Godrej Tiara
K-RERA · the public record
Deccan Habitat
Bengaluru North · Sri. V. RANGANATH
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
31 Dec 2020declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
115registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
2 3 4 bhk
115
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
1.6registered acres
74.2registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Deccan Habitat
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/180208/002313
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion31 December 2020
Land area6,274 sq m (1.6 acres)
Homes registered115
Tower/wing entries3
Unit mix115 × 2 3 4 bhk
In context
Density74.2 homes per acre
Density in context49th percentile of 529 Bengaluru North projects (median 75.3)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 115 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 5,075 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 6,274 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.59 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 3 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 151 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 01-12-2017 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 3 4 bhk | 115 | 100% | 5,075 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOWER 1 | 10 | 20 | 38 | - |
| TOWER 2 | 9 | 40 | 46 | - |
| TOWER 3 | 9 | 55 | 67 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 115 official flat/unit rows, matching the 115 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 bhk | 70 | 87.5-106.0 sqm | 51.5-62.6 sqm | 79 |
| 2 bhk | 30 | 69.0-72.5 sqm | 41.8-43.6 sqm | 30 |
| 4 bhk | 15 | 116.0-145.0 sqm | 68.0-87.2 sqm | 30 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOWER 3 | 55 | 69.0-145.0 sqm | 41.8-87.2 sqm | 62 |
| TOWER 2 | 40 | 87.5-102.0 sqm | 51.5-56.7 sqm | 42 |
| TOWER 1 | 20 | 100.0-116.0 sqm | 58.6-68.0 sqm | 35 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| oo1 | TOWER 1 | 0 | 4 bhk | 116.0 sqm | 68.0 sqm | 2 |
| oo2 | TOWER 1 | 0 | 3 bhk | 100.0 sqm | 58.6 sqm | 2 |
| 101 | TOWER 1 | 1 | 4 bhk | 116.0 sqm | 68.0 sqm | 2 |
| 102 | TOWER 1 | 1 | 3 bhk | 100.0 sqm | 58.6 sqm | 1 |
| 201 | TOWER 1 | 2 | 4 bhk | 116.0 sqm | 68.0 sqm | 2 |
| 202 | TOWER 1 | 2 | 3 bhk | 100.0 sqm | 58.6 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 30 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2020 — which has passed with no OC on file.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Document listed: BESCOM
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Not identified in the document list
Fire NOCDocument listed: Fire Force Department
Pollution control (KSPCB)Document listed: KSPCB
Environmental clearanceNot identified in the document list
Airport Authority height clearanceDocument listed: Airport Authority of India
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
1 K-RERA order on this project (PROJECT MODIFICATION) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (12 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raveesha KL vs SRI. V. RANGANATH | RERA to instruct the promoter to follow the government norms, refund the maintenance and deposits collected, and compensate for all these inconvenience caused by the promoter. | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2024 |
| Ashoka & ANOTHER vs SRI. V. RANGANATH | RERA to instruct the promoter to follow the government norms, refund the maintenance and deposits collected, and compensate for all these inconvenience caused by the promoter. | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2024 |
| Jagadis B K vs SRI. V. RANGANATH | RERA to instruct the promoter to follow the government norms, refund the maintenance and deposits collected, and compensate for all these inconvenience caused by the promoter | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2024 |
| K V BHARATH & ANOTHER vs SRI. V. RANGANATH | RERA to instruct the promoter to follow the government norms, refund costs charged for Solar Heater, Maintenance & Deposits collected and compensate for all these inconvenience caused by the promoter. | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2024 |
| Saravana Sastha Kumar vs SRI. V. RANGANATH | Refund of Deposits, maintenance charges, compensation and compliance of all the government orders | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2024 |
| Saravana Sastha K vs SRI. V. RANGANATH | Refund of Deposits, maintenance charges, compensation and compliance of all the government orders | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2024 |
| Pradeep Nagaraju vs SRI. V. RANGANATH | Request Rera to instruct promoter to stop collecting maintenance and also refund the already collected maintenance till date. Instruct promoter to return remaining deposit. | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2024 |
| Vybhav Bhushan & OTHERS vs SRI. V. RANGANATH | Request RERA to Instruct the promoter to follow the government norms, refund the maintenance and deposits collected, and compensate for all these inconvenience caused | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2024 |
| Pradeep P S & ANOTHER vs SRI. V. RANGANATH | Request RERA to Instruct the promoter to follow the government norms, refund the maintenance and deposits collected, and compensate for all these inconvenience caused | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2024 |
| Thripura H D vs SRI. V. RANGANATH | Request RERA to instruct the promoter to follow the government norms, refund the maintenance and deposits collected, Refund the amount charged for common area which is part of flat costing | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2024 |
| N Veerasubramanian vs SRI. V. RANGANATH | Request RERA to Instruct the promoter to follow the government norms, refund the maintenance and deposits collected, and compensate for all these inconvenience caused | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2024 |
| Usharani vs Sri. V. RANGANATH | Request RERA to Instruct the promoter to follow the government norms, refund the maintenance and deposits collected, and compensate with the damages for all these inconvenience caused | AUTHORITY | 28/04/2026 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Prabha Jhangiani. | - | 2013 | Mosque Road, Frazer Town |
| Contractor | Deccan Group | - | 2001 | 1 st main, Rajajinagar Industrial Estate |
| Structural engineer | N. Shankarappa | - | - | - |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹66.7 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Axis Bank Rajajinagar 3rd Block (IFSC UTIB0003568, a/c …8399). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 8 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 8 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 9 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 19 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 23 km |
| Electronic City | 24 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 26 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.