Inside a Quietlist Buyer’s Report

Century
Trails.

Phase 1 · Bidaluru, Devanahalli Taluk, Bengaluru Rural

A better plot.
For the home you want.

A green side for daylight. A wider frontage for the ground floor. A corner with the entrance direction you prefer. The filed layout turns a long list of plot numbers into choices worth comparing.

See what the plans reveal ↓Read all 30 pages ↗

Reviewed 18 September 2026 · A conditional shortlist: title, plot release and usable services must be established before purchase.

Plot numbers, roads & the northern parkApproved layout

Approved Century Trails layout showing the southwest and northeast plot groups, connecting road and large northern park

↗

Approved Layout Plan · Report p. 6Open the drawing ↗

345 residential plots. One commercial plot.
A serviced plotted layout on 25 acres 30 guntas. The house is the buyer’s separate project.

K-RERA · Phase 1 · 00651057 selected plots + all 40 nonstandard plotsComplete 30-page report

A closer reading

The number is the address.
The edges make the difference.

Which boundary meets the road? What lies beside the house? How much of the plot’s area is useful frontage? Three comparisons show why the answers matter.

01 Green space & direction

The park is to the north.
The road can be east or west.

130, 156 and 192 have east-road access. 131, 157 and 193 have west-road access. All six are 30×50 ft plots with a 3 m pathway and Park-6 to the north: a green side beside the future house.

Our buying read

For an east-entrance preference and morning light at the front, start with 130 / 156 / 192. Keep the west-road alternatives if their price or a shaded front suits you. The filing gives no material reason to rank one of those repeated east-road positions above the other two.

Approved Layout Plan and portal plot boundaries · Report pp. 8, 16–17. Road direction is not a completed house-door direction. North-side openings depend on the eventual house plan; the pathway brings passing people too.

Compare all 12 park-side plots ↗

Plots 106, 107, 130, 131 and 156 beside the northern pathway and Park-6, with roads on different sides — Park-6 holds 87.6% of this phase’s park area. A park-side plot offers a different setting from a road corner elsewhere in the layout. Report p. 8.

02 Area versus usable width

More land.
Less room at the front.

Plot 118 is slightly larger than a standard 30×50. Yet its west-road boundary is just 6.85 m, against 9.14 m on a regular plot. Beside it, 119 has a much broader 16.60 m east-road boundary. The area figure alone hides the difference.

Our buying read

For a broad ground floor without buying a full 40×60, compare 2–11 and 13–15. Each offers about 40 ft of frontage and 44 ft of depth. They use 17.2% more land than a 30×50, but offer a third more frontage. The compromise is a shallower plot and private land behind.

Portal plot-dimension schedule, checked against the Approved Layout Plan · Report pp. 16, 21–23. These are land dimensions, not approved floor areas. Taper, setbacks and the house design determine the usable building space.

Read the nonstandard-plot comparison ↗

Width where the plot meets the road Filed dimensions

Plot	Area	Frontage
118 · west road	141.57 sq m	6.85 m
Regular 30×50	139.29 sq m	9.14 m
119 · east road	215.81 sq m	16.60 m

The road-side width matters for parking, the entrance and room planning.

Layout crop showing the narrow road end of plot 118 and the broader road end of neighbouring plot 119 — Both carry the “Odd Site” label. Their shapes create quite different house-planning choices. Report p. 21.

03 What stays open?

A gap beside the plot.
Three kinds of future neighbour.

39 and 40 have east roads and the STRR land bank on one side. 21 and 22 meet the same reservation with west roads. The layout puts reserved land beside these 40×60 plots, but it belongs to the authority and its eventual use can change.

Our buying read

The park reservation and lake-related buffer give the northern plots a stronger basis for expected openness. Civic-amenity land, the STRR land bank and a neighbour’s field need different pricing assumptions. Do not pay the same permanent-green premium for all three.

Approved Layout Plan; STRR Land Bank and CA Relinquishment Deed · Report pp. 8–10, 20. The park boundary does not guarantee an unobstructed lake view, private access or drainage performance.

Read the neighbouring-land comparison ↗

Southwest layout with STRR Land Bank 1 between plots 21, 22, 39 and 40, and civic-amenity land between 87 and 88 — The hatched STRR reservation is labelled separately from the parks. Future use matters more than how empty it looks today. Report p. 9.

Named alternatives

Three ways to start
your shortlist.

The report compares 57 selected plots, all 40 nonstandard plots and regular mid-row alternatives. The right choice depends on the house you intend to build.

Green side, smaller plot

256.
Compare 257.

256 is a 30×40 with an east road and northern park pathway. 257 is a larger 30×50 with a west road and pathways on two sides. The second path adds openness and passing activity; it is not another vehicular road.

See the park-side options ↗

More room for the house

31 & 61.
Compare 62–76.

The two 40×60 corners have north/east road boundaries, both 12 m wide. East-road mid-row plots 62–76 offer the same land area with only one road side. Compare the corner’s separation with the regular plot’s simpler, less exposed setting.

Compare the larger plots ↗

Compact north/east corner

253 & 285.
Or 122 / 149 / 187 / 221.

253 and 285 are 30×40 corners with north/east roads. The second set offers 30×50 with the same road directions. These are entrance options for the future house, not completed door positions; two road sides also bring more exposure and setback considerations.

Read the corner comparisons ↗

The portal completion record reports 343 sold and three unsold plots without identifying those three. This is not live availability; the shortlist may involve resale. Every choice remains conditional on plot-linked title, operative release and service evidence. No asking prices or approved house plans are supplied.

The ownership decision

A plot today.
Shared obligations
for years.

The house can wait. The running costs may not. The filed agreement starts maintenance at possession or the invitation to take possession, whichever comes first. It also lets future phases share amenities, while the clubhouse remains promoter-owned.

Plots 256, 257 and 259 around the end of Park-6, with pathways and road boundaries separately shown — The park-side path is part of the setting, not land you buy with the plot. The report follows the drawing into the ownership terms.

A completion application is only part of the story.

The February 2026 application does not substitute for the operative plot-release and commissioning documents. The report compares the approval validity and conflicting handover schedules without claiming that work remains unfinished today.

↗ 02

Nine title reports. Conditions tied to the land.

The July 2023 opinions contain survey-specific conditions. The report preserves them for current, plot-linked legal review; old pending matters are not presented as proof of pending cases today.

↗ 03

Power promised: 1,884 kW. Earlier NOC: 1,384 kW.

The residential allocations alone exceed the earlier whole-layout planning figure by 500 kW. This calls for the final sanctioned schedule; it does not establish a shortage or account for simultaneous usage.

↗ 04

A bigger plot can carry a bigger common bill.

For costs allocated by plot area, a 40×60 bears about twice a 30×40’s share. The agreement leaves charge amounts open, allows future-phase sharing and permits third-party clubhouse events.

↗ 05

Payment triggers and refunds worth negotiating.

65% of the stated price is tied to initiating works in the filed template. The report also separates the conflicting refund timelines and the 5% pre-conveyance assignment fee from a registered owner’s resale.

↗

Open the actual report

All 30 pages. Yours to inspect.

The complete PDF, with no sample pages removed.

Open PDF ↗

Page 8 of 30

Your project has its own story

Know what to choose.
Know what to question.

Have Quietlist read the filed plans and documents for the project you are considering. Get a buying shortlist, the trade-offs and the evidence behind the recommendations.

Independent of the sale.
We take no money from builders, sellers or brokers.

Buyer’s Report

₹4,999 for one project

Homes and alternatives to compare
Drawing-led explanations of the differences
Project progress, obligations and negotiation points
An illustrated PDF to keep and share

Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.

The source and its scope
stay with the finding.

This is the 18 September 2026 reading of Century Trails Phase 1, registration PRM/KA/RERA/1250/303/PR/281223/006510. It combines the approved layout, portal plot schedules, historical title reports and filed contract forms. Road frontage is not a completed house-door direction or a guaranteed sunlight result. No current asking prices, named live inventory, site inspection or current court search are supplied. Release and commissioning attachments are named in the portal but their contents are absent from this bundle; that does not establish that the promoter never obtained them. The complete report retains the sources, qualifications and purchase conditions behind each recommendation.

Century
Trails.

The number is the address.
The edges make the difference.