K-RERA · the public record
Nitesh Hyde Park Phase II
Bengaluru South · NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
5.4registered acres
30.0registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Nitesh Hyde Park Phase II
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/180627/001912
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
In context
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 163 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 83 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 21,954 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.49 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 2 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 163 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 243 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 17-05-2010 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3Bed - 2 | 14 | 100% | 83 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block E | 12 | 98 | 98 | - |
| Block F | 12 | 65 | 65 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 163 official flat/unit rows, matching the 163 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 BHK | 117 | 83.5-125.3 sqm | 38.9-61.1 sqm | 117 |
| 2 BHK | 46 | 65.4-65.9 sqm | 30.9-31.8 sqm | 46 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block E | 98 | 65.4-84.1 sqm | 30.9-40.9 sqm | 98 |
| Block F | 65 | 83.5-125.3 sqm | 38.9-61.1 sqm | 65 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIHP-E-0001 | Block E | 0 | 3 BHK | 83.5 sqm | 39.2 sqm | 1 |
| NIHP-E-0004 | Block E | 0 | 3 BHK | 83.5 sqm | 39.2 sqm | 1 |
| NIHP-E-0005 | Block E | 0 | 3 BHK | 83.5 sqm | 39.2 sqm | 1 |
| NIHP-E-0006 | Block E | 0 | 2 BHK | 65.4 sqm | 30.9 sqm | 1 |
| NIHP-E-0007 | Block E | 0 | 2 BHK | 65.4 sqm | 30.9 sqm | 1 |
| NIHP-E-0008 | Block E | 0 | 3 BHK | 83.5 sqm | 39.2 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
8 of 33 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 25 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2018, extended (an extension) to 31 Dec 2019 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. An extension application filed on 09 May 2019 is pending with K-RERA — until it is approved, the registration stands lapsed.
Approval documents
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
1 K-RERA order on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (7 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nirvikar Singh vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Payment of PreEMI Backlog in One Short | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| K C RAVINDRA vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | return of amount and compensation | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| Mandar Sudhakar Bhatye vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Main Prayer: Impose a penalty up to five percent of the actual or estimated cost of the real estate project named as “Nitesh Hyde Park” Interim Prayer: Respondent to deposit compensation amount | AUTHORITY | 15/12/2025 |
| Prakash Narasimha Naik vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Main Prayer: Impose a penalty up to five percent of the actual or estimated cost of the real estate project named as “Nitesh Hyde Park” . Interim Prayer: To direct respondent to deposit compensation | AUTHORITY | 15/12/2025 |
| SHISHIR SHETTY vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Sum of total amount demanded and payable to applicants is Rs. 1,22,26,536.92/- (Rupees One Crore Twenty-Two Lakh Twenty-Six Thousand Five Hundred Thirty Six and Paisa Ninety Two Only) plus interest | AUTHORITY | 11/02/2023 |
| Harsha Gopalakrishna vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS | Interest and Pre EMIs for every month's delay in delivery. | AUTHORITY | 09/07/2024 |
| FLINTA REAL ESTATE LLP, THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE MR SAANDIP KUNDU vs NITESH HYDE PARK PHASE II | Refund of a total of INR 48,19,52,619/- | AUTHORITY | 08/12/2021 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (71 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190302/0002335 02-03-2019 | Cancellation and refund of money with interest | Nitesh Columbus Square Phase II (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190325/0002497 25-03-2019 | Huge delay in completion of Nitesh Columbus Square project | Nitesh Columbus Square Phase II (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190327/0002527 27-03-2019 | Not handed over as per commitment and incomplete construction | Nitesh Columbus Square Phase II (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190417/0002295 17-04-2019 | Grievance against Nitesh Housing Developers PVT Ltd/Nitesh Columbus Square/C 701 | Nitesh Columbus Square Phase II (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190513/0002972 13-05-2019 | Inordinate delay in completion of project and handing over possession - Refund Request | Nitesh Napa Valley (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190528/0003188 28-05-2019 | Nitesh not refunding amount around 35 Lacs that I paid during sale agreement and there after | Nitesh Melbourne Park (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY |
| CMP/190624/0002421 24-06-2019 | Requesting refund with interest and penalty due to non completion of project by promoter | Nitesh Columbus Square Phase II (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190626/0003405 26-06-2019 | Return of amount and compensation | Nitesh Hyde Park Phase II | DISPOSED AUTHORITY |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Design Front Architects | - | 2008 | road No:7/6, 2nd Main |
| Contractor | Apex Viswa Engineering Services | - | 2003 | Bilekahalli, Bannerghatta Road |
| Structural engineer | Design Tree Services Consultants | - | - | - |
Builder track record
RERA filingNitesh has 10 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Nitesh Housing”). 10 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a higher delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹65.2 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: YES BANK Kasturba Road (IFSC YESB0000022, a/c …0645). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 7 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 7 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 12 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 12 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 19 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 20 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 38 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.