K-RERA · the public record
Skylark Ithaca
Bengaluru East · Ithaca Estates
Know the project.
Then choose your home.
The registration, progress and filed details in one place. Go further with an independent reading of the project’s evidence.
The record · free to read
Registration read 20 Sep 2026Progress & dates
The timeline on file.
Promoter-reported construction
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q3 2025
declared completion
31 Dec 2019
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
Inventory & scale
What this registration contains.
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
The whole registration
19.7registered acres
89.5registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual home.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This illustrates the report format. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the sample report ↗
The source record
The details behind the headline.
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/170915/000308
This project, on the record
The comparable facts of this project, from its own RERA registration record. Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
Official Registry Facts
Official project scale
RERA filingRegistration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 1,761 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 105,637 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 79,621 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.499 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 19 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 1,761 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 1,679 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 25-08-2014 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apartment | 1,498 | 100% | 105,637 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 1 | 19 | 113 | 113 | - |
| Tower 2 | 19 | 115 | 115 | - |
| Tower 3 | 19 | 115 | 115 | - |
| Tower 4 | 19 | 75 | 75 | - |
| Tower 5 | 19 | 115 | 115 | - |
| Tower 6 | 19 | 115 | 115 | - |
| Tower 7 | 19 | 76 | 76 | - |
| Tower 8 | 19 | 79 | 79 | - |
Showing first 8 of 19 tower/wing rows.
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 1,761 official flat/unit rows, matching the 1,761 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 987 | 750.9-795.2 sqft | 303.6-318.1 sqft | 987 |
| 3BHK | 558 | 944.6-1,485.1 sqft | 380.8-598.0 sqft | 558 |
| 1BHK | 211 | 434.2-452.7 sqft | 181.7-187.4 sqft | 211 |
| 4BHK | 5 | 1,812.8-2,294.7 sqft | 727.4-919.0 sqft | 5 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 10 | 117 | 750.9-1,485.1 sqft | 303.6-598.0 sqft | 117 |
| Tower 9 | 116 | 452.7-1,439.0 sqft | 187.4-587.1 sqft | 116 |
| Tower 11 | 115 | 750.9-1,485.1 sqft | 303.6-598.0 sqft | 115 |
| Tower 2 | 115 | 452.7-1,439.0 sqft | 187.4-587.1 sqft | 115 |
| Tower 3 | 115 | 750.9-1,485.1 sqft | 303.6-598.0 sqft | 115 |
| Tower 5 | 115 | 452.7-1,439.0 sqft | 187.4-587.1 sqft | 115 |
| Tower 6 | 115 | 750.9-1,485.1 sqft | 303.6-598.0 sqft | 115 |
| Tower 1 | 113 | 750.9-1,485.1 sqft | 303.6-598.0 sqft | 113 |
| Tower 12 (Phase II) | 89 | 452.7-944.6 sqft | 187.4-380.8 sqft | 89 |
| Tower 13 (Phase II) | 89 | 750.9-795.2 sqft | 303.6-318.1 sqft | 89 |
| Tower 14 (Phase II) | 89 | 750.9-795.2 sqft | 303.6-318.1 sqft | 89 |
| Tower 15 (Phase II) | 89 | 452.7-944.6 sqft | 187.4-380.8 sqft | 89 |
Showing first 12 of 19 tower/wing groups.
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1-001 | Tower 1 | 0 | 2BHK | 750.9 sqft | 303.6 sqft | 1 |
| T1-002 | Tower 1 | 0 | 2BHK | 795.2 sqft | 318.1 sqft | 1 |
| T1-003 | Tower 1 | 0 | 2BHK | 795.2 sqft | 318.1 sqft | 1 |
| T1-005 | Tower 1 | 0 | 2BHK | 795.2 sqft | 318.1 sqft | 1 |
| T1-006 | Tower 1 | 0 | 2BHK | 795.2 sqft | 318.1 sqft | 1 |
| T1-101 | Tower 1 | 1 | 2BHK | 750.9 sqft | 303.6 sqft | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filing⚠ 1 litigation case on record
- NCLT — NCLT (2019)
All 12 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA complaint orders (39 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rajendra Gurram vs SKY LARK ITHACA | Flat delivery,Rent compensation,delay compensation | AUTHORITY | 29/04/2025 |
| Niyas Ahmed Kambalbasha vs SKYLARK ITHACA | Refund With Interest | AUTHORITY | 29/04/2025 |
| SNEHANSU BHUSAN CHATTERJEE vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | Get money back and stop EMI | AUTHORITY | 15/06/2026 |
| Dr Satish J Patil vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | 1) Execute the Exit option- memorandum of understanding agreement 2) Reimbrse all the pre-emis with interest 3) foreclose the loan 4) Payment of opportunity cost with interest | AUTHORITY | 15/06/2026 |
| IMMIDI VIDYA vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | Refund | AUTHORITY | 15/06/2026 |
| Mitalee Chopra and Vikas Vivek vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | as prayed in the facts of case | AUTHORITY | 15/06/2026 |
| SACHIDANANDA KRISHNAPPA KANCHAN vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | 1) Refund of amount paid by me and Opportunity cost to be paid by the developer 2) Bank Loan takeover OR cancellation of loan in my name refund of disbursed amount 3) Reimbursement of pending pre EMIs | AUTHORITY | 15/06/2026 |
| Mr.Vishal Gupta and Mrs.Varalika Gupta vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | 1. Direct the M/s.Skylark Mansions Pvt Ltd & M/s. | AUTHORITY | 15/06/2026 |
| ABHISHEK TEWARI vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | ICICI Bank Loan Pre EMI is requested to be stopped. Bank failed to release the funds based on the inconsistent progress made by the Developer. Expected Refund is approximately 18 Lakhs. | AUTHORITY | 15/06/2026 |
| Chitralekha Mishra vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | Refund of amount paid by complainants along with interest, Refund of Pre-emi's paid ,Abide terms of Exit Option-MOU , Payment of opportunity cost ,bank loan closure,Refund of all payments | AUTHORITY | 15/06/2026 |
| Nilesh Ishverbhai Patel vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | Exit the project by cancelling Agreement, Direct Respondents to refund the sum of Rs. 7,36,492/- along with interest at 18% , Direct the Respondent to discharge to loan and repay the pemi | AUTHORITY | 15/06/2026 |
| Bhupendra Kashinath Ingle vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | As prayed in the facts of case | AUTHORITY | 15/06/2026 |
| Mohammad Sharique Ahmad vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | 1. Exit from the project. 2. Refund of Rs. 6,32,276/- at 18% interest 3. Opportunity Cost of Rs. 4,78,778/- 4. Direct Respondent to Discharge the loan amount disbursed 5. Refund of pre-emi along wit | AUTHORITY | 15/06/2026 |
| Refund of Booking Amount vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | Help to get refund from Builder. | AUTHORITY | 15/06/2026 |
| Mohammad Sharique Ahmad vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | 1. a. exit the project and cancellation of the agreement, 2. Refund of sale consideration along with 18% interest pa 3. Direct the Respondent to discharge the loan 4. Opportunity cost | AUTHORITY | 15/06/2026 |
| Dindukurthi Radha Krishna babu vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | Direct the builder to refund advance , reimburce pre-emi & Emi also clear the pending amount due to ICICI Bank loan NoLBBNG00002997860towards both the principal and accrued interest | AUTHORITY | 15/06/2026 |
| mohammad sharique ahmad vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | retund and exit from the project SKYLARK ITHAKA | AUTHORITY | 15/06/2026 |
| Abdul Mujeeb Khan vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | 1. Direct the M/s.Skylark Mansions Pvt Ltd & M/s.Ithaca Estates Pvt Ltd to pay the complainant all the pre-emi’s (1,818,331/-.. Pre-Emi as on today) which the opposite party has failed to reimburse. | AUTHORITY | 15/06/2026 |
| Silgin Sidharthan Moothandassery vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | Refund of Rs Rs 35,27,127 along with interest | AUTHORITY | 15/06/2026 |
| Nitin Urs vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | i. Levy penalty on Respondents/developer amounting to five percent of real estate project in terms of Section 60 of the Act and other reliefs as stated in a separate sheet due to restriction of space | AUTHORITY | 15/06/2026 |
| Mr Subramanian vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | Refund and cancellation of the amount Rs 56,33,104 | AUTHORITY | 15/06/2026 |
| Roshan Gupta vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | Refund with compensation | AUTHORITY | 15/06/2026 |
| Jayashankar Prasad Singh vs Skylark Mansion Pvt. Ltd | direction to handover possession with damages | AUTHORITY | 14/12/2024 |
| Kumari Niwedita vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | Refund of PRE-EMI & stop upcoming PRE-EMI | AUTHORITY | 14/12/2024 |
| LAXMIKANT AGARWAL vs ITHACA ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED | Refund from Skylark due to non-completion 3yrs pending project. And clearance to me so that I can stop paying pre-emi to bank. | AUTHORITY | 14/02/2025 |
| venkata naga sarat kumar inuguri vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | Cancellation and release of money I have paid (with interest) | AUTHORITY | 13/12/2025 |
| Shammi Malhotra vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | Refund of the amount as per below schedule along with interest i.e Rs 9510717 with with interest | AUTHORITY | 13/09/2025 |
| Shammi Malhotra vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | Direct opposite party to pay me the advance paid to them, loan disbursed amount,and clear all outstanding loan amount in my home loan acc no.LBBNG00003119183 | AUTHORITY | 13/09/2025 |
| Avinash Kumar More and Nisha Agrawal vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | Refund of Full Amount including the Pre-EMI reimbursement | AUTHORITY | 13/08/2025 |
| Mrs Delnaz Sam Dalal vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | Direct the opposite party to pay me the advance paid,pre-emi,opportunity cost Rs.2/sft/PM, and clear outstanding in ICICI -loan No.LBMUM00003160401. | AUTHORITY | 13/08/2025 |
| Ghazlaa Parveen vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | Looking for refund and compensation | AUTHORITY | 12/07/2025 |
| Arun Radhakrishnan pillai vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | cancellation & refund of entire amount along with Opportunity cost & Interest as per RERA | AUTHORITY | 12/07/2025 |
| Dr Sanjay Kumar Misra vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | a. Grant the Complainants the leave to exit the project b. Refund of sum of Rs. 8,49,526/- at 18% interest c. Direct the Respondents to clear/ discharge the loan amount received by them & OC | AUTHORITY | 12/07/2025 |
| Joyson Simon Raymond Furtado vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | Refund of the amount as per below schedule along with interest. | AUTHORITY | 11/07/2026 |
| Chris Mathew vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | Refund of the amount as per below schedule along with interest. | AUTHORITY | 11/07/2026 |
| Vishnupriya vs Ithaca Estates Private Limited | Transfer of loan to the builder through Injunction | AUTHORITY | 08/06/2023 |
| Ashmeet Singh Chhabra vs SKYLARK ITHACA | a. Grant the Complainants the leave to exit the project 2.Direct Respondents to refund the sum of Rs. 59,27,646 along with 18% interest and direct respondent to clear loan amount 3. Opportunity cost | AUTHORITY | 08/03/2025 |
| Ayz Ali Cheriya Melat vs Ithaca Estates Pvt Ltd | Kindly get my money refunded as project stalled since 2017, Rs. 30,29,520/- plus interest and compensation for mental harrassment, stress and tension. | AUTHORITY | 08/03/2025 |
| NITIN PURI vs M/S.ITHACA ESTATES | It is praid to kind authority of Karnataka RERA , Bengaluru to kindly order against the respondent / promoter for refund of the monies of the complainant for Rs. 6132527 with interests | AUTHORITY | 06/08/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (141 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190208/0002078 08-02-2019 | compensation for delay in emi credit | Skylark Ithaca | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190211/0002081 11-02-2019 | Refund of booking amount upon cancellation | Skylark Ithaca | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190212/0002122 12-02-2019 | Pre emi reversal and exit option apply as per the aggrement | Skylark Ithaca | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190216/0002145 16-02-2019 | The claim is for refund and compensation with interest at the rate of SBI Basic Prime lending rate plus 2percent from the date of payment to till the date of realization. | Skylark Ithaca | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190217/0002176 17-02-2019 | Exit Option, Amount Repayment and Cancellation of RERA Registration | Skylark Ithaca | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190219/0002217 19-02-2019 | Delay in possession & halted construction | Skylark Ithaca | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190219/0002218 19-02-2019 | Delay in Possession and no work progress | Skylark Ithaca | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190223/0002258 23-02-2019 | DELAY IN CONSTRUCTION OF SKYLARK ITHACA | Skylark Ithaca | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Statutory approval status
RERA filingClean approvals profile: every applicable statutory NOC is on file — including Fire NOC, environmental clearance and pollution-control clearance (KSPCB), the clearances buyers most often find still pending. Nothing is outstanding among the statutory NOCs — which compliance documents are filed versus still under process is a separate matter, covered in Litigation & compliance above. Since these are developer-filed portal statuses, have your lawyer confirm them against the linked NOC copies.
3 further authority slots are marked not applicable by the regulator.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water supply and sewage board | Approved | 29-11-2013 | BWSSB 291113.pdf |
| KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres) | Approved | 12-03-2014 | KSPCB 120314.pdf |
| KSPCB- MOEF (Above 50 Acres) | Approved | 04-07-2015 | MOEF 040715.pdf |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | Approved | 19-04-2025 | BESCOM 190425.pdf |
| Fire and Safety | Approved | 25-01-2014 | Fire 250114.PDF |
| Airport Authority of India | Approved | 09-03-2013 | Airport 090313.pdf |
| BSNL/Telecommunication Department | Approved | 24-02-2014 | BSNL 2402014.pdf |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2025-Q3): ₹0.00 Cr collected from buyers, ₹0.00 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.
| Construction progress | 34% → 34% (+0 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 998/1761 (57%) |
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹42.7 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: ICICI Bank Commissariat Road (IFSC ICIC0000002, a/c …4745). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest major job hub is ~5 km away — a manageable everyday commute to a major job hub.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Whitefield IT hub | 5 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 10 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 13 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 14 km |
| Electronic City | 20 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 21 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.