Centrona ZEN-A
MahaRERA · the public record
AVEER YOG
GHATKOPAR · AMBIT LIFE STYLE HOMES LIMITED LIABILITY PARTERSHIP
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a unit? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your unit, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
See the report before you buy
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best units.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗From another project
See the report before you buy.
A published sample shows the level of detail, source illustrations and buyer reasoning. Its findings belong to that project.
Read a sample report ↗97units filed as unsoldInventory · 24 October 2026
31 Mar 2029declared completionMahaRERA registration · read 10 Sep 2026
166registered unitsMahaRERA registration · read 10 Sep 2026
Free project details
Registration read 10 Sep 2026RERA details for AVEER YOG
MahaRERA · PC1180002601409
Delivery and registration
When is the project declared for completion?
AVEER YOG is registered with MahaRERA as PC1180002601409 and the promoter has declared completion for 31 Mar 2029.
31 Mar 2029
declared completion
29months to go
against the declared date
The completion date and status as they stand on the MahaRERA registration record.
Source · MahaRERA project registration · read 10 Sep 2026
| MahaRERA registration | PC1180002601409 |
| Registered on | 03 Aug 2026 |
| Promoter-declared completion | 31 Mar 2029 |
| Current status | Certificate Signed |
| Against today | 29 months to the declared date |
Sales
How many are filed as sold or booked?
In AVEER YOG, 0 of 97 units filed with MahaRERA are recorded as sold or booked, about 0%, and 97 are filed as unsold.
0%sold or booked
0 of 97 units
Counts as the promoter filed them at the last compliance date; this is the filed inventory, not current availability. The registration lists 166 units; this inventory lists 97. These are separate filed records. Their counts do not match; neither count establishes today's availability.
Source · MahaRERA sold/unsold inventory filing · read 10 Sep 2026
No units are declared mortgaged, reserved, investor-held or not-for-sale in this inventory filing.
Sales
Are registered sale-agreement prices available?
No registered sale-agreement price is recorded for AVEER YOG in the MahaRERA project file.
Not available
This is what the record does not contain, not a value of zero.
Source · MahaRERA project file · checked 24 October 2026
What the filings record, unit by unit
Read from MahaRERA on 24 October 2026
No unit in AVEER YOG carries a filed agreement value in this unit list. What the promoter has filed is the government ready reckoner value for 97 units — the Annual Statement of Rates valuation, with each unit’s carpet area and floor already applied. Across them that is Rs 19,609 a sq ft typical, over Rs 18,785 to Rs 19,609.
A reckoner value is the basis stamp duty is charged on. It is not a price anyone paid, not an asking price, and not a valuation of the unit to you.
Buildings & Wings
The buildings and wings registered under this project, with each tower's sanctioned height and declared completion date. Here the tallest tower rises to G+16 and 166 units are registered across the project.
| Building | Wings | Floors | Units | Declared completion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVEER YOG | 1 | G+16 | 166 | - |
Unit mix on the filing: 166 non-residential.
Complaints
No buyer complaints were on this project's MahaRERA record at the time of reading.
Legal & Litigation
The promoter has declared 3 court cases on this project to MahaRERA. Filed statuses: 3 “Ongoing”. These are the promoter's filed statements, not a current court check. A disposed application or motion does not establish that the whole case is closed. Litigation can cloud the land title or stall the build — have a lawyer pull the cause list for each and confirm whether it touches the title to your unit. This is declared by the promoter; there may be further cases not on the RERA record.
| Court | Case no. | Year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Court Of Judicature At Bombay | WP/797/2015 | 2015 | Ongoing Filed description: The present Writ Petition has been filed by Padmanabh Builders challenging the order dated 27th May 2014 passed by the Competent Authority granting deemed conveyance in favour of the Co-operative Housing Society under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963. The Petitioners contend that they continue to be the lawful owners of the property, that the development was intended to be carried out in phases, and that they had retained valuable development rights, including the balance FSI/TDR, which could not have been conveyed to the Society. It is their case that the Competent Authority failed to consider the pending disputes, contractual arrangements, and their subsisting ownership and development rights before granting the deemed conveyance,failed to consider the pending disputes, contractual arrangements, and their subsisting ownership and development rights before granting the deemed conveyance, rendering the impugned order illegal and liable to be set aside. |
| High Court Of Judicature At Bombay | Suit/405/2025 | 2025 | Ongoing Filed description: The present Commercial Suit has been instituted by Ambit Life Style Homes LLP, the developer appointed by Parekh Market Premises Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., seeking directions against certain non-cooperating members and occupants to vacate and hand over possession of their respective shops and offices to facilitate the redevelopment of the society property. The Plaintiffs contend that the Society has obtained a valid deemed conveyance, executed a registered Development Agreement in favour of the Plaintiffs, and that an overwhelming majority of members have consented to and complied with the redevelopment process. Despite the issuance of valid vacation notices and the Plaintiffs having obtained the requisite approvals, including the Intimation of Approval (IOA), and having incurred substantial expenditure towards redevelopment, Defendant Nos. 2 to 10 have failed to vacate their premises, thereby obstructing the project. The suit, therefore, seeks mandatory and consequential relie |
| Bombay City Civil Court At Bombay | Suit/2599/2015 | 2015 | Ongoing Filed description: Pending |
Location, Land & Connectivity
Located at GHATKOPAR, M.G.ROAD, Kurla, Mumbai Suburban, 400077. Per the filed land record, the plot is bounded to the north by Bounded by CTS No. 4555, to the south by Bounded by CTS No. 4674, to the east by M. G. Road and to the west by Bounded by CTS No. 4647. These are the boundaries as recorded in the filed land record.