Adarsh Paradise
K-RERA · the public record
PINNACLE
Hosakote · Landstar Homes
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
30 Mar 2018declared completionK-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
145registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 26 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
Flats
42
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
The whole registration
1.4registered acres
103.1registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for PINNACLE
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1250/304/PR/171215/000699
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion30 March 2018
Land area5,694 sq m (1.4 acres)
Homes registered145
Tower/wing entries1
Unit mix42 × Flats
In context
Density103.1 homes per acre
Density in context80th percentile of 117 Hosakote projects (median 78.8)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 145 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 3,696 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 5,694 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.5 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 160 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 04-01-2017 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flats | 42 | 100% | 3,696 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PINNACLE | 5 | 145 | 160 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 145 official flat/unit rows, matching the 145 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 BHK | 115 | 645.0-973.0 sqft | 328.0-497.0 sqft | 115 |
| 3 BHK | 28 | 674.0-973.0 sqft | 341.3-497.0 sqft | 28 |
| 2BHK | 2 | 706.0-761.0 sqft | 360.0-379.0 sqft | 2 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PINNACLE | 145 | 645.0-973.0 sqft | 328.0-497.0 sqft | 145 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PINNACLE | 0 | 2 BHK | 876.0 sqft | 443.7 sqft | 1 |
| 2 | PINNACLE | 0 | 2 BHK | 740.0 sqft | 374.3 sqft | 1 |
| 3 | PINNACLE | 0 | 2 BHK | 740.0 sqft | 374.3 sqft | 1 |
| 4 | PINNACLE | 0 | 2 BHK | 740.0 sqft | 374.3 sqft | 1 |
| 5 | PINNACLE | 0 | 2 BHK | 740.0 sqft | 374.3 sqft | 1 |
| 6 | PINNACLE | 0 | 2 BHK | 740.0 sqft | 374.3 sqft | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 15 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 30 Mar 2018, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 30 Mar 2019 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 08 Jun 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1250/304/PR/220608/000699) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Fire NOCBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Pollution control (KSPCB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Environmental clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Airport Authority height clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
K-RERA complaint orders (16 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amitava Mukhopadhyay vs Landstar Homes | Direct the Respondents to refund all payments made by the Complainant, including EMIs, and repay the outstanding home loan associated with Account No.637109559, obtaining an NOC from HDFC. | AUTHORITY | 28/07/2025 |
| ANSHU KUMAR SINHA vs Pinncle | Entire refund along with interest and direction to the bank to close the loan amount | AUTHORITY | 21/01/2026 |
| Praveen Kumar Sinha vs Landstar Homes | Refund of Rs 13 lakhs and Rs 42,11,600 of bank loan of IDBI with all penalty interest charges and compensation of 1 crore | AUTHORITY | 17/12/2025 |
| Manju Manikya vs Landstar Homes | Cancel the booking of Unit in Question and refund earnest amount of Rs. 24,15,000 to complainant and loan amount of Rs. 35,22,000 directly to SBI along with future interest and penalties, if any. | AUTHORITY | 17/12/2025 |
| Mallikarjuna Reddy N vs Landstar Homes | We urge the builder to deliver the flats without any further delay and to provide delay period interest for such period | AUTHORITY | 15/06/2026 |
| Harshit Mohan vs Landstar Homes | Developer be directed to refund the earnest money paid by complainant and close the loan account | AUTHORITY | 05/04/2025 |
| HARSHIT MOHAN vs Landstar Homes | Developer be directed to refund the complainant and close the loan account | AUTHORITY | 05/04/2025 |
| Harshit Mohan vs Landstar Homes | Developer be directed to refund the complainant and close the loan account | AUTHORITY | 05/04/2025 |
| Praveen Kumar Sinha vs Landstar Homes | Refund of Rs 13 lakhs and Rs 42,57,332 of bank loan of SBI with all penalty interest charges and compensation of 1 crore | AUTHORITY | 05/04/2025 |
| Ramesh Babu Maguluri vs Landstar Homes | Developer be directed to refund the complainant and close the loan account | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2025 |
| Kuldeep Singh vs Landstar Homes | Order the respondents to refund entire amount along with interest paid by the complainant and directions to Respondents to repay the entire outstanding of Loan | AUTHORITY | 02/04/2025 |
| Mallikarjuna Reddy N vs Landstar Homes | We urge the builder to deliver the flats without any further delay and to provide delay period interest for such period | AUTHORITY | 02/02/2026 |
| UPENDRA PRASAD vs Landstar Homes | Developer be directed to refund the complainant and close the loan account | AUTHORITY | 01/04/2025 |
| UPENDRA PRASAD vs Landstar Homes | Developer be directed to refund the complainant and close the loan account | AUTHORITY | 01/04/2025 |
| KIRAN PADAMANNOOR vs Landstar Homes | Developer be directed to refund the complainant and close the loan account | AUTHORITY | 01/04/2025 |
| KIRAN PADAMANNOOR vs Landstar Homes | Developer be directed to refund the complainant and close the loan account | AUTHORITY | 01/04/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (1 complaint listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/210318/0007794 18-03-2021 | Pending Amenities | PINNACLE | POSTED FOR ORDERS AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹17.2 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: STATE BANK OF INDIA AECS Layout (IFSC SBIN0009046, a/c …5837). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 12 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Whitefield IT hub | 12 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 17 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 19 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 19 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 23 km |
| Electronic City | 29 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.