Lashkaria Pearl
MahaRERA · the public record
The Westpark Phase-1
Oshiwara-Jogeshwari West · WESTPARK DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
Project Review · example purchase
Spending a few crores on a home? ₹4,999 to check what you’re buying.
Check what the plans put beside your home, below it and in front of it. The view, nearby buildings and shared facilities can change what you are buying.
9units filed as unsoldInventory · 17 October 2026
30 Jun 2032declared completionMahaRERA registration · read 19 Jul 2026
416registered unitsMahaRERA registration · read 19 Jul 2026
From another project · Empire Solitaire
Avoid bad decisions, only go for the best homes.
Read the complete sample: unit choices, layout illustrations, important risks and questions for the builder. Its findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Project Review sample ↗
From another project · Dosti Pine · earlier comprehensive example
North-east at the door. Or in the living room.
E2506 has north-east-facing living space and a south-west entrance. E3001 reverses those directions and sits on the top floor. The report compares named flats, refuge adjacency and shared gardens using the March 2026 filing, read on 17 September 2026; this is not live availability.
This longer example shows the depth of research available in Project Deep Dive. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the Dosti Pine sample report ↗
Free project details
Registration read 19 Jul 2026RERA details for The Westpark Phase-1
MahaRERA · PR1181012500079
Delivery and registration
When is the project declared for completion?
The Westpark Phase-1 is registered with MahaRERA as PR1181012500079 and the promoter has declared completion for 30 Jun 2032.
30 Jun 2032
declared completion
68months to go
against the declared date
The completion date and status as they stand on the MahaRERA registration record.
Source · MahaRERA project registration · read 19 Jul 2026
| MahaRERA registration | PR1181012500079 |
| Registered on | 16 Jun 2025 |
| Promoter-declared completion | 30 Jun 2032 |
| Current status | Certificate Signed |
| Against today | 68 months to the declared date |
Approvals and compliance
What compliance filings are on record?
MahaRERA's defaulter and deregistration lists and the quarterly-progress filing for The Westpark Phase-1 record 1 quarterly progress report since registration.
1quarterly filing
Entries as they appear on MahaRERA's own lists and the project's progress filing.
Source · MahaRERA defaulter, deregistration and QPR lists · read 19 Jul 2026
- Filing progress reports — 1 quarterly progress report on record since registration, with no current default.
Construction
How much construction cost has been reported?
In The Westpark Phase-1, ₹105.69 Cr of a declared ₹723.91 Cr estimated project cost is reported as incurred, about 14.6%, as at the last certified filing with MahaRERA.
14.6%
₹105.69 Cr
of ₹723.91 Cr declared cost
Cost incurred as last certified to MahaRERA. It is a financial measure, not a survey of site work, and it can lag on-site reality between filings.
Source · MahaRERA quarterly progress filing · read 19 Jul 2026
Sales
How many are filed as sold or booked?
In The Westpark Phase-1, 407 of 416 homes filed with MahaRERA are recorded as sold or booked (400 with registered agreements and 7 booked), about 98%, and 9 are filed as unsold.
98%sold or booked
407 of 416 homes
₹2312.47 Cr
committed by buyers
Counts and agreement value as the promoter filed them at the last compliance date; this is the filed inventory, not current availability. Of that agreement value, ₹661.85 Cr (about 29%) is recorded as collected and ₹1650.62 Cr as receivable.
Source · MahaRERA sold/unsold inventory filing · read 19 Jul 2026
Filed agreement values: across 407 sold or booked entries with usable filed values and areas, the effective carpet rate is ₹45,859/sqft, with eight in ten falling between ₹40,647 and ₹50,131 — computed from the agreement values and carpet areas the promoter filed, not broker quotes.
The units recorded as unsold on the filing. The reckoner value is the government's ready-reckoner assessment the promoter filed against that unit, the figure stamp duty is charged on. It is not a price anyone paid, not an asking price, and not a valuation of the unit.
| Floor | Unit | Carpet | Govt reckoner value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Floor 36 | 3601 | 2,136 sqft (198.48 sqm) | ₹3.43 Cr |
| Floor 37 | 3701 | 1,261 sqft (117.12 sqm) | ₹2.02 Cr |
| Floor 37 | 3702 | 1,261 sqft (117.12 sqm) | ₹2.02 Cr |
| Floor 38 | 3801 | 1,261 sqft (117.12 sqm) | ₹2.02 Cr |
| Floor 38 | 3802 | 1,261 sqft (117.12 sqm) | ₹2.02 Cr |
| Floor 39 | 3901 | 2,088 sqft (193.95 sqm) | ₹3.35 Cr |
| Floor 39 | 3902 | 1,261 sqft (117.12 sqm) | ₹2.02 Cr |
| Floor 39 | 3902 | 2,079 sqft (193.12 sqm) | ₹3.34 Cr |
| Floor 4 | 401 | 1,261 sqft (117.12 sqm) | ₹2.02 Cr |
No units are declared mortgaged, reserved, investor-held or not-for-sale in this inventory filing.
What the filings record, home by home
Read from MahaRERA on 17 October 2026
MahaRERA publishes, home by home, what this promoter filed: which homes are sold and which are not, the RERA carpet area of each, and for sold or booked entries the filed agreement value — the consideration filed for that specific home. On this project 407 homes carry one, and 9 of the 416 are recorded unsold. Since we started watching this ledger, 5 homes have moved out of the unsold list, most recently on 17 October 2026.
Here is one home filed as unsold, beside the amounts filed for comparable homes:
| Home | Carpet | Filed comparison | Based on |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 5-1102 | 1,362 sqft | Rs 6.74 cr typical, over Rs 6.19 cr to Rs 7.65 cr | 34 filed · number pattern + area (within 2%), same building |
A filed consideration is the amount the promoter reported for one home. It is not a valuation, and MahaRERA does not publish the date of any of these agreements — read a range as a spread, not as a trend. An unsold row means no sale had been filed for it when we looked, which is a filing state, not a promise that the home is available to you today. One of the two observations is an archived copy whose time is the moment the file was written, not a portal fetch time.
In The Westpark Phase-1, every one of the 9 unsold homes has filed sales to compare with. The Sales Report gives each of them its own row — the filed agreements behind its comparison listed in full, the government reckoner value the promoter filed against it, and mortgage status where the filing supplies it. Missing mortgage information is not confirmation that a unit is free of a mortgage. Built from the filing itself, sent by email.
Buildings & Wings
The buildings and wings registered under this project, with each tower's sanctioned height and declared completion date. Here the tallest tower rises to G+43 and 416 homes are registered across the project.
| Building | Wings | Floors | Units | Declared completion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 2 | 1 | G+43 | 67 | - |
| Tower 3 | 1 | G+43 | 139 | - |
| Tower 4 | 1 | G+43 | 103 | - |
| Tower 5 | 1 | G+43 | 107 | - |
Unit mix on the filing: 416 residential.
Complaints
No buyer complaints were on this project's MahaRERA record at the time of reading.
Legal & Litigation
The promoter has declared 27 court cases on this project to MahaRERA. Filed statuses: 6 “Closed”; 21 “Ongoing”. These are the promoter's filed statements, not a current court check. A disposed application or motion does not establish that the whole case is closed. Litigation can cloud the land title or stall the build — have a lawyer pull the cause list for each and confirm whether it touches the title to your home. This is declared by the promoter; there may be further cases not on the RERA record.
| Court | Case no. | Year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Court (Original) | S/965/2014 | 2014 | Closed Filed description: This is a partition suit. Plaintiff seeking 1/4th undivided right in Part A Land and Part B Land and decree of seperate possession thereof and the Deed of Conveyance dated 21.05.2004 between Defendant Nos. 1 to 15 and Sahyog Homes Limited is null and void and the Redevelopment Agreement dated 25.11.2010 between Sahyog Homes Ltd. and Defendant No. 37 relating to Plaintiffs undevided right is not binding on Plaintiffs. Sahyog Homes Ltd while denying the rights of the Plaintiff stated that the suit is barred by law of limitation. Sahyog is the bonafide purchaser for value without notice. Revenue records supports the case of Sahyog as vide order dated 22.12.1962 the Mamlatdar, recorded the names of Rev. Joseph Braz D'Silva and Warner D'Silva as owners and the Sahyog purchased through their successors. Till date revenue records, order have never been challenged. Interim Injuction as prayed under N.M. No. 959 of 2014 was rejected by Hon'ble High Court vide its order 09.05.2014. |
| High Court (Appellate Side) | WP/6437/2015 | 2015 | Closed Filed description: This writ challenging the Order dated 05.03.2015 passed by Chief Revenue Controlling Authority directing the Petitioners to pay Rs. 2,31,62,800/- as deficit stamp duty and prayed that the same be quashed and set aside. No Reply is served upon Plaintiff yet. |
| High Courtt (Original) | 293/2024 | 2024 | Ongoing Filed description: Plaintiff prays that Letters of Administration dated 30.01.2023 permitting the Defendant No.1 to administer the suit property be declared void and be cancelled to the extent of plaintiff's property. No Written Statement is served upon Plaintiff yet. The Letters of Administration challaned under this Suit is already revoked by by Honble High Court in its order dated 20.08.2024 passed in Miscellaneous Petition (L) No.16780 of 2020 in Testamentary Petition No. 2476 of 2022. |
| High Courtt (Original) | WP/899/2020 | 2020 | Ongoing Filed description: Plaintiff seeking (1) declaration that acquisition proceedings initiated by the Respondents and Acquisition Award dated 01.06.1971 be set aside; (b) order directing the Respondents to handover peaceful possession of the aforesaid lands to the Petitioners (3) in alternative pay compensation under aquisition. Sahyog Homes Ltd. has filed IA(L) No. 27023 of 2022 for intervention which was dismissed for default. A fresh IA No.3890 of 2024 is filed for restoration of IA(L) No. 27023 of 2022 which is pending. These land parcels have already been acquired by MHADA and the name of MHADA has been updated in the VII / XII extract for these properties. |
| City Civil Court Dindoshi | 1151/2015 | 2015 | Ongoing Filed description: Plaintiff seeking declaration that (1) the Deed of Settlement dated 05.10.2005 and Deed of Confirmation dated 31.07.2006 are not valid and binding (2) Plaintiff holds 1/3rd share, Defendant Nos. 1 to 3 hold 1/9th share each and Defendant No.4 holds 1/3rd share in a portion of the suit Land. Sahyog Homes Ltd. filed WS stating that suit is barred by limitation, Sahyog Homes Ltd. is a bonafide purchaser for value without notice, revenue recods already entered in the name of Sahyog which is till date not challenged by the Plaintiff. |
| Revenue & Textile Minister, Government Of Maharashtra | 2619/8026/Prakaran 11 | 2019 | Ongoing Filed description: Subject properties were purchased by Sahyog and its name is duly entered which mutation is challanged in revenue authorities. The Appelants challenged mutation entry whereunder the name of the Sahyog Homes Ltd was mutated with respect to suit lands as Applicant are claiming to be the joint owners of the suit lands. Sahyog Homes Ltd. yet to file reply. No order is passed till date. |
| Revenue & Textile Minister, Government Of Maharashtra | Revision No. 2619/8027/Prakaran 12 | 2019 | Ongoing Filed description: Subject properties were purchased by Sahyog and its name is duly entered which mutation is challanged in revenue authorities. The Appelants challenged mutation entry whereunder the name of the Sahyog Homes Ltd was mutated with respect to suit lands as Applicant are claiming to be the joint owners of the suit lands. Sahyog Homes Ltd. yet to file reply. No order is passed till date. |
| Revenue & Textile Minister, Government Of Maharashtra | Revision No. 2619/8028/Prakaran 13 | 2019 | Ongoing Filed description: Subject properties were purchased by Sahyog and its name is duly entered which mutation is challanged in revenue authorities. The Appelants challenged mutation entry whereunder the name of the Sahyog Homes Ltd was mutated with respect to suit lands as Applicant are claiming to be the joint owners of the suit lands. Sahyog Homes Ltd. yet to file reply. No order is passed till date. |
| City Civil Court Dindoshi | Long Cause Suit No. 3104/2014 | 2014 | Ongoing Filed description: This suit is related to slum structure. The Plaintiff seeking declaration that Defendant No. 1 is not the only person having right to suit premises but Plaintiff has equal right threfore Defendants be restrained from creating third party rights in suit premises. Defence of Sahyog Homes Ltd. that (1) dispute is between Plaintiff and Defendant No. 1 and for the said reason the progress of the slum rehabilitation scheme should not be disturbed (2) this Citi Civil Court does not have the jurisdiction to entertain this suit. No adverse order is passed till date |
| City Civil Court Dindoshi | S.C.Suit No.2882/2015 | 2015 | Ongoing Filed description: "This suit is related to slum structure. Plaintiff seeking order to (1) Sahyog Homes Ltd to execute agreement with Plaintiff relating to Room No. 293; (2) joint possession of the permanent alternate accommodation; (3) payment of 50% of the compensation. The dispute is between Plaintiff and Defendant No. 1. Eligibility is decided by competent authority so Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the suit. |
| City Civil Court Dindoshi | S C Suit No 1842/2022 NM/3770/2022 by Plaintiff | 2022 | Ongoing Filed description: This suit is related to slum structure. Plaintiff prayed that he may be declaration eligible and Defendant No.1 is not eligible and entitled to permanent alternate accommodation in lieu of the suit premises. The dispute is between Plaintiff and Defendant No. 1. Eligibility is decided by competent authority so Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the suit. |
| City Civil Court Dindoshi | L. C. Suit No. 2283/2022 | 2022 | Ongoing Filed description: "This suit is related to slum structure. Plaintiff claims to be declared eligible for the permanent alternate accommodation and not to disturb possession of Plaintiff. Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the suit. |
| Grievance Redressal Committee | Appeal No. 8/2021 | 2021 | Closed Filed description: This Appeal is related to slum structure. Appellant seeking order declaring eligibility for slum rehabilitation scheme |
| Additional Collector (E&R) | Appeal No. 32/2023 | 2023 | Closed Filed description: The Appeal is related to slum structure. Appellant claims right in her deceased son's slum structure at Sr. No. 29 of Annexure II. |
| Grievance Redressal Committee | Appeal No. 01/2025 | 2025 | Closed Filed description: This appeal is related to slum structure. Appellant prayed for deletion of name of Respondent No. 5 and declare himself eligible. The subject property in this matter and Suit No.1842/2022 above is same. |
| High Court (Appellate Side) | IAST/40767/2025 | 2025 | Ongoing Filed description: Application for restoration of WP/6437/2015 |
| High Court (Original) | Counter_Claim (L) No.39555/2025 | 2025 | Ongoing Filed description: For declaration that: Def. Nos. 1 to 33 had no right title and interest in the suit property. Def. Nos. 34 to 39 are owners by inheritance. Def. Nos. 1, 2 to 5 and 31 to hand over possession. In the alternative Def. Nos. 1, 2 to 5 and 31 to pay Rs.270 Crore to Plaintiff and Def. Nos.34 to 39. |
| High Court (Original) | CARBP/146/2026 | 2026 | Ongoing Filed description: This Arbitration Petition is related to an area admeasuring 3,333 Sq. Mtrs. and related car parking and to execute agreement for sale for the 3,333 Sq.Mtrs area. |
| High Court (Original) | Arbitration CARAPL/5494/2026 | 2026 | Ongoing Filed description: This Arbitration Petition is related to an area admeasuring 3,333 Sq. Mtrs. and related car parking and to execute agreement for sale for the 3,333 Sq.Mtrs area. |
| High Court (Original) | WP(ST)/25651/2025 | 2025 | Ongoing Filed description: Petitioner has challenged the Order dated 30.04.2025 passed by AGRC in Appeal No. 01/2025 and Order dated 17.11.2024 passed by Addl. Collector (E& R) in Appeal No. 805/2023 |
| Additional Collector (E&R) | Appeal No. 1029/2024 | 2024 | Ongoing Filed description: At Sr. No. 162 of Annexure-II of Namrata CHS was purchased by Appellant from Mr. Vasmani Shankar Ningappa hence filed this appeal for eligiblity in the name of Appellant instead of Mr. Vasmani Ningappa. |
| Additional Collector (E&R) | Appeal No. 872/2025 | 2025 | Ongoing Filed description: At Sr. No. 179 of Annexure-II of Navshakti CHS was closed at the time of survey hence eligibility was not decided hence filed this appeal for eligiblity in the name of Appellant. |
| Additional Collector (E&R) | Appeal No. 1510/2025 | 2025 | Ongoing Filed description: At Sr. No. 200 of Annexure-II of Samadhan CHS Mr. Vishkarma Santosh Radheshyam has been declared eligible which is challenged in this appeal. |
| Additional Collector (E&R) | Appeal No. 2329/2025 | 2025 | Ongoing Filed description: The slum structure at Sr. No. 141 of Annexure-II of ShaktiNagar CHS is shown as non-eligible as it was closed. Hence this appeal filed for declaring the same eligibile. |
| Additional Collector (E&R) | Appeal No. 241/2026 | 2026 | Ongoing Filed description: At Sr. No. 144 of Annexure-II of Namrata CHS has been undecided in the name of Appellant. Decision of Competent Authority-4 is pending hence this appeal. |
| Additional Collector (E&R) | Appeal No. 126/2026 | 2026 | Ongoing Filed description: At Sr. No. 126 of Annexure-II of Samadhan CHS has been declared eligible for paid rehabilitation. This appeal challenging paid rehabilitation and seeking free rehabilitation. |
| High Court (Original) | - | 2025 | Closed Filed description: Order received |
Location, Land & Connectivity
Located at Oshiwara-Jogeshwari West, New Shakti Nagar Road, Andheri, Mumbai Suburban, 400102. Per the filed land record, the plot is bounded to the north by CTS No. 308(Pt), 315 (Pt), 317 (Pt), 319 (Pt), to the south by CTS No. 1A (Pt), to the east by 321/1/A/1 (Pt) and to the west by CTS No. 1A (Pt), 308 (Pt) and 313. These are the boundaries as recorded in the filed land record.
Location & connectivity
The nearest of the listed job hubs is about 4 km in a straight line from the mapped location. Road distance and travel time will differ.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Andheri MIDC / SEEPZ | 4 km |
| Chhatrapati Shivaji Int'l Airport | 7 km |
| Powai / Hiranandani business park | 8 km |
| Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC) | 9 km |
| Lower Parel / Worli business district | 16 km |
| Nariman Point / Fort | 24 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.