Mithila Splendor
K-RERA · the public record
UNICCA EMPORIS
Bengaluru East · UNICCA EMPORIS
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Prestige Park Grove · earlier comprehensive example
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Prestige Park Grove sample report ↗
30 Jun 2018declared completionK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
270registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
Free project details
Registration read 25 Oct 2026Registered units and project size
3 BHK (2) LAND OWNER
9
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 25 Oct 2026
The whole registration
3.1registered acres
86.4registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual unit.
RERA details for UNICCA EMPORIS
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/171016/001020
Project facts and comparisons
On the register
Declared completion30 June 2018
Land area12,646 sq m (3.1 acres)
Homes registered270
Tower/wing entries5
Unit mix9 × 3 BHK (2) LAND OWNER
In context
Density86.4 homes per acre
Density in context68th percentile of 1123 Bengaluru East projects (median 75.5)
Source: K-RERA. Each comparison names the group of projects used.
Project areas, parking and inventory
Project areas and parking
RERA filing| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 270 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 142 sqm | Total carpet area reported for the project. |
| Registered land area | 12,646 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.24 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 5 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 214 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 127 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 01-07-2014 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 BHK (2) LAND OWNER | 9 | 100% | 142 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQUA | 15 | 30 | 30 | - |
| AQETTA | 16 | 32 | 32 | - |
| AZUR | 16 | 32 | 32 | - |
| JAL | 16 | 64 | 64 | - |
| NEEL | 15 | 56 | 56 | - |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingLitigation status was not supplied in the captured record. This is not confirmation that there are no cases.
All 24 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 30 Jun 2018, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 30 Jun 2019 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 08 Jun 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/220608/001020) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Approval documents
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Fire NOCBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Pollution control (KSPCB)Bundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Environmental clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
Airport Authority height clearanceBundled document listed: All NOCs from Authority
A listed file does not confirm approval. An unlisted file does not establish that an approval is missing or required. Check the documents and their applicability before relying on them.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
K-RERA complaint orders (10 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manish Mathur vs UNICCA EMPORIS PRIVATE LIMITED | Completion of pending work and defects repairs, Refund of INR 8,08,125.00, NOC from builder and Association, Compensation | AUTHORITY | 28/07/2025 |
| Bhawana Taya vs UNICCA EMPORIS | Reimbursement of amount paid, interest, damages | AUTHORITY | 13/07/2023 |
| Sanjay kumar Tayal vs UNICCA EMPORIS PRIVATE LIMITED | Reimbursement of amount paid, witinterest, damages | AUTHORITY | 13/06/2023 |
| Jyotika Tayal vs UNICCA EMPORIS PRIVATE LIMITED | Reimbursement of amount paid, interest, damages | AUTHORITY | 13/06/2023 |
| Gaurav Tayal vs UNICCA EMPORIS | Reimbursement of amount paid, interest, damages | AUTHORITY | 13/06/2023 |
| Aakash Tayal vs UNICCA EMPORIS PRIVATE LIMITED | Reimbursement of amount paid, interest, damages | AUTHORITY | 13/06/2023 |
| Keshav Tayal vs UNICCA EMPORIS PRIVATE LIMITED | Reimbursement of amount paid, interest, damages | AUTHORITY | 13/06/2023 |
| Upasana Tayal vs UNICCA EMPORIS | Reimbursement of amount paid, interest, damages | AUTHORITY | 13/06/2023 |
| Nina Rani Anuj Agarawal vs UNICCA EMPORIS PRIVATE LIMITED | Reimbursement of amount paid, interest, damages | AUTHORITY | 13/06/2023 |
| MAYANK AGRAWAL vs UNICCA EMPORIS PRIVATE LIMITED MEHUL SHAH | Refund of total of 27965/- for property tax and 53600/- for the damages caused due to flooring. Also, provide the correct parking and refund the ameneties charges. | AUTHORITY | 11/10/2022 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (1 complaint listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/220310/0009105 10-03-2022 | Property tax dispute, parking not alloted and substandard flooring | UNICCA EMPORIS | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | MEHUL SHAH C/O OS2 ARCHITECTS | - | 2005 | 121 M G ROAD, FORT |
| Contractor | UNICCA EMPORIS PRIVATE LIMITED | - | 2012 | ARAMANE NAGAR, SADASHIVANAGAR BANGALORE |
| Structural engineer | AVINASH MALPANI | - | - | - |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹35.4 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a unit agreement or asking price. This project-cost average cannot establish whether a quoted unit price is fair. Compare the exact unit, area basis, date and included charges in any price evidence.
RERA 70% project account is on file: INDUSIND BANK SADASHIVANAGAR (IFSC INDB0000333, a/c …0010). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 3 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Whitefield IT hub | 3 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 7 km |
| Electronic City | 15 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 16 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 18 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 29 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.