Anchor Sky D
MahaRERA · the public record
THREE ICC-B WING
Wadala · The Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Company Ltd
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a unit? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your unit, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
See the report before you buy
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best units.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗From another project
See the report before you buy.
A published sample shows the level of detail, source illustrations and buyer reasoning. Its findings belong to that project.
Read a sample report ↗76units filed as unsoldInventory · 17 October 2026
30 Nov 2032declared completionMahaRERA registration · read 18 Jul 2026
84registered unitsMahaRERA registration · read 18 Jul 2026
Free project details
Registration read 18 Jul 2026RERA details for THREE ICC-B WING
MahaRERA · PR1172022600316
Delivery and registration
When is the project declared for completion?
THREE ICC-B WING is registered with MahaRERA as PR1172022600316 and the promoter has declared completion for 30 Nov 2032.
30 Nov 2032
declared completion
73months to go
against the declared date
The completion date and status as they stand on the MahaRERA registration record.
Source · MahaRERA project registration · read 18 Jul 2026
| MahaRERA registration | PR1172022600316 |
| Registered on | 30 Apr 2026 |
| Promoter-declared completion | 30 Nov 2032 |
| Current status | Certificate Signed |
| Against today | 73 months to the declared date |
Promoter record
What else is this promoter on record for?
The Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Company Ltd is the promoter of record on 3 projects registered with MahaRERA.
3projects
registered with MahaRERA
Counted across Quietlist's full MahaRERA register store, matched on the promoter name as it appears on each filing.
Source · MahaRERA register, all projects · read 18 Jul 2026
Sales
How many are filed as sold or booked?
In THREE ICC-B WING, 0 of 84 units filed with MahaRERA are recorded as sold or booked, about 0%, and 84 are filed as unsold.
0%sold or booked
0 of 84 units
Counts as the promoter filed them at the last compliance date; this is the filed inventory, not current availability.
Source · MahaRERA sold/unsold inventory filing · read 18 Jul 2026
No units are declared mortgaged, reserved, investor-held or not-for-sale in this inventory filing.
What the filings record, unit by unit
Read from MahaRERA on 17 October 2026
MahaRERA publishes, unit by unit, what this promoter filed: which units are sold and which are not, the RERA carpet area of each, and for sold or booked entries the filed agreement value — the consideration filed for that specific unit. On this project 8 units carry one, and 76 of the 84 are recorded unsold. Since we started watching this ledger, 8 units have moved out of the unsold list, most recently on 17 October 2026.
Here is one unit filed as unsold, beside the amounts filed for comparable units:
| Unit | Carpet | Filed comparison | Based on |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1105 | 1,487 sqft | Rs 5.84 cr typical, over Rs 5.78 cr to Rs 5.94 cr | 5 filed · number pattern + area (within 2%), same building |
A filed consideration is the amount the promoter reported for one unit. It is not a valuation, and MahaRERA does not publish the date of any of these agreements — read a range as a spread, not as a trend. An unsold row means no sale had been filed for it when we looked, which is a filing state, not a promise that the unit is available to you today. One of the two observations is an archived copy whose time is the moment the file was written, not a portal fetch time.
In THREE ICC-B WING, 20 of the 76 unsold units have filed sales to compare with. The Sales Report gives each of them its own row — the filed agreements behind its comparison listed in full, the government reckoner value the promoter filed against it, and mortgage status where the filing supplies it. Missing mortgage information is not confirmation that a unit is free of a mortgage. Built from the filing itself, sent by email.
Buildings & Wings
The buildings and wings registered under this project, with each tower's sanctioned height and declared completion date. Here the tallest tower rises to G+23 and 84 units are registered across the project.
| Building | Wings | Floors | Units | Declared completion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bldg 7- THREE ICC-WING B | 1 | G+23 | 84 | - |
Unit mix on the filing: 83 residential and 1 non-residential.
Legal and disputes
What disputes are disclosed?
1 complaint is on the MahaRERA record for THREE ICC-B WING, with orders passed in 0 of them.
1complaint
0with an order
Counts as disclosed in the project record.
Source · MahaRERA project disclosures · read 18 Jul 2026
| Complaint no. | Filed | Parties | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| SM12600430 | 24/06/2026 | Bhakti Achrekar vs The Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Company Ltd | pending / no order on file |
Legal & Litigation
The promoter has declared 7 court cases on this project to MahaRERA. Filed statuses: 7 “Ongoing”. These are the promoter's filed statements, not a current court check. A disposed application or motion does not establish that the whole case is closed. Litigation can cloud the land title or stall the build — have a lawyer pull the cause list for each and confirm whether it touches the title to your unit. This is declared by the promoter; there may be further cases not on the RERA record.
| Court | Case no. | Year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ivth Labour Court, Mumbai | 90 | 2002 | Ongoing Filed description: To declare that the opponent Company has not classified me as a permanent worker from 1st January 1995, which is an illegal change on the part of the Company.To give directions to Opponent Company to classify him as a permanent worker from 1st January 1995 and pay all the consequential benefits accordingly. |
| Bombay High Court | 2175 | 2014 | Ongoing Filed description: To hold and declare that the Respondents have committed Unfair Labour Practice under items 6,9 and 10 of Schedule IV of the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971. To direct the Respondents to cease and desist from unfair labour practices.To direct the Respondents to give status, all benefits and privileges as Permanent employee with effect from 1.01.2006 |
| Bombay High Court | 2439 | 2014 | Ongoing Filed description: To hold and declare that the Respondents have committed Unfair Labour Practice under items 6,9 and 10 of Schedule IV of the MRTU and PULP Act, 1971. To direct the Respondents to cease and desist from unfair labour practices.To direct the Respondents to give status, all benefits and privileges as Permanent employee with effect from 1.01.2006 |
| Industrial Court, Mumbai | 26 | 2013 | Ongoing Filed description: Prayer in original Application: 1) To declare the change which was made from 23-09-02 by the company is illegal. 2) To direct the opponent to withdraw the illegal change and provide work to the badliworkers assuming that there were 105 posts in engineering department prior to agreement dated 28/7/2001. 3) To direct the opponents to pay wages for the days on which they were sent home without giving work. |
| Bombay High Court | 1273 | 2005 | Ongoing Filed description: To direct that the impugned order dated 25-11-04 passed by the Commissioner of labour thereby giving permission to close down the Spring Mills thereof, be quashed and set aside. |
| Bombay High Court | 2368 | 2013 | Ongoing Filed description: The petitioners argue that since both mills of Bombay Dyeing have shut down, Development Control Regulation (DCR) 58(1)(a) and (b) should apply, leading to a higher allocation of open land and Floor Space Index (FSI) for MHADA under DCR 58(1)(b). They seek court intervention to: restrain authorities from approving layout plans for the Naigaon (Spring Mill) and Lower Parel properties; cancel any prior sanctions granted under DCR 58; prohibit Bombay Dyeing from undertaking development until the case is decided; grant interim reliefs; and award costs along with any other appropriate relief. |
| Bombay High Court | 212 | 2016 | Ongoing Filed description: We may place it on record that some of the Apartment Purchasers numbering 11 viz: Bina Deepak Panchamia & Others Versus The Bombay Dyeing and manufacturing company limited & others for the following reliefs:- The suit is filed by Bina Panchamia & Ors against the Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd. claiming inter-alia cancellation of the Deed of Declaration; conveyance of suit property, injunction on any construction on the larger property and claiming compensation for defects in Springs building. |
Location, Land & Connectivity
Located at Wadala, G.D. AMBEKAR ROAD, Ward ABCD, Mumbai City, 400014. Per the filed land record, the plot is bounded to the north by Common Internal Road having Survey no. 223, to the south by MCGM Garden having Survey no.15/223, to the east by MCGM Garden having Survey no.15/223 and to the west by Land having survey no. 223 & 1/128. These are the boundaries as recorded in the filed land record.
Location & connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 2 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Lower Parel / Worli business district | 2 km |
| Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC) | 7 km |
| Chhatrapati Shivaji Int'l Airport | 9 km |
| Nariman Point / Fort | 10 km |
| Powai / Hiranandani business park | 13 km |
| Andheri MIDC / SEEPZ | 14 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.