Mantri Centrium
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
Mantri Developers · Bengaluru South · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171015/000608
The Drawings Report · ₹4,999
We read all 5 approved drawings and 35 filed papers on this project’s RERA file — the sheets the builder filed to get it approved.
One real find, from a Noida project’s approved drawings: the buyer pays for 10,000 sq ft — the floor inside the flat is 6,982 sq ft.
Get it for this project →Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked. Sent as a PDF in one working day.
Free before you decide: the 14 things to get in writing before you book
Every item comes from a real RERA filing. Send it to the family group before anyone pays a token.
Send the checklist to the family group Read it here →Mantri Webcity2A occupies 21,448 sq m (5.3 acres) with 588 registered homes in 4 towers, estimated to cost ₹180.3 crore. With 110.9 homes per acre, it ranks at the 87th percentile of the 784 Bengaluru South projects tracked here (median 77.3). Its declared completion date of 28 February 2020 has passed; no occupancy certificate is on record.
Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
What you can verify free on this page
The official K-RERA filing record, in plain English
Registration and delivery
Mantri Webcity2a is registered with K-RERA as PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171015/000608, and the promoter has declared completion for 28 Feb 2020.
28 Feb 2020
declared completion
Figures are the promoter's own filings as they stood when Quietlist last read the register. A declared completion date is a filing, not a handover commitment.
Source · K-RERA project register · read 10 Sep 2026
Project scale
Mantri Webcity2a spans 21,448 sq m (5.30 acres), comprises 4 towers, registers 588 units, and is declared to cost ₹180.34 cr.
₹180.34 cr
declared project cost
5.30acres
21,448 sq m
588units
on the registration
3.0FAR
sanctioned
Scale and cost as the promoter registered them. The declared cost is the promoter's own estimate on the filing, not a valuation and not a price to a buyer.
Source · K-RERA project registration · read 10 Sep 2026
Promoter record
Mantri is the promoter of record on 8 projects registered with K-RERA, 8 of which are past their declared completion dates on the register.
8projects
registered with K-RERA
8past declared date
on the register
Counted across Quietlist's full K-RERA register store, matched on the promoter name as it appears on each filing.
Source · K-RERA register, all projects · read 10 Sep 2026
🔒 What I’d do as a buyer here · Drawings Report
The report opens with what this project really is — read from its approved drawings — then the specific calls: the cheapest good way to buy here, the flat to say no to, what you can stop worrying about, and what to get in writing before you sign anything.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 588 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 21,448 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 3 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 4 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 641 total (31 open) — 1.09 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 04-03-2013 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| NOT WORKING | 0 | 0 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 22 | 147 | 161 | - |
| G | 22 | 147 | 160 | - |
| H | 22 | 147 | 160 | - |
| J | 22 | 147 | 160 | - |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 588 official flat/unit rows, matching the 588 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5-BHK | 336 | 89.3-97.1 sqm | 5.3-5.8 sqm | 336 |
| 2-BHK | 252 | 67.0-79.2 sqm | 4.1-4.8 sqm | 252 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 147 | 67.0-89.8 sqm | 4.1-5.4 sqm | 147 |
| G | 147 | 67.0-89.8 sqm | 4.1-5.4 sqm | 147 |
| H | 147 | 67.0-89.8 sqm | 4.1-5.4 sqm | 147 |
| J | 147 | 67.0-97.1 sqm | 4.1-5.8 sqm | 147 |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F-201 | F | 2 | 2.5-BHK | 89.3 sqm | 5.4 sqm | 1 |
| F-202 | F | 2 | 2-BHK | 70.9 sqm | 4.3 sqm | 1 |
| F-203 | F | 2 | 2-BHK | 70.9 sqm | 4.3 sqm | 1 |
| F-204 | F | 2 | 2.5-BHK | 89.8 sqm | 5.4 sqm | 1 |
| F-205 | F | 2 | 2.5-BHK | 89.7 sqm | 5.4 sqm | 1 |
| F-206 | F | 2 | 2-BHK | 67.0 sqm | 4.1 sqm | 1 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Which flat to ask for · Drawings Report
The flat-level read: which towers and floors to prefer and which to avoid, what the drawings put above, below and beside each flat, and the things on this site nobody at the sales desk will tell you about.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
3 of 35 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 32 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 28 Feb 2020, extended (an extension) to 28 Feb 2021 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. An extension application filed on 29 Mar 2021 is pending with K-RERA — until it is approved, the registration stands lapsed.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
K-RERA complaint orders (50 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRS SHRUTI GAUTAM vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | As prayed in the facts of case | AUTHORITY | 30/08/2024 |
| MUDIT SAXENA vs MANTRI DEVELOPER PVT. LTD. | Deposit+2X + interest=Rs.3,062,754 + EMIs+interest | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2023 |
| ANUPAMA ARUN vs MANTRI DEVELOPER PVT. LTD. | Refund,closure of home loan & as detailed in facts | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2023 |
| VAIBHAV SHARMA vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED PNB HOUSING FINANCIAL LIMITED | as prayed in the facts of the complaint | AUTHORITY | 29/07/2022 |
| MR.CHETAN SHAH vs M/S.MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | Refund of amount paid till date against flat no J 403 alongwith reasonable interest | AUTHORITY | 27/12/2023 |
| MR ANANT RAMACHANDRAN vs M/S.MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | (1) Refund entire sale consideration paid by Complainant, with 2x as per Pre-EMI Scheme. (2) Direct Developer to foreclose Complainant's loan with PNBHFL, and refund PRE-EMIS paid by Complainant | AUTHORITY | 27/03/2025 |
| VARUNA GEDDA vs mantri developers pvt ltd | Refund of money with guaranteed profit and closure of loan | AUTHORITY | 27/01/2025 |
| SHARDUL AND DIVYA SINGH vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | As prayed in the facts of case | AUTHORITY | 24/01/2023 |
| MITAL DEVANG PATHAK vs Mantri Developers Private Limited | Complainants prays for the refund an amount of Rs.7,00,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakh Only) along with the dues pending against the PNB Loan and the closure of the same with penalty and interest @12% per an | AUTHORITY | 23/12/2025 |
| Ratheesh Kummarkkaroth vs Mantri Developers Private Limited | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 22/01/2026 |
| PRATIMA GOPAL vs MANTRI WEBCITY 2A | As prayed in the Facts of complaint | AUTHORITY | 21/10/2024 |
| MALAVIKA NAIR vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | To direct the Respondent to cancel the Sale Agreement and Construction Agreement and refund the consideration paid along with the compensation and pass such orders as this Tribunal may deem fit. | AUTHORITY | 20/01/2023 |
| Garimella Venkata Ramana Sastry vs Mantri Developers Private Limited | For the completion and delivery of the apartment at the first instance and for the payment of interest on delay period. | AUTHORITY | 19/11/2025 |
| BAPAN KUMAR DUTTA vs Mantri Developers Private Limited | The complainant seeks a refund of Rs. 60,02,574.00 with interest from 01/12/2017 and with unpaid pre-EMI installments and , along with the outstanding bank loan amount | AUTHORITY | 19/11/2025 |
| MS.ANKITA SINGH vs M/S.MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | Refund needed at earliest with interest, this is a breach of trust and commitment by Manti Developers | AUTHORITY | 18/12/2023 |
| SHREYANSHU PAVAS vs MANTRI WEBCITY 2A | As prayed in the facts of case | AUTHORITY | 18/06/2024 |
| RANJAN BISWAS vs MANTRI WEBCITY 2A | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with Interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount. | AUTHORITY | 18/06/2024 |
| Sameer Gupta vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 18/01/2023 |
| Sachidanand Joshi vs MANTRI TECHNOLOGY CONSTELLATIONS | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 18/01/2023 |
| Mohammed Azmathulla vs M/S.MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. | handover our flat K2006 with interest on delay period. | AUTHORITY | 16/06/2025 |
| MR SAIRAM DHARMARAJU vs M/S.MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. | Refund of amount with assured returns and cancellation of the loan | AUTHORITY | 13/12/2025 |
| MOHAN PULLAIAH vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | We are seeking refund of the amount invested plus the buy back amount guaranteed with interest and closure of loan. nOC to be provided | AUTHORITY | 13/09/2025 |
| MOHAN PULLIAH vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | Refund with assured return on investment interest and cancellation of loan | AUTHORITY | 13/09/2025 |
| jitendra kumar vs mantri webcity 2a | As prayed in Facts of complaint | AUTHORITY | 13/07/2023 |
| DEBASIS SARKAR vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Refunf along with interest and cost | AUTHORITY | 13/07/2023 |
| nidhi sibal vs mantri developers | Refund of entire sale consideration along with interest as prescribed in RERA Act and Rules | AUTHORITY | 12/03/2024 |
| MAMTA SHUKLA vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD | DELAY COMPENSATION @ 18% FROM THE DATE OF POSSESSION AS MENTIONED ON AGREEMENT TILL THE DATE OF ACTUAL POSSESSION WITH OC | AUTHORITY | 11/12/2023 |
| Himanshu Srivastava vs MANTRI TECHNOLOGY CONSTELLATIONS PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 09/11/2022 |
| Paul Mani vs Mantri Developers Private Limited | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 07/11/2022 |
| Muralidhar Sortur vs Mantri Technology Constellations Pvt Ltd | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 07/11/2022 |
| Somashekar S Umadi vs Mantri Developers Private Limited | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 07/11/2022 |
| MR.ATUL KUMAR VERMA vs M/S.MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | Refund of my invested money Rs. 59,37,403 together with INTEREST from the date of payment to until now. | AUTHORITY | 07/03/2023 |
| Devdas Panduranga Shetti & Seema Devdas Shetti vs Mantri Webcity 2A | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with Interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount | AUTHORITY | 06/06/2024 |
| Sharad Mantri vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Reimbursement of the amount already paid along with the interest or allotment of flat | AUTHORITY | 06/06/2023 |
| MOHAN PULLIAH vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS | Pay the money in accordance with buyback scheme + interest for the delay and closure of loan in my name. | AUTHORITY | 06/03/2023 |
| ROSHAN JAMEER PATEL vs MANTRI WEBCITY 2A | As prayed in facts of complaint | AUTHORITY | 05/08/2024 |
| Shahul Hameed Dasthagir vs Mantri Developers Private Limited | Refund | AUTHORITY | 04/06/2024 |
| DURAI RAJ D S vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | Direct the developer to terminate the agreement dated 01-09-2017 and refund the sum of Rs.38,63,846/- along with compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- and interest and costs. | AUTHORITY | 03/08/2023 |
| SATHEESH DWARAGANAHALLI RAO & ANOTHER vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount | AUTHORITY | 03/05/2024 |
| MRINMOY DAS & ANOTHER vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with Interest B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2024 |
| URMIL PARIKH & ANOTHER vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2024 |
| SATHEESH DWARAGANAHALLI RAO & ANOTHER vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | : A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2024 |
| SATISH ARORA vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2024 |
| VINOD A CHETTIAR & ANOTHER vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with Interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount. | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2024 |
| RAGHAVENDRA KUDVA PADUBIDRI & ANOTHER vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with Interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2024 |
| MR.RAGHAVENDRA VT vs M/S.MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | As prayed in the facts of complaint | AUTHORITY | 03/03/2026 |
| Guru Bhadra Singh vs Mantri Developers Private Limited | As prayed in Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 02/11/2022 |
| PALLAV RUSTOGI vs MANTRI WEBCITY 2A | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 02/07/2024 |
| MS SONAL GUPTA AND ANOTHER vs M/S.MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | Refund of amount with interest and directing the developer to close the loan | AUTHORITY | 02/04/2024 |
| HAMEEDA BEGUM A vs MANTRI WEBCITY 2A | Refund of amount paid and compensation of the losses incurred by interests, inflation etc due to delay in flats. | AUTHORITY | 02/02/2023 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (138 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190211/0002109 11-02-2019 | REFUND OF DOWN PAYMENT WITH 100% ASSURED RETURN UNDER BUYBACK, CLOSURE OF HOME LOAN WITH PNBHFL, PAYMENT OF INTEREST, REFUND OF EMIs PAID TO PNBHFL, COMPENSATION | Mantri Webcity2A | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/190211/0002111 11-02-2019 | REFUND OF DOWN PAYMENT WITH 100% ASSURED RETURN UNDER BUYBACK, CLOSURE OF HOME LOAN WITH PNBHFL, PAYMENT OF INTEREST, REFUND OF EMIs PAID TO PNBHFL, COMPENSATION | Mantri Webcity3A (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190217/0002170 17-02-2019 | Project delayed, pushed to acquire a higher cost apartment and further delay on the same | Mantri Webcity3A (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190220/0002206 20-02-2019 | Possession dates are registered wrongly with RERA for MANTRI WEBCITY 2A | Mantri Webcity2A | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190222/0002125 22-02-2019 | Completion and Possession not delivered in Mantri Webcity Projct by Mantri Developers Pvt Ltd | Mantri Webcity3A (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190225/0002286 25-02-2019 | COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 31 OF RERA 2016 | Mantri Webcity3C (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190305/0002188 05-03-2019 | REFUND OF DOWN PAYMENT WITH 100% ASSURED RETURN UNDER BUYBACK, CLOSURE OF HOME LOAN WITH PNBHFL, PAYMENT OF INTEREST, REFUND OF EMIs PAID TO PNBHFL, COMPENSATION | Mantri Webcity2A | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190319/0002378 19-03-2019 | Buy Back closure 3 Years contract breached for indefinite period, Huge debt on Buyer for Pre-EMi and Home Loan | Mantri Webcity2B (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
K-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | RSP | - | NA | RSP House, 30 Museum Road |
| Contractor | M/S Simplex | - | NA | SC Road, Anand Rao circle |
| Structural engineer | NAGESH CONSULTANTS | - | - | - |
Mantri has 8 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Mantri Developers”). 8 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a higher delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹30.7 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Bank of Baroda Altamount Branch, Mumbai (IFSC BARB0ALTAMO, a/c …1046). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
The nearest major job hub is ~10 km away — a manageable everyday commute to a major job hub.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 5 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 10 km |
| Electronic City | 12 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 12 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 17 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 32 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
The approved drawings
Everything above is on this page already, free, from the government record. The drawings are different: the 5 approved sheets are the same drawings the builder filed to get Mantri Webcity2A approved — what sits under each tower, which floor holds machines, what the sales sheet leaves out. Nobody reads them for you. We do.
What that turns up — from other projects’ filings:
ATS Knightsbridge · Sector 124, Noida
You pay for 10,000 sq ft. The floor inside your home is 6,982 sq ft. The rest is walls, shared circulation and services. Get both numbers written into your agreement before you pay any booking amount.
Oberoi Elysian · Goregaon East, Mumbai
“The building is complete.” The tower has reached full height — true. The same filed certificate, same page: sanitary fittings 6% done. Ask for a possession date in writing.
Godrej Aristocrat · Sector 49, Gurugram
Paying extra for the top floor? The terrace drawing shows what sits on the slab above those flats: the overhead water tanks, the lift machine rooms and the roof machinery. Ask which flat sits under which.
Prestige Camden Gardens · Thanisandra, Bengaluru
The approved parking table asks for 12 visitor spaces. It shows 0. Two-wheeler spaces: also 0. Ask in writing where visitors will park.
Want this project read from its filed drawings?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. For Mantri Webcity2A, one reading of it goes further. Which flat should I ask for? — what the approved drawings and filed papers say about the flats, the parking, the approvals, and what to get in writing before you sign. That is the Drawings Report. See a real one first:
Drawings Report sample: Prestige Camden Gardens → · browse all sample reports →
Payment is confirmed automatically. The Drawings Report is 1 working day. We email the link, so you can close the tab.
Drawings Report · ₹4,999
Every drawing on file, read — which flat to ask for · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Paying from outside India? Pay $59 (Drawings Report) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes, and send the 14-point booking checklist with the first email.
Built by Mantri Developers. View Mantri Developers's full track record →
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Mantri Webcity2a?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 10 Sep 2026