Unishire Pratyaksh
K-RERA · the public record
SHRIRAM SUVILAS GARDEN OF JOY
Bengaluru North · SUVILAS PROPERTIES
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
01 Jul 2020declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
152registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
4 BHK
8
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
2.0registered acres
76.0registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for SHRIRAM SUVILAS GARDEN OF JOY
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/180227/001096
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion1 July 2020
Land area8,095 sq m (2.0 acres)
Homes registered152
Tower/wing entries2
Unit mix8 × 4 BHK
In context
Density76 homes per acre
Density in context52nd percentile of 529 Bengaluru North projects (median 75.3)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 152 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 240 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 8,095 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.25 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 2 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 152 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 148 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 01-07-2017 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 BHK | 8 | 100% | 240 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block1 | 10 | 76 | 76 | - |
| Block2 | 9 | 76 | 76 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 152 official flat/unit rows, matching the 152 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 128 | 69.2-88.4 sqm | 0.5-0.7 sqm | 128 |
| 1BHK | 8 | 47.5-50.9 sqm | 0.3-0.4 sqm | 8 |
| 3 BHK | 8 | 158.1 sqm | 1.4-1.4 sqm | 8 |
| 3BHK | 8 | 103.8-106.9 sqm | 0.8-0.8 sqm | 8 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block1 | 76 | 47.5-158.1 sqm | 0.3-1.4 sqm | 76 |
| Block2 | 76 | 47.5-158.1 sqm | 0.3-1.4 sqm | 76 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01.00.01 | Block1 | 0 | 3 BHK | 158.1 sqm | 1.4 sqm | 1 |
| 01.00.02 | Block1 | 0 | 3 BHK | 158.1 sqm | 1.4 sqm | 1 |
| 01.00.03 | Block1 | 0 | 3 BHK | 158.1 sqm | 1.4 sqm | 1 |
| 01.00.04 | Block1 | 0 | 3 BHK | 158.1 sqm | 1.4 sqm | 1 |
| 01.01.01 | Block1 | 1 | 2BHK | 72.6 sqm | 0.6 sqm | 1 |
| 01.01.02 | Block1 | 1 | 2BHK | 85.4 sqm | 0.7 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 26 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 01 Jul 2020, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 01 Jan 2022 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 19 Feb 2021 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/210219/001096) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Fire NOCBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Pollution control (KSPCB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Environmental clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Airport Authority height clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
3 K-RERA orders on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (13 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sanjana Shashi Kumar vs SUVILAS PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED, GLORY JP SHRIRAM PROPERTIES LIMITED | A full refund including the interest paid out so far | AUTHORITY | 30/09/2024 |
| GIRISH L vs SUVILAS PROPERTIES PRIVATE LTD & SHRIRAM PROPERTIES LIMITED | REQUEST FOR RETURN OF AMOUNT PAID/ EXPESNES ALONG WITH INTEREST AND COMPENSATION | AUTHORITY | 30/07/2024 |
| SANTOSH PAI & PRATIKSHA SHRIKANTH NAYAK vs SUVILAS PROPERTIES PRIVATE LTD & SHRIRAM PROPERTIES LIMITED | RERA certificate is expired for this project. RERA needs to be intervene and sought the issue as per the due more then 1/2 year and provide the compensation from the eigther of the builders. | AUTHORITY | 30/07/2024 |
| KESARI PRASAD DANDIN & KRUTHIKA KESARIPRASAD DANDIN vs SUVILAS PROPERTIES PRIVATE LTD & SHRIRAM PROPERTIES LIMITED | We need the compensation from builder. | AUTHORITY | 29/07/2024 |
| SATEESH C V & SHILPA A vs SUVILAS PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED; SHRIRAM PROPERTIES PVT LTD | Demand builder to return the amount paid (Rs. 41,06,340/-) along with interest for Unit 01.02.04 as SELLER failed to delivery possession of the apartment by Oct 2022 | AUTHORITY | 23/07/2024 |
| Deepak Damodaran vs SUVILAS PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED; SHRIRAM PROPERTIES LIMITED | Since No construction work is going on and no progress in work I request to refund Full amount along with applicable interest as per the law | AUTHORITY | 23/07/2024 |
| Rajeev & Divya Rajeev vs M/s Suvilas Properties Private Limited & Shriram Properties Limited | They should be paying the bank interest and my house rent till Possession. Also request RERA not to extend their deadline to complete the project | AUTHORITY | 14/12/2023 |
| BRIJEND KUMAR TIWARI AND NEHA TIWARI vs SUVILAS PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED | Builder is NOT Responding so Knocking the door for REFUND | AUTHORITY | 07/03/2023 |
| Abhishek M Kurkuri & Sweta A Kurkuri vs M/S SUVILAS PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED; M/S.SHRIRAM PROPERTIES LIMITED | Return of amount and interest and compensation for project not completed as per the agreement | AUTHORITY | 05/08/2024 |
| Shwetha Singh & J Thomas Swaroop vs Suvilas Properties Private Limited & Shriram Properties Limited | Repay the entire amount of Rs. 47,82,364/- along with Interest till today. Direct the Respondent to pay 50lakhs as Compensation. | AUTHORITY | 02/08/2024 |
| MANISH PANEY vs SUVILAS PROPERTIES PVT LTD; SHRIRAM PROPERTIES LTD | Request for refund with bank intrest | AUTHORITY | 01/09/2025 |
| Brijend Kumar Tiwari vs SUVILAS PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED; SHRIRAM PROPERTIES LIMITED | Since there is no progress seen for many month and actual builder is also escaped so asking to get all my money invested money back | AUTHORITY | 01/09/2025 |
| Ankurkumar Thakorbhai Desai vs SHRIRAM PROPERTIES | Refund of Booking Amount is needed. | AUTHORITY | 01/06/2023 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (8 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/220223/0009046 23-02-2022 | Request for refund for Unit No 02-07-04 Shriram Garden of Joy | SHRIRAM SUVILAS GARDEN OF JOY | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/220516/0009461 16-05-2022 | Delivery date expiry | SHRIRAM SUVILAS GARDEN OF JOY | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/220623/0009670 23-06-2022 | Return of full paid amount (Rs. 41,06,340/-) along with interest for Unit 01.02.04 as Builder failed to complete the project as per agreed timeline (Oct 2022) | SHRIRAM SUVILAS GARDEN OF JOY | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/220903/0009974 03-09-2022 | Project not completed and Asking for extension without compensation | SHRIRAM SUVILAS GARDEN OF JOY | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/221029/0010151 29-10-2022 | Delayed Completion of the Project - Shriram Suvilas Garden of Joy Jalahalli | SHRIRAM SUVILAS GARDEN OF JOY | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/221102/0010156 02-11-2022 | Complaint to claim a full refund and compensation for financial and mental distress imposed on me by the builder | SHRIRAM SUVILAS GARDEN OF JOY | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/221115/0010339 15-11-2022 | Refund of All Amount Paid against FLAT | SHRIRAM SUVILAS GARDEN OF JOY | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/221125/0010404 25-11-2022 | Project construction Delayed and stalled | SHRIRAM SUVILAS GARDEN OF JOY | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | DESIGN DESK ( RAVI JOHN) | - | 2011 | NO 100 OLD NO 52 FIRST FLOOR DONNA BAS TOWER, RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE |
| Contractor | SUVILAS PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED | - | 2012 | NO 100 OLD NO 52 DONNA BAS TOWER, RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST |
| Structural engineer | MANOHAR CONSULTANTS ( N MANOHAR) | - | - | - |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹32.9 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC SADASHIVANAGAR BANGALORE (IFSC HDFC0001079, a/c …1660). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 7 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 3 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 7 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 13 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 18 km |
| Electronic City | 19 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 26 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.