Krishna Mystiq
K-RERA · the public record
KRISHNA MYSTIQ (PHASE-II)
Bengaluru South · KRISHNA ENTERPRISES (HOUSING & INFRASTRUCTURES) INDIA
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
31 Oct 2017declared completionK-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
60registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 26 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
The whole registration
4.9registered acres
12.2registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for KRISHNA MYSTIQ (PHASE-II)
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/180329/000899
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion31 October 2017
Land area19,931 sq m (4.9 acres)
Homes registered60
Tower/wing entries3
In context
Density12.2 homes per acre
Density in context2nd percentile of 791 Bengaluru South projects (median 77.3)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 60 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 19,931 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | ~0.37 | Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈7,352 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 19,931 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 3 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 66 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 22-11-2013 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 1 | 4 | 20 | 22 | - |
| Tower 2 | 4 | 20 | 22 | - |
| Tower 3 | 4 | 20 | 22 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 60 official flat/unit rows, matching the 60 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 60 | 89.0 sqm | 590.0 sqm | 60 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 1 | 20 | 89.0 sqm | 590.0 sqm | 20 |
| Tower 2 | 20 | 89.0 sqm | 590.0 sqm | 20 |
| Tower 3 | 20 | 89.0 sqm | 590.0 sqm | 20 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1-001 | Tower 1 | 0 | 3BHK | 89.0 sqm | 590.0 sqm | 1 |
| T1-002 | Tower 1 | 0 | 3BHK | 89.0 sqm | 590.0 sqm | 1 |
| T1-003 | Tower 1 | 0 | 3BHK | 89.0 sqm | 590.0 sqm | 1 |
| T1-004 | Tower 1 | 0 | 3BHK | 89.0 sqm | 590.0 sqm | 1 |
| T1-101 | Tower 1 | 1 | 3BHK | 89.0 sqm | 590.0 sqm | 1 |
| T1-102 | Tower 1 | 1 | 3BHK | 89.0 sqm | 590.0 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
11 of 35 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 24 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Oct 2017 — which has passed with no OC on file.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Fire NOCBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Pollution control (KSPCB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Environmental clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Airport Authority height clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
K-RERA complaint orders (10 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANAMIKA DAS vs M/S.KRISHNA ENTERPRISES | Refund of my entire Investment along with Interest & Compensation or immediate possesion along with delay compensation | AUTHORITY | 24/06/2025 |
| Deokant Payasi vs M/s.KRISHNA ENTERPRISES (HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURES) INDIA PVT LTD | Refund of the money paid along with interest of 12%. | AUTHORITY | 22/07/2025 |
| Balasubrahmanyam Nanduri vs M/S.KRISHNA ENTERPRISES (HOUSING & INFRASTRUCTURES) INDIA PVT LTD | Immediate Project completion and see to it that the compensation is been paid by the promoter for the losses incurred by the buyers | AUTHORITY | 22/07/2025 |
| Chambattil Sankaran vs M/S.KRISHNA ENTERPRISES (HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURES) INDIA PVT LTD | Give firm instructions to thepromoter to start all the necessary work and deliver the flat without further delay. | AUTHORITY | 22/07/2025 |
| Prasad Deshpande vs M/S.KRISHNA ENTERPRISES AND ANOTHER | Refund of my entire Investment along with Interest | AUTHORITY | 20/05/2025 |
| Ashvin vs Krishna Mystiq | Refund of the entire invested amount(till date) with interest | AUTHORITY | 14/03/2023 |
| Vipin Nair vs M/S.KRISHNA ENTERPRISES (HOUSING & INFRASTRUCTURES) INDIA PVT LTD & ANOTHER | I would like entire amount paid to the builder returned with 24% interest from promised date of possession plus refund of interest on home loan charged by SBI (Rs.5 lakhs) and return of legal fees | AUTHORITY | 13/05/2025 |
| Anurag Gupta vs M/S.KRISHNA ENTERPRISES (HOUSING & INFRA) INDIA P LTD | Either our money should be refunded or please get us on possesion of flat | AUTHORITY | 07/07/2025 |
| Archana Menon vs M/S.KRISHNA ENTERPRISES (HOUSING & INFRA) INDIA P LTD | We are looking for complete refund along with interest paid for all these years, compensation as promised by the builder due to delay for the mental torture for all these 5 years. | AUTHORITY | 07/07/2025 |
| T S Kashyap vs M/S.KRISHNA ENTERPRISES (HOUSING & INFRA) INDIA P LTD | Builder should complete project and compensate for the delay in project. | AUTHORITY | 07/07/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (35 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190821/0003939 21-08-2019 | Request for refund - Massively overdue project, broken promises | KRISHNA MYSTIQ (PHASE-II) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/191019/0004345 19-10-2019 | Request for refund - Massively overdue project, broken promises | KRISHNA MYSTIQ (PHASE-II) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/191125/0004688 25-11-2019 | PROJECT NOT COMPLETED SINCE 2016 | KRISHNA SHELTON (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/200110/0005188 10-01-2020 | Builder has not delivered the project even after 4 years | KRISHNA MYSTIQ (PHASE-II) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/200311/0004641 11-03-2020 | Delivery Date Expiry | KRISHNA MYSTIQ (PHASE-II) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/200604/0005958 04-06-2020 | Project is abandoned from the past 5 years & Delivery date expired | KRISHNA MYSTIQ (PHASE-II) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/200604/0005961 04-06-2020 | Massive Delay - Builder has not delivered the project even after 51 months after paying 90% amount | KRISHNA MYSTIQ (PHASE-II) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/200605/0005963 05-06-2020 | Delay in project handover. | KRISHNA MYSTIQ (PHASE-II) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Builder track record
RERA filingKrishna Enterprises has 2 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records. 2 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a higher delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹216.7 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC KASTURBA GANDHI MARG (IFSC HDFC0000009, a/c …8588). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 14 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 7 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 14 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 15 km |
| Electronic City | 15 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 22 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 34 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.