Aratt Rolling Whites - Plots
K-RERA · the public record
ARATT ROLLING WHITES - ROW VILLAS
Anekal · ARATT ROLLING WHITES
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a villa? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your villa, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
See the report before you buy
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best villas.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗From another project · Sterling Villa Grande — Phase II · earlier comprehensive example
Two curved rows. Different lake-side choices.
A radial fronts the oval across the loop road; B radial faces the outer drive. The report compares all six villa types, from pool-equipped A to three-bedroom B and smaller C, with all 74 registered villa numbers. The March 2026 completion application’s three unsold homes are not identified; these are not live availability recommendations.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Sterling Villa Grande — Phase II sample report ↗
28 Jul 2019declared completionK-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
55registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 26 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
group housing villas
55
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
The whole registration
2.7registered acres
20.6registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for ARATT ROLLING WHITES - ROW VILLAS
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/171102/001879
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion28 July 2019
Land area10,817 sq m (2.7 acres)
Homes registered55
Tower/wing entries2
Unit mix55 × group housing villas
In context
Density20.6 homes per acre
Density in context13th percentile of 480 Anekal projects (median 75.6)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 55 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 7,088 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 10,817 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | ~0.66 | Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈7,157 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 10,817 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 2 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 55 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 55 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 29-07-2017 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| group housing villas | 55 | 100% | 7,088 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1 | 29 | 29 | - |
| B | 1 | 26 | 26 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 55 official flat/unit rows, matching the 55 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 55 | 103.2-107.2 sqm | 64.5-160.3 sqm | 55 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 29 | 103.2-107.2 sqm | 64.5-160.3 sqm | 29 |
| B | 26 | 104.5-107.2 sqm | 64.5-66.1 sqm | 26 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | A | 0 | 3BHK | 103.2 sqm | 160.3 sqm | 1 |
| A2 | A | 0 | 3BHK | 103.2 sqm | 160.3 sqm | 1 |
| A3 | A | 0 | 3BHK | 103.2 sqm | 160.3 sqm | 1 |
| A4 | A | 0 | 3BHK | 103.2 sqm | 160.3 sqm | 1 |
| A5 | A | 0 | 3BHK | 103.2 sqm | 160.3 sqm | 1 |
| A6 | A | 0 | 3BHK | 103.2 sqm | 160.3 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 15 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 28 Jul 2019 — which has passed with no OC on file.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Fire NOCBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Pollution control (KSPCB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Environmental clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Airport Authority height clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA complaint orders (8 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JOSHI RAJEN BHANUPRAKASH vs ARATT ROLLING WHITES | I would like to RERA to take strict action against the builder Aratt to help me get the small issues of the house fixed along with basic amenities and promised amenities to be fulfilled ASAP. | AUTHORITY | 09/12/2023 |
| SHALYA KANISHKA RATH vs ARATT ROLLING WHITES | Request Support from RERA for help getting relief in completing the agreed amenities, STP, Facilities, Maintenance till hard over is complete | AUTHORITY | 09/12/2023 |
| VISHNU V MENON vs ARATT ROLLING WHITES | All amenities to be completed with fixed timeline and monitoring. All maintenance to be borne by builder till amenities completion. Builder 1 year maintenance as billed | AUTHORITY | 09/12/2023 |
| RANBIR LUWANG THOUNAOJAM vs ARATT ROLLING WHITES | We want Aratt to complete the pending amenities and maintain the project till project completion. 1 year maintenance after the completion using our deposits to them.. | AUTHORITY | 09/12/2023 |
| MEGHNA MARY BABU vs ARATT ROLLING WHITES | 1. Amenities to be completed and timeline to be monitored 2. Project is delayed so builder shoulf compensate | AUTHORITY | 09/12/2023 |
| ABHISEKH MOHAPATRO vs ARATT ROLLING WHITES | All amenities to be completed within next 6 months. Maintenance to be borne by builder till proper handover of project | AUTHORITY | 09/12/2023 |
| JESSEL MENINO SAVIO REBELLO vs ARATT ROLLING WHITES | Builder should complete all promised amenities within defined timeline. maintenance to be borne by builder until all amenities are completed. Defects in villa should be rectified. | AUTHORITY | 09/12/2023 |
| ARATT ROLLING WHITES OWNERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION vs ARATT ROLLING WHITES | Request Support from RERA for completion to the agreed amenities, STP, Facilities by the promoter | AUTHORITY | 09/12/2023 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (8 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/220614/0009630 14-06-2022 | Project stalled and no maintenance work or promised amenities | ARATT ROLLING WHITES - ROW VILLAS | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220615/0009634 15-06-2022 | In complete and delayed project with no Basic Maintenance | ARATT ROLLING WHITES - ROW VILLAS | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220616/0009640 16-06-2022 | Pending Amenities of Aratt rolling whites. | ARATT ROLLING WHITES - ROW VILLAS | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220616/0009642 16-06-2022 | House condition is worst and Basic Amenities and facilities not provided like STP, clubhouse | ARATT ROLLING WHITES - ROW VILLAS | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220617/0009646 17-06-2022 | Aratt Rolling whites - Pending amenities and maintenance | ARATT ROLLING WHITES - ROW VILLAS | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220628/0009694 28-06-2022 | Project stalled & common amentities not completed even after 3 yrs | ARATT ROLLING WHITES - ROW VILLAS | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220908/0009988 08-09-2022 | Project Stalled with No proper maintenance and No Amenities | ARATT ROLLING WHITES - ROW VILLAS | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220913/0010008 13-09-2022 | Project abandoned by builder without amenities and villa internal work | ARATT ROLLING WHITES - PLOTS (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹28.0 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Axis Bank Victoria Layout Branch (IFSC UTIB0003411, a/c …2332). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 11 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 11 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 21 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 26 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 27 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 33 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 50 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.