Vijaya Aquagreen
K-RERA · the public record
THE POEM BY SHRIRAM PROPERTIES
Bengaluru North · SPL PALMS DEVELOPERS
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
50%construction reportedQ1 2026 filing
0units not bookedof 660 · Q1 2026 filing
31 Mar 2026declared completionK-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 26 Oct 2026Construction progress and dates
Promoter-reported construction
50%
Q3 2025
50%
Q4 2025
50%
Q1 2026
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q1 2026
declared completion
31 Mar 2026
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Registered units and project size
1 BHK
72
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
The whole registration
6.3registered acres
104.9registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for THE POEM BY SHRIRAM PROPERTIES
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/210319/004033
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion31 March 2026
Land area25,456 sq m (6.3 acres)
Homes registered660
Tower/wing entries6
Unit mix72 × 1 BHK
In context
Density104.9 homes per acre
Density in context83rd percentile of 529 Bengaluru North projects (median 75.3)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 660 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 342 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 25,456 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.249 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 6 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 624 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 257 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 688 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 01-03-2021 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 BHK | 72 | 100% | 342 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower-1 | 19 | 114 | 114 | - |
| Tower-2 | 18 | 108 | 108 | - |
| Tower-3 | 18 | 108 | 108 | - |
| Tower-4 | 18 | 108 | 108 | - |
| Tower-5 | 19 | 114 | 114 | - |
| Tower-6 | 18 | 108 | 72 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 660 official flat/unit rows, matching the 660 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 257 | 62.1-65.2 sqm | 0.1-0.1 sqm | 257 |
| NA | 220 | 68.3 sqm | 0.2 sqm | 220 |
| 3BHK | 111 | 83.0 sqm | 0.2 sqm | 111 |
| 1BHK | 72 | 36.5 sqm | 0.1 sqm | 36 (36 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower-1 | 114 | 62.1-83.0 sqm | 0.1-0.2 sqm | 114 |
| Tower-5 | 114 | 62.1-83.0 sqm | 0.1-0.2 sqm | 114 |
| Tower-2 | 108 | 62.1-83.0 sqm | 0.1-0.2 sqm | 108 |
| Tower-3 | 108 | 62.1-83.0 sqm | 0.1-0.2 sqm | 108 |
| Tower-4 | 108 | 62.1-83.0 sqm | 0.1-0.2 sqm | 108 |
| Tower-6 | 108 | 36.5-68.3 sqm | 0.1-0.2 sqm | 72 (36 with 0) |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01.01.01 | Tower-1 | 1 | 2BHK | 62.1 sqm | 0.1 sqm | 1 |
| 01.01.02 | Tower-1 | 1 | NA | 68.3 sqm | 0.2 sqm | 1 |
| 01.01.03 | Tower-1 | 1 | 3BHK | 83.0 sqm | 0.2 sqm | 1 |
| 01.01.04 | Tower-1 | 1 | 2BHK | 65.2 sqm | 0.1 sqm | 1 |
| 01.01.05 | Tower-1 | 1 | NA | 68.3 sqm | 0.2 sqm | 1 |
| 01.01.06 | Tower-1 | 1 | 2BHK | 62.1 sqm | 0.1 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
11 of 37 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 26 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →
K-RERA complaint orders (5 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amitkumar Fulchand Kuhikar vs M/S. SUVILAS REALITIES PRIVATE LIMITED | i need the full refund from " The Poem" Shriram Properties. | AUTHORITY | 26/06/2024 |
| AMRENDRA KUMAR SINGH & RAKHI RANI vs M/S SUVILAS REALITIES PRIVATE LIMITED | REFUND OF FULL PAID AMOUNT | AUTHORITY | 20/06/2024 |
| Anudeep M N & Madhura M vs M/s Suvilas Realities Private Limited | To help me in getting my booking amount back of rupees 1lakh from the Shriram properties Poem. | AUTHORITY | 08/04/2024 |
| JITANDRA SINGH vs SHRIRAM PROPERTIES | I will need your help in getting the refund of the booking amount of Rs. 50,000/- | AUTHORITY | 07/03/2024 |
| Surjit Kumar Singh & Nidhi Kumari vs SUVILAS REALTIES PRIVATE LIMITED | We need from builder either they have to handover the flat as committed or pay the interest by developer for what ever delay took place after Mar 24.from mar 24 | AUTHORITY | 02/07/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (3 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/210912/0008322 12-09-2021 | refund required of token amount of 50k INR | SHRIRAM SUVILAS PALMS (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/220531/0009555 31-05-2022 | False delivery date assured | SHRIRAM SUVILAS PALMS (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/220719/0009767 19-07-2022 | Refund of initial booking amount of rs 50000 | SHRIRAM SUVILAS PALMS (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Statutory approval status
RERA filing7 of 7 applicable approvals are marked Approved in the filing. Check the linked documents for their scope and validity.
3 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water supply and sewage board | Approved | 06-06-2019 | BWSSB NOC Modified.pdf |
| KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres) | Approved | 03-11-2020 | kspcb NOC.pdf |
| KSPCB- MOEF (Above 50 Acres) | Approved | 03-03-2020 | SEIAAState Level Environment Impact Assessment Au.pdf |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | Approved | 01-06-2020 | Bescom NOC.pdf |
| Fire and Safety | Approved | 19-02-2020 | Fire Revised NOC.pdf |
| Airport Authority of India | Approved | 13-03-2020 | AAINOC.pdf |
| BSNL/Telecommunication Department | Approved | 27-02-2020 | BSNL Approval.pdf |
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Design Desk | - | 2010 | NO 100 OLD NO 52 DONNABAS TOWERS RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE |
| Contractor | SUVILAS | - | 2012 | NO 100 OLD NO 52 DONNABAS TOWERS RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE |
| Structural engineer | MANOHAR CONSULTANTS | - | - | - |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹0.00 Cr collected from buyers, ₹1.77 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account. This quarter the escrow withdrawal (₹1.77 Cr) exceeded buyer collections (₹0.00 Cr) — worth asking the builder to reconcile against certified construction milestones, which is what RERA requires escrow draws to track.
| Construction progress | 50% → 50% (+0 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 660/660 (100%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹61.35 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹44.61 Cr (0.73x collections) |
- 100% of registered units are shown as sold/booked, but no completion certificate is on file yet.
- The filed unit sales count did not move across the available QPR window because the project was already effectively sold out.
- The builder has drawn 0.73x of buyer collections from escrow (about 73% of the ₹61 Cr collected) — money is largely staying in the regulated escrow account rather than being pulled out ahead of spend, which is the safer direction. A ratio near or above 1.0 would be the one to scrutinise.
- In the latest QPR, escrow withdrawal exceeds buyer collections for that quarter. This can be normal if prior balance existed, but it needs a clean explanation.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹23.0 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC SADASHIVNAGAR BANGALORE (IFSC HDFC0001079, a/c …1788). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 11 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 11 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 14 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 23 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 25 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 27 km |
| Electronic City | 29 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.