A. M. Residency
MahaRERA Property Intelligence · Rey Road · Mumbai City
P51900004243 · Rey Road · promoter Shree Naman Estate
The Drawings Report · ₹4,999
We read all 5 approved drawings and 42 filed papers on this project’s RERA file — the sheets the builder filed to get it approved.
6 of 6 homes still unsold in the latest filing · 3.5% of the project cost incurred.
One real find, from a Gurugram colony’s approved papers: 392.997 sq m already used of the 396 allowed — the promised extra room can never be built.
Get it for this project →Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked. Sent as a PDF in one working day.
Free before you decide: the 14 things to get in writing before you book
Every item comes from a real RERA filing. Send it to the family group before anyone pays a token.
Send the checklist to the family group Read it here →Delivery and registration
Harbour Heights is registered with MahaRERA as P51900004243 and the promoter has declared completion for 30 Dec 2026.
30 Dec 2026
declared completion
3months to go
against the declared date
The completion date and status as they stand on the MahaRERA registration record.
Source · MahaRERA project registration · read 12 Jul 2026
| MahaRERA registration | P51900004243 |
| Registered on | 09 Aug 2017 |
| Promoter-declared completion | 30 Dec 2026 |
| Current status | Certificate Signed |
| Against today | 3 months to the declared date |
Approvals and compliance
MahaRERA's defaulter and deregistration lists and the quarterly-progress filing for Harbour Heights record 36 quarterly progress reports since registration.
36quarterly filings
Entries as they appear on MahaRERA's own lists and the project's progress filing.
Source · MahaRERA defaulter, deregistration and QPR lists · read 12 Jul 2026
Construction
In Harbour Heights, ₹81 of a declared ₹2,345 estimated project cost is reported as incurred, about 3.5%, as at the last certified filing with MahaRERA.
3.5%
₹81
of ₹2,345 declared cost
Cost incurred as last certified to MahaRERA. It is a financial measure, not a survey of site work, and it can lag on-site reality between filings.
Source · MahaRERA quarterly progress filing · read 12 Jul 2026
Sales
In Harbour Heights, 0 of 6 homes filed with MahaRERA are recorded as sold or booked, about 0%, and 6 remain available.
0%sold
0 of 6 homes
Counts as the promoter filed them at the last compliance date; this is the filed inventory, not current availability.
Source · MahaRERA sold/unsold inventory filing · read 12 Jul 2026
The units recorded as unsold on the filing. The reckoner value is the government's ready-reckoner assessment the promoter filed against that unit, the figure stamp duty is charged on. It is not a price anyone paid, not an asking price, and not a valuation of the home.
| Floor | Unit | Carpet | Govt reckoner value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Floor 1 | 1 | 11 sqft (1 sqm) | - |
| Floor 1 | 1 | 11 sqft (1 sqm) | - |
| Floor 1 | 1 | 11 sqft (1 sqm) | - |
| Floor 1 | 1 | 11 sqft (1 sqm) | - |
| Floor 1 | 1 | 11 sqft (1 sqm) | - |
| Floor 1 | 1 | 11 sqft (1 sqm) | - |
No units are declared mortgaged, reserved, investor-held or not-for-sale in this inventory filing.
Sales
No registered sale-agreement price is recorded for Harbour Heights in the MahaRERA project file.
Not available
This is what the record does not contain, not a value of zero.
Source · MahaRERA project file · checked 12 Jul 2026
The buildings and wings registered under this project, with each tower's sanctioned height and declared completion date. Here the tallest tower rises to G+90 and 6 homes are registered across the project.
| Building | Wings | Floors | Homes | Declared completion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOWER 1 | 1 | G+90 | 1 | 31 Dec 2025 |
| TOWER 2 | 1 | G+90 | 1 | 31 Dec 2025 |
| TOWER 3 | 1 | G+90 | 1 | 31 Dec 2025 |
| TOWER 4 | 1 | G+90 | 1 | 31 Dec 2025 |
| RETAIL 1 | 1 | G+10 | 1 | - |
| RETAIL 2 | 1 | G+10 | 1 | - |
Unit mix on the filing: 4 residential and 2 non-residential (shops/offices).
Legal and disputes
25 complaints are on the MahaRERA record for Harbour Heights, with orders passed in 25 of them.
25complaints
25with an order
Counts as disclosed in the project record.
Source · MahaRERA project disclosures · read 12 Jul 2026
| Complaint no. | Filed | Parties | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CC006000000194604 | 20/10/2020 | Sumit Kajare vs Asif Shaikh | order passed |
| CC006000000197111 | 03/06/2021 | SUVEF MOHAMMED RAZA SHAIKH vs RADIUS SUMER DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000292346 | 24/08/2022 | MAKBUL HUSSAIN DHOLFAR vs Radius Sumer Developers Pvt Ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000292347 | 24/08/2022 | ZAKIR HUSSAINI GHOTAWALA vs Radius Sumer Developers Pvt Ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000292348 | 24/08/2022 | JUZAR HUSSAIN DHOLFAR vs Radius Sumer Developers Pvt. Ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000292349 | 24/08/2022 | AKBAR ALI USTAD vs Radius Sumer Developers Pvt. Ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000292350 | 24/08/2022 | HUSSAINI GHOTAWALA vs Radius Sumer Developers Pvt. Ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000408211 | 28/11/2023 | Munira Shabbir Patanwala vs Radius Sumer Developers Pvt. Ltd | order passed |
| CC12400265 | 29/09/2024 | Rajiv Kumar Patel vs RADIUS SUMER DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC12400236 | 26/09/2024 | Mahesh Parte vs RADIUS SUMER DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC12400243 | 26/09/2024 | Kailash SRINIVASAN Kudlur vs RADIUS SUMER DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC12400251 | 28/09/2024 | Kiran Deverla vs RADIUS SUMER DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC12400261 | 29/09/2024 | Commandur Parthasarthy Srinivasa vs RADIUS SUMER DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC12400262 | 29/09/2024 | Naresh Pai vs RADIUS SUMER DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC12400263 | 29/09/2024 | Ramanarasimham Gudimetla vs RADIUS SUMER DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC12400264 | 29/09/2024 | Pushkar Vishwambhar Deshmukh vs RADIUS SUMER DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC12400266 | 29/09/2024 | Venkatesh Srinivasan Srinivasan vs RADIUS SUMER DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC12400267 | 29/09/2024 | Venkata Mandapati vs RADIUS SUMER DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC12400268 | 29/09/2024 | Bhuvaneswaram Kesavan vs RADIUS SUMER DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC12400269 | 29/09/2024 | Rohith Shetty vs RADIUS SUMER DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC12400272 | 29/09/2024 | Srikanth Raghavan Srinivasan Iyengar vs RADIUS SUMER DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC12400273 | 29/09/2024 | Praveen Kumar vs RADIUS SUMER DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC12400274 | 29/09/2024 | Srikanth Kongara vs RADIUS SUMER DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC12400275 | 29/09/2024 | Ranganathan Rajagopalan vs RADIUS SUMER DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC12400276 | 29/09/2024 | Karan Panwar vs RADIUS SUMER DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
The promoter has declared 27 court cases on this project to MahaRERA. 19 are still pending. Litigation can cloud the land title or stall the build — have a lawyer pull the cause list for each and confirm whether it touches the title to your home. This is declared by the promoter; there may be further cases not on the RERA record.
| Court | Case no. | Year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small Causes Court | RAE Suit No 1738/2554 | 2006 | Pending |
| Maharashtra State Consumer Commission | CC No 68 | 2015 | Pending |
| Maharashtra State Consumer Commission | CC No 70 | 2015 | Pending |
| Maharashtra State Consumer Commission | CC No 74 | 2015 | Pending |
| Maharashtra State Consumer Commission | CC No 75 | 2015 | Closed |
| Maharashtra State Consumer Commission | CC No 78 | 2015 | Pending |
| Maharashtra State Consumer Commission | CC No 79 | 2015 | Pending |
| Maharashtra State Consumer Commission | CC No 80 | 2015 | Closed |
| Maharashtra State Consumer Commission | CC No 81 | 2015 | Pending |
| Maharashtra State Consumer Commission | CC No 83 | 2015 | Pending |
| Maharashtra State Consumer Commission | CC No 106 | 2015 | Pending |
| Maharashtra State Consumer Commission | CC No 107 | 2015 | Pending |
| Maharashtra State Consumer Commission | CC No 67 | 2015 | Pending |
| Maharashtra State Consumer Commission | CC No 69 | 2015 | Closed |
| Maharashtra State Consumer Commission | CC No 73 | 2015 | Pending |
| Maharashtra State Consumer Commission | CC No 76 | 2015 | Closed |
| Maharashtra State Consumer Commission | CC No 71 | 2015 | Pending |
| Maharashtra State Consumer Commission | CC No 77 | 2015 | Pending |
| Maharashtra State Consumer Commission | CC No 82 | 2015 | Pending |
| Maharashtra State Consumer Commission | CC No 173 | 2009 | Pending |
| Maharashtra State Consumer Commission | CC No 72 | 2015 | Closed |
| Bombay High Court | Lodging No 22481 | 2015 | Pending |
| Bombay High Court | 2638 | 2008 | Closed |
| Small Causes Court | 1034 | 2007 | Closed |
| Bombay High Court | 2970 | 2018 | Disposed Off |
| Bombay High Court | 1341 | 2018 | Pending |
| Bombay High Court | 2665 | 2018 | Pending |
Located at Rey Road, Matharpakhadi Road, Mumbai City, Mumbai City, 400010. Per the filed land record, the plot is bounded to the north by CTS-532, to the south by 18mtr matharpakhadi road, to the east by 27mtr wide barrister nath pai road and to the west by CTS nos 468 and 470 and 1-470. These are the boundaries as recorded in the filed land record.
The nearest major job hub is ~3 km away — walking/short-hop distance to a major employment hub — a genuine work-near-home location.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Lower Parel / Worli business district | 3 km |
| Nariman Point / Fort | 6 km |
| Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC) | 11 km |
| Chhatrapati Shivaji Int'l Airport | 13 km |
| Powai / Hiranandani business park | 17 km |
| Andheri MIDC / SEEPZ | 18 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
🔒 What I’d do as a buyer here · Drawings Report
The report opens with what this project really is — read from its approved drawings — then the specific calls: the cheapest good way to buy here, the home to say no to, what you can stop worrying about, and what to get in writing before you sign anything.
🔒 Which home to ask for · Drawings Report
The home-level read: which ones to prefer and which to avoid, what the drawings put around each, and the things on this site nobody at the sales desk will tell you about.
The approved drawings
Everything above is on this page already, free, from the government record. The drawings are different: the 5 approved sheets are the same drawings the builder filed to get Harbour Heights approved — what sits under each tower, which floor holds machines, what the sales sheet leaves out. Nobody reads them for you. We do.
What that turns up — from other projects’ filings:
ATS Knightsbridge · Sector 124, Noida
You pay for 10,000 sq ft. The floor inside your home is 6,982 sq ft. The rest is walls, shared circulation and services. Get both numbers written into your agreement before you pay any booking amount.
Oberoi Elysian · Goregaon East, Mumbai
“The building is complete.” The tower has reached full height — true. The same filed certificate, same page: sanitary fittings 6% done. Ask for a possession date in writing.
Godrej Aristocrat · Sector 49, Gurugram
Paying extra for the top floor? The terrace drawing shows what sits on the slab above those flats: the overhead water tanks, the lift machine rooms and the roof machinery. Ask which flat sits under which.
Prestige Camden Gardens · Thanisandra, Bengaluru
The approved parking table asks for 12 visitor spaces. It shows 0. Two-wheeler spaces: also 0. Ask in writing where visitors will park.
Want this project read from its filed drawings?
6 of the 6 homes are still unsold in the latest filing, so which one you take is a real choice. With 3.5% of the project cost incurred, there is no finished building to walk through — the approved drawings are the only place to see what you are buying. We read the 5 approved drawings on Harbour Heights’s file and tell you which homes we would ask for, what sits around them, and what to get in writing before you pay the token.
This page is the free MahaRERA filing summary. For Harbour Heights, one reading of it goes further. Which home should I ask for? — what the approved drawings and filed papers say about the homes, the parking, the approvals, and what to get in writing before you sign. That is the Drawings Report. See a real one first:
Drawings Report sample: Oberoi Elysian – Tower A → · browse all sample reports →
Payment is confirmed automatically. The Drawings Report is 1 working day. We email the link, so you can close the tab.
Drawings Report · ₹4,999
Every drawing on file, read — which home to ask for · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Paying from outside India? Pay $59 (Drawings Report) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes, and send the 14-point booking checklist with the first email.
Flags are from MahaRERA's own published problem lists — not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every flagged project on our Mumbai, Thane & the MMR RERA red-flag register.
Last checked against the RERA register: 10 Sep 2026