Galaxy Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd
MahaRERA · the public record
Ajmera Uptown
Village Kalas, Vishrantwadi · AJMERA BORA ASSOCIATES
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a unit? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your unit, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
See the report before you buy
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best units.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗From another project
See the report before you buy.
A published sample shows the level of detail, source illustrations and buyer reasoning. Its findings belong to that project.
Read a sample report ↗42units filed as unsoldInventory · 18 October 2026
31 Jan 2031declared completionMahaRERA registration · read 18 Jul 2026
42registered unitsMahaRERA registration · read 18 Jul 2026
Free project details
Registration read 18 Jul 2026RERA details for Ajmera Uptown
MahaRERA · PC1260002600596
Delivery and registration
When is the project declared for completion?
Ajmera Uptown is registered with MahaRERA as PC1260002600596 and the promoter has declared completion for 31 Jan 2031.
31 Jan 2031
declared completion
51months to go
against the declared date
The completion date and status as they stand on the MahaRERA registration record.
Source · MahaRERA project registration · read 18 Jul 2026
| MahaRERA registration | PC1260002600596 |
| Registered on | 01 Jun 2026 |
| Promoter-declared completion | 31 Jan 2031 |
| Current status | Certificate Signed |
| Against today | 51 months to the declared date |
Construction
How much construction cost has been reported?
In Ajmera Uptown, ₹43.00 Lakh of a declared ₹205.88 Cr estimated project cost is reported as incurred, about 0.2%, as at the last certified filing with MahaRERA.
0.2%
₹43.00 Lakh
of ₹205.88 Cr declared cost
Cost incurred as last certified to MahaRERA. It is a financial measure, not a survey of site work, and it can lag on-site reality between filings.
Source · MahaRERA quarterly progress filing · read 18 Jul 2026
Sales
How many are filed as sold or booked?
In Ajmera Uptown, 0 of 42 units filed with MahaRERA are recorded as sold or booked, about 0%, and 42 are filed as unsold.
0%sold or booked
0 of 42 units
Counts as the promoter filed them at the last compliance date; this is the filed inventory, not current availability.
Source · MahaRERA sold/unsold inventory filing · read 18 Jul 2026
No units are declared mortgaged, reserved, investor-held or not-for-sale in this inventory filing.
Sales
Are registered sale-agreement prices available?
No registered sale-agreement price is recorded for Ajmera Uptown in the MahaRERA project file.
Not available
This is what the record does not contain, not a value of zero.
Source · MahaRERA project file · checked 18 October 2026
What the filings record, unit by unit
Read from MahaRERA on 18 October 2026
No unit in Ajmera Uptown carries a filed agreement value in this unit list. What the promoter has filed is the government ready reckoner value for 42 units — the Annual Statement of Rates valuation, with each unit’s carpet area and floor already applied. Across them that is Rs 7,059 a sq ft typical, over Rs 7,057 to Rs 7,060.
A reckoner value is the basis stamp duty is charged on. It is not a price anyone paid, not an asking price, and not a valuation of the unit to you.
Buildings & Wings
The buildings and wings registered under this project, with each tower's sanctioned height and declared completion date. Here the tallest tower rises to G+2 and 42 units are registered across the project.
| Building | Wings | Floors | Units | Declared completion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wing A1 | 1 | G+2 | 42 | - |
Unit mix on the filing: 42 non-residential.
Complaints
No buyer complaints were on this project's MahaRERA record at the time of reading.
Legal & Litigation
The promoter has declared 16 court cases on this project to MahaRERA. Filed statuses: 8 “Closed”; 8 “Ongoing”. These are the promoter's filed statements, not a current court check. A disposed application or motion does not establish that the whole case is closed. Litigation can cloud the land title or stall the build — have a lawyer pull the cause list for each and confirm whether it touches the title to your unit. This is declared by the promoter; there may be further cases not on the RERA record.
| Court | Case no. | Year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bombay High Court | 4521 | 2018 | Closed Filed description: The said writ petition was filed by Dhananjay Bhimrao Gaikwad and others (as "Petitioners") against Ajmera Bora Associates (as "Respondents"), for setting aside the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme on the said Larger Land. Vide the said Order dated 16 October 2019, the Hon'ble High Court dismissed the said petition, as the Petitioners agreed to approach the Grievance Committee regarding the subject matter of the petition. |
| Bombay High Court | 01 | 2020 | Closed Filed description: Mr. Dhananjay Bhimrao Gaikwad and others (as "Appellants") filed an Appeal before the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee, Government of Maharashtra, for quashing and setting aside the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme and for cancellation of all the permissions granted for the said scheme. Vide the said Order dated 29 June 2020, the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee dismissed the said Appeal, for the reasons more particularly stated therein |
| Pune Senior Division | 217 | 2020 | Ongoing Filed description: Mr. Raju Lakshman Londhe and 64 others [slum dwellers) (as "Plaintiffs") against Saidas Dattatray Rasane and 41 others (as "Defendants") filed the suit was filed for Declaration and Injunction in respect of the said Property. The Defendant Nos. 1 to 41 are the members of Rasane family, the previous owner of the said Property and Parmar Bora Associates (now Ajmera Bora Associates) is the Defendant No. 42 therein. The Plaintiffs contended that, they were tenants in the said Property, and the previous owner granted the leasehold rights of their respective portions to them between the years 1940 to 1960 and since then they are in possession of their respective portions in the said Property |
| Bombay High Court | 715 | 2023 | Closed Filed description: Raju Lakshman Londhe and others (as "Applicants") filed the said Civil Revision Application No. 715/2023 against Pramila Madhukar Rasane and others (as "Respondents"). Parmar Bora Associates was one of the Respondents therein. Vide the said Order dated 13 December 2023, the Hon'ble High Court dismissed the said application stating that, the said revision application is not maintainable as the Applicant has remedy to file an appeal under the provisions of Section 104 of Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). |
| District Superintendent Of Land Records, Pune (Dslr) | 5058 | 2021 | Closed Filed description: Raju Lakshman Londhe and others (slum dwellers] (as "Appellants") against City Survey Officer No. 2. Parmar Bora Associates and Ajmera Bora Associates (as "Respondents") it appears that, the said Appeal was filed by the Appellants challenging the Mutation Entry No. 51 dated 20 June 2011, recording the name of Parmar Bora Associates on the basis of a Sale Deed dated 9 February 2010 and Mutation Entry Nos 52 dated 9 December 2011, recording the name of Ajmera Bora Associates pursuant to the change in the name of partnership firm from Parmar Bora Associates to Ajmera Bora Associates, in the property cards of CTS Nos. 3357, 3376, 3422. 3437 and 3447 |
| Deputy Director Land Records | 5845 | 2022 | Closed Filed description: Raju Lakshman Londhe and others (slum dwellers] (as "Appellants") filed an Appeal bearing no. 5845/2022, before the Deputy Director Land Records and Settlement Raju Lakshman Londhe and others (slum dwellers] (as "Appellants") filed an Appeal bearing no. 5845/2022, before the Deputy Director Land Records and Settlement Commissioner, Pune. Vide the Order dated 30 October 2024, Deputy Director Land Records and Settlement Commissioner, Pune, dismissed the said appeal and confirmed the order dated 28 September 2022 |
| Slum Rehabilitation Authority, Pune | 495 | 2022 | Closed Filed description: Ms. Subhadra Prakash Kasore made an Application to Competent Authority No. 2, SRA, Pune, for reconsideration of the Slum Scheme. The Competent Authority No. 2, SRA, Pune, directed the slum dwellers to evict their respective hutment within 48 hours from the date of the order and co-operate with the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme vide order Dated 12-05-2022. |
| Bombay High Court | 7488/2021, 6504/2022 | 2021 | Closed Filed description: aggrieved by the Order dated 29 June 2020 in Appeal No. 01/2020, passed by the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee mentioned hereinabove, the Petitioners filed the said Writ Petitions, Writ Petition bearing no.7488/2021 & 6504/2022, for the relief mentioned therein. by Vide a common Order dated 28 February 2024, the Hon'ble High Court, Bombay, rejected the said Writ Petitions bearing no. 7488/2021 and 6504/2022 |
| Supreme Court | 5880 | 2024 | Closed Filed description: The aggrieved by the abovementioned Order dated 28 February 2024, Rahul Triveni Mishra and others (as "Petitioners") filed a Special Leave to Appeal No. 5880/2024, before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India Vide an Order dated 15 March 2024, the Hon'ble Supreme Court dismissed the said petition stating that, no ground for interference is made out to exercise its jurisdiction Under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. |
| Bombay High Court | 14448 | 2024 | Ongoing Filed description: The Writ Petition No. 14448/2024, filed before the Hon'ble High Court, Bombay, by Ajmera Bora Associates (as "Petitioner") against (i) State of Maharashtra, (ii) SRA, Pune, (iii) Chief Executive Officer, SRA, Pune, (iv) The Competent Authority, SRA, Pune, and (v) Municipal Commissioner, PMC (as "Respondents"), for to issue writ of Mandamus or direction to the Respondent No. 3 to implement its Order dated 12 May 2022 issued under Sections 12 (8), 33, 2Z (2) of the Maharashtra Slum Act. |
| Bombay High Court | 32 | 2025 | Ongoing Filed description: The Petitioner, Ajmera Bora Associates, have filed the said Contempt Petition No.32 of 2025, seeking action against the Respondent No.(iii) and (iv) under the provisions of The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and for other reliefs as stated therein. That in view of the non-compliance of the directions by the Respondent Nos. iii and iv, the Hon'ble High Court was pleased to issue notice and call upon the Respondent Nos. iii and iv as to why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them. |
| Bombay High Court | 23999 | 2025 | Ongoing Filed description: Interim Application No. 23999/2025, filed before the Hon'ble High Court, Bombay, in Contempt Petition No. 32/2025 by Nilesh Saban Shinde ("as Applicant") against (i) State of Maharashtra, (ii) SRA. Pune and Pimpri Chinchwad, (iii) Chief Executive Officer, SRA, Pune (iv) The Competent Authority No. 2, SRA, Pune (v) Municipal Commissioner, PMC. ("as Respondents") it appears that, the Applicant is a devotee and representative of the Vajreshwari, Mari Aai Devi Temple ("said temples") located in the vicinity of the said Property. The said Applicant filed the said Application to intervene in the said Contempt Petition No. 32/2025. |
| Bombay High Court | 2016 | 2025 | Ongoing Filed description: Interim Application No. 2016/2025, filed before the Hon'ble High Court, Bombay, in the Writ Petition No. 14448/2024, by Santosh Shivaji Shinde and another (as "Applicants") against (i) State of Maharashtra, (ii) SRA, Pune, (iii) Chief Executive Officer, SRA, Pune, (iv) PMC and (v) Commissioner of Police, Pune, (as "Respondents") it appears that, the Applicants are devotees and representatives appointed by the trust of The Vajreshwari Temple, Mari Aaai Devi Temple, Renuka Mata Mandir Temple, Durga Devi Temple and Yellama Devi Temple ("said temples") located in the vicinity of the said Property. The said Applicants filed the said Application to intervene in the said Writ Petition No. 14448/2024 seeking (i) stay on the eviction and demolition process of the said temples, (ii) declaration that, the demolition of the said temples would be unconstitutional and to explore other solutions for its reservation or relocation. |
| Bombay High Court | 6875 | 2025 | Ongoing Filed description: The Interim Application No. 6875/2025, filed before the Hon'ble High Court, Bombay, in Writ Petition No. 14448/2024, by Navdurga Samajik Trust, Temple of Durga Mata (as "Applicants") against (i) State of Maharashtra, (ii) SRA, Pune, (iii) Chief Executive Officer, SRA, Pune, (iv) Competent Authority no. 2, SRA Pune and Pimpri Chinchwad (v) Municipal Commissioner, PMC, (as "Respondents") it appears that, the Applicant is a Society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 whose Durgamata Temple is located in the vicinity of the said Property. The said Applicants filed the said Application to intervene in the said Writ Petition No. 14448/2024 |
| Bombay High Court | 7846 | 2025 | Ongoing Filed description: The Interim Application No. 7846/2025, filed before the Hon'ble High Court, Bombay, in Writ Petition No.14448/2024, by M/s Ajmera Bora Associates (as "Applicants") against (i) State of Maharashtra, (ii) SRA, Pune and Pimpri Chinchwad, (iii) Chief Executive Officer, SRA, Pune (iv) The Competent Authority No. 02, SRA Pune and Pimpri Chinchwad (v) Municipal Commissioner, PMC. (as "Respondents") it appears that, the Applicant being the Original Petitioner in the said main Writ Petition No. 14448/2024, filed the said Interim Application for directing the Respondent Nos. (ii) to (iv) authorities to (i) implement their own undertaking dated 11 February 2025 recorded by the Hon'ble High Court. Bombay, vide its order dated 11 February 2025 passed in the said Writ Petition No. 14448/2024. |
| Bombay High Court | 31459 | 2025 | Ongoing Filed description: The Contempt Petition bearing (Stamp) No. 31459/2025, filed before the Hon'ble High Court, Bombay, in the Writ Petition No. 14448/2024, by Nilesh Baban Shinde (as "Petitioner") against (i) State of Maharashtra, (ii) Mis Ajmera Bora Associates, (iii)SRA, Pune and Pimpri Chinchwad (iv) Chief Executive Officer, SRA, Pune, (v) The Competent Authority No. 2, SRA, Pune, (vi) Asst. Police Commissioner, (vii) Senior Police Inspector, Vishrantwadi Police Station, (viii) Sanjay Ajmera, (ix) Mayur Sanjay Ajmera. (x) Sanjeev Wahi, (xi) Aadesh Nikam (xii) Akshay Gaikwad and (xiii) Shankar Jadhav (as "Respondents") it appears that, being aggrieved by the demolition of the said Shri Mriyayi Devi Temple and to protect the Vajreshwari Temple from being demolished which is situated in the vicinity of the said Property. |
Location, Land & Connectivity
Located at Village Kalas, Vishrantwadi , Alandi Road and Dhanori Road, Pune City, Pune, 411015. Per the filed land record, the plot is bounded to the north by CTS No 95 S.No 111, to the south by Adj S.No 46 Dhanori Shiv mandir, to the east by Dhanori Road and to the west by 45 m Alandi Pune Road. These are the boundaries as recorded in the filed land record.
Location & connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 8 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Pune Int'l Airport (Lohegaon) | 5 km |
| Pune Junction / city centre | 6 km |
| Kharadi / EON IT Park | 8 km |
| Magarpatta / Hadapsar IT | 9 km |
| Baner–Balewadi belt | 10 km |
| Hinjewadi Rajiv Gandhi IT Park | 14 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.