The District
K-RERA · the public record
Commune
Anekal · Commune Properties India
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
31 Dec 2019declared completionK-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
384registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 26 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
1, 2 & 3 BHK
384
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
The whole registration
5.3registered acres
71.8registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Commune
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/171015/000813
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion31 December 2019
Land area21,650 sq m (5.3 acres)
Homes registered384
Tower/wing entries5
Unit mix384 × 1, 2 & 3 BHK
In context
Density71.8 homes per acre
Density in context46th percentile of 480 Anekal projects (median 75.6)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 384 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 28,134 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 21,650 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 5 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 384 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 17 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 10-10-2013 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1, 2 & 3 BHK | 384 | 100% | 28,134 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower-1 | 9 | 72 | 72 | - |
| Tower 2 | 13 | 104 | 104 | - |
| Tower 3 | 13 | 104 | 104 | - |
| Tower 4 | 13 | 52 | 52 | - |
| Tower 5 | 13 | 52 | 52 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 384 official flat/unit rows, matching the 384 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 208 | 67.4-69.9 sqm | 34.8-35.2 sqm | 208 |
| 3BHK | 104 | 103.8-107.6 sqm | 52.8-53.8 sqm | 104 |
| 1BHK | 72 | 44.6-45.0 sqm | 25.9 sqm | 72 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 2 | 104 | 67.4-69.7 sqm | 34.8-35.2 sqm | 104 |
| Tower 3 | 104 | 67.7-69.9 sqm | 34.8-35.2 sqm | 104 |
| Tower-1 | 72 | 44.6-45.0 sqm | 25.9 sqm | 72 |
| Tower 4 | 52 | 103.8-105.0 sqm | 52.8 sqm | 52 |
| Tower 5 | 52 | 107.0-107.6 sqm | 53.8 sqm | 52 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10101 | Tower-1 | 1 | 1BHK | 44.6 sqm | 25.9 sqm | 1 |
| 10102 | Tower-1 | 1 | 1BHK | 44.6 sqm | 25.9 sqm | 1 |
| 10103 | Tower-1 | 1 | 1BHK | 44.9 sqm | 25.9 sqm | 1 |
| 10104 | Tower-1 | 1 | 1BHK | 44.9 sqm | 25.9 sqm | 1 |
| 10105 | Tower-1 | 1 | 1BHK | 44.6 sqm | 25.9 sqm | 1 |
| 10106 | Tower-1 | 1 | 1BHK | 44.6 sqm | 25.9 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 20 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2019 — which has passed with no OC on file.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Fire NOCBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Pollution control (KSPCB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Environmental clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Airport Authority height clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
K-RERA complaint orders (34 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAKESH CHARAN C vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | Direction to execute Sale Deed & compensation | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2025 |
| Jaya Padmanabhan vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | Completion and compensation | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2025 |
| Sudheer Madathil vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | Promoters to pay delay compensation | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2025 |
| Aniruddha Aditya vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | delay compensation | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2025 |
| Nibu Jacob George vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | a. To direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay delay compensation , To direct the Respondent/Promoter to initiate the registration process and hand-over of the flat | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2025 |
| Rajesh Valeri Sivasankaran Nair vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | To direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay delay compensation, c. To direct the Respondent/Promoter to initiate the registration process and hand-over of the flat to the Complainants | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2025 |
| Rajmohan Rao Udiawar vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | To direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay delay compensation , To direct the Respondent/Promoter to initiate the registration process and hand-over of the flat | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2025 |
| Havard Valerian DSilva vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | To direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay delay compensation, d. To direct the Respondent/Promoter to initiate the registration process and hand-over of the flat | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2025 |
| Hadlee Raymond DSilva vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | To direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay delay compensation, To direct the Respondent/Promoters to reimburse the Pre-EMI , To direct the Respondent/Promoter to initiate the registration process an | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2025 |
| Biny Balan vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | To direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay delay compensation, To direct the Respondent/Promoter to initiate the registration process and hand-over of the flat to the Complainants | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2025 |
| Sandeep Kandyan Thundyan vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | To direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay delay compensation, To direct the Respondent/Promoter to initiate the registration process and hand-over of the flat to the Complainants | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2025 |
| Pajimannu Vijayalakshmana Mundur vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | To direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay delay compensation, To direct the Respondent/Promoter to initiate the registration process and hand-over of the flat to the Complainants | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2025 |
| Sajesh Nittoor vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | To direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay delay compensation along with future interest, To direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay compensation for loss and/or damages and/ or mental agony caused, | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2025 |
| Nitin Gaikwad vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | To direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay delay compensation, To direct the Respondent/Promoter to initiate the registration process and hand-over of the flat to the Complainants without any furt | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2025 |
| Ivan Robert Dias vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | To direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay delay compensation , To direct the Respondent/Promoters to reimburse the Pre-EMI paid by the Complainant, | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2025 |
| Rahul Sharma vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | Refund and Compensation | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2025 |
| Saravanan E vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | Delay compensation | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2025 |
| Shraddha Vijaykumar Maske vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | Delay compensation | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2025 |
| Shobhit Verma vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | Delay compensation | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2025 |
| George Thomas P C vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | Delay Compensation | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2025 |
| Johar Das vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | 1. Finishing of Apartment. 2. Reimbursement of Rs. 350000. 3. Refund of illegal fee. 4. Penalty u/s 62 of RERA Act. | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2025 |
| SHWETA SETHI vs COMMUNE PROPERTIES INDIA PVT. LTD., | I want builder to return the maount I have invested =22,36,635 paid to builder till date + 7.5 lacs interest on bank loan=30 Lacs to be returned by builder | AUTHORITY | 28/11/2024 |
| L S MUKUND vs COMMUNE PROPERTIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED | (1) Refund of sale consideration amount of Rs.15,30,189/- with interest, (2) Rs.3,33,638/- as interest paid on the loan availed, (3) Rs.3,30,162/- as outstanding principal-loan amount & legal fee | AUTHORITY | 25/08/2022 |
| Swetha Sethi vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | Complaint for delay compensation | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Anandgouda Patil vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | Delay Compensation | AUTHORITY | 22/04/2026 |
| Krishnakumari Ramesh vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | Compensation for the delay | AUTHORITY | 22/04/2026 |
| Sushil Tejas Soans vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | Delay period interest | AUTHORITY | 22/04/2026 |
| Venkateswaran Taruvai Guruswamy vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | Interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 22/04/2026 |
| Channabasappa Kolar vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | Interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 22/04/2026 |
| Sachin Utage vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 22/04/2026 |
| Sanjay Sharma vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | Interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 22/04/2026 |
| Lionel Andrade vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd | interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 22/04/2026 |
| Commune Buyers Welfare Association vs Commune Properties Indisa Pvt Ltd., | Initiate actions against the promoter for creating Illegal mortgage and grant such other relief as prayed for | AUTHORITY | 17/05/2024 |
| COMMUNE ONE OWNERS COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED vs Commune Properties Indisa Pvt Ltd., | facilitate takeover of the project by recovering the missused fund by the promoter | AUTHORITY | 17/05/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (26 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190426/0002780 26-04-2019 | Compensation for the Delay in completing the project even after collecting 95 Percent of sale consideration amounts | Commune | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190824/0003999 24-08-2019 | BREACH OF AGREEMENT | Commune | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/191106/0004636 06-11-2019 | Booking advance given to promoter but unit not alloted by promoter | Commune | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/200616/0006041 16-06-2020 | Execution of Sale Deed and Delivey of possesio | Commune | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210125/0007497 25-01-2021 | Want double compensation, Interest on amount paid, expeditious completion of project with all necessary statutory approvals. | Commune | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210223/0007613 23-02-2021 | Illegal Mortgage, Unfair Trade Practices, Enormous Delay in Completion & Continuous Breach of Agreement Terms | Commune | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210628/0008067 28-06-2021 | DELAYED HANDOVER, WITHDRAWAL FROM PROJECT, AND REFUND | Commune | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/210830/0008282 30-08-2021 | To direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay delay compensation | Commune | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 1 project professional/vendor row across Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contractor | Bhuvana Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. | - | 2011 | 19th Main, Koramangala 6th Block |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹23.6 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: YES BANK Avenue Road (IFSC YESB0000658, a/c …0300). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 16 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 16 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 25 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 30 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 31 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 38 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 54 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.