Mantri Blossom 2
K-RERA · the public record
Mantri Blossom1
Bengaluru South · Gardenview Abode
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
99%construction reportedQ1 2026 filing
21units not bookedof 85 · Q1 2026 filing
30 Apr 2020declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Construction progress and dates
Promoter-reported construction
99%
Q3 2025
99%
Q4 2025
99%
Q1 2026
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q1 2026
declared completion
30 Apr 2020
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Registered units and project size
NOT WORKING
0
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
3.0registered acres
28.0registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Mantri Blossom1
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171017/000505
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion30 April 2020
Land area12,267 sq m (3.0 acres)
Homes registered85
Tower/wing entries2
In context
Density28 homes per acre
Density in context7th percentile of 791 Bengaluru South projects (median 77.3)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 85 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 12,267 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 4.5 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 2 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 186 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 18-11-2014 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| NOT WORKING | 0 | 0 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 25 | 43 | 94 | - |
| B | 25 | 42 | 92 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 85 official flat/unit rows, matching the 85 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-BHK | 53 | 236.3-248.7 sqm | 15.1-20.6 sqm | 53 |
| 3.5-BHK | 17 | 200.1 sqm | 16.4-17.0 sqm | 17 |
| 5-BHK-DUP | 15 | 277.5-344.0 sqm | 20.7-32.0 sqm | 15 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 43 | 236.3-344.0 sqm | 15.1-24.5 sqm | 43 |
| B | 42 | 200.1-344.0 sqm | 16.4-32.0 sqm | 42 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-101 | A | 1 | 4-BHK | 245.2 sqm | 15.4 sqm | 1 |
| A-102 | A | 1 | 4-BHK | 248.7 sqm | 15.4 sqm | 1 |
| A-201 | A | 2 | 4-BHK | 245.2 sqm | 15.8 sqm | 1 |
| A-202 | A | 2 | 4-BHK | 248.7 sqm | 15.8 sqm | 1 |
| A-301 | A | 3 | 5-BHK-DUP | 315.1 sqm | 24.5 sqm | 1 |
| A-302 | A | 3 | 4-BHK | 248.7 sqm | 15.8 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 21 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →
K-RERA complaint orders (5 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| NIKHIL MEHTA vs Montri Blosssom | refund with compensation by cancelling flat booking due to delay in possession | AUTHORITY | 17/10/2025 |
| R Dinesh Ranka vs Gardenview Abode Private Limited | To direct the Respondent to register the SCHEDULE B FLAT (Flat B-502) in the name of the Complainants without any further delay. | AUTHORITY | 17/06/2026 |
| Ajay Malhotra vs Gardenview Abode Private Limited | To register the Schedule Flat in the name of the Complaints as agreed upon, without any further delay, without demanding excess amount and damages for losses incurred by the Complainants | AUTHORITY | 17/06/2026 |
| MUGDHA GOUD vs GARDENVIEW ABODE PRIVATE LIMITED | Possession and Delay period compensation | AUTHORITY | 14/06/2024 |
| S G Sambasivan vs V N Kumar | Refund of Advance payment alongwith interest | AUTHORITY | 08/11/2022 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (3 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190530/0003205 30-05-2019 | Amounts investment as per advertisement under Buyback Scheme | Mantri Blossom1 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/210512/0007947 12-05-2021 | Refund of Advance alongwith interest | Mantri Blossom1 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/221119/0010369 19-11-2022 | Refund of initial deposit amount | Mantri Blossom 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Statutory approval status
RERA filing7 of 7 applicable approvals are marked Approved in the filing. Check the linked documents for their scope and validity.
3 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water supply and sewage board | Approved | 27-09-2014 | 1-Blossom BWSSB NOC 27-Sept-2014.PDF |
| KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres) | Approved | 06-09-2014 | 2-Blossom KSPCB 06-Sept-2014.pdf |
| KSPCB- MOEF (Above 50 Acres) | Approved | 13-01-2016 | 3-Blossom MOEF 13-Jan-2016.pdf |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | Approved | 19-03-2013 | 5-Blossom BESCOM 19-March-2013.pdf |
| Fire and Safety | Approved | 24-08-2017 | 7-Blossom Fire NOC 24-Aug-2017.pdf |
| Airport Authority of India | Approved | 16-11-2012 | 9-Blossom HAL 16-Nov-2012.pdf |
| BSNL/Telecommunication Department | Approved | 18-02-2013 | 10-Blossom BSNL18-Feb-2013.pdf |
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Architect Hafeez Contractor | - | NA | Fort, Mumbai |
| Contractor | New Consolidated Construction Co. Ltd | - | NA | Marathon Nextgen Complex, Lower Parel |
| Structural engineer | Mr. Praveen Kadam, | - | - | - |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹0.00 Cr collected from buyers, ₹0.98 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account. This quarter the escrow withdrawal (₹0.98 Cr) exceeded buyer collections (₹0.00 Cr) — worth asking the builder to reconcile against certified construction milestones, which is what RERA requires escrow draws to track.
| Construction progress | 99% → 99% (+0 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 64/85 (75%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹3.30 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹6.48 Cr (1.96x collections) |
- Across available QPR rows, escrow withdrawals are 1.96x buyer collections. Ask the builder to reconcile this against certified project costs and prior-period balances.
- In the latest QPR, escrow withdrawal exceeds buyer collections for that quarter. This can be normal if prior balance existed, but it needs a clean explanation.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹259.1 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK OF INDIA Cantonment Branch (IFSC PUNB0004000, a/c …6187). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 7 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 7 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 12 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 12 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 19 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 19 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 38 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.