Sterling Villa Grande Phase-III
K-RERA · the public record
Sterling Ascentia
Bengaluru East · Sterling Urban Ventures
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
New Registered 10 days ago · all new registrations in Bangalore
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
97%construction reportedQ1 2026 filing
9units not bookedof 290 · Q1 2026 filing
31 Dec 2021declared completionK-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 26 Oct 2026Construction progress and dates
Promoter-reported construction
87%
Q3 2025
88%
Q4 2025
97%
Q1 2026
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q1 2026
declared completion
31 Dec 2021
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
Registered units and project size
TYPE H
6
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 26 Oct 2026
The whole registration
5.7registered acres
51.2registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for Sterling Ascentia
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/171026/000563
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion31 December 2021
Land area22,915 sq m (5.7 acres)
Homes registered290
Tower/wing entries4
Unit mix6 × TYPE H
In context
Density51.2 homes per acre
Density in context20th percentile of 1123 Bengaluru East projects (median 75.5)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 290 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 753 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 22,915 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 3.25 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 4 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 426 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 66 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 538 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 15-09-2015 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| TYPE H | 6 | 100% | 753 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 3 | 14 | 59 | 107 | - |
| Tower 4 | 14 | 59 | 89 | - |
| Tower 5 | 14 | 86 | 115 | - |
| Tower 6 | 14 | 86 | 115 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 290 official flat/unit rows, matching the 290 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 210 | 98.2-125.5 sqm | 36.2-45.9 sqm | 291 |
| 2BHK | 80 | 98.2-123.1 sqm | 36.2-45.9 sqm | 103 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 5 | 86 | 98.2-123.1 sqm | 36.2-45.9 sqm | 115 |
| Tower 6 | 86 | 98.2-123.1 sqm | 36.2-45.9 sqm | 115 |
| Tower 3 | 59 | 109.3-123.6 sqm | 43.0-45.1 sqm | 105 |
| Tower 4 | 59 | 116.4-125.5 sqm | 43.0-45.6 sqm | 59 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T3-001 | Tower 3 | 0 | 3BHK | 119.3 sqm | 43.9 sqm | 2 |
| T3-002 | Tower 3 | 0 | 3BHK | 116.4 sqm | 43.0 sqm | 2 |
| T3-003 | Tower 3 | 0 | 3BHK | 123.6 sqm | 45.1 sqm | 2 |
| T3-011 | Tower 3 | 1 | 3BHK | 109.3 sqm | 43.9 sqm | 1 |
| T3-012 | Tower 3 | 1 | 3BHK | 116.4 sqm | 43.9 sqm | 2 |
| T3-013 | Tower 3 | 1 | 3BHK | 123.6 sqm | 45.1 sqm | 2 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
2 of 33 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 31 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2021, extended (Extension) to 30 Sep 2026 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 28 Oct 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/221028/000563) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
See the filed approval statuses and linked documents →
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
5 K-RERA orders on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION, PROJECT MODIFICATION, PROJECT WITHDRAWL) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (6 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| MOTILAL BAPNA & ANOTHER vs M/S STERLING URBAN VENTURES PVT. LTD. & OTHERS | Stop illegal construction of 14th floor in Tower 4 | AUTHORITY | 31/01/2024 |
| Krishnaprasad H vs M/s Sterling Urban Ventures Pvt. Ltd | Ask builder to manage the outgoings till the project is complete as under section 11(4) of Karnataka RERA ACT. | AUTHORITY | 20/12/2024 |
| Nitish Rai vs M/s Sterling Urban Ventures Pvt. Ltd | Seeking compensation from the builder for the delays and loss of property. | AUTHORITY | 16/06/2026 |
| SHASHI RANJAN & SHRITI CHOUDHARY vs M/S STERLING URBAN VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED | Please direct the builder to collect the maintenance from us and run the maintenance of this society smoothly as per they sale deed. | AUTHORITY | 14/02/2025 |
| Subrat Kumar Biswal & Swetalina Nayak vs M/s Sterling Urban Ventures Private Limited | Direct the builder to manage the outgoings till the project is completed as per the sale deed to comply under section 11(4) of Karnataka RERA ACT. | AUTHORITY | 14/02/2025 |
| STERLING ASCENTIA APARTMENT OWNERS CO OPERATIVE vs M/s Sterling Urban Ventures Pvt. Ltd | Restrain the Respondents from deviating, modifying or altering the sanctioning plan and direct completion of the project as per the original sanction plan | AUTHORITY | 10/01/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (22 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/221007/0010064 07-10-2022 | Structural Defects and Missing Amenities in Sterling Ascentia | Sterling Ascentia | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/221021/0010125 21-10-2022 | Structural Defect and Pending Amenities in Sterling Ascentia | Sterling Ascentia | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/221122/0010377 22-11-2022 | Structural Defect and Pending Amenities in Sterling Ascentia | Sterling Ascentia | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/221122/0010378 22-11-2022 | Structural Defect, Pending Amenities and Clubhouse | Sterling Ascentia | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/221122/0010379 22-11-2022 | Structural Defect and Pending Amenities in Sterling Ascentia | Sterling Ascentia | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/221122/0010380 22-11-2022 | Structural Defect and Pending Amenities in Sterling Ascentia | Sterling Ascentia | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/221122/0010381 22-11-2022 | Structural Defects and pending amenities | Sterling Ascentia | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/221122/0010382 22-11-2022 | Structural Defect & Pending Amenties in Sterling Ascentia | Sterling Ascentia | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Statutory approval status
RERA filing6 of 6 applicable approvals are marked Approved in the filing. Check the linked documents for their scope and validity.
4 further authority slots are marked not applicable in the filing.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water supply and sewage board | Approved | 22-07-2013 | 22072013 BWSSB NOC.pdf |
| KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres) | Approved | 21-10-2013 | 03022014 KSPCB NOC.pdf |
| KSPCB- MOEF (Above 50 Acres) | Approved | 07-02-2015 | 722015 moef.pdf |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | Approved | 17-07-2018 | 17072018 BESCOM NOC T56.pdf |
| Fire and Safety | Approved | 07-09-2013 | 07092013 FIRE NOC.pdf |
| Airport Authority of India | Approved | 20-12-2022 | 25112011 AAI NOC.pdf |
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Venkataraman Associates | - | 1970 | 10/2 O’Shaughnessy Road, Langford Gardens Bangalore |
| Contractor | New Consolidated Construction Company Ltd | - | 1946 | Zonal Office: Veracious Presidio No. 6 3rd floor 15th cross, 100 ft ring road J P Nagar 6th phase Bengaluru |
| Structural engineer | PRAKASH B V | - | - | - |
Builder track record
RERA filingSterling Urban has 2 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records (average reported construction progress 100%). 1 is past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹1.02 Cr collected from buyers, ₹0.71 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.
| Construction progress | 87% → 97% (+10 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 281/290 (97%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹12.70 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹8.89 Cr (0.70x collections) |
- 97% of registered units are shown as sold/booked, but no completion certificate is on file yet.
- Construction progress moved from 87% to 97% across the filed QPR window.
- The filed unit sales count did not move across the available QPR window because the project was already effectively sold out.
- The builder has drawn 0.70x of buyer collections from escrow (about 70% of the ₹13 Cr collected) — money is largely staying in the regulated escrow account rather than being pulled out ahead of spend, which is the safer direction. A ratio near or above 1.0 would be the one to scrutinise.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹113.8 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK OF INDIA MG Road (IFSC PUNB0227300, a/c …0252). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 1 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 1 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 9 km |
| Electronic City | 10 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 10 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 14 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 30 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.