K-RERA · the public record
DS MAX SONATA
Bengaluru North · DS MAX PROPERTIES
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
1.5registered acres
123.2registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for DS MAX SONATA
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/180120/001403
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
In context
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 180 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 12,135 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 5,911 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 1.65 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 180 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 180 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 20-08-2017 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 & 3bhk | 119 | 100% | 12,135 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SONATA | 3 | 180 | 180 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 180 official flat/unit rows, matching the 180 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 126 | 922.0-1,195.0 sqft | 27.6-35.8 sqft | 126 |
| 3BHK | 54 | 1,171.0-1,485.0 sqft | 35.1-44.5 sqft | 54 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SONATA | 180 | 922.0-1,485.0 sqft | 27.6-44.5 sqft | 180 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SONATA | 0 | 2BHK | 975.0 sqft | 29.2 sqft | 1 |
| 2 | SONATA | 0 | 2BHK | 985.0 sqft | 29.5 sqft | 1 |
| 3 | SONATA | 0 | 2BHK | 998.0 sqft | 29.9 sqft | 1 |
| 4 | SONATA | 0 | 2BHK | 1,011.0 sqft | 30.3 sqft | 1 |
| 5 | SONATA | 0 | 2BHK | 1,049.0 sqft | 31.4 sqft | 1 |
| 6 | SONATA | 0 | 2BHK | 957.0 sqft | 28.7 sqft | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 14 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2020, extended (Covid Extension) to 30 Sep 2021 — both dates have passed with no OC on file.
Approval documents
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA complaint orders (3 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| RATAN CHANDRA BISWAS vs DS MAX PROPERTIES PVT LTD | So we want remove the garbage point other wise refund the money along with interest and other hidden expenses. | AUTHORITY | 29/12/2025 |
| Sonata Resident's Welfare Association vs DS MAX PROPERTIES PVT LTD | Instruct builder to stop merging SONATA with any other project. Boundary to be constructed as per schedule A, deviations to be regularized, project completion deadline to be confirmed | AUTHORITY | 29/12/2025 |
| Aditya Khandavilli vs THYAGARAJU AND 2 OTHERS, DX MAX PROPERTIES PVT LTD | Hereby requesting RERA to advice builder to allow 3rd party (interior design installation/modification) without damaging the structures/hampering the security concern & providing blue prints marked. | AUTHORITY | 15/06/2023 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (4 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190225/0002292 25-02-2019 | Quality of work not maintained as promised | DS Max Silverwood (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/210303/0007734 03-03-2021 | refund with interest and compensation due to Quality issues and structural defects | DS MAX Smartnest (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220209/0008992 09-02-2022 | INTERIORS EXECUTION BY 3RD PARTY DESIGN HOUSE_BONITO | DS MAX SONATA | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/221013/0010093 13-10-2022 | Very worst Construction of structure | DS Max Silverwood (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Builder track record
RERA filingDS-MAX has 46 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Ds Max”) (average reported construction progress 60%). 25 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹11.0 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: ANDHRA BANK BANASWADI (IFSC ANDB0001432, a/c …3934). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 13 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 13 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 16 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 25 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 26 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 29 km |
| Electronic City | 31 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.