Sruthika Springfields
K-RERA · the public record
THE PINNACLE
Yelahanka · Sruthika Builders & Developers
Is this the right project?
Which home should you choose?
Read the free RERA facts below. For help choosing a home or comparing a price, select a report.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
See the findings, not just a list of checks.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project X-Ray sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project 360. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
93%construction reportedQ1 2026 filing
89units not bookedof 120 · Q1 2026 filing
31 Dec 2027declared completionK-RERA registration · read 05 Nov 2026
Free project details
Registration read 05 Nov 2026Construction progress and dates
Promoter-reported construction
83%
Q3 2025
89%
Q4 2025
93%
Q1 2026
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q1 2026
declared completion
31 Dec 2027
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 05 Nov 2026
Registered units and project size
Apartments 3BHK59 2BHK61
120
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 05 Nov 2026
The whole registration
1.3registered acres
89.9registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for THE PINNACLE
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/472/PR/160224/006635
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion31 December 2027
Land area5,400 sq m (1.3 acres)
Homes registered120
Tower/wing entries1
Unit mix120 × Apartments 3BHK59 2BHK61
In context
Density89.9 homes per acre
Density in context71st percentile of 127 Yelahanka projects (median 76)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 120 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 9,735 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Official built-up area | 16,739 sqm | Useful scale context when comparing density and project cost. |
| Registered land area | 5,400 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | ~2.25 | Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈12,150 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 5,400 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 132 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Covered-parking field | 140 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Approved plan number | PRJ/5197/22-23 | Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder. |
| Plan approval date | 14-02-2023 | |
| Project start date | 30-10-2021 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apartments 3BHK59 2BHK61 | 120 | 100% | 9,735 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A Block | 4 | 120 | 132 | 14.5 m |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 120 official flat/unit rows, matching the 120 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 BHK | 61 | 58.8-77.4 sqm | 31.8-42.1 sqm | 61 |
| 3 BHK | 59 | 90.0-101.0 sqm | 47.6-58.8 sqm | 59 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A Block | 120 | 58.8-101.0 sqm | 31.8-58.8 sqm | 120 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | A Block | 0 | 3 BHK | 95.1 sqm | 47.6 sqm | 1 |
| 002 | A Block | 0 | 2 BHK | 77.4 sqm | 42.1 sqm | 1 |
| 003 | A Block | 0 | 3 BHK | 97.9 sqm | 53.6 sqm | 1 |
| 004 | A Block | 0 | 3 BHK | 97.9 sqm | 56.5 sqm | 1 |
| 005 | A Block | 0 | 3 BHK | 98.0 sqm | 53.9 sqm | 1 |
| 006 | A Block | 0 | 3 BHK | 101.0 sqm | 57.9 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingThe promoter answered No to the land-litigation question. This is a filed declaration, not a court search.
22 of 44 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 22 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →
Statutory approval status
RERA filing3 of 3 applicable approvals are marked Approved in the filing. Check the linked documents for their scope and validity.
7 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water supply and sewage board | Approved | 09-10-2019 | BWSSB NOC Dt 09 10 2019_compressed.pdf |
| KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres) | Approved | 22-05-2020 | KSPCB NOC 22 05 2020 2_compressed.pdf |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | Approved | 30-04-2022 | BESCOM NOC dated 30 04 2022_compressed.pdf |
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 4 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chartered accountant | Kasiraju Venkata Chala Pavan Kumar | 223800/11/11/2009 | 0000 | Hyderabad, Telangana - 500013 |
| Engineer | Iftikar Ahmad Chappu | BCCL/BL-3-6/SE-0200/22-23 | 0000 | Belagavi, Karnataka - 591301 |
| Architect | Pushpendra Kumar Bharti | CA/2009/45995 | 0000 | North West Delhi, Delhi - 110085 |
| Contractor | Sanjay Sahu | - | 0000 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560064 |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹1.16 Cr collected from buyers, ₹1.38 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account. This quarter the escrow withdrawal (₹1.38 Cr) exceeded buyer collections (₹1.16 Cr) — worth asking the builder to reconcile against certified construction milestones, which is what RERA requires escrow draws to track.
| Construction progress | 83% → 93% (+10 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 31/120 (26%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹2.71 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹5.88 Cr (2.17x collections) |
- Construction progress moved from 83% to 93% across the filed QPR window.
- Across available QPR rows, escrow withdrawals are 2.17x buyer collections. Ask the builder to reconcile this against certified project costs and prior-period balances.
- In the latest QPR, escrow withdrawal exceeds buyer collections for that quarter. This can be normal if prior balance existed, but it needs a clean explanation.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹23.4 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: ICICI Bank Matthikere IFSC Code : ICIC0002329 Pin Code : 560064. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 10 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 10 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 14 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 22 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 23 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 26 km |
| Electronic City | 29 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.