. The transport assessment also deserves careful reading. In its reporting on a supportive study and IISc’s response, The Hindu described Professor Ashish Verma’s concern that different traffic measures were used across forecast scenarios, making comparisons difficult.
For a household, the practical question is the journey from the particular apartment to work, school and everyday destinations. Travel those routes at the hours you would normally use them. Treat a future improvement as an addition to a home that already suits your life.
Hebbal’s filings reward that approach. They show construction moving independently of the reported sold count, and commercial development alongside residential projects. Choose the apartment on its own merits, with its construction history and payment commitments clearly understood. The tunnel can remain part of the neighbourhood’s future without having to carry the purchase decision.