Nitesh Columbus Square Phase II
K-RERA · the public record
Nitesh Melbourne Park
Bengaluru East · NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
31 Mar 2022declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
490registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
3Bed - 27
2
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
10.7registered acres
45.9registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Nitesh Melbourne Park
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/170916/000224
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion31 March 2022
Land area43,199 sq m (10.7 acres)
Homes registered490
Tower/wing entries12
Unit mix2 × 3Bed - 27
In context
Density45.9 homes per acre
Density in context17th percentile of 1123 Bengaluru East projects (median 75.5)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 490 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 117 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 43,199 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 1.75 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 12 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 490 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 53 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 17-10-2016 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3Bed - 27 | 2 | 100% | 117 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block A | 4 | 40 | 40 | - |
| Block B | 4 | 40 | 40 | - |
| Block C | 4 | 40 | 40 | - |
| Block D | 4 | 50 | 50 | - |
| Block E | 4 | 50 | 50 | - |
| Block F | 4 | 50 | 50 | - |
| Block G | 4 | 40 | 40 | - |
| Block H | 4 | 45 | 45 | - |
Showing first 8 of 12 tower/wing rows.
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 490 official flat/unit rows, matching the 490 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 331 | 95.9-128.7 sqm | 61.8-103.0 sqm | 331 |
| 2.5BHK | 84 | 92.0-95.9 sqm | 57.6-81.7 sqm | 84 |
| 1BHK | 35 | 10.0-11.3 sqm | 6.6-7.3 sqm | 35 |
| 4BHK | 30 | 150.8-150.9 sqm | 95.7-120.1 sqm | 30 |
| 1B1T | 10 | 10.0 sqm | 6.6 sqm | 10 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block D | 50 | 11.3-150.8 sqm | 7.3-120.0 sqm | 50 |
| Block E | 50 | 11.3-150.9 sqm | 7.3-120.1 sqm | 50 |
| Block F | 50 | 11.3-150.9 sqm | 7.3-120.1 sqm | 50 |
| Block H | 45 | 10.0-118.0 sqm | 6.6-93.2 sqm | 45 |
| Block K | 45 | 10.0-126.6 sqm | 6.6-96.3 sqm | 45 |
| Block A | 40 | 117.9-128.7 sqm | 74.8-102.7 sqm | 40 |
| Block B | 40 | 117.9-128.1 sqm | 74.8-95.5 sqm | 40 |
| Block C | 40 | 118.0-128.1 sqm | 74.8-101.9 sqm | 40 |
| Block G | 40 | 95.9-127.5 sqm | 61.8-98.8 sqm | 40 |
| Block I | 40 | 95.1-128.1 sqm | 61.3-102.9 sqm | 40 |
| Block J | 40 | 95.1-128.1 sqm | 61.3-103.0 sqm | 40 |
| Block L | 10 | 117.9 sqm | 74.8-90.2 sqm | 10 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIMP-A-0001 | Block A | 0 | 3BHK | 128.7 sqm | 100.5 sqm | 1 |
| NIMP-A-0002 | Block A | 0 | 3BHK | 128.7 sqm | 102.7 sqm | 1 |
| NIMP-A-0003 | Block A | 0 | 3BHK | 117.9 sqm | 94.8 sqm | 1 |
| NIMP-A-0004 | Block A | 0 | 3BHK | 117.9 sqm | 95.0 sqm | 1 |
| NIMP-A-0005 | Block A | 0 | 3BHK | 117.9 sqm | 82.2 sqm | 1 |
| NIMP-A-0006 | Block A | 0 | 3BHK | 117.9 sqm | 83.3 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 14 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Mar 2022, extended (Covid Extension) to 31 Dec 2022 — both dates have passed with no OC on file.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Fire NOCBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Pollution control (KSPCB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Environmental clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Airport Authority height clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
1 K-RERA order on this project (PROJECT WITHDRAWL) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (31 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEEPAK MARTIN S vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | full refund of our principal and interest as per the agreement | AUTHORITY | 30/03/2023 |
| vijaykumar S Nayanegali vs NITESH MELBOURNE PARK | Refund of booking amount of Rs 4 laks and Interest till date | AUTHORITY | 27/04/2022 |
| KUMAR ABHISHEK vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Full Refund amount plus penalty | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| AJEET KUMAR MALL vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Principal payment with interest as per RERA rules | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| MAHANTESH R GUNDALI vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Full REfund amount with penalty | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| SHRIKANT SARDA & (2) NAMRATA SARDA vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED Now called as NHDPL PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED | Refund of the amount including interest and penalty | AUTHORITY | 23/05/2023 |
| CHETAN ANAND & MRS. NARINDER KAUR ANAND vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | Refund along with interest on monies paid | AUTHORITY | 23/05/2023 |
| SURESH BABU M vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED NOW CALLED AS NHDPL PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED | Refund of Rs.64,87,376 with compensation (interest) | AUTHORITY | 22/02/2023 |
| BHUSHAN SHRAVAN BARI vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED Now called as NHDPL PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED | Refund paid amount with applicable interest | AUTHORITY | 22/02/2023 |
| ANIL REBELLO vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED Now called as NHDPL PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED | refund of amount, interest and compensation | AUTHORITY | 21/06/2023 |
| LAKSHMANAN BALAKRISHNAN vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED now as called NHDPL SOUTH PRIVATE LIMITED | To get back my investment of Rs.50,00,000 plus interest | AUTHORITY | 20/05/2023 |
| Vijay Kumar M vs VIJAY KUMAR M & MRS. CHANDANA CHANDRASHEKAR | Refund of Principal paid with interest and compensation | AUTHORITY | 20/05/2023 |
| SHEKHAR SHARAN BHATIYA & (2) RADHA BHATIYA vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED Now called as NHDPL PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED | Since project is stalled kindly order builder to refund the money paid with interest. | AUTHORITY | 16/02/2023 |
| NAVNEETH BHEEMAN & (2) LEENA POOVANNA NAVNEETH vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED Now called as NHDPL PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIM | Refund of full amount paid along with interest at prevailing rates of 9.5% | AUTHORITY | 15/03/2023 |
| R SREERAM ANVESH vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Refund, Interest, Compensation for mental agony and Legal Cost | AUTHORITY | 11/02/2023 |
| ASHWINI MADAPPA M vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Refund of INR 30.23 lakhs (fully paid amount) + applicable interest for delays | AUTHORITY | 11/02/2023 |
| MERILIN STANLEY & STANLEY FRANCIS vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Rs 40,00,000/- | AUTHORITY | 11/02/2023 |
| RASHMI KOTHARI vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Refund of Total amount paid of Rs. 4399730/ + Interest @ 18% pa. | AUTHORITY | 11/02/2023 |
| JITENDRA HARICHANDAN vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Refund with Compensation for Paid Installments | AUTHORITY | 11/02/2023 |
| RANJIT NAMBIAR vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Help in refund. | AUTHORITY | 11/02/2023 |
| MUKUND MADHAV AGARWAL vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Refund of Money with Interest | AUTHORITY | 11/02/2023 |
| Dsouza Prakash vs Nitesh Housing Developers Pvt Ltd. | Refunds of advance payment paid to Nitesh Housing Developers with interest | AUTHORITY | 11/02/2023 |
| Anand Kumar Verma vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Please help me to get my principal and interest amount from Nitesh | AUTHORITY | 11/02/2023 |
| Karthic Raj S vs NITESH MELBOURSE PARK | I would request that Nitesh estates refunds my amount in full with Interest and penalty fee for the delay of more than 7 years . | AUTHORITY | 11/02/2023 |
| SUDEEP KABI vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Cancellation of Unit No. D-0307 along with refund of Rs. 20,75,869/- with 18% interest p.a and compensation of Rs. 5,00,000/- for delay | AUTHORITY | 11/02/2023 |
| NACHIKETA TRIVEDI vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED Now called as NHDPL PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED | Help in refund with the applicable interest | AUTHORITY | 09/06/2023 |
| AMREETA MAZUMDAR & (2) ARUNAVA SEAL vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED Now called as NHDPL PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED | Refund of the money we gave to NHDPL with interest | AUTHORITY | 05/05/2023 |
| Chintu Varkey vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Cancellation of Unit No. D-0001 along with refund of Rs. 31,00,089/- with 18% interest p.a and compensation of Rs. 5,00,000/- for delay | AUTHORITY | 05/04/2023 |
| Chintu Varkey vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Cancellation of Unit No. D-0091 along with refund of Rs. 10,05,302/- with 18% interest p.a and compensation of Rs. 5,00,000/- for delay | AUTHORITY | 05/04/2023 |
| MANISHA BAJAJ vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | For refund of the entire amount paid by the complainant along with interest and compensation | AUTHORITY | 03/05/2023 |
| Sunil Banthiya vs NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Compensation | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2023 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (71 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190302/0002335 02-03-2019 | Cancellation and refund of money with interest | Nitesh Columbus Square Phase II (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190325/0002497 25-03-2019 | Huge delay in completion of Nitesh Columbus Square project | Nitesh Columbus Square Phase II (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190327/0002527 27-03-2019 | Not handed over as per commitment and incomplete construction | Nitesh Columbus Square Phase II (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190417/0002295 17-04-2019 | Grievance against Nitesh Housing Developers PVT Ltd/Nitesh Columbus Square/C 701 | Nitesh Columbus Square Phase II (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190513/0002972 13-05-2019 | Inordinate delay in completion of project and handing over possession - Refund Request | Nitesh Napa Valley (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190528/0003188 28-05-2019 | Nitesh not refunding amount around 35 Lacs that I paid during sale agreement and there after | Nitesh Melbourne Park | DISPOSED AUTHORITY |
| CMP/190624/0002421 24-06-2019 | Requesting refund with interest and penalty due to non completion of project by promoter | Nitesh Columbus Square Phase II (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190626/0003405 26-06-2019 | Return of amount and compensation | Nitesh Hyde Park Phase II (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Sandeep Shikre & Associates | - | 1989 | Prabhadevi Industrial Estate, Veer Sawarkar Marg |
| Contractor | AL Fara'A Infraprojects Pvt Ltd., | - | 2011 | Andheri-Kurla Road, Andheri( East) |
| Structural engineer | Novel Engineering Consultants | - | - | - |
Builder track record
RERA filingNitesh has 10 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Nitesh Housing”). 10 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a higher delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹31.4 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: YES BANK Kasturba Road (IFSC YESB0000022, a/c …0671). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 2 project-photo uploads.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 5 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 5 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 12 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 15 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 16 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 16 km |
| Electronic City | 26 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.