Bangalore/Project record

K-RERA · the public record

Casagrand Meridian

Bengaluru East · CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS

Project Review · example purchase

Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.

Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.

From another project · Prestige Park Grove

Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.

Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.

Read the Project Review sample ↗
Prestige Park Grove Project Review · first page
First page of the complete sample.
80%construction reportedQ1 2026 filing
0units not bookedof 215 · Q1 2026 filing
02 Nov 2025declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026

Free project details

Registration read 25 Oct 2026

Construction progress and dates

Promoter-reported construction

K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q1 2026

declared completion

02 Nov 2025

The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.

K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026

Registered units and project size

3 BHK
166
2 BHK
49

Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026

The whole registration

3.3registered acres

64.5registered units per acre

The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.

RERA details for Casagrand Meridian

K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/181122/005482

Project facts and comparisons

On the register

Declared completion2 November 2025
Land area13,498 sq m (3.3 acres)
Homes registered215
Tower/wing entries1
Unit mix166 × 3 BHK, 49 × 2 BHK

In context

Density64.5 homes per acre
Density in context33rd percentile of 1123 Bengaluru East projects (median 75.5)

Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.

Project areas, parking and inventory

Project areas and parking

RERA filing
DisclosureOfficial valueWhy it matters
Registered units215Total inventory registered with K-RERA.
Official carpet area24,538 sqmTotal carpet area reported for the project.
Official built-up area41,932 sqmUseful scale context when comparing density and project cost.
Registered land area13,498 sqmThe land area attached to this K-RERA registration.
Sanctioned FAR/FSI2.25Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design.
Registered tower/wing entries1Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page.
Parking total (reconciled)297Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together.
Covered-parking field297Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together.
Open-parking field0Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together.
Garage field0Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together.
Approved plan numberBBMP/CC/8138/22-23Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder.
Plan approval date14-11-2022
Project start date01-12-2022

Official inventory & towers

RERA filing

K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.

Registered inventory mix

TypeUnitsShareOfficial carpet area
3 BHK16677%18,751 sqm
2 BHK4923%4,000 sqm

Registered tower / wing summary

Tower/wingFloorsUnitsParkingHeight
Tower 11421529744.95 m

Official unit register

RERA filing

K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 215 official flat/unit rows, matching the 215 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.

By unit type

Unit typeRowsCarpet areaUDSParking lots
3 BHK16793.7-124.0 sqm55.4-74.4 sqm167
2 BHK4880.5-93.7 sqm47.4-55.4 sqm48

By tower / wing

Tower/wingRowsCarpet areaUDSParking lots
Tower 121580.5-124.0 sqm47.4-74.4 sqm215
Show sample official unit rows
UnitTowerFloorTypeCarpetUDSParking
G01Tower 103 BHK124.0 sqm74.4 sqm1
G02Tower 103 BHK114.4 sqm67.5 sqm1
G03Tower 102 BHK80.5 sqm47.5 sqm1
G04Tower 103 BHK103.5 sqm61.3 sqm1
G05Tower 103 BHK124.0 sqm74.1 sqm1
G06Tower 102 BHK91.2 sqm53.3 sqm1

Legal, Approvals & Project Team

Litigation & compliance

RERA filing

The promoter answered No to the land-litigation question. This is a filed declaration, not a court search.

⚠ 9 of 31 compliance document slots are filed as under process / not yet usable: Commencement Certificate, Certificate from Registered Engineer indicating the structural safety of the building, Urban Land Ceiling, District Magistrate, Conversion Certificate under section 95 of the KLR Act 1964 and more.

1 additional compliance slots are filed as Not Applicable.

No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.

See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →

K-RERA complaint orders (4 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)

PartiesRelief soughtDisposalOrder date
Viswanath Akash vs caSAGRAND mERIDANPass an order directing the Respondent to refund the amount of Rs. Rs.16,10,975/- (Rupees Sixteen lakhs ten thousand nine hundred and Seventy five only) along with interest from the date of paymentAUTHORITY22/07/2025
Manish Agarwal N vs Casa Grande GArden City BuildersInterest for delay periodAUTHORITY19/09/2026
ARUNKUMAR TUPILI vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITEDTo get my booking amount and interest on booking amount due to delay in refundingAUTHORITY19/04/2024
Rakesh Ojha vs Casagrand MeridianReject undue extension without valid force majeure. Order technical inspection of the site to verify progress and labor deployment. Direct promoter to hand over possession as per the RERA timeline.AUTHORITY17/02/2026

⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.

Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (8 complaints listed against this promoter)

ComplaintSubject (as filed)ProjectStatus
CMP/200816/0006368
16-08-2020
Delay in Handover of Apartment C204 - CASAGRAND ROYCE ProjectCasagrand Royce (another project by this promoter)DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4
CMP/211201/0008654
01-12-2021
DELAYED COMPLETION BREACH OF TRUST FINANCIAL LOSSES SUFFERED BY COMPLAINANTSCasagrand Royce (another project by this promoter)DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4
CMP/220321/0009178
21-03-2022
Builder refuses to pay interset for the amount refunded after 4 yearsCasagrand Royce (another project by this promoter)DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5
CMP/220616/0009641
16-06-2022
Delay In hand over which was expected to be done by 9th of March 2022Casagrand Florella (another project by this promoter)DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4
CMP/220706/0009722
06-07-2022
Builder not refunding the booking amount due to unavailability of the unitCasagrand Florella Phase 2 (another project by this promoter)DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4
CMP/221104/0010175
04-11-2022
Builder not delivering the apartment flat C306 to date even after the expiry of the RERA Extended due date (15th July 2022) and denied to pay delay compensationCasa Grande Lorenza (another project by this promoter)DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5
CMP/221107/0010222
07-11-2022
Builder not delivering the apartment flat C306 to date even after the expiry of the RERA Extended due date (15th July 2022) and denied to pay delay compensationCasa Grande Lorenza (another project by this promoter)DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5
CMP/221221/0010496
21-12-2022
Builder not adhering to the agreed and adding new clause in the sale deedCasagrand Florella (another project by this promoter)DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5

Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.

Statutory approval status

RERA filing

4 of 5 applicable approvals are marked Approved in the filing. Other recorded statuses: KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres): To Be Applied. Check the linked documents for their scope and validity.

5 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.

Authority / NOCStatusDateFile
Water supply and sewage boardApproved16-09-2022BWSSB NOC Bhattarahalli.pdf
KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres)To Be Applied-View NOC
KPTCL- BESCOMApproved29-07-2022Bhattarahalli BESCOM NOC.pdf
Fire and SafetyApproved22-07-2022Bhattarahalli Fire NOC OrderCertificate.pdf
Airport Authority of IndiaApproved14-07-2022Bhattarahalli AAI.pdf

Project team & certifications

RERA filing

K-RERA names 4 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.

RoleNameRegistration / licenceSinceLocality
Chartered accountantNARAYANA RAO M2279482014Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560068
EngineerShivaraj G NaikBCC-BS-365-1382000Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560068
ArchitectNagesh PSBCC/BL 3-2-3/A-323/88-892000Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560085
ContractorM/s CASA GRANDE CITY GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT LTD-2010Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560042

Builder track record

RERA filing

Casagrand has 20 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Casa Grande”) (average reported construction progress 37%). 11 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder.

Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.

Financials & Construction Progress

Financial disclosures

RERA filing

Latest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹0.96 Cr collected from buyers, ₹0.00 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.

Construction progress63% → 80% (+17 pts)
Units sold/booked as registered215/215 (100%)
Buyer collections in available QPRs₹499.58 Cr
Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs₹172.63 Cr (0.35x collections)
  • 100% of registered units are shown as sold/booked, but no completion certificate is on file yet.
  • Construction progress moved from 63% to 80% across the filed QPR window.
  • The filed unit sales count did not move across the available QPR window because the project was already effectively sold out.
  • The builder has drawn 0.35x of buyer collections from escrow (about 35% of the ₹500 Cr collected) — money is largely staying in the regulated escrow account rather than being pulled out ahead of spend, which is the safer direction. A ratio near or above 1.0 would be the one to scrutinise.

QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.

Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹55.6 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.

RERA 70% project account is on file: DCB Bank M G Road IFSC Code : DCBL0000038 Pin Code : 560001. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.

Location & Connectivity

The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 7 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.

LandmarkStraight-line
Whitefield IT hub7 km
Outer Ring Road / Manyata9 km
Bellandur–Marathahalli belt9 km
MG Road / city centre11 km
Electronic City20 km
Kempegowda Int'l Airport20 km

Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.

Free · Watch this project

We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes, and send the 14-point booking checklist with the first email.

Something went wrong — email hello@quietlist.in.

✓ You're watching — we'll email you if the RERA record changes.

Built by Casa Grande. View Casa Grande's full track record →
Casa Grande has 20 projects registered in Bangalore, 3 past RERA deadline.

Other projects by this builder in Bangalore

Casagrand Flamingo
Past deadline · 68% built · 100% sold
Casagrand Zaiden
Past deadline · 65% built · 100% sold
Casagrand Amor
Filing overdue · 40% built · 70% sold
Casagrand Estancia
Filing overdue · 5% built · 64% sold
Casagrand Hazen
Filing overdue · 78% built · 99% sold
Casagrand Moondance
Filing overdue · 1% built · 89% sold

Other RERA-registered projects in Krishnarajapuram

Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.

Registration last seen on RERA: 25 Oct 2026. Document and inventory dates are shown in their sections.