Ozone Chambers
K-RERA · the public record
Pebble Bay -Koramangala Phase I
Bengaluru South · ITALIX LIVING SPACES
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
31 Dec 2019declared completionK-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
111registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 26 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
The whole registration
1.8registered acres
61.5registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Pebble Bay -Koramangala Phase I
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/180420/001520
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion31 December 2019
Land area7,299 sq m (1.8 acres)
Homes registered111
Tower/wing entries2
In context
Density61.5 homes per acre
Density in context28th percentile of 791 Bengaluru South projects (median 77.3)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 111 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 7,299 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | ~2.45 | Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈17,918 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 7,299 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 2 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 62 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 25-04-2016 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 15 | 63 | 30 | - |
| B | 15 | 48 | 32 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 111 official flat/unit rows, matching the 111 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 62 | 113.1-133.1 sqm | 32.8-37.4 sqm | 62 |
| 1BHK | 33 | 39.7-116.4 sqm | 11.1-32.8 sqm | 33 |
| 4BHK | 16 | 162.2 sqm | 45.1 sqm | 16 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 63 | 39.7-133.1 sqm | 11.1-37.4 sqm | 63 |
| B | 48 | 116.4-162.2 sqm | 32.8-45.1 sqm | 48 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-G01-A | A | 0 | 1BHK | 39.7 sqm | 11.1 sqm | 1 |
| A-G01-B | A | 0 | 1BHK | 39.7 sqm | 11.1 sqm | 1 |
| A-G02 | A | 0 | 3BHK | 133.1 sqm | 37.4 sqm | 1 |
| A-G03 | A | 0 | 3BHK | 116.4 sqm | 32.8 sqm | 1 |
| A-101A | A | 1 | 1BHK | 39.7 sqm | 11.1 sqm | 1 |
| A-101B | A | 1 | 1BHK | 39.7 sqm | 11.1 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
1 of 22 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 21 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2019 — which has passed with no OC on file.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Not identified in the document list
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Not identified in the document list
Fire NOCDocument listed: Fire Force Department
Pollution control (KSPCB)Document listed: KSPCB
Environmental clearanceDocument listed: SEIAA
Airport Authority height clearanceDocument listed: Airport Authority of India
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA complaint orders (7 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Akon Ventures LLP vs PEBBLE BAY KORAMANGALA PHASE 1 | handover posssession and delay compensation | AUTHORITY | 28/04/2025 |
| Akon Ventures LLP vs PEBBLE BAY KORAMANGALA PHASE 1 | Hand over of possession of residential flat and delay compensation | AUTHORITY | 28/04/2025 |
| Jeetender J Aswani vs GREEN VIEW KORAMANGALA | refund of entire sale consideration | AUTHORITY | 19/08/2024 |
| RAMNATH T R vs ITALIX LIVING SPACES PVT LTD | Direct the Respondent to pay the Delay Compensation with Physical possession of the said flat or Refund the entire amount with interest as per under Section 18 & Sec 19 of the RERA Act. | AUTHORITY | 17/06/2025 |
| Akon Ventures LLP vs ITALIX LIVING SPACES PVT LTD | Handover possession and delay compensation | AUTHORITY | 17/06/2025 |
| Akon Ventures LLP vs ITALIX LIVING SPACES PVT LTD | handover of possession and delay compensation | AUTHORITY | 17/06/2025 |
| Neeru Malik vs ITALIX LIVING SPACES PVT LTD | Direction to the Promoter to refund Rs. 50,00,000/- to the Complainant forthwith, and also award compensation for delay of 2.5 years in effecting refund. | AUTHORITY | 01/10/2026 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (3 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190518/0003082 18-05-2019 | Claiming for refund of the paid amount with Suitable compensation from the Promoter | Pebble Bay -Koramangala Phase I | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/200316/0005741 16-03-2020 | Refund with Delay Compensation. | Pebble Bay -Koramangala Phase I | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/200903/0006503 03-09-2020 | Complaint Regarding Non-payment of Refund under Section 18 | Pebble Bay -Koramangala Phase I | POSTED FOR ORDERS AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹159.5 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: YES BANK Turner Road (IFSC YESB0000134, a/c …0066). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 7 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 5 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 7 km |
| Electronic City | 11 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 12 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 14 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 31 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.