K-RERA · the public record
Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I
Bengaluru East · NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
4.4registered acres
55.1registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/180509/001674
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
In context
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 241 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 121 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 17,705 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.16 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 5 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 241 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 46 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 19-03-2012 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3Bed - 13 | 4 | 100% | 121 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block A | 12 | 50 | 50 | - |
| Block B | 12 | 50 | 50 | - |
| Block C | 12 | 39 | 39 | - |
| Block D | 12 | 50 | 50 | - |
| Block E | 12 | 52 | 52 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 241 official flat/unit rows, matching the 241 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 168 | 103.3-121.3 sqm | 41.1-46.9 sqm | 168 |
| 2BHK | 48 | 80.5 sqm | 32.4 sqm | 48 |
| 4BHK | 25 | 130.0-155.3 sqm | 52.1-61.3 sqm | 25 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block E | 52 | 80.5-108.2 sqm | 32.4-42.8 sqm | 52 |
| Block A | 50 | 106.0-130.0 sqm | 43.3-52.1 sqm | 50 |
| Block B | 50 | 106.0-121.3 sqm | 43.3-46.9 sqm | 50 |
| Block D | 50 | 80.5-105.7 sqm | 32.4-42.9 sqm | 50 |
| Block C | 39 | 103.3-155.3 sqm | 42.8-61.3 sqm | 39 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NICC-A-0101 | Block A | 0 | 3BHK | 106.0 sqm | 43.3 sqm | 1 |
| NICC-A-0102 | Block A | 0 | 3BHK | 106.0 sqm | 43.3 sqm | 1 |
| NICC-A-0103 | Block A | 0 | 3BHK | 106.0 sqm | 43.3 sqm | 1 |
| NICC-A-0104 | Block A | 0 | 4BHK | 130.0 sqm | 52.1 sqm | 1 |
| NICC-A-0201 | Block A | 1 | 3BHK | 106.0 sqm | 43.3 sqm | 1 |
| NICC-A-0202 | Block A | 1 | 3BHK | 106.0 sqm | 43.3 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
9 of 34 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 25 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2018, extended (an extension) to 31 Dec 2019 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. An extension application filed on 09 May 2019 is pending with K-RERA — until it is approved, the registration stands lapsed.
Approval documents
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
2 K-RERA orders on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION, PROJECT TOR) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (32 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMEER SHAHUL vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Refund of the collected funds of 26.85 lakh with 18% interest | AUTHORITY | 30/01/2025 |
| Potti Kalpana and Potti Venkata Narasimha Rao vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Direction to be given to INESA( Transferee Developer) and B.N. Venugopal to honour the commitments of NUDPL (Transferor Developer) | AUTHORITY | 29/09/2026 |
| RAUNAK KUNDU AND ANOTHER vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Devendra Ram Krishna vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Relief u/s 3 4 5 7 8 11 15 35 38 59 60 61 62 and other section of RERA Act. Due to lack of space refer facts of complaint column & Last Enclosure Facts of Complaint and Reliefs and interim reliefs | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Hareesh Kurup vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Kiran Kumar Pujari vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Manish Kumar Agarwal vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| NAVEEN CHANDRA vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| PAWAN MUNSHI vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Prabhu Loganathan vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Pranav Kumar Agarwal vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Puneet Bhatia vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Sandeep Mallya Perdoor vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Sanjeev K Chaudhary vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Varun Gupta vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| VIKRAM BABARAO DABRE vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Saurabh Kumar vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Bhunesh Singh Kshatri vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Raghunathan Govindarjapuram vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Aanchal Agarwal vs INESA Ventures LLP | As prayed in Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 15/10/2022 |
| Vinay Agarwal vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | As prayed in the facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
| BIBEK DIPTA CHAUDHURI vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | i) Direction to the Builder to handover possession of my apartment, complete in all respects and in conformity with the Construction Agreement and for the consideration mentioned therein, with all add | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
| Deepak Kubendran vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Cancel agreement, refund payment with interest compensation | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
| Gopi Krishna Ravinuthala vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
| N Jeevan Belliappa vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
| V V S SANTOSH KUMAR vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
| Tarun Bansal vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Relief u/s 3 4 5 7 8 11 15 35 38 59 60 61 62 and other section of RERA Act. Due to lack of space refer facts of complaint column & Last Enclosure Facts of Complaint and Reliefs and interim reliefs | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
| Vishwas Kudli Nagaraja vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
| Sundaram Narayanaswamy vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
| Amit Kumar Rathi vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Withdraw/Exit from project with full compensatory interest from the respective date of payment. | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
| JIBU THOMAS VELAMKALAM vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Delayed compensation and Refund of entire amount with Interest | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
| Bijoy P vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Full Refund with Interest for the delay | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (34 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190320/0002471 20-03-2019 | Compensation | Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190506/0002921 06-05-2019 | Refund due to non completion of project | Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/200804/0006291 04-08-2020 | Refund and Compensation | Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/200807/0006317 07-08-2020 | Refund- 7 year delay | Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/201004/0006697 04-10-2020 | Refund of money with interest and delay compensation | Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/201010/0006810 10-10-2020 | Provide Compensation for inordinate delay in handing over the apartment | Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/201020/0006926 20-10-2020 | Refund of Rs 26.85 lakh with 18 percent interest | Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/201022/0006917 22-10-2020 | Delayed Compensation and Refund of the entire amount along with interest | Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I | UNDER ENQUIRY AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | AECOM | - | 2008 | C wing first floor Mittal tower, no 6 M G Road |
| Contractor | Simplex Infrastructures Ltd | - | 1924 | S C Road Brigade Plaza, Unit C Anand Rao Circle |
| Structural engineer | Novel Engineering Consultants | - | - | - |
Builder track record
RERA filingNitesh has 10 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Nitesh Urban”). 10 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a higher delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹60.9 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: YES BANK Kasturba Road (IFSC YESB0000022, a/c …0927). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 2 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 2 km |
| Electronic City | 9 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 9 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 10 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 15 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 31 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.