Prestige Elm Park
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS · Bengaluru South · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/170915/000281
The Drawings Report · ₹4,999
We read all 4 approved drawings and 23 filed papers on this project’s RERA file — the sheets the builder filed to get it approved.
One real find, from a Noida project’s approved drawings: the buyer pays for 10,000 sq ft — the floor inside the flat is 6,982 sq ft.
Get it for this project →Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked. Sent as a PDF in one working day.
Free before you decide: the 14 things to get in writing before you book
Every item comes from a real RERA filing. Send it to the family group before anyone pays a token.
Send the checklist to the family group Read it here →PRESTIGE BAGAMANE TEMPLE BELLS covers 52,103 sq m (12.9 acres) and includes 10 towers with 970 registered apartments, with an estimated project cost of ₹330.4 crore. With 75.3 homes per acre, it ranks at the 47th percentile of the 784 Bengaluru South projects tracked here (median 77.3). Its declared completion date of 30 September 2019 has passed; no occupancy certificate is on record.
Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
What you can verify free on this page
The official K-RERA filing record, in plain English
Registration and delivery
Prestige Bagamane Temple Bells is registered with K-RERA as PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/170915/000281, and the promoter has declared completion for 30 Sep 2019.
30 Sep 2019
declared completion
Figures are the promoter's own filings as they stood when Quietlist last read the register. A declared completion date is a filing, not a handover commitment.
Source · K-RERA project register · read 10 Sep 2026
Project scale
Prestige Bagamane Temple Bells spans 52,103 sq m (12.87 acres), comprises 10 towers, registers 970 units, and is declared to cost ₹330.37 cr.
₹330.37 cr
declared project cost
12.87acres
52,103 sq m
970units
on the registration
2.249FAR
sanctioned
Scale and cost as the promoter registered them. The declared cost is the promoter's own estimate on the filing, not a valuation and not a price to a buyer.
Source · K-RERA project registration · read 10 Sep 2026
Promoter record
Prestige is the promoter of record on 89 projects registered with K-RERA, 51 of which are past their declared completion dates on the register.
89projects
registered with K-RERA
51past declared date
on the register
66%
average construction reported
Counted across Quietlist's full K-RERA register store, matched on the promoter name as it appears on each filing.
Source · K-RERA register, all projects · read 10 Sep 2026
🔒 What I’d do as a buyer here · Drawings Report
The report opens with what this project really is — read from its approved drawings — then the specific calls: the cheapest good way to buy here, the flat to say no to, what you can stop worrying about, and what to get in writing before you sign anything.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 970 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 77,674 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 52,103 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.249 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 10 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 1,058 total (25 open) — 1.09 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 10-03-2015 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| APARTMENT | 968 | 100% | 77,674 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower-1 | 18 | 112 | 116 | - |
| Tower-2 | 18 | 108 | 112 | - |
| Tower-3 | 18 | 110 | 114 | - |
| Tower-4 | 18 | 112 | 116 | - |
| Tower-5 | 18 | 112 | 116 | - |
| Tower-6 | 18 | 112 | 116 | - |
| Tower-7 | 18 | 148 | 152 | - |
| Tower-8 | 13 | 77 | 81 | - |
Showing first 8 of 10 tower/wing rows.
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 970 official flat/unit rows, matching the 970 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 356 | 37.9-75.1 sqft | 39.8-59.5 sqft | 356 |
| 2BHK+STUDY | 300 | 87.3-89.0 sqft | 46.8-56.1 sqft | 300 |
| 3BHK | 190 | 103.8-105.3 sqft | 54.6-55.4 sqft | 190 |
| 1BHK | 122 | 37.9-39.9 sqft | 21.6-29.3 sqft | 122 |
| Club House | 2 | 771.0-1,031.5 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 54 (1 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower-7 | 148 | 39.9-89.0 sqft | 22.3-47.1 sqft | 148 |
| Tower-1 | 112 | 74.4-105.3 sqft | 39.9-54.9 sqft | 112 |
| Tower-4 | 112 | 74.4-105.3 sqft | 39.9-54.9 sqft | 112 |
| Tower-5 | 112 | 74.7-105.1 sqft | 40.1-55.4 sqft | 112 |
| Tower-6 | 112 | 74.4-105.3 sqft | 39.9-54.9 sqft | 112 |
| Tower-3 | 110 | 74.4-89.0 sqft | 39.9-56.1 sqft | 110 |
| Tower-2 | 108 | 74.4-105.3 sqft | 39.9-54.9 sqft | 108 |
| Tower-8 | 77 | 37.9-75.1 sqft | 21.6-52.5 sqft | 77 |
| Tower-9 | 77 | 37.9-75.1 sqft | 21.6-59.5 sqft | 77 |
| Club House | 2 | 771.0-1,031.5 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 54 (1 with 0) |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1011 | Tower-1 | 0 | 2BHK+STUDY | 87.3 sqft | 47.2 sqft | 1 |
| 1012 | Tower-1 | 0 | 2BHK+STUDY | 88.8 sqft | 47.3 sqft | 1 |
| 1013 | Tower-1 | 0 | 2BHK | 74.4 sqft | 39.9 sqft | 1 |
| 1014 | Tower-1 | 0 | 3BHK | 105.3 sqft | 54.9 sqft | 1 |
| 1015 | Tower-1 | 0 | 3BHK | 103.8 sqft | 54.6 sqft | 1 |
| 1021 | Tower-1 | 1 | 2BHK+STUDY | 87.3 sqft | 47.2 sqft | 1 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Which flat to ask for · Drawings Report
The flat-level read: which towers and floors to prefer and which to avoid, what the drawings put above, below and beside each flat, and the things on this site nobody at the sales desk will tell you about.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
All 23 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 30 Sep 2019 — which has passed with no OC on file.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA complaint orders (14 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANAND VS vs PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS LIMITED | Payment of interest for delayed possession and obtaining occupancy certificate along with any other relief as this Tribunal may deem fit | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2023 |
| PRAMOD S M vs PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS LIMITED | Payment of interest for delayed possession and obtaining occupancy certificate along with any other relief as this Tribunal may deem fit | AUTHORITY | 20/05/2024 |
| MAMTA HEGDE vs PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS LIMITED | Payment of interest for delayed possession and obtaining occupancy certificate along with any other relief as this Tribunal may deem fit | AUTHORITY | 20/05/2024 |
| BHUVANESH PACHAURI vs PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS LIMITED | Payment of interest for delayed possession and obtaining occupancy certificate along with any other relief as this Tribunal may deem fit | AUTHORITY | 20/05/2024 |
| AARIK SUBRAMANYAM vs PRESTIGE BAGAMANE TEMPLE BELLS | Payment of interest for delayed possession and obtaining occupancy certificate along with any other relief as this Tribunal may deem fit | AUTHORITY | 20/05/2024 |
| RADHA NEELE GOWDA vs PRESTIGE BAGAMANE TEMPLE BELLS | Payment of interest for delayed possession and obtaining occupancy certificate along with any other relief as this Tribunal may deem fit | AUTHORITY | 20/05/2024 |
| SHWETHA S vs PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS LIMITED | Payment of interest for delayed possession and obtaining occupancy certificate along with any other relief as this Tribunal may deem fit | AUTHORITY | 20/05/2024 |
| GEETHA SANTOSH vs PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS LIMITED | Payment of interest for delayed possession and obtaining occupancy certificate along with any other relief as this Tribunal may deem fit | AUTHORITY | 20/05/2024 |
| MITHUNRAJ vs PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS LIMITED | Payment of interest for delayed possession and obtaining occupancy certificate along with any other relief as this Tribunal may deem fit | AUTHORITY | 20/05/2024 |
| Phaneendra K N vs PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS LIMITED | Strict adherence to sanction plan and compensation for repair of structural defect, rectify the seepage issue in the basement car parking, and compensation for mental agony and legal cost | AUTHORITY | 17/10/2022 |
| Pruthvi Raj vs PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS LIMITED | Strict adherence to sanction plan and compensation for repair of structural defect, rectify the seepage issue in the basement car parking, and compensation for mental agony and legal cost | AUTHORITY | 17/10/2022 |
| Pradeep G S vs PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS LIMITED | Strict adherence to sanction plan and compensation for repair of structural defect, allot the car parking space, and compensation for mental agony and legal cost | AUTHORITY | 17/10/2022 |
| VENKATESH S ARBATTI vs PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS LIMITED | 1. Prestige to allot a car parking space to the Complainants near the tower, in which their apartment is situated, without seeking for additional costs and rectification of issues in apartment | AUTHORITY | 17/10/2022 |
| PAWAN KUMAR MITTAL vs PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS LIMITED | Interest for delay in Possession | AUTHORITY | 13/08/2022 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (61 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190225/0002242 25-02-2019 | Builder not paying compensation as per agreement and no handover of apartment after deadline | PRESTIGE WESTWOODS (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190325/0002508 25-03-2019 | Delayed Interest for delayed handover | Prestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190330/0002539 30-03-2019 | Delay in delivery of Project | Prestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190419/0002630 19-04-2019 | This is to request to adjust against balance or reimburse the amount as per delay clause @ 9% till date on the amount paid. Also to adhere to agreement for handover of flat no 14011 in tower 14 | Prestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190519/0003075 19-05-2019 | Prestiege Royale Gardens T2147 Apartmen Dealy in possession, compensation not being pais as per agreement | Prestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190519/0003091 19-05-2019 | Undue delay of project completion and Monetary compensation towards that per Construction agreement | Prestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190520/0003069 20-05-2019 | There is no OC 2 yrs after promised data of delivery. There is misrepresentation of the tower number scheduled apartment comparing brochure and sanctioned plan. | PRESTIGE ROYALE GARDENS PHASE 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/190614/0003288 14-06-2019 | Delay in delivery and compensation not paid | PRESTIGE ROYALE GARDENS PHASE 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
K-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | ABHAY ITTY ZACHARIAH | - | 2016 | RICHMOND TOWN, BANGALORE |
| Contractor | JMC PROJECT INDIA LIMITED | - | 1994 | GOLD TOWER, BANGALORE |
| Structural engineer | PRUTHVIRAJ | - | - | - |
Prestige has 89 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Prestige Estates”) (average reported construction progress 66%). 51 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹34.1 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LAVELLE ROAD (IFSC KKBK0000422, a/c …6321). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
The nearest major job hub is ~14 km away — a real but liveable commute to the nearest job hub — factor peak-hour traffic.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 7 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 14 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 14 km |
| Electronic City | 15 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 21 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 34 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
The approved drawings
Everything above is on this page already, free, from the government record. The drawings are different: the 4 approved sheets are the same drawings the builder filed to get PRESTIGE BAGAMANE TEMPLE BELLS approved — what sits under each tower, which floor holds machines, what the sales sheet leaves out. Nobody reads them for you. We do.
What that turns up — from other projects’ filings:
ATS Knightsbridge · Sector 124, Noida
You pay for 10,000 sq ft. The floor inside your home is 6,982 sq ft. The rest is walls, shared circulation and services. Get both numbers written into your agreement before you pay any booking amount.
Oberoi Elysian · Goregaon East, Mumbai
“The building is complete.” The tower has reached full height — true. The same filed certificate, same page: sanitary fittings 6% done. Ask for a possession date in writing.
Godrej Aristocrat · Sector 49, Gurugram
Paying extra for the top floor? The terrace drawing shows what sits on the slab above those flats: the overhead water tanks, the lift machine rooms and the roof machinery. Ask which flat sits under which.
Prestige Camden Gardens · Thanisandra, Bengaluru
The approved parking table asks for 12 visitor spaces. It shows 0. Two-wheeler spaces: also 0. Ask in writing where visitors will park.
Want this project read from its filed drawings?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. For PRESTIGE BAGAMANE TEMPLE BELLS, one reading of it goes further. Which flat should I ask for? — what the approved drawings and filed papers say about the flats, the parking, the approvals, and what to get in writing before you sign. That is the Drawings Report. See a real one first:
Drawings Report sample: Prestige Camden Gardens → · browse all sample reports →
Payment is confirmed automatically. The Drawings Report is 1 working day. We email the link, so you can close the tab.
Drawings Report · ₹4,999
Every drawing on file, read — which flat to ask for · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Paying from outside India? Pay $59 (Drawings Report) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes, and send the 14-point booking checklist with the first email.
Built by Prestige Estates. View Prestige Estates's full track record →
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Prestige Bagamane Temple Bells?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 10 Sep 2026