Simhachalum
K-RERA · the public record
CITRUS AIRE
Anekal · GOWRI HEIGHTS
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
31 Aug 2020declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
198registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
198
198
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
1.6registered acres
124.5registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for CITRUS AIRE
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/180604/001864
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion31 August 2020
Land area6,436 sq m (1.6 acres)
Homes registered198
Tower/wing entries1
Unit mix198 × 198
In context
Density124.5 homes per acre
Density in context90th percentile of 480 Anekal projects (median 75.6)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 198 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 9,337 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 6,436 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 222 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 41 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 15-02-2018 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 198 | 198 | 100% | 9,337 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NA | 9 | 198 | 222 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 198 official flat/unit rows, matching the 198 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 198 | 51.3-54.5 sqm | 30.9-33.0 sqm | 198 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NA | 198 | 51.3-54.5 sqm | 30.9-33.0 sqm | 198 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1001 | NA | 1 | 2BHK | 54.5 sqm | 33.0 sqm | 1 |
| 1002 | NA | 1 | 2BHK | 52.0 sqm | 31.3 sqm | 1 |
| 1003 | NA | 1 | 2BHK | 53.6 sqm | 32.5 sqm | 1 |
| 1004 | NA | 1 | 2BHK | 51.3 sqm | 30.9 sqm | 1 |
| 1005 | NA | 1 | 2BHK | 52.0 sqm | 31.3 sqm | 1 |
| 1006 | NA | 1 | 2BHK | 54.5 sqm | 33.0 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 24 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Aug 2020, extended (Extension) to 10 Oct 2024 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 22 Jun 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/220622/001864) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Document listed: BESCOM
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Not identified in the document list
Fire NOCDocument listed: Fire Force Department
Pollution control (KSPCB)Document listed: KSPCB
Environmental clearanceNot identified in the document list
Airport Authority height clearanceDocument listed: Airport Authority of India
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
3 K-RERA orders on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION, PROJECT WITHDRAWL) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (2 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Akshatha Hegde vs GOWRI HEIGHTS PVT. LTD | Direct defaulting developers to refund booking amount (less 25% cancellation charges) with interest | AUTHORITY | 21/04/2022 |
| Amitava kumar saha & Poulami Saha vs Gowri Heights Private Limited | I'm looking for refund along with compensation | AUTHORITY | 07/01/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (2 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190910/0004164 10-09-2019 | Refund of Cancellation of booking amount paid | CITRUS AIRE | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/210531/0007970 31-05-2021 | Refund on Cancellation of Allotment | CITRUS AIRE | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Mahesh Meti | - | 2004 | Geddalahalli, Sanjaynagar |
| Contractor | Gowri Infra Engineers Pvt. Ltd | - | 2011 | Chandra Layout, Bangalore |
| Structural engineer | Base Engineering Services | - | - | - |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹11.9 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC Richmond Road, Bangalore. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 2 project-photo uploads.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 5 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 5 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 15 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 21 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 21 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 28 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 45 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.