K-RERA · the public record
MAHAVEER TRIDENT
Bengaluru South · REDDY STRUCTURES
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
2.4registered acres
58.5registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for MAHAVEER TRIDENT
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/190219/002385
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
In context
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 140 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 10,572 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 9,693 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 1 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 4 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 140 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 22-06-2018 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK AND 3BHK | 140 | 100% | 10,572 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLOCK A | 3 | 36 | 36 | - |
| BLOCK B | 3 | 28 | 28 | - |
| BLOCK C | 3 | 56 | 56 | - |
| BLOCK D | 3 | 20 | 20 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 140 official flat/unit rows, matching the 140 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK-2T | 84 | 605.0-842.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 (84 with 0) |
| 3BHK-3T | 48 | 797.1-1,125.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 (48 with 0) |
| 3BHK-2T | 8 | 816.0-856.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 (8 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLOCK C | 56 | 610.6-1,125.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 (56 with 0) |
| BLOCK A | 36 | 742.0-1,102.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 (36 with 0) |
| BLOCK B | 28 | 605.0-1,035.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 (28 with 0) |
| BLOCK D | 20 | 606.0-842.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 (20 with 0) |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G-01 | BLOCK A | 0 | 3BHK-3T | 1,102.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 |
| G-02 | BLOCK A | 0 | 3BHK-3T | 1,076.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 |
| G-03 | BLOCK A | 0 | 2BHK-2T | 783.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 |
| G-04 | BLOCK A | 0 | 2BHK-2T | 807.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 |
| G-05 | BLOCK A | 0 | 3BHK-2T | 816.1 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 |
| G-06 | BLOCK A | 0 | 3BHK-3T | 1,067.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 23 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2021, extended (Extension) to 31 Mar 2025 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 19 Apr 2023 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/230419/002385) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
1 K-RERA order on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (14 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| sanjit patra vs mahaveer trident | Compensation on the delay of this project | AUTHORITY | 27/02/2024 |
| NISHA MENON vs MAHAVEER TRIDENT | Compensation On The Delay Of The Project | AUTHORITY | 22/01/2024 |
| SHAIK AKEEB BASHA vs mAHAVEER tRIDENT, | Interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 20/05/2025 |
| Nusrath Sulthana vs Reddy Structures Pvt. Ltd., | We are looking for RERA intervention to get the apartment handover with all the pending and agreed work completed and the compensation for delayed possession of apartment. | AUTHORITY | 16/05/2026 |
| Ankita Singh Basu & Kuntal Kumar Basu vs REDDY STRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED | Compensation on project delay. | AUTHORITY | 14/05/2024 |
| V SARAVANAKUMAR vs MAHAVEER TRIDENT | Compensation on the delay of the project | AUTHORITY | 12/12/2023 |
| KAPIL INCHURE & SANJEEVINI vs REDDY STRUCTURE PVT LTD | Compensation as per RERA rules and sale agreement on delayed posession | AUTHORITY | 12/12/2023 |
| KARTHIKA S. MANU vs M/S REDDY STRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER | As per agreement builder/owner has to pay be general bank interest + 2% for the money that is paid already if delayed. Please make sure they pay this compensation to me. | AUTHORITY | 12/02/2024 |
| AVINASH KARNANI vs M/S REDDY STRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER | Compensation on the delay of the project | AUTHORITY | 12/02/2024 |
| SHIVANI BRIJESH DIGASKAR vs REDDY STRUCTURE PVT LTD | Compensation on the delay of the Project | AUTHORITY | 05/01/2024 |
| PRASHANT vs REDDY STRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED | componsation for the delay | AUTHORITY | 05/01/2024 |
| GIRIDHAR DASARI vs MAHAVEER TRIDENT | compensation for the delay that has happened since december 2021 till project completetion as per the sbi interest +2% as agreed in the sale agreement. | AUTHORITY | 05/01/2024 |
| VINAY KUMAR MURTHY vs REDDY STRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED WESTERN DEVELOPERS | Compensation on the delay of the project | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2024 |
| NISHIKANT vs REDDY STRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER | Compensation for delay in handover and breach of contract | AUTHORITY | 01/04/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (82 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/200305/0005643 05-03-2020 | Refund of GST amount | MAHAVEER PROMENADE (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/201226/0007330 26-12-2020 | refund extra gst amount charged | MAHAVEER PROMENADE (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/210115/0007039 15-01-2021 | Refund of GST amount | MAHAVEER PROMENADE (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210117/0007459 17-01-2021 | REFUND OF EXTRA GST 4% CHARGED | MAHAVEER PROMENADE (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/210201/0007547 01-02-2021 | REFUND OF EXTRA PAID GST AMOUNT | MAHAVEER PROMENADE (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210701/0008086 01-07-2021 | Refund of GST Amount | MAHAVEER PROMENADE (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/211012/0008432 12-10-2021 | Unable to make use of plot due to litigation | MAHAVEER PALATIUM (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/211027/0008477 27-10-2021 | Refund of advance paid for blocking plots | MAHAVEER PALATIUM (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | ANI SAMBYAL SINGH | - | 1993 | KSCMF BUILDING, CUNNINGHAM ROAD |
| Contractor | G.N. CONSTRUCTION | - | 2012 | KODICHIKKANAHALLI MAIN ROAD, SOMESHWARA LAYOUT |
| Structural engineer | DR. R JAGADISH | - | - | - |
Builder track record
RERA filingReddy Structures has 10 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records (average reported construction progress 67%). 7 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹31.8 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC RICHMOND ROAD (IFSC HDFC0000523, a/c …0024). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 2 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 2 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 9 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 13 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 16 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 20 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 38 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.