K-RERA · the public record
Mahaveer Highlands
Bengaluru South · REDDY STRUCTURES
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Construction progress and dates
Promoter-reported construction
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q1 2026
declared completion
31 Mar 2027
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
2.7registered acres
114.5registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Mahaveer Highlands
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/220922/005266
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
In context
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 312 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 22,754 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Official built-up area | 49,765 sqm | Useful scale context when comparing density and project cost. |
| Registered land area | 11,027 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.75 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 4 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 301 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Covered-parking field | 258 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 43 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Approved plan number | BMICAPA/NAYO-3/Building | Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder. |
| Plan approval date | 07-08-2019 | |
| Project start date | 01-08-2022 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 BHK | 19 | 6% | 749 sqm |
| 3 BHK | 120 | 38% | 10,456 sqm |
| 2 BHK | 173 | 55% | 11,549 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block-A | 10 | 78 | 76 | 34.9 m |
| Block-B | 10 | 78 | 75 | 34.9 m |
| Block-C | 10 | 78 | 75 | 34.9 m |
| Block-D | 10 | 78 | 75 | 34.9 m |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 312 official flat/unit rows, matching the 312 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 BHK | 173 | 59.3-70.0 sqm | 202.0-380.0 sqm | 172 (1 with 0) |
| 3 BHK | 120 | 86.0-88.3 sqm | 301.0-370.0 sqm | 120 |
| 1 BHK | 19 | 39.3-39.5 sqm | 202.0-214.0 sqm | 0 (19 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block-A | 78 | 39.3-70.0 sqm | 202.0-380.0 sqm | 58 (20 with 0) |
| Block-B | 78 | 63.2-88.3 sqm | 202.0-380.0 sqm | 78 |
| Block-C | 78 | 63.2-88.3 sqm | 202.0-380.0 sqm | 78 |
| Block-D | 78 | 63.2-88.3 sqm | 202.0-380.0 sqm | 78 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Block-A | 1 | 2 BHK | 70.0 sqm | 380.0 sqm | 1 |
| 2 | Block-A | 1 | 2 BHK | 68.5 sqm | 370.0 sqm | 1 |
| 3 | Block-A | 1 | 2 BHK | 68.5 sqm | 369.0 sqm | 1 |
| 4 | Block-A | 1 | 1 BHK | 39.5 sqm | 202.0 sqm | 0 |
| 29 | Block-A | 1 | 1 BHK | 39.3 sqm | 214.0 sqm | 0 |
| 30 | Block-A | 1 | 2 BHK | 65.1 sqm | 332.0 sqm | 0 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingThe promoter answered No to the land-litigation question. This is a filed declaration, not a court search.
⚠ 9 of 36 compliance document slots are filed as under process / not yet usable: Organization Structure, Water Permission Letter, Certificate from Registered Engineer indicating the structural safety of the building, Urban Land Ceiling, Change of Land Use and more.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →
K-RERA complaint orders (1 complaint against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| RACHANA MR vs REDDY STRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED | Kindly help in getting me complete amount refunded. | AUTHORITY | 01/02/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (82 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/200305/0005643 05-03-2020 | Refund of GST amount | MAHAVEER PROMENADE (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/201226/0007330 26-12-2020 | refund extra gst amount charged | MAHAVEER PROMENADE (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/210115/0007039 15-01-2021 | Refund of GST amount | MAHAVEER PROMENADE (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210117/0007459 17-01-2021 | REFUND OF EXTRA GST 4% CHARGED | MAHAVEER PROMENADE (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/210201/0007547 01-02-2021 | REFUND OF EXTRA PAID GST AMOUNT | MAHAVEER PROMENADE (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210701/0008086 01-07-2021 | Refund of GST Amount | MAHAVEER PROMENADE (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/211012/0008432 12-10-2021 | Unable to make use of plot due to litigation | MAHAVEER PALATIUM (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/211027/0008477 27-10-2021 | Refund of advance paid for blocking plots | MAHAVEER PALATIUM (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Statutory approval status
RERA filing10 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 4 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chartered accountant | SOGASANI & CO. | 29711 | 2000 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560001 |
| Engineer | NADIG CONSULTING | BCC/BL 3.6/E-4059/14-15 | 2015 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560001 |
| Architect | INDRAJITH S KEMBHAVI | CA/2000/26684 | 1977 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560041 |
| Contractor | KPC CONSTRUCTIONS | - | 2007 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560083 |
Builder track record
RERA filingReddy Structures has 10 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records (average reported construction progress 47%). 8 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹13.26 Cr collected from buyers, ₹0.00 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.
| Construction progress | 76% → 87% (+11 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 252/312 (81%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹32.46 Cr |
- Construction progress moved from 76% to 87% across the filed QPR window.
- The builder has drawn 0.00x of buyer collections from escrow (about 0% of the ₹32 Cr collected) — money is largely staying in the regulated escrow account rather than being pulled out ahead of spend, which is the safer direction. A ratio near or above 1.0 would be the one to scrutinise.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹15.3 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC RICHMOND ROAD IFSC Code : HDFC0000523 Pin Code : 560025. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 21 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 16 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 21 km |
| Electronic City | 22 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 23 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 30 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 40 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.