Greenfinch Meadows
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT · Bengaluru East · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/180509/001674
The Drawings Report · ₹4,999
We read all 5 approved drawings and 34 filed papers on this project’s RERA file — the sheets the builder filed to get it approved.
One real find, from a Noida project’s approved drawings: the buyer pays for 10,000 sq ft — the floor inside the flat is 6,982 sq ft.
Get it for this project →Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked. Sent as a PDF in one working day.
Free before you decide: the 14 things to get in writing before you book
Every item comes from a real RERA filing. Send it to the family group before anyone pays a token.
Send the checklist to the family group Read it here →Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I covers 4.4 acres with 5 towers and 241 homes registered, estimated at ₹146.7 crore. With 55.1 homes per acre, it ranks at the 23rd percentile of the 1118 Bengaluru East projects tracked here (median 75.7). Its declared completion date of 31 December 2018 has passed; no occupancy certificate is on record.
Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
What you can verify free on this page
The official K-RERA filing record, in plain English
Registration and delivery
Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I is registered with K-RERA as PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/180509/001674, and the promoter has declared completion for 31 Dec 2018.
31 Dec 2018
declared completion
Figures are the promoter's own filings as they stood when Quietlist last read the register. A declared completion date is a filing, not a handover commitment.
Source · K-RERA project register · read 10 Sep 2026
Project scale
Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I spans 17,705 sq m (4.37 acres), comprises 5 towers, registers 241 units, and is declared to cost ₹146.72 cr.
₹146.72 cr
declared project cost
4.37acres
17,705 sq m
241units
on the registration
2.16FAR
sanctioned
Scale and cost as the promoter registered them. The declared cost is the promoter's own estimate on the filing, not a valuation and not a price to a buyer.
Source · K-RERA project registration · read 10 Sep 2026
Promoter record
Nitesh is the promoter of record on 11 projects registered with K-RERA, 10 of which are past their declared completion dates on the register.
11projects
registered with K-RERA
10past declared date
on the register
Counted across Quietlist's full K-RERA register store, matched on the promoter name as it appears on each filing.
Source · K-RERA register, all projects · read 10 Sep 2026
🔒 What I’d do as a buyer here · Drawings Report
The report opens with what this project really is — read from its approved drawings — then the specific calls: the cheapest good way to buy here, the flat to say no to, what you can stop worrying about, and what to get in writing before you sign anything.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 241 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 121 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 17,705 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.16 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 5 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 241 total (46 open) — 1.00 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 19-03-2012 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3Bed - 13 | 4 | 100% | 121 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block A | 12 | 50 | 50 | - |
| Block B | 12 | 50 | 50 | - |
| Block C | 12 | 39 | 39 | - |
| Block D | 12 | 50 | 50 | - |
| Block E | 12 | 52 | 52 | - |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 241 official flat/unit rows, matching the 241 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 168 | 103.3-121.3 sqm | 41.1-46.9 sqm | 168 |
| 2BHK | 48 | 80.5 sqm | 32.4 sqm | 48 |
| 4BHK | 25 | 130.0-155.3 sqm | 52.1-61.3 sqm | 25 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block E | 52 | 80.5-108.2 sqm | 32.4-42.8 sqm | 52 |
| Block A | 50 | 106.0-130.0 sqm | 43.3-52.1 sqm | 50 |
| Block B | 50 | 106.0-121.3 sqm | 43.3-46.9 sqm | 50 |
| Block D | 50 | 80.5-105.7 sqm | 32.4-42.9 sqm | 50 |
| Block C | 39 | 103.3-155.3 sqm | 42.8-61.3 sqm | 39 |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NICC-A-0101 | Block A | 0 | 3BHK | 106.0 sqm | 43.3 sqm | 1 |
| NICC-A-0102 | Block A | 0 | 3BHK | 106.0 sqm | 43.3 sqm | 1 |
| NICC-A-0103 | Block A | 0 | 3BHK | 106.0 sqm | 43.3 sqm | 1 |
| NICC-A-0104 | Block A | 0 | 4BHK | 130.0 sqm | 52.1 sqm | 1 |
| NICC-A-0201 | Block A | 1 | 3BHK | 106.0 sqm | 43.3 sqm | 1 |
| NICC-A-0202 | Block A | 1 | 3BHK | 106.0 sqm | 43.3 sqm | 1 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Which flat to ask for · Drawings Report
The flat-level read: which towers and floors to prefer and which to avoid, what the drawings put above, below and beside each flat, and the things on this site nobody at the sales desk will tell you about.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
9 of 34 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 25 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2018, extended (an extension) to 31 Dec 2019 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. An extension application filed on 09 May 2019 is pending with K-RERA — until it is approved, the registration stands lapsed.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
2 K-RERA orders on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION, PROJECT TOR) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (31 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMEER SHAHUL vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Refund of the collected funds of 26.85 lakh with 18% interest | AUTHORITY | 30/01/2025 |
| RAUNAK KUNDU AND ANOTHER vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Devendra Ram Krishna vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Relief u/s 3 4 5 7 8 11 15 35 38 59 60 61 62 and other section of RERA Act. Due to lack of space refer facts of complaint column & Last Enclosure Facts of Complaint and Reliefs and interim reliefs | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Hareesh Kurup vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Kiran Kumar Pujari vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Manish Kumar Agarwal vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| NAVEEN CHANDRA vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| PAWAN MUNSHI vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Prabhu Loganathan vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Pranav Kumar Agarwal vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Puneet Bhatia vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Sandeep Mallya Perdoor vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Sanjeev K Chaudhary vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Varun Gupta vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| VIKRAM BABARAO DABRE vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Saurabh Kumar vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Bhunesh Singh Kshatri vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Raghunathan Govindarjapuram vs NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
| Aanchal Agarwal vs INESA Ventures LLP | As prayed in Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 15/10/2022 |
| Vinay Agarwal vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | As prayed in the facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
| BIBEK DIPTA CHAUDHURI vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | i) Direction to the Builder to handover possession of my apartment, complete in all respects and in conformity with the Construction Agreement and for the consideration mentioned therein, with all add | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
| Deepak Kubendran vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Cancel agreement, refund payment with interest compensation | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
| Gopi Krishna Ravinuthala vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
| N Jeevan Belliappa vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
| V V S SANTOSH KUMAR vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
| Tarun Bansal vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Relief u/s 3 4 5 7 8 11 15 35 38 59 60 61 62 and other section of RERA Act. Due to lack of space refer facts of complaint column & Last Enclosure Facts of Complaint and Reliefs and interim reliefs | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
| Vishwas Kudli Nagaraja vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
| Sundaram Narayanaswamy vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Reliefs under Section 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 19, 34, 35, 38, 59, 60, 61, 62 and various provision of RERA Act and Karnataka RERA Rules, elaborate reliefs prayed in the Facts of Complaint Column | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
| Amit Kumar Rathi vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Withdraw/Exit from project with full compensatory interest from the respective date of payment. | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
| JIBU THOMAS VELAMKALAM vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Delayed compensation and Refund of entire amount with Interest | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
| Bijoy P vs M/S NITESH URBAN DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED | Full Refund with Interest for the delay | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (34 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190320/0002471 20-03-2019 | Compensation | Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190506/0002921 06-05-2019 | Refund due to non completion of project | Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/200804/0006291 04-08-2020 | Refund and Compensation | Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/200807/0006317 07-08-2020 | Refund- 7 year delay | Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/201004/0006697 04-10-2020 | Refund of money with interest and delay compensation | Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/201010/0006810 10-10-2020 | Provide Compensation for inordinate delay in handing over the apartment | Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/201020/0006926 20-10-2020 | Refund of Rs 26.85 lakh with 18 percent interest | Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/201022/0006917 22-10-2020 | Delayed Compensation and Refund of the entire amount along with interest | Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I | UNDER ENQUIRY AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
K-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | AECOM | - | 2008 | C wing first floor Mittal tower, no 6 M G Road |
| Contractor | Simplex Infrastructures Ltd | - | 1924 | S C Road Brigade Plaza, Unit C Anand Rao Circle |
| Structural engineer | Novel Engineering Consultants | - | - | - |
Nitesh has 11 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Nitesh Urban”). 10 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a higher delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹60.9 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: YES BANK Kasturba Road (IFSC YESB0000022, a/c …0927). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
The nearest major job hub is ~2 km away — walking/short-hop distance to a major employment hub — a genuine work-near-home location.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 2 km |
| Electronic City | 9 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 9 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 10 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 15 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 31 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
The approved drawings
Everything above is on this page already, free, from the government record. The drawings are different: the 5 approved sheets are the same drawings the builder filed to get Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I approved — what sits under each tower, which floor holds machines, what the sales sheet leaves out. Nobody reads them for you. We do.
What that turns up — from other projects’ filings:
ATS Knightsbridge · Sector 124, Noida
You pay for 10,000 sq ft. The floor inside your home is 6,982 sq ft. The rest is walls, shared circulation and services. Get both numbers written into your agreement before you pay any booking amount.
Oberoi Elysian · Goregaon East, Mumbai
“The building is complete.” The tower has reached full height — true. The same filed certificate, same page: sanitary fittings 6% done. Ask for a possession date in writing.
Godrej Aristocrat · Sector 49, Gurugram
Paying extra for the top floor? The terrace drawing shows what sits on the slab above those flats: the overhead water tanks, the lift machine rooms and the roof machinery. Ask which flat sits under which.
Prestige Camden Gardens · Thanisandra, Bengaluru
The approved parking table asks for 12 visitor spaces. It shows 0. Two-wheeler spaces: also 0. Ask in writing where visitors will park.
Want this project read from its filed drawings?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. For Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I, one reading of it goes further. Which flat should I ask for? — what the approved drawings and filed papers say about the flats, the parking, the approvals, and what to get in writing before you sign. That is the Drawings Report. See a real one first:
Drawings Report sample: Prestige Camden Gardens → · browse all sample reports →
Payment is confirmed automatically. The Drawings Report is 1 working day. We email the link, so you can close the tab.
Drawings Report · ₹4,999
Every drawing on file, read — which flat to ask for · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Paying from outside India? Pay $59 (Drawings Report) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes, and send the 14-point booking checklist with the first email.
Built by Nitesh Urban. View Nitesh Urban's full track record →
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Nitesh Cape Cod Phase I?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 10 Sep 2026