Prestige Elm Park
K-RERA · the public record
Prestige Suncrest
Anekal · PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
34%construction reportedQ1 2026 filing
0units not bookedof 437 · Q1 2026 filing
30 Sep 2028declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Construction progress and dates
Promoter-reported construction
22%
Q3 2025
25%
Q4 2025
34%
Q1 2026
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q1 2026
declared completion
30 Sep 2028
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Registered units and project size
1 Bed
49
2 Bed
96
3 Bed
292
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
5.9registered acres
74.5registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Prestige Suncrest
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/170225/007512
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion30 September 2028
Land area23,738 sq m (5.9 acres)
Homes registered437
Tower/wing entries2
Unit mix49 × 1 Bed, 96 × 2 Bed, 292 × 3 Bed
In context
Density74.5 homes per acre
Density in context49th percentile of 480 Anekal projects (median 75.6)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 437 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 35,103 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Official built-up area | 82,086 sqm | Useful scale context when comparing density and project cost. |
| Registered land area | 23,738 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.49 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 2 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 437 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Covered-parking field | 580 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 33 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Approved plan number | BDA/No./AS/AA-3/TS-2/D/18/2024-25 | Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder. |
| Plan approval date | 15-01-2025 | |
| Project start date | 01-04-2025 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Bed | 49 | 11% | 1,966 sqm |
| 2 Bed | 96 | 22% | 6,354 sqm |
| 3 Bed | 292 | 67% | 26,794 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower-01 | 26 | 224 | 224 | 87.05 m |
| Tower - 02 | 25 | 213 | 213 | 84 m |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 437 official flat/unit rows, matching the 437 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 BED 2T | 143 | 82.2-86.0 sqm | 48.6-50.5 sqm | 143 |
| 3 BED 3T | 100 | 97.1-102.9 sqm | 57.7-59.6 sqm | 100 |
| 2 BED 2T | 96 | 65.7-70.3 sqm | 40.9-42.8 sqm | 96 |
| 1BED | 49 | 39.1-41.2 sqm | 22.1-23.1 sqm | 49 |
| 3 BED 3T + HOME OFFICE | 47 | 105.6-107.3 sqm | 65.3-67.0 sqm | 47 |
| 3 BED 3T +HOME OFFICE | 2 | 107.3 sqm | 67.0 sqm | 2 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower-01 | 224 | 39.1-105.6 sqm | 22.1-65.3 sqm | 224 |
| Tower - 02 | 213 | 41.2-107.3 sqm | 23.1-67.0 sqm | 213 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1021 | Tower-01 | 2 | 3 BED 2T | 83.0 sqm | 48.6 sqm | 1 |
| 1022 | Tower-01 | 2 | 2 BED 2T | 65.7 sqm | 40.9 sqm | 1 |
| 1023 | Tower-01 | 2 | 1BED | 39.1 sqm | 22.1 sqm | 1 |
| 1024 | Tower-01 | 2 | 2 BED 2T | 66.2 sqm | 41.2 sqm | 1 |
| 1025 | Tower-01 | 2 | 3 BED 3T | 97.1 sqm | 59.2 sqm | 1 |
| 1026 | Tower-01 | 2 | 2 BED 2T | 70.3 sqm | 42.8 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingThe promoter answered No to the land-litigation question. This is a filed declaration, not a court search.
10 of 34 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 24 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (61 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190225/0002242 25-02-2019 | Builder not paying compensation as per agreement and no handover of apartment after deadline | PRESTIGE WESTWOODS (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190325/0002508 25-03-2019 | Delayed Interest for delayed handover | Prestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190330/0002539 30-03-2019 | Delay in delivery of Project | Prestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190419/0002630 19-04-2019 | This is to request to adjust against balance or reimburse the amount as per delay clause @ 9% till date on the amount paid. Also to adhere to agreement for handover of flat no 14011 in tower 14 | Prestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190519/0003075 19-05-2019 | Prestiege Royale Gardens T2147 Apartmen Dealy in possession, compensation not being pais as per agreement | Prestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190519/0003091 19-05-2019 | Undue delay of project completion and Monetary compensation towards that per Construction agreement | Prestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190520/0003069 20-05-2019 | There is no OC 2 yrs after promised data of delivery. There is misrepresentation of the tower number scheduled apartment comparing brochure and sanctioned plan. | PRESTIGE ROYALE GARDENS PHASE 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/190614/0003288 14-06-2019 | Delay in delivery and compensation not paid | PRESTIGE ROYALE GARDENS PHASE 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Statutory approval status
RERA filing6 of 6 applicable approvals are marked Approved in the filing. Check the linked documents for their scope and validity.
4 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water supply and sewage board | Approved | 16-05-2024 | Prestige Suncrest - Panchayat water NOC.pdf |
| KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres) | Approved | 13-02-2025 | PCB - CFE small size.pdf |
| KSPCB- MOEF (Above 50 Acres) | Approved | 07-03-2025 | MOEF.pdf |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | Approved | 04-07-2024 | Suncrest - BESCOM NOC.pdf |
| Fire and Safety | Approved | 24-10-2024 | Fire NOC.pdf |
| Airport Authority of India | Approved | 14-09-2024 | NOC_Ms Prestige Estates Projects Ltd 83.PDF |
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 4 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chartered accountant | Bhuvana Bhat | 029183S | 2024 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560010 |
| Engineer | Design Ventures Engineering Consultants (I) Pvt Ltd | BCCL/BL-3.6/SE- 0218/21-22 | 2009 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560080 |
| Architect | Urban Frame Pvt. Ltd. | CA/96/20794 | 2011 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560052 |
| Contractor | K2K Infrastructure (I) Pvt Ltd | - | 2007 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560001 |
Builder track record
RERA filingPrestige has 81 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Prestige Estates”) (average reported construction progress 65%). 53 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹30.89 Cr collected from buyers, ₹33.89 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account. This quarter the escrow withdrawal (₹33.89 Cr) exceeded buyer collections (₹30.89 Cr) — worth asking the builder to reconcile against certified construction milestones, which is what RERA requires escrow draws to track.
| Construction progress | 22% → 34% (+12 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 437/437 (100%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹74.57 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹78.61 Cr (1.05x collections) |
- 100% of registered units are shown as sold/booked, but no completion certificate is on file yet.
- Construction progress moved from 22% to 34% across the filed QPR window.
- The filed unit sales count did not move across the available QPR window because the project was already effectively sold out.
- Across available QPR rows, escrow withdrawals are 1.05x buyer collections. Ask the builder to reconcile this against certified project costs and prior-period balances.
- In the latest QPR, escrow withdrawal exceeds buyer collections for that quarter. This can be normal if prior balance existed, but it needs a clean explanation.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹48.0 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK Lavelle Road, Bangalore IFSC Code : KKBK0000422 Pin Code : 560001. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 3 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 3 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 13 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 19 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 19 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 26 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 43 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.