Shriram WYT Field
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
SPL TOWERS · Bengaluru East · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/211206/004573
Report coverage
K-RERA registry & builder-record report
What this report covers
To confirm directly with the builder
🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report
The paid report opens with the overall risk rating, the specific red-flag findings, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the builder before you commit.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 592 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 53 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 46,538 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.24 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 4 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 592 total (360 open) — 1.00 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 15-09-2021 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 6,7,8,9 - Type 1B & 1A | 238 | 100% | 53 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower-6 | 14 | 148 | 148 | - |
| Tower-7 | 14 | 148 | 148 | - |
| Tower-8 | 14 | 148 | 148 | - |
| Tower-9 | 14 | 148 | 148 | - |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 592 official flat/unit rows, matching the 592 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 BEDROOM TYPE-1A | 120 | 52.8 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 60 (60 with 0) |
| 2.5 BEDROOM TYPE-1 | 114 | 62.5 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 58 (56 with 0) |
| 2 BEDROOM TYPE-1 | 90 | 52.7 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 30 (60 with 0) |
| 2 BEDROOM TYPE-3 | 90 | 44.9-48.9 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 30 (60 with 0) |
| 2 BEDROOM TYPE-2 | 60 | 43.5 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 30 (30 with 0) |
| 2 BEDROOM TYPE-5 | 45 | 46.5 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 15 (30 with 0) |
| 2 BEDROOM TYPE-3A | 30 | 44.9 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 30 |
| 2 BEDROOM TYPE-1B | 28 | 52.7 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 28 |
| 2 BEDROOM TYPE-2A | 15 | 43.6 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 15 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower-6 | 148 | 43.5-62.5 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 148 |
| Tower-7 | 148 | 43.5-62.5 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (148 with 0) |
| Tower-8 | 148 | 43.5-62.5 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 148 |
| Tower-9 | 148 | 43.5-62.5 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (148 with 0) |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06.00.02 | Tower-6 | 0 | 2 BEDROOM TYPE-1B | 52.7 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
| 06.00.03 | Tower-6 | 0 | 2.5 BEDROOM TYPE-1 | 62.5 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
| 06.00.04 | Tower-6 | 0 | 2.5 BEDROOM TYPE-1 | 62.5 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
| 06.00.05 | Tower-6 | 0 | 2 BEDROOM TYPE-1A | 52.8 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
| 06.00.06 | Tower-6 | 0 | 2 BEDROOM TYPE-1A | 52.8 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
| 06.00.07 | Tower-6 | 0 | 2 BEDROOM TYPE-2A | 43.6 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 1 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report
Which block and unit to prefer, the livability read on the filed plans, and a plan-by-plan walkthrough — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.
🔒 Full records — land title, amenities paperwork & document catalog · Compliance report
The complete land-title chain, the paperwork behind each declared amenity, and every document row on file with the regulator — the raw records the compliance read is built on.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
All 26 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA complaint orders (8 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAJESH KUMAR SINGH vs SPL TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED | REQUEST FOR REFUND OF RS. 50000/ AS AGREEMENT WAS NOT MADE . | AUTHORITY | 27/11/2023 |
| Kishore V vs SPL TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Intervention for the refund of booking advance given to Shriram Properties | AUTHORITY | 26/07/2023 |
| Ipsita Banerjee vs SPL TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED | We require a refund of my hard earned money of 1 lakh as I do not wish to enter into a sale agreement with Shriram Properties Wytfield Ph 2. | AUTHORITY | 26/04/2023 |
| Deepak Sridhar vs SPL TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Booking amount of Rs.50,000/- refund | AUTHORITY | 14/03/2023 |
| DIPTI RANJAN NAYAK vs SPL TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Builder refusing to return the Booking/Token amount of 1 Lakh. Please look this matter seriously and help to to get my amount back. | AUTHORITY | 13/04/2023 |
| Jenita Saira Ignatius vs SPL TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED | We kindly request RERA to help us in getting this refund as early as possbile | AUTHORITY | 07/09/2023 |
| Ayushi Goel vs SPL TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Not continue the property and want my entire money back from the Bank and the Promotor | AUTHORITY | 03/07/2026 |
| Himanshu Kumar Sharma vs SPL TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED | WE REQUIRE A REFUND OF MY HARD EARNED MONEY OF 1 LAKH AS I DO NOT WISH TO ENTER INTO A SALE AGREEMENT WITH SHRIRAM PROPERTIES WYTFIELD PH 2. | AUTHORITY | 01/06/2023 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (9 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/211001/0008409 01-10-2021 | Refund Of Booking Amount | Shriram WYT Field (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/210318/0007796 18-03-2021 | Refund of 5% booking amount | Shriram WYT Field (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/220207/0008976 07-02-2022 | Builder refusing to return the Booking/Token amount of 1 Lakh. | Shriram WYT Field -2 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/220309/0009100 09-03-2022 | Refund of booking amount and compensation | Shriram WYT Field (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY |
| CMP/220420/0009373 20-04-2022 | Booking Amount Refund | Shriram WYT Field -2 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/220520/0009493 20-05-2022 | Booking amount of Rs.50,000/- refund | Shriram WYT Field -2 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/220604/0009586 04-06-2022 | Refund of advance sale consideration | Shriram WYT Field (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/221104/0010179 04-11-2022 | Builder refusing to return the Booking/Token amount of 1 Lakh. | Shriram WYT Field -2 | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Clean approvals profile: every applicable statutory NOC is on file — including Fire NOC and pollution-control clearance (KSPCB), the clearances buyers most often find still pending. Nothing is outstanding among the statutory NOCs — which compliance documents are filed versus still under process is a separate matter, covered in Litigation & compliance above. Note environmental clearance is not among the approvals K-RERA marks applicable to this project — if the named-approvals check shows it as "not found in catalog", that is why; ask the builder directly whether it applies here. Since these are developer-filed portal statuses, have your lawyer confirm them against the linked NOC copies.
4 further authority slots are marked not applicable by the regulator.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water supply and sewage board | Approved | 04-02-2021 | NOC Water Supply dated 04 February 2021 WYT Projec.pdf |
| KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres) | Approved | 30-11-2019 | 005 KSPCB.pdf |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | Approved | 19-11-2019 | 003 BESCOM NOC.pdf |
| Fire and Safety | Approved | 21-05-2019 | 001 FIRE NOC AO.pdf |
| Airport Authority of India | Approved | 08-05-2019 | 002 Airport NOC.pdf |
| BSNL/Telecommunication Department | Approved | 11-01-2021 | NOC BSNL.pdf |
K-RERA names 2 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Gardencity Realty (Architectural Division) | - | 2004 | Kalyan nagar, Outer ring road |
| Structural engineer | INNOTECH ENGINEERING CONSULT PVT LTD | - | - | - |
Latest quarterly filing (2025-Q4): ₹27.51 Cr collected from buyers, ₹18.08 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.
| Construction progress | 100% → 100% (+0 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 592/592 (100%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹28.53 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹383.10 Cr (13.43x collections) |
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹32.5 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: INDUSIND BANK M G Road (IFSC INDB0000008, a/c …1603). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit.
The nearest major job hub is ~11 km away — a real but liveable commute to the nearest job hub — factor peak-hour traffic.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Whitefield IT hub | 11 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 14 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 15 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 16 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 18 km |
| Electronic City | 27 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
Should you buy in Shriram WYT Field -2?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. The full RERA Property Intelligence Report gives you buyer-complaint history, regulatory flags, builder track record, the official unit register, land title, NOCs, and (where the sanctioned plans support it) room-by-room unit data and an annotated site plan. See a real one first:
Sample: Sobha Silicon Oasis → · browse all sample reports →
Compliance Report · ₹999
The regulator’s filing record, read · 1 working day
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Unit Guidance Report · ₹2,999
Everything, down to which unit · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Paying from outside India? Pay $15 (Compliance) or $39 (Unit Guidance) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.
Built by Spl Towers.
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Shriram WYT Field -2?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 27 Jul 2026