Mantri Centrium
K-RERA · the public record
Mantri Webcity3A
Bengaluru South · Mantri Developers
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
29 Jan 2019declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
286registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
NOT WORKING
0
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
7.3registered acres
39.2registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Mantri Webcity3A
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171015/000560
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion29 January 2019
Land area29,542 sq m (7.3 acres)
Homes registered286
Tower/wing entries4
In context
Density39.2 homes per acre
Density in context12th percentile of 791 Bengaluru South projects (median 77.3)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 286 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 29,542 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 3 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 4 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 296 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 25 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 04-03-2013 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| NOT WORKING | 0 | 0 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| U | 17 | 72 | 74 | - |
| V | 17 | 71 | 74 | - |
| W | 17 | 72 | 74 | - |
| X | 17 | 71 | 74 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 286 official flat/unit rows, matching the 286 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5-BHK | 136 | 99.4 sqm | 7.0-7.4 sqm | 136 |
| 3-BHK | 136 | 120.8 sqm | 8.4-8.9 sqm | 136 |
| 2-BHK | 14 | 88.0-108.6 sqm | 5.6-7.1 sqm | 14 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| U | 72 | 88.0-120.8 sqm | 5.6-8.4 sqm | 72 |
| W | 72 | 88.0-120.8 sqm | 5.6-8.4 sqm | 72 |
| V | 71 | 88.0-120.8 sqm | 5.9-8.9 sqm | 71 |
| X | 71 | 88.0-120.8 sqm | 5.9-8.9 sqm | 71 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U-001 | U | 0 | 2-BHK | 88.0 sqm | 5.6 sqm | 1 |
| U-002 | U | 0 | 2-BHK | 88.0 sqm | 5.6 sqm | 1 |
| U-003 | U | 0 | 2-BHK | 108.6 sqm | 6.7 sqm | 1 |
| U-004 | U | 0 | 2-BHK | 108.6 sqm | 6.7 sqm | 1 |
| U-101 | U | 1 | 2.5-BHK | 99.4 sqm | 7.0 sqm | 1 |
| U-102 | U | 1 | 2.5-BHK | 99.4 sqm | 7.0 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
3 of 35 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 32 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 29 Jan 2019, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 28 Jan 2020 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 23 Feb 2023 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/230223/000560) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Fire NOCBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Pollution control (KSPCB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Environmental clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Airport Authority height clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
K-RERA complaint orders (13 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gunjan Agarwal vs Mantri Webcity3A | As prayed in the facts of case | AUTHORITY | 27/07/2022 |
| Jugnu Sakuja vs Mantri Developers Private Limited. | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with interest B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount | AUTHORITY | 26/03/2025 |
| SYLVESTER ASWIN STANLEY vs MANTRI WEBCITY 3A | as sought in facts of complaint | AUTHORITY | 25/04/2023 |
| ABHISHEK PATHAK vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of complaint | AUTHORITY | 24/01/2023 |
| Nitin Jain vs M/S.MANTRI DEVELOPERS | Refund of my booking amount | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Arun Mohan vs Mantri Webcity 3A | (1) Refund of entire sale consideration, alongwith 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme, and reimburse total EMI paid by Complainant. (2)Direct Developer to pay loan outstanding amount to PNBHFL. | AUTHORITY | 22/06/2023 |
| V PAUL AUSTIN BHARATH KUMAR vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 20/03/2023 |
| ANITHA BAKHTANI vs MANTRI WEBCITY 3A | Please order Developer to provide immediate refund of my amount due : Rs. 7,26,718/- | AUTHORITY | 12/09/2024 |
| Mantri Webcity Buyers Association for Collective Effort (force) vs Mantri Developers Private Limited and Others | As prayed in Fact | AUTHORITY | 12/06/2025 |
| Indu N C vs Mantri Technology Constellations Pvt. Ltd. | Delay compensation in term of section 12 14 18 & 19 and detail relief described in the Facts of Complaint, due to want of space | AUTHORITY | 09/11/2022 |
| MR.SHASHI BHUSHAN CHIDARA vs M/S.MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | As prayed in Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 07/03/2023 |
| KAIZAD MASTER & NIVEDITA KAIZAD MASTER vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with Interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount. | AUTHORITY | 03/05/2024 |
| ANUPAM KUMAR DUBEY & ANOTHER vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with Interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount. | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (138 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190211/0002109 11-02-2019 | REFUND OF DOWN PAYMENT WITH 100% ASSURED RETURN UNDER BUYBACK, CLOSURE OF HOME LOAN WITH PNBHFL, PAYMENT OF INTEREST, REFUND OF EMIs PAID TO PNBHFL, COMPENSATION | Mantri Webcity2A (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/190211/0002111 11-02-2019 | REFUND OF DOWN PAYMENT WITH 100% ASSURED RETURN UNDER BUYBACK, CLOSURE OF HOME LOAN WITH PNBHFL, PAYMENT OF INTEREST, REFUND OF EMIs PAID TO PNBHFL, COMPENSATION | Mantri Webcity3A | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190217/0002170 17-02-2019 | Project delayed, pushed to acquire a higher cost apartment and further delay on the same | Mantri Webcity3A | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190220/0002206 20-02-2019 | Possession dates are registered wrongly with RERA for MANTRI WEBCITY 2A | Mantri Webcity2A (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190222/0002125 22-02-2019 | Completion and Possession not delivered in Mantri Webcity Projct by Mantri Developers Pvt Ltd | Mantri Webcity3A | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190225/0002286 25-02-2019 | COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 31 OF RERA 2016 | Mantri Webcity3C (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190305/0002188 05-03-2019 | REFUND OF DOWN PAYMENT WITH 100% ASSURED RETURN UNDER BUYBACK, CLOSURE OF HOME LOAN WITH PNBHFL, PAYMENT OF INTEREST, REFUND OF EMIs PAID TO PNBHFL, COMPENSATION | Mantri Webcity2A (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190319/0002378 19-03-2019 | Buy Back closure 3 Years contract breached for indefinite period, Huge debt on Buyer for Pre-EMi and Home Loan | Mantri Webcity2B (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | RSP | - | NA | RSP House, 30 Museum Road |
| Contractor | TATA PROJECTS LIMITED, | - | NA | 1-7-80 to 87, Prenderghast Road |
| Structural engineer | Novel Engineering | - | - | - |
Builder track record
RERA filingMantri has 8 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Mantri Developers”). 8 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a higher delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹21.6 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Bank of Baroda Altamount Branch, Mumbai (IFSC BARB0ALTAMO, a/c …1042). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 10 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 5 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 10 km |
| Electronic City | 12 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 12 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 17 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 32 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.