K-RERA · the public record
Parkwest - Oak - Tower 10
Bengaluru South · Relationship Properties
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 26 Oct 2026Construction progress and dates
Promoter-reported construction
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q1 2026
declared completion
30 Jun 2025
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Registered units and project size
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
The whole registration
2.6registered acres
86.6registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Parkwest - Oak - Tower 10
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/210216/003900
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
In context
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 222 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 110 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 10,376 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | ~3.02 | Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈31,307 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 10,376 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 285 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 21 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 01-02-2021 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 BHK (S) Typ 03a | 1 | 100% | 110 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oak - Tower 10 | 32 | 222 | 285 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 222 official flat/unit rows, matching the 222 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 123 | 108.2-110.1 sqm | 54.4-58.8 sqm | 186 |
| 1BHK | 33 | 43.2-69.9 sqm | 21.4-36.8 sqm | 33 |
| 2.5 BHK | 33 | 88.6 sqm | 44.9-47.1 sqm | 33 |
| 2BHK | 33 | 69.9-108.5 sqm | 36.8-54.4 sqm | 33 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oak - Tower 10 | 222 | 43.2-110.1 sqm | 21.4-58.8 sqm | 285 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Oak - Tower 10 | 0 | 2.5 BHK | 88.6 sqm | 44.9 sqm | 1 |
| 002 | Oak - Tower 10 | 0 | 1BHK | 43.2 sqm | 21.4 sqm | 1 |
| 003 | Oak - Tower 10 | 0 | 2BHK | 69.9 sqm | 36.8 sqm | 1 |
| 101 | Oak - Tower 10 | 1 | 2.5 BHK | 88.6 sqm | 44.9 sqm | 1 |
| 102 | Oak - Tower 10 | 1 | 1BHK | 43.2 sqm | 21.4 sqm | 1 |
| 103 | Oak - Tower 10 | 1 | 2BHK | 69.9 sqm | 36.8 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
12 of 41 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 29 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 30 Jun 2025, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 30 Jun 2026 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 04 Jul 2025 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/250704/003900) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
K-RERA complaint orders (1 complaint against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sudipta Dey vs Park West Oak | We respectfully pray for a direction to the Respondents to pay interest for the delay in possession and to provide a firm timeline for completion and handover of the flat, along with any other reliefs | AUTHORITY | 17/12/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (312 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190311/0002417 11-03-2019 | Refund of Booking amount with GST along with interest and compensation, For revokation of RERA registration granted to the promoter | Parkwest - Sapphire- Tower 5 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY |
| CMP/190311/0002422 11-03-2019 | Refund of booking amount and GST amount paid, along with interest and compensation, to revoke the registration granted by RERA | Parkwest - Sapphire- Tower 5 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY |
| CMP/201009/0006794 09-10-2020 | Delay in Project Delivery as promised in Advertisement and Agrement | Parkwest - Maple - Tower 4 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/201010/0006804 10-10-2020 | Delay in apartment unit and amenities handover as committed in the Agreemetn | Parkwest - Maple - Tower 4 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/201010/0006812 10-10-2020 | Delay in Project Delivery as promised in Advertisement and Agrement | Parkwest - Maple - Tower 4 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/201011/0006814 11-10-2020 | POSSESSION PENDING | Parkwest - Maple - Tower 4 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/201107/0007032 07-11-2020 | No construction activity/No concrete response from Builder | Parkwest - Sapphire- Tower 5 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/201127/0007136 27-11-2020 | Breach of Agreement and non response to previous complaint | Parkwest - Sapphire- Tower 5 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Statutory approval status
RERA filing10 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | RSP Design Consultants India Private Limited | - | 1978 | Ashok Nagar, Bengaluru |
| Contractor | Shapoorji Pallonji And Company Private Limited | - | 1943 | Kaveri Nagar, Murgesh Pallya |
| Structural engineer | Designtree Service Consultants Private Limited | - | - | - |
Builder track record
RERA filingRelationship Properties has 10 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records (average reported construction progress 62%). 8 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹3.41 Cr collected from buyers, ₹3.60 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account. This quarter the escrow withdrawal (₹3.60 Cr) exceeded buyer collections (₹3.41 Cr) — worth asking the builder to reconcile against certified construction milestones, which is what RERA requires escrow draws to track.
| Construction progress | 66% → 74% (+8 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 222/222 (100%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹10.53 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹72.95 Cr (6.93x collections) |
- 100% of registered units are shown as sold/booked, but no completion certificate is on file yet.
- Construction progress moved from 66% to 74% across the filed QPR window.
- The filed unit sales count did not move across the available QPR window because the project was already effectively sold out.
- Across available QPR rows, escrow withdrawals are 6.93x buyer collections. Ask the builder to reconcile this against certified project costs and prior-period balances.
- In the latest QPR, escrow withdrawal exceeds buyer collections for that quarter. This can be normal if prior balance existed, but it needs a clean explanation.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹70.0 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC Rajajinagar, Dr. Rajkumar road (IFSC HDFC0004000, a/c …9375). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 11 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 5 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 11 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 14 km |
| Electronic City | 17 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 21 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 30 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.