Butterfly Avenue
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
D C HI RISE · Bengaluru East · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/191220/003084
The Drawings Report · ₹4,999
We read all 8 approved drawings and 48 filed papers on this project’s RERA file — the sheets the builder filed to get it approved.
One real find, from a Noida project’s approved drawings: the buyer pays for 10,000 sq ft — the floor inside the flat is 6,982 sq ft.
Get it for this project →Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked. Sent as a PDF in one working day.
Free before you decide: the 14 things to get in writing before you book
Every item comes from a real RERA filing. Send it to the family group before anyone pays a token.
Send the checklist to the family group Read it here →DC CAPITOL spans 2.1 acres, featuring one tower with 152 registered 2 and 3 BHK residential flats, estimated to cost ₹48.5 crore. Its density of 72.4 homes per acre is the 44th percentile among 1118 Bengaluru East projects (median 75.7). Its declared completion date of 31 October 2022 has passed; no occupancy certificate is on record.
Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
What you can verify free on this page
The official K-RERA filing record, in plain English
Registration and delivery
DC Capitol is registered with K-RERA as PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/191220/003084, and the promoter has declared completion for 31 Oct 2022.
31 Oct 2022
declared completion
Figures are the promoter's own filings as they stood when Quietlist last read the register. A declared completion date is a filing, not a handover commitment.
Source · K-RERA project register · read 10 Sep 2026
Project scale
DC Capitol spans 8,497 sq m (2.10 acres), comprises 1 tower, registers 152 units, and is declared to cost ₹48.52 cr.
₹48.52 cr
declared project cost
2.10acres
8,497 sq m
152units
on the registration
16948.0FAR
sanctioned
Scale and cost as the promoter registered them. The declared cost is the promoter's own estimate on the filing, not a valuation and not a price to a buyer.
Source · K-RERA project registration · read 10 Sep 2026
🔒 What I’d do as a buyer here · Drawings Report
The report opens with what this project really is — read from its approved drawings — then the specific calls: the cheapest good way to buy here, the flat to say no to, what you can stop worrying about, and what to get in writing before you sign anything.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 152 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 12,145 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 8,497 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | ~1.99 | Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈16,948 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 8,497 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build. |
| Registered towers/wings | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 156 total (15 open) — 1.03 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 30-09-2019 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 AND 3 BHK RESIDENTIAL FLATS | 152 | 100% | 12,145 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLOCK A | 4 | 152 | 156 | - |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 152 official flat/unit rows, matching the 152 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 92 | 68.0-78.0 sqm | 49.0-57.0 sqm | 92 |
| 3BHK | 60 | 82.0-103.0 sqm | 57.0-75.0 sqm | 60 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLOCK A | 152 | 68.0-103.0 sqm | 49.0-75.0 sqm | 152 |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BLOCK A | 1 | 2BHK | 70.0 sqm | 51.0 sqm | 1 |
| 002 | BLOCK A | 1 | 2BHK | 70.0 sqm | 51.0 sqm | 1 |
| 003 | BLOCK A | 1 | 2BHK | 70.0 sqm | 52.0 sqm | 1 |
| 004 | BLOCK A | 1 | 2BHK | 74.0 sqm | 53.0 sqm | 1 |
| 005 | BLOCK A | 1 | 2BHK | 70.0 sqm | 52.0 sqm | 1 |
| 006 | BLOCK A | 1 | 2BHK | 78.0 sqm | 57.0 sqm | 1 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Which flat to ask for · Drawings Report
The flat-level read: which towers and floors to prefer and which to avoid, what the drawings put above, below and beside each flat, and the things on this site nobody at the sales desk will tell you about.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
All 48 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Oct 2022, extended (Covid Extension) to 31 Jul 2023 — both dates have passed with no OC on file.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA complaint orders (51 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nagendra Baddam vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on south side as per original approved plan & Swimming pool 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| SREENATH VEMPALLI vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Ravikumar Tanneru vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on Westside as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Muralikrishna Maddu vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Sumanth Kumar Vanga vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Anindra Nallapati vs D C HI RISE LLP | Relief Sought For : 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing ov | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Karthik N vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Hanumantharao vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on south side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| M V M Murali Krishna vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| SATYA GOPI KRISHNA KANTH MYNENI vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol and3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Nayab Rasool Nandavarapu vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. Need our Compound Wall on WEST side as per Original Approved Plan 2. Do not want to share our UDS & Driveway to any other Phases of DC Capitol 3. Association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Menta Manikanta vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Prasanta Kumar Jena vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Thejaswini vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Praveen Kumar Palli vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. Need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Yedugur Susmitha vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Sandeep Kumar Vemulapalli vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. Need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. Dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to any other phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| yagnyashri shrikanth Baba vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. Dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to any other phases of DC Capitol 3. Association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| BhanuKiran Botta vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| SRINIVASARAO VAKKALAGADDA vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Kona Balachandra vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. Need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. Dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to any other phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Sumana vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. Need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. Dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. Association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| GIRISHA N vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs Doc | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| K Suneel vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1.Need our compound wall on south side to be contructed as per original plan 2. Dont want to share the driveway to further phases formation | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| VEERA PRASAD CHATLA vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Dadi S K K Santosh Venkat vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Sreekanth Badida vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Seshananda Reddy Tippaluri vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Sreerama Abhinay vs D C HI RISE LLP | We require the compound wall on the west side to be constructed as per the originally approved plan." "We do not wish to share our Undivided Share (UDS) and driveway with any other phases of the DC Ca | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Bhargav R vs D C HI RISE LLP | We require the compound wall on the west side to be constructed as per the originally approved plan." "We do not wish to share our Undivided Share (UDS) and driveway with any other phases of the DC Ca | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Ramakrishna Kovuri vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. Need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. Don't want to share our UDS & Driveway to another phases of DC Capitol 3. Association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Priyanshu Kumar Sinha vs D C HI RISE LLP | Relief Sought For : 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. No sharing UDS & Driveway to other phases of DC Capitol 3. Need all original documents for Association | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| S Ashish Prusty vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. Need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. Dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to another phases of DC Capitol 3. Association formation & handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Kumari Nitu Kushwaha vs D C HI RISE LLP | (Driveway & registered UDS) Relief Sought For : 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. associ | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Gyana Ranjan Mahunta vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Sampath A vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. don't want to share our UDS & Driveway to any other phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation, handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Arvind Kumar Tiwari vs D C HI RISE LLP | Need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan . dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to any other phases of DC Capitol. Document pending for association formation | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| PANKAJ AMBARTANI vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. Need our Compound Wall on WEST side as per Original Approved Plan 2. Do not want to share our UDS & Driveway to any other Phases of DC Capitol 3. Association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Praveen Kumar SP vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Bhaskar Viswanathan vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1.Need our full compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. Dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to another phases of DC Capitol 3. Association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Arun Kumar vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. Need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. Dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original Docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Gopinath S vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1.need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2.dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to any other phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Tapan Kumar Mishra vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. Need our Compound Wall on WEST side as per Original Approved Plan 2. Do not want to share our UDS & Driveway to any other Phases of DC Capitol 3. Association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Radha Krishna Indupuri vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Jayita Saha vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs Doc | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Mahesh Podapati vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs Doc | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Ramkumar vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Pruthvi V vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyotherphases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| chitiprolu mahesh vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs Doc | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| Gayathri V S vs D C HI RISE LLP | 1. need our compound wall on WEST side as per original approved plan 2. dont want to share our UDS & Driveway to anyother phases of DC Capitol 3. association formation , handing over original docs | AUTHORITY | 23/06/2025 |
| YASH KUMAR vs D C CAPITAL | We are interested in buying the flat. And would like rera authorities to intervene as the builder is not adhering to the sale agreement and refusing to give us the flat. | AUTHORITY | 16/11/2023 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (1 complaint listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/220107/0008772 07-01-2022 | Refusing to sale flat (flat no 122) after agreement and giving it to someone else | DC CAPITOL | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
K-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | V SIVA KUMAR | - | 2008 | 21ST MAIN, BSK II STAGE |
| Contractor | BHAKTHAVACHALU NAIDU | - | 2005 | SBM ROAD, CHIKKALASANDRA |
| Structural engineer | SRINIVAS RAO BOLIMUNTA | - | - | - |
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹31.9 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Axis Bank PANATHUR BRANCH (IFSC UTIB0002928, a/c …7709). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
The nearest major job hub is ~2 km away — walking/short-hop distance to a major employment hub — a genuine work-near-home location.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 2 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 6 km |
| Electronic City | 11 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 11 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 15 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 29 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
The approved drawings
Everything above is on this page already, free, from the government record. The drawings are different: the 8 approved sheets are the same drawings the builder filed to get DC CAPITOL approved — what sits under each tower, which floor holds machines, what the sales sheet leaves out. Nobody reads them for you. We do.
What that turns up — from other projects’ filings:
ATS Knightsbridge · Sector 124, Noida
You pay for 10,000 sq ft. The floor inside your home is 6,982 sq ft. The rest is walls, shared circulation and services. Get both numbers written into your agreement before you pay any booking amount.
Oberoi Elysian · Goregaon East, Mumbai
“The building is complete.” The tower has reached full height — true. The same filed certificate, same page: sanitary fittings 6% done. Ask for a possession date in writing.
Godrej Aristocrat · Sector 49, Gurugram
Paying extra for the top floor? The terrace drawing shows what sits on the slab above those flats: the overhead water tanks, the lift machine rooms and the roof machinery. Ask which flat sits under which.
Prestige Camden Gardens · Thanisandra, Bengaluru
The approved parking table asks for 12 visitor spaces. It shows 0. Two-wheeler spaces: also 0. Ask in writing where visitors will park.
Want this project read from its filed drawings?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. For DC CAPITOL, one reading of it goes further. Which flat should I ask for? — what the approved drawings and filed papers say about the flats, the parking, the approvals, and what to get in writing before you sign. That is the Drawings Report. See a real one first:
Drawings Report sample: Prestige Camden Gardens → · browse all sample reports →
Payment is confirmed automatically. The Drawings Report is 1 working day. We email the link, so you can close the tab.
Drawings Report · ₹4,999
Every drawing on file, read — which flat to ask for · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Paying from outside India? Pay $59 (Drawings Report) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes, and send the 14-point booking checklist with the first email.
Built by Hi Rise.
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in DC Capitol?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 10 Sep 2026