MahaRERA · the public record
Regency Antilia Phase X
NEAR CENTURY RAYON · REGENCY NIRMAN LTD
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a unit? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your unit, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
See the report before you buy
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best units.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗From another project
See the report before you buy.
A published sample shows the level of detail, source illustrations and buyer reasoning. Its findings belong to that project.
Read a sample report ↗Free project details
Registration read 18 Jul 2026RERA details for Regency Antilia Phase X
MahaRERA · PR1335052502791
Delivery and registration
When is the project declared for completion?
Regency Antilia Phase X is registered with MahaRERA as PR1335052502791 and the promoter has declared completion for 30 Apr 2030.
30 Apr 2030
declared completion
42months to go
against the declared date
The completion date and status as they stand on the MahaRERA registration record.
Source · MahaRERA project registration · read 18 Jul 2026
| MahaRERA registration | PR1335052502791 |
| Registered on | 13 Mar 2026 |
| Promoter-declared completion | 30 Apr 2030 |
| Current status | Certificate Signed |
| Against today | 42 months to the declared date |
Approvals and compliance
What compliance filings are on record?
MahaRERA's defaulter and deregistration lists and the quarterly-progress filing for Regency Antilia Phase X record 1 quarterly progress report since registration.
1quarterly filing
Entries as they appear on MahaRERA's own lists and the project's progress filing.
Source · MahaRERA defaulter, deregistration and QPR lists · read 18 Jul 2026
- Filing progress reports — 1 quarterly progress report on record since registration, with no current default.
Promoter record
What else is this promoter on record for?
REGENCY NIRMAN LTD is the promoter of record on 29 projects registered with MahaRERA.
29projects
registered with MahaRERA
Counted across Quietlist's full MahaRERA register store, matched on the promoter name as it appears on each filing.
Source · MahaRERA register, all projects · read 18 Jul 2026
Construction
How much construction cost has been reported?
In Regency Antilia Phase X, ₹2.75 Cr of a declared ₹157.00 Cr estimated project cost is reported as incurred, about 1.8%, as at the last certified filing with MahaRERA.
1.8%
₹2.75 Cr
of ₹157.00 Cr declared cost
Cost incurred as last certified to MahaRERA. It is a financial measure, not a survey of site work, and it can lag on-site reality between filings.
Source · MahaRERA quarterly progress filing · read 18 Jul 2026
Sales
How many are filed as sold or booked?
In Regency Antilia Phase X, 2 of 210 units filed with MahaRERA are recorded as sold or booked, about 1%, and 208 are filed as unsold.
1%sold or booked
2 of 210 units
₹3.49 Cr
committed by buyers
Counts and agreement value as the promoter filed them at the last compliance date; this is the filed inventory, not current availability. Of that agreement value, ₹15.00 Lakh (about 4%) is recorded as collected and ₹3.34 Cr as receivable.
Source · MahaRERA sold/unsold inventory filing · read 18 Jul 2026
No units are declared mortgaged, reserved, investor-held or not-for-sale in this inventory filing.
Sales
Are registered sale-agreement prices available?
No registered sale-agreement price is recorded for Regency Antilia Phase X in the MahaRERA project file.
Not available
This is what the record does not contain, not a value of zero.
Source · MahaRERA project file · checked 26 October 2026
What the filings record, unit by unit
Read from MahaRERA on 26 October 2026
MahaRERA publishes, unit by unit, what this promoter filed: which units are sold and which are not, the RERA carpet area of each, and for sold or booked entries the filed agreement value — the consideration filed for that specific unit. On this project 2 units carry one, and 208 of the 210 are recorded unsold.
A filed consideration is the amount the promoter reported for one unit. It is not a valuation, and MahaRERA does not publish the date of any of these agreements — read a range as a spread, not as a trend. An unsold row means no sale had been filed for it when we looked, which is a filing state, not a promise that the unit is available to you today. Only one observation of this ledger so far: no change can be reported yet. This observation is an archived copy whose time is the moment the file was written, not a portal fetch time.
Buildings & Wings
The buildings and wings registered under this project, with each tower's sanctioned height and declared completion date.
| Building | Wings | Floors | Declared completion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building Type D5 | 1 | - | - |
Complaints
No buyer complaints were on this project's MahaRERA record at the time of reading.
Legal & Litigation
The promoter has declared 7 court cases on this project to MahaRERA. Filed statuses: 7 “Ongoing”. These are the promoter's filed statements, not a current court check. A disposed application or motion does not establish that the whole case is closed. Litigation can cloud the land title or stall the build — have a lawyer pull the cause list for each and confirm whether it touches the title to your unit. This is declared by the promoter; there may be further cases not on the RERA record.
| Court | Case no. | Year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bombay High Court | 5578/2008 | 2008 | Ongoing Filed description: Petitioner filed this petition against the order dated 02-07-2008 passed by Hon’ble Co-operative Minister, whereby the names of Petitioners were removed as the member. |
| Court Of Civil Judge Ulhasnagar | 55/2010 | 2010 | Ongoing Filed description: Regency Filed Suit for Declaration and injunction Prayers:- a. It may be declared that, the Defendants have no right to interfere with the Property rights of the Plaintiff. b. The Hon’ble court may be pleased to issue an order of perpetual injunction to restrain the defendants, their servants, agents, etc. from interfering with the property rights of the plaintiff in the suit Property. In this matter court grant injunction application (Exh.5) filed by Plaintiff (Regency). Plaintiff filed Evidence Affidavit along with Document now matter adj for Cross of plaintiff. Matter is posted for hearing on 04/02/2026 |
| Civil Judge Ulhasnagar | 28/2025 | 2025 | Ongoing Filed description: Plaintiff Filed this Civil Appeal challenging the Judgement dated 03/10/2022 passed against him in RCS No. 27/2010. |
| Bombay High Court | 371/2019 | 2019 | Ongoing Filed description: The Petitioners in the respective petitions submit that they were the lawful owners of the respective properties in question and that no compensation whatsoever was tendered or received by them at the time of the acquisition effected by the Provisional Government in the year 1949-50. Petitioners are also claiming that said properties was not use for which it was acquired. Petitioner prayed that Respondent No. 6 (State Government) be directed to return the said properties to Original Owners by implementing decision taken under Notification dated 10th October 1973 (on the basis of his allegation that said properties was not use for which it was acquired) |
| Bombay High Court | 2387/2019 | 2019 | Ongoing Filed description: The Petitioners in the respective petitions submit that they were the lawful owners of the respective properties in question and that no compensation whatsoever was tendered or received by them at the time of the acquisition effected by the Provisional Government in the year 1949-50. Petitioners are also claiming that said properties was not use for which it was acquired. Petitioner prayed that Respondent No. 6 (State Government) be directed to return the said properties to Original Owners by implementing decision taken under Notification dated 10th October 1973 (on the basis of his allegation that said properties was not use for which it was acquired) |
| Bombay High Court | 2388/2019 | 2019 | Ongoing Filed description: The Petitioners in the respective petitions submit that they were the lawful owners of the respective properties in question and that no compensation whatsoever was tendered or received by them at the time of the acquisition effected by the Provisional Government in the year 1949-50. Petitioners are also claiming that said properties was not use for which it was acquired. Petitioner prayed that Respondent No. 6 (State Government) be directed to return the said properties to Original Owners by implementing decision taken under Notification dated 10th October 1973 (on the basis of his allegation that said properties was not use for which it was acquired) |
| Court Of Civil Judge Ulhasnagar | RCS NO 27/2010 | 2010 | Ongoing Filed description: Plaintiff Filed Suit for Declaration and injunction Praying to declare that, the Defendants have no right to the suit property and Plaintiff is only sole possessor of the suit property. |
Location, Land & Connectivity
Located at NEAR CENTURY RAYON, CTS NO. 279/1 TO 279/6, SURVEY NO. 46, 47, 48, 52, 54, 55, 56, 58, 57, 51, 50, 40, 41, 44, 42, 43, 49, SHEET NO. 99, 100, 102, 103, 104, 105, 113, 114, 115 , Ulhasnagar, Thane, 421001. Per the filed land record, the plot is bounded to the north by River, to the south by Kalyan Murbad Road, to the east by Gurudwara and Temple and to the west by Club House. These are the boundaries as recorded in the filed land record.
Location & connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 32 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Powai / Hiranandani business park | 32 km |
| Andheri MIDC / SEEPZ | 34 km |
| Chhatrapati Shivaji Int'l Airport | 37 km |
| Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC) | 38 km |
| Lower Parel / Worli business district | 46 km |
| Nariman Point / Fort | 51 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.