Casagrand Zaiden
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS · Bengaluru South · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/220722/005099
The Drawings Report · ₹4,999
We read all 7 approved drawings and 31 filed papers on this project’s RERA file — the sheets the builder filed to get it approved.
Only 4 of 622 flats not yet sold in the latest quarterly filing · 78% reported construction progress.
One real find, from a Noida project’s approved drawings: the buyer pays for 10,000 sq ft — the floor inside the flat is 6,982 sq ft.
Get it for this project →Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked. Sent as a PDF in one working day.
Free before you decide: the 14 things to get in writing before you book
Every item comes from a real RERA filing. Send it to the family group before anyone pays a token.
Send the checklist to the family group Read it here →CASAGRAND HAZEN covers 8.9 acres, featuring 3 towers with a diverse unit mix, including 622 registered homes, and an estimated project cost of ₹193.9 crore. Its density of 69.9 homes per acre is the 38th percentile among 784 Bengaluru South projects (median 77.3). Its declared completion date is 13 July 2027; no occupancy certificate is on record.
Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
What you can verify free on this page
The official K-RERA filing record, in plain English
Registration and delivery
Casagrand Hazen is registered with K-RERA as PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/220722/005099, and the promoter has declared completion for 13 Jul 2027.
13 Jul 2027
declared completion
Figures are the promoter's own filings as they stood when Quietlist last read the register. A declared completion date is a filing, not a handover commitment.
Source · K-RERA project register · read 10 Sep 2026
Project scale
Casagrand Hazen spans 36,016 sq m (8.90 acres), comprises 3 towers, registers 622 units, and is declared to cost ₹193.93 cr.
₹193.93 cr
declared project cost
8.90acres
36,016 sq m
622units
on the registration
2.0FAR
sanctioned
Scale and cost as the promoter registered them. The declared cost is the promoter's own estimate on the filing, not a valuation and not a price to a buyer.
Source · K-RERA project registration · read 10 Sep 2026
Promoter record
Casagrand is the promoter of record on 20 projects registered with K-RERA, 11 of which are past their declared completion dates on the register.
20projects
registered with K-RERA
11past declared date
on the register
37%
average construction reported
Counted across Quietlist's full K-RERA register store, matched on the promoter name as it appears on each filing.
Source · K-RERA register, all projects · read 10 Sep 2026
Construction
Casagrand Hazen reports 78% construction progress in its most recent quarterly filing with K-RERA.
78%
reported construction progress
The percentage the promoter filed at the last quarterly report. It is a filed figure, not an inspection, and it can lag site conditions between filings.
Source · K-RERA quarterly progress report · read 10 Sep 2026
Sales
Casagrand Hazen reports 616 of 622 units booked in its most recent quarterly filing with K-RERA, about 99%.
99%booked
616 of 622 units
Booked share as the promoter filed it at the last quarterly report; this is the filed position, not current availability.
Source · K-RERA quarterly progress report · read 10 Sep 2026
🔒 What I’d do as a buyer here · Drawings Report
The report opens with what this project really is — read from its approved drawings — then the specific calls: the cheapest good way to buy here, the flat to say no to, what you can stop worrying about, and what to get in writing before you sign anything.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 622 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 49,391 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Official built-up area | 95,891 sqm | Useful scale context when comparing density and project cost. |
| Registered land area | 36,016 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 3 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 655 total (668 covered, 34 open) — 1.05 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Approved plan number | PRJ/11822/21-22 | Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder. |
| Plan approval date | 13-07-2022 | |
| Project start date | 28-08-2022 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK+2T | 242 | 39% | 16,607 sqm |
| 3BHK+3T | 161 | 26% | 16,997 sqm |
| 1BHK+1T+STUDY | 5 | 1% | 294 sqm |
| 3BHK+2T | 128 | 21% | 10,245 sqm |
| 4BHK+4T | 19 | 3% | 2,723 sqm |
| 1BHK+1T | 67 | 11% | 2,522 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 1 | 4 | 378 | 393 | 14.95 m |
| Tower 2 | 4 | 170 | 174 | 14.95 m |
| Tower 3 | 4 | 74 | 88 | 14.95 m |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 622 official flat/unit rows, matching the 622 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK+2T | 242 | 58.4-100.1 sqm | 36.1-63.9 sqm | 242 |
| 3BHK+3T | 161 | 97.7-120.1 sqm | 58.5-76.2 sqm | 175 |
| 3BHK+2T | 128 | 71.3-91.1 sqm | 42.8-56.2 sqm | 128 |
| 1BHK+1T | 67 | 37.4-45.9 sqm | 23.1-28.2 sqm | 67 |
| 4BHK+4T | 19 | 120.0-144.7 sqm | 90.3-90.6 sqm | 38 |
| 1BHK+1T+STUDY | 5 | 51.8-67.6 sqm | 32.8-44.3 sqm | 5 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 1 | 378 | 37.4-144.7 sqm | 23.1-90.6 sqm | 393 |
| Tower 2 | 170 | 57.5-120.1 sqm | 38.1-75.9 sqm | 174 |
| Tower 3 | 74 | 67.6-144.7 sqm | 44.3-90.5 sqm | 88 |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-G01 | Tower 1 | 0 | 2BHK+2T | 60.0 sqm | 37.2 sqm | 1 |
| A-G02 | Tower 1 | 0 | 2BHK+2T | 60.0 sqm | 37.2 sqm | 1 |
| A-G03 | Tower 1 | 0 | 2BHK+2T | 60.0 sqm | 37.2 sqm | 1 |
| A-G04 | Tower 1 | 0 | 2BHK+2T | 60.0 sqm | 37.2 sqm | 1 |
| A-G05 | Tower 1 | 0 | 2BHK+2T | 58.4 sqm | 36.1 sqm | 1 |
| A-G06 | Tower 1 | 0 | 3BHK+2T | 71.3 sqm | 43.0 sqm | 1 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Which flat to ask for · Drawings Report
The flat-level read: which towers and floors to prefer and which to avoid, what the drawings put above, below and beside each flat, and the things on this site nobody at the sales desk will tell you about.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
⚠ 5 of 31 compliance document slots are filed as under process / not yet usable: Certificate from Registered Engineer indicating the structural safety of the building, Urban Land Ceiling, District Magistrate, Conversion Certificate under section 95 of the KLR Act 1964, JD AFFIDAVIT CUM DECLARATION.
1 additional compliance slots are filed as Not Applicable.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA complaint orders (4 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ashwini Anjanappa vs Casa Grande Garden City Builders Pvt Ltd. | Either the apartment should be handover to me by dec2025 or refund of full payment made by me and the bank with interest and waiting period compensation of the completion delayed | AUTHORITY | 23/07/2026 |
| Pinaki Prasad Mohanty vs Casa Grande GArden City builders Pvt Ltd. | Refund of Amount at the Current Market Price | AUTHORITY | 13/08/2026 |
| HAFIZUNNISA M vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT LTD | Please be advised to adhere to Karnataka RERA clause. As per RERA clause the builder has to refund the entire booking amount without any deduction if the sale agreement is not executed and registered | AUTHORITY | 11/02/2023 |
| SARASWATI KAR vs CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT LTD., | Cancellation of the allotment and refund of money paid | AUTHORITY | 04/01/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (8 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/200816/0006368 16-08-2020 | Delay in Handover of Apartment C204 - CASAGRAND ROYCE Project | Casagrand Royce (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/211201/0008654 01-12-2021 | DELAYED COMPLETION BREACH OF TRUST FINANCIAL LOSSES SUFFERED BY COMPLAINANTS | Casagrand Royce (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220321/0009178 21-03-2022 | Builder refuses to pay interset for the amount refunded after 4 years | Casagrand Royce (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/220616/0009641 16-06-2022 | Delay In hand over which was expected to be done by 9th of March 2022 | Casagrand Florella (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220706/0009722 06-07-2022 | Builder not refunding the booking amount due to unavailability of the unit | Casagrand Florella Phase 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/221104/0010175 04-11-2022 | Builder not delivering the apartment flat C306 to date even after the expiry of the RERA Extended due date (15th July 2022) and denied to pay delay compensation | Casa Grande Lorenza (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/221107/0010222 07-11-2022 | Builder not delivering the apartment flat C306 to date even after the expiry of the RERA Extended due date (15th July 2022) and denied to pay delay compensation | Casa Grande Lorenza (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/221221/0010496 21-12-2022 | Builder not adhering to the agreed and adding new clause in the sale deed | Casagrand Florella (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Clean approvals profile: every applicable statutory NOC is on file — including environmental clearance and pollution-control clearance (KSPCB), the clearances buyers most often find still pending. Nothing is outstanding among the statutory NOCs — which compliance documents are filed versus still under process is a separate matter, covered in Litigation & compliance above. Note Fire NOC is not among the approvals K-RERA marks applicable to this project — if the named-approvals check shows it as "not found in catalog", that is why; ask the builder directly whether it applies here. Since these are developer-filed portal statuses, have your lawyer confirm them against the linked NOC copies.
6 further authority slots are marked not applicable by the regulator.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water supply and sewage board | Approved | 26-06-2018 | Gottigere BWSSB NOC.pdf |
| KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres) | Approved | 05-02-2025 | Gottigere KSPCB.pdf |
| KSPCB- MOEF (Above 50 Acres) | Approved | 21-01-2022 | Gottigere MOEF EC Updated Cori.pdf |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | Approved | 25-01-2022 | Gottigere BESCOM.pdf |
K-RERA names 4 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chartered accountant | NARAYANA RAO M | 227948 | 2014 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560068 |
| Engineer | Amarnath R Boraiah | BCC/BL-3.6/SE-0325/2019-20 | 2012 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560019 |
| Architect | Ar Jayanth Vaitha | BCC/BL-3.6/A-2433/2012-13(1685) | 2003 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560017 |
| Contractor | CASA GRANDE GARDEN CITY BUILDERS PVT LTD | - | 2015 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560042 |
Casagrand has 20 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Casa Grande”) (average reported construction progress 37%). 11 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Latest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹3.27 Cr collected from buyers, ₹0.00 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.
| Construction progress | 68% → 78% (+10 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 618/622 (99%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹990.73 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹8.80 Cr (0.01x collections) |
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹31.2 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC HALASURU IFSC Code : HDFC0000286 Pin Code : 560042. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
The nearest major job hub is ~7 km away — a manageable everyday commute to a major job hub.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 7 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 13 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 13 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 20 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 21 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 39 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
The approved drawings
Everything above is on this page already, free, from the government record. The drawings are different: the 7 approved sheets are the same drawings the builder filed to get CASAGRAND HAZEN approved — what sits under each tower, which floor holds machines, what the sales sheet leaves out. Nobody reads them for you. We do.
What that turns up — from other projects’ filings:
ATS Knightsbridge · Sector 124, Noida
You pay for 10,000 sq ft. The floor inside your home is 6,982 sq ft. The rest is walls, shared circulation and services. Get both numbers written into your agreement before you pay any booking amount.
Oberoi Elysian · Goregaon East, Mumbai
“The building is complete.” The tower has reached full height — true. The same filed certificate, same page: sanitary fittings 6% done. Ask for a possession date in writing.
Godrej Aristocrat · Sector 49, Gurugram
Paying extra for the top floor? The terrace drawing shows what sits on the slab above those flats: the overhead water tanks, the lift machine rooms and the roof machinery. Ask which flat sits under which.
Prestige Camden Gardens · Thanisandra, Bengaluru
The approved parking table asks for 12 visitor spaces. It shows 0. Two-wheeler spaces: also 0. Ask in writing where visitors will park.
Want this project read from its filed drawings?
Only 4 of 622 flats not yet sold in the latest quarterly filing. If one of them is yours, the drawings tell you what you are getting; if you are buying resale, most of what the register knows is already on this page. Still choosing? We read the 7 approved drawings on CASAGRAND HAZEN’s file and tell you which flats we would ask for, what sits around them, and what to get in writing before you pay the token.
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. For CASAGRAND HAZEN, one reading of it goes further. Which flat should I ask for? — what the approved drawings and filed papers say about the flats, the parking, the approvals, and what to get in writing before you sign. That is the Drawings Report. See a real one first:
Drawings Report sample: Prestige Camden Gardens → · browse all sample reports →
Payment is confirmed automatically. The Drawings Report is 1 working day. We email the link, so you can close the tab.
Drawings Report · ₹4,999
Every drawing on file, read — which flat to ask for · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Paying from outside India? Pay $59 (Drawings Report) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes, and send the 14-point booking checklist with the first email.
Built by Casa Grande. View Casa Grande's full track record →
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Casagrand Hazen?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 10 Sep 2026